Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SPAMMER
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/profile.asp?User=47252
"strange"...already reported this individuals past spamming directly to matt and no action was ever taken
[of special note is that ALL past and present posts by the above alias are on astrom related stocks]
-----------------------
and another recent "strange" situation [of many]...hawkeiz with multiple, ongoing TOS including personal attacks, vulgarity, OT, etc, etc spends less than one day in jail, and is given his graybeard status back...and although it was stated he would have "limited" posting capability...look at his action today????
yet i have had NO violations and am stripped of graybeard and have 3 posts a day privileges?
boy do i feel "special"...having guidelines re-written and applied ONLY to me
...sounds equitable
...perhaps in a paralell bizarro universe
mimurray, no kidding?...is that how it works?
so essentially no one is left in the free world that has interest in this "gem"?
and the only ones that might be buying now are members/posters of this board?
and even though most have stated they have been buying, buying, buying all along?...and yet somehow SP either goes down or sideways???????
and then when the "blockbuster" news that everyone states is coming?...whats going to happen then?...are people here going to be buying...or selling?...and what will happen to SP then?
you got it maybe about 1/2 right
it appears it is as i have been stating for months now [and just after the last spike in january]...MORE FREAKING SHARES AND SW & CO CANT BE "TRUSTED"...and this is nothing more than a shell, selling shares to "finance" TFN...with little-to-no value for the common SH
and of course when any semblance of reality was attempted to be discussed/debated, what was the result?...nothing but vile personal attacks
and flippers/daytraders?...appears they are/were the only ones making bank...while again the so-called longs kept insisting...HOLD
but yet all the so-called longs kept hooting and hollering... how NOTHING was going to stop this runaway train
BUY!...BUY!!!...BUY!!!!!!!!!!!!
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP!!...TO DA MOOOOOOON ;)
FGFC?...
here ya go:
http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=FGFC&read=31
and "mighty mouse"?
isnt this continued spamming?...and arent ALL the stocks "covered" astrom related vehicles?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/profile.asp?User=47252
geez...i wonder whats going on
re: IBCX, last .015, hmmmm...[edit]
another of my "1 post P&D" is trending up
lets see...@ .0001 pre-split, what kinda gains we talking about?
cripes!, i believe we are at almost a double...so far
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
[edit] PS: my last allowable post for the day, thanks to the skewed, biased, morphing so-called policies of admin, apparently discriminating between factual posters and the preferred "to da moon" shillsters
re: "...PAIM...weeee..how high can she go :)..."
lets take a look-see at todays PR numbers:
"...Estimated Total Annual Gross Revenues of $157,236,600.00 USD..."
if that isnt a page from the share selling pino "how to" book, dont know what is
and given past "partnerships" of pino and winick, couldnt be more "appropriate"
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PAIM! ;)
re: "...I went back and cleaned up just today's posts.
Few things.
Bashers are not a topic.
Pumpers are not a topic.
Only PAIM and the trading surrounding it. If your post isn't about that it will be removed and if you constantly do it, you'll be removed from the board.
I've banned two users for a few days to drive my point home."
Posted by: IH Admin [Matt]
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=10103104
as well as:
"Guys, let's keep the topic to this stock. Sterling, CMKX, GVRP stories aren't on topic here. I have plenty of that garbage to deal with elsewhere.
I just wiped out about 75 posts. Mostly rruff and Janice. Get on topic boys and girls"
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=10128035
etc, etc, etc
simply freaking amazing!
how one can continue to allow "chance" after chance after chance for individuals...just not me
cant find "justifiable" cause for an action?
no problem!...just change or re-interpret the guidelines to satisfy ones personal wacky vendetta
if this were a "private" issue between 2 memebers i would say SOS...but for an administrator to abuse authority in this manner??
