Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It was an unearned profit. Why do you think it came done. DUH!!!!
I did!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Earnings drive stock prices #101. Cysg has no earnings as per Sept'09, they showed a profit at Sept'09 but not a earned profit.We do not know projected revenues or gross margins. This is all FACT. Speculation does not put money in your pocket, but a gamble that you can afford to lose does sometimes. Earlier in the day I posted a message that the technical indicators I use show a possible uptick. I stand by that.
Their unaudited reports in Sept '09, show they were a loser. They had no profit. For 2007, $(3,015.513) loss, 2008 $(1,680.435) loss. Without other income in 2009 they had a loss of $(844,386). They have yet to show that they can make a profit. It is black and white, read it. Sept'09 unaudited reports.
Again, I own more than 65mil.
Press releases to the SEC such as 10-Q, 8-K, 20-F are called filings. Others are company news such as 2/9 and 2/17. This company CYSG has not had a filing since 5/16/2007. FACT11
As per 12/15/2009, the float is to be determined, outstanding shares issued and authorized sometimes determines the amount of the loan(float). With 1,884,579,792 issued with 4,000,000,000 authorized there appears to be a lot of room. Unless they can release some real fins, the float could be whatever. Also rememmber that back in Sept'09, their unaudited reports listed $170,778,800 in additional paid-in capital.
1.884bil issued and outstanding, 4bil authorized.
Several weeks ago I posted that I thought CYSG had a possible chance of moving up based on the technical indicators that I use. I still show a possibility of upward movement techincially. This is soley based on my indicators.
Remmeber the sentence" arm lengths transaction"!!!!
go CYSG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Phone conversations mean nothing. All good going compainies post any inportant publicy. Again we have heresay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Negative!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why can you not give me a name of a sub???????????????
Why can you not tell me?
A preslease is not a filing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No FACTSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Show the posters a SEC filing after 5/16/2006,10-Q, 10-K, etc,any type of SEC filing
Show it to me in black and white.Public words, are again this is no than heresay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Also, I am not under the Security Act of 1933!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where did you get this info?
Because, I hope my post 22393 is right. I have followed this company since 2004, did not start buying until 2007,2008 and 2009 when price was .0.0001. If I lose this, so what, but I do not think so, and please do not ask me why!!!!!!!!!!
I am sorry I referenced the wromg post. Heresay is heresay, facts are facts. Cysg released figures in Sept'09, that is a public fact. There has been no public info from CYSG that they are going to release any fins(audited or unaudited) by 3/31/2010, anyone stating that they are, is considered heresay, unless someone can show a public statement from CYSG. CYSG did release some pr's and that is a fact. But what did the pr's really say?
Are you refering to recent filings?
I am not an insider, you tell me what form was required for CYSG? What post from you did I miss?
Read my post 22393!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Read my post 22393. I rest my case!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What old filings?
Could you please post the names of the three subs.
Heresay is your post 22712, how many more times do I have say that I own more than 65mil shares, but I still like FACTS!!!!!!!!!!
Facts are facts, heresay is heresay!!!!A big mac is not a sub, they do not post earnings to the big 'M'11111111111111111,
If you publish fins you are accountable. If you want to buy, etc, are there any other posters that know about posting false fins???
Whoever released the fins in Sept'09 made themselves liable for false information. If you have any knowledge of accounting you would know this. I have a printed copy of those fins and have studied them for a long time. There are no SUBS!!!!!!!!!!!
Sept'09 fins state that convertible notes payable were 7.9mil, that is not is not dilution.
All companies that report fins do under GAAP, Generally Accepted Accounting Procuderes. Cysg is no exception. If you are familar with this, you know what I am referring to!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why do you speculate that the audited fins are going to be better than the unaudited released in Sept'09. What is your basis??????????
They have only 1.884bil issued and outstanding. Have 4bill authorized.
It appears that my post 22393 has some creditability!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SEC has certain forms which companies are required to file if they are considered an ongoing business, otherwise they just stay as a sorry pink sheet garbage, no news with no facts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!