...sounding more and more like the dubya admin
OT: Ruellit [edit]
youve come to know me over the years
do you think its "equitable" that i should have been singled out to have my grandfather status revoked?
has this happened to anyone?...ever?
never been jailed
TOS few and far in between [and was never notified of any violations]
as a matter of fact, past PM claims by others of "wrongdoing" on my part which were forwarded to admin, were subsequently proven to be false/malicious/libelous
action taken by admin?:
none to those making the wrongful claims, but continued microscopic analyzation and censorship of my postings...and now the lasted graybeard revocation
if i was a chronic violator of TOS, i would be the first to say "give 'em da boot"
but if one posts within guidelines, and the only "offense" is some dont like what is posted, it appears something is seriously amiss with this type of action
and anyone could be next
its like the patriot act of ihub...incarcerated or sent into seclusion without charges, cause, rights or representation
GLTU
[edit] btw, i cant PM, and have only 3 posts a day under this format, so i wont be able to respond to any messages or PM
ballyhooo, re: IBCX
am very excited about possibilities going forward, and is why i loaded up
as always, "unexpected" developments could derail that excitement...but for the time being i believe we are looking REAL good
GLTU
re: ICAN/IBCX...
...bought heavy just before the split...imo it will be a whole new game with minimal [if any] RS blues
[note that they went out of their way to mention common shares were RS...no mention of preferred]
note: this is my 1 "P&D" post
gotmilk, if you look at the post i was responding to you will discover that statement was made by administration
note: i apologize for the length of this post, but i have been collared with 3 posts a day
as to membership, either i am not understanding your post, or you seem to be confused
up until a couple of days ago i had grandfather status [and as a matter of fact, it was dated well before your "membership"]...but for some unexplained reason i was stripped of the graybeard the same day i received the message from admin i posted
...has anyone else received this "notification"?
i never stated i wouldnt pay for a sub...and it was never suggested...and i have no problem with "contributing"
my alias has never been in jail for TOS violations, and MANY graybeards are more confrontational than me...so why have i been singled out?
with thousands of members to deal with, i can understand admin getting irritated when their workload is increased due to receipt of multiple PMs from other members complaining about someone "rocking the boat"
but i assure you, those complaints come from members that are incapable of debating issues/facts...have tried to humiliate me with ongoing personal attacks and vulgarity...realize that "strategy" doesnt work, then seek out admin for satisfaction
...it appears to have worked
admittedly i have sent my fair share of PM to admin, but only when blatant TOS violations/personal attacks directed towards me werent dealt with by moderators...and "curiously", even when presented to admin, they were allowed to stand...eg?:
*manifla
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9759432
isnt the above both vulgar and a personal attack?
so why when it comes to me, it appears the rules once again dont apply
...there are dozens and dozens of similar examples, but it appears admin refusal to apply the rules fairly to everyone is an expression of their own personal opinion...and actually that is confirmed as they have stated directly to me "...you are an AH and i am not going to jump through hoops to assist you..."
so OK...i deal with the ongoing personal attacks without violating TOS myself
...i deal with admin turning a blind eye to those personal attacks
result of that "tolerance"?
...essentially getting the boot
---------------------
its further "curious" that when aliases make certain unsubstantiated claims about a company/mgmt, and opposing DD is posted with supporting links/references, that it is the individual who posts factually that is many times admonished
listen, i have no illusions of what drives these "gems", and i am all for a good pump...all i am stating is that it can be done with honesty on these boards...let the companies and their reps do the BS
and i aint no nemo, et al
there are no "hahhahahahaha"s, or screaming "POS/scam!"
i try to contribute with balance
but rather than look at material presented objectively, its easier for self-serving individuals just to throw me into the generic pool of "basher"...and come out swinging with personal attacks
GLTU
re: APPI, another of my 1 post P&D
doing well going into the close
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9977097
hey fringy_baby...did ya "forget" to address this post?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=10073544
re: "...so I've decided we need to push subscriptions. But in the least-invasive ways possible..."
would this be one of the ways of "pushing subscriptions"?
although some have stated i am a "pain in the arse", it is VERY rare that i have a TOS violation, yet the same day my grandfather status was stripped, i received the "notification" below
was this "honor" bestowed only upon me?, because i can think of several "grandfathered" aliases that havent been affected who are waaay more sarcastic than i
-------------------------
Sent By: IH Admin [Matt] Date: 3/8/2006 10:21:31 PM
iHub Free Trial
All new and existing free members whose accounts have been approved can take advantage of a 2-week free trial of the site.
What does this mean? It means that for 2 weeks, the system will treat you as if you're a paying subscriber. All of the awesome features will be unlocked, and you won't see any ads on most pages.
To find out if you're an approved member, go to http://www.investorshub.com/boards/my_account.asp and look at the Account Level row. If it says "Free: 15 posts per day", you're approved and can take advantage of this free 2-week trial.
If it says "Free: 3 posts per day", your account has not yet been approved, likely because you haven't written a post anywhere. When you write a post, I look to make sure you're not a spammer or just don't play well with others, and if I approve, your account is upgraded. So if you are in the "3 posts per day" category, get out there and write a post somewhere!
To take advantage of this 2-week free trial, simply visit http://www.investorshub.com/boards/freetrial.asp and click the button on that page. You will only get to use this free trial once, so make sure you use it during a timeframe when you'll be able to kick the tires around on iHub.
Once you've enabled your free trial, we'll follow up with a PM suggesting various features to try out.
Enjoy!
Reply to this with any problems or questions.
IH Admin [Matt]
re: "...A three day Pump and Dump..."
really?
HPNN: so my one and only 1 post early in the morning [before market opening] stating "...imo jump on this "gem" if/when volume comes back..." [while cautioning that AS had just been increased], on the day when volume did come back...and with SP on that day remaining stable before doubling the next 2 days is a P&D?
and my mention on that same day of SYCI/SYDI, with one and only 1 post stating "...volume precedes price?..." [while cautioning about cornell and bump in AS], followed by a 40%+ pop within 3 days is also a P&D?
sounds to me like these 2 examples were simply mentions blended with alerts of possible negatives...in other words [God forbid!]...balance
yeah, i know thats a tough concept for many, but for some strange reason i feel its fairer to offer a balance of info/facts/opinion, rather than just "to da moon" or "this is a POS"
so how would you then define someone or a situation with dozens and dozens and dozens of posts promoting a stock [like EKWX], over a period of several months, constantly stating how it was "ready", and as dilution continued, and as SP declined some 90%?
Google Agrees to Settle 'Click Fraud' Case
By MICHAEL LIEDTKE, AP Business Writer
26 minutes ago
SAN FRANCISCO - Google Inc. has agreed to pay up to $90 million to settle a lawsuit alleging the online search engine leader overcharged thousands of advertisers who paid for bogus sales referrals generated through a ruse known as "click fraud."
The proposed settlement, announced by the company Wednesday, would apply to all advertisers in Google's network during the past four years. Any Web site showing improper charges dating back to 2002 will be eligible for an account credit that could be used toward future ads distributed by Google.
The total value of the credits available to advertisers will be lower than $90 million because part of that amount will be used to cover the fees of lawyers who filed the case last year in Arkansas state court. The proposed settlement still requires final court approval.
The lawsuit, filed by Lane's Gifts and Collectibles on behalf of all Google advertisers, revolves around one of the most sensitive subjects facing Google and Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO - news), which runs the Internet's second largest marketing network.
Yahoo, which is also named in the suit, said Wednesday that it intends to fight the lawsuit's allegations.
Mountain View, Calif.-based Google makes virtually all of its money from text-based advertising links that trigger commissions each time they are clicked on. Besides enriching Google, the system has been a boon for advertisers, whose sales have been boosted by an increased traffic from prospective buyers.
But sometimes mischief makers and scam artists repeatedly click on specific advertising links even though they have no intentions of buying anything. The motives for the malicious activity known as click fraud vary widely, but the net effect is the same: advertisers end up paying for fruitless Web traffic.
The lawsuit alleged Google had conspired with its advertising partners to conceal the magnitude of click fraud to avoid making refunds.
The frequency of click fraud hasn't been quantified, causing some stock market analysts to worry Google's profits will falter if it turns out to be a huge problem.
Google executives have repeatedly said the level of click fraud on its ad network is minuscule — a contention that the proposed settlement amount seems to support.
The $90 million translates into less than 1 percent of Google's $11.2 billion in revenue during the past four years.
Google disclosed the settlement after the stock market closed. The company's shares fell $10.57 to close at $353.88 on the Nasdaq Stock Market, then shed another $2.11 in extended trading.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060309/ap_on_hi_te/google_click_fraud
Rasica, right behind TAKI...
..you are my second biggest hero
...oh wait a sec...wheres TAKI?
[re: "... was contacted by Sandy and the SEC and within two weeks everyone got their divies..."]
there is a 50/50 chance...
..of it going higher...or lower
GOP House Panel Votes to Block Ports Deal
By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer
41 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - In an election-year repudiation of President Bush, a House panel dominated by Republicans voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to block a Dubai-owned firm from taking control of some U.S port operations.
By 62-2, the Appropriations Committee voted to bar DP World, run by the government of Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, from holding leases or contracts at U.S. ports. Bush has promised to veto any such measure passed by Congress, but there is widespread public opposition to the deal and the GOP fears losing its advantage on the issue of national security in this fall's elections.
As the panel acted, Democrats on the other side of the Capitol were clamoring for a vote on the same issue in the GOP-led Senate.
"We believe an overwhelming majority will vote to end the deal," said Democrat Charles Schumer of New York, whose attempt to force the issue to the floor brought the Senate to a late-afternoon standstill.
By its vote, the House committee attached the ports language to a must-pass $91 billion measure financing hurricane recovery and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The full House could consider that measure as early as next week.
While GOP Senate leaders hope to delay a quick showdown with Bush on the issue, the House panel, including members of Bush's own party, showed a willingness to defy him.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060308/ap_on_go_co/ports_security_22;_ylt=AmPgPmprognc_A270SWHuBgTv5UB;....
DesertRat1, re: SYDI, and today?...
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9977130
SYDI -- Syndication, Inc.
Com ($0.0001)
Primary Venue: Dually Quoted on Pink Sheets and OTC Bulletin Board
TRADE DATA Best Bid: 0.0080 Best Ask: 0.0090
Last Sale: 0.0090
Change: +0.0025
Percent Change: +38.46
OT: re; "...WTF is a poor immigrant to do..."
perhaps ask one of the 12M illegals for guidance?
---------------
Number of Illegal Immigrants Hits 12M
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer
Tue Mar 7, 2:38 PM ET
WASHINGTON - The number of illegal immigrants in the United States has grown to as many as 12 million, and they now account for about one in every 20 workers, a new estimate says.
Efforts to curb illegal immigration have not slowed the pace, said a report Tuesday by the Pew Hispanic Center.
Instead, the report's author said, those efforts are having an unintended consequence: People who illegally enter the United States from Mexico are staying longer because it is harder to move back and forth across the border.
"The security has done more to keep people from going back to Mexico than it has to keep them from coming in," said Jeffrey Passel, a senior research associate at the center.
It is difficult to accurately measure the number of illegal immigrants in the United States, but most public agencies and private groups had settled on a figure of about 11 million.
The Pew Hispanic Center used Census Bureau data to estimate that the United States had 11.1 million illegal immigrants in March 2005. The center used monthly population estimates to project a current total of 11.5 million to 12 million.
The report estimates that 850,000 illegal immigrants have arrived in United States each year since 2000.
President Bush has called for a program that would grant temporary worker status to illegal immigrants already here. The House rejected the program and instead passed a border security bill last year that leaned toward lawmakers who were calling for a crackdown.
The Senate is trying to address both border security and the temporary worker program, but consensus has been elusive. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., has said he hopes his panel will produce a bill by the end of March.
There are about 7.2 million undocumented workers in the U.S., or about 5 percent of the country's work force, the Pew report said.
It estimated that illegal immigrants fill a quarter of all agricultural jobs, 17 percent of office and house cleaning positions, 14 percent of construction jobs and 12 percent in food preparation.
"Especially if we look at the Mexicans, these are people with fairly low levels of formal education," Passel said. "They're not able to get licensing or credentials in the United States because of their status, so the kinds of jobs available to them in the United States are somewhat limited."
Business leaders and advocates for immigrants' rights argue that America's economy would collapse if all the illegal workers were deported.
"Undocumented immigrants do pay taxes, and they do contribute to the economic, social and cultural developments of their communities," said Peta Ikambana of the American Friends Service Committee. The group was organizing a rally near the Capitol on Tuesday to protest the House bill.
"Just building walls will not stop immigration," Ikambana said. "Those that are here will just go underground."
Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates tougher border enforcement, said he isn't surprised that the number of illegal immigrants continues to climb. He called the government's crackdown halfhearted at best.
Camarota pointed to a recent government report showing that very few businesses are fined for hiring illegal immigrants. The government filed only three notices that it intended to fine companies in 2004, down from 417 notices in 1999, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office.
Camarota said there would be plenty of Americans willing to accept jobs done by illegal immigrants if they paid adequate wages and benefits.
Tuesday's report by the Pew Hispanic Center said Mexicans make up 56 percent of illegal immigrants. An additional 22 percent come from other Latin American countries, mainly in Central America. About 13 percent are from Asia, and Europe and Canada combine for 6 percent.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060307/ap_on_go_ot/illegal_immigration
re: "...you broke in to the middle of a conversation that didn't involve you..."
no kidding?...is that how it works here murray?
so posts on this public forum according to you [a moderator????] are private "conversations" that one cant respond or add their opinion without being belittled?
it appears there seems to be some confusion about the purpose/function of these boards/site and of what is a personal attack, never mind just common courtesy/respect....particularly from a moderator
F6, ...aGREED. eom.
cowboycadillac, seriously...are you joking?
how many times have you been at the EXTREME ends of the spectrum with the shares disclosure issue?
i mean pounding the table...hard...of how outraged you are about non-disclosure, and then again adamant about transparency
can you help us understand the wild swings?
getting pretty ugly here...
Lax Oversight Blamed for High Gas Prices
By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 36 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Too little oversight of financial markets — not supply and demand problems — are to blame for skyrocketing natural gas prices, top law enforcement officials in four Midwestern states said Tuesday.
Comparing natural gas trading to "the wild, wild West," the attorneys general from Illinois, Iowa, Missouri and Wisconsin urged Congress to increase regulation of markets they say are vulnerable to abuse and manipulation.
The officials — all Democrats — issued a six-month study of natural gas prices. They said they want to debunk the commonly held view that a lack of supply and surging demand are responsible for sharp price increases that have caused a 25 percent to 30 percent rise in winter heating bills in the Midwest and elsewhere.
"It's stunningly annoying to sit here and have to literally say the moon is not made of green cheese," Missouri Attorney General Jay Nixon said at a news conference. "Supply and demand did not cause the spikes."
The price surge has affected more than half of all U.S. households that heat with natural gas. Many of those who rely on electric heat have also seen bills go up because a large number of power plants run on natural gas.
While natural gas prices are up about 28 percent this year, usage is down 5 percent. At the same time, supply has remained steady.
"How can you have demand down, and price up and supply level?" said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller. "It doesn't make sense. To get to these big increases, you have to look at the financial side, at the trading."
The report prepared by Mark Cooper, research director for the Consumer Federation of America, concluded that one reason for the upward climb of prices is a huge influx of money into largely unregulated financial markets.
Under current law, Miller said, only about 20 percent of trades are reported. The lack of transparency allows traders to gain huge positions and potentially manipulate the market, he said.
"It's sort of like the wild, wild West in terms of trading," Miller said. "There's very little reporting of trades."
The officials urged Congress to make market trading more transparent by requiring registration of traders and reporting of all trades. They also want stricter limits on positions held by one entity, longer settlement periods for short- and long-term contracts, and restrictions on how much the price of natural gas can fluctuate before trading is temporarily halted for a cooling off period.
Sandy Crockett, a spokeswoman for the Natural Gas Supply Association, blamed the recent price spike on "unprecedented and massive supply disruptions" in the Gulf of Mexico during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
"Both the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have, in fact, concluded that this winter's price fluctuations were entirely consistent with market fundamentals at that time," she said in a written statement.
"We support their ongoing efforts to police natural gas markets for any evidence of manipulation or abuse," Crockett said, adding, "We remain comfortable with the level of oversight provided by these regulatory agencies."
Wisconsin Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager said the report was commissioned before the hurricanes struck and took them into account. The report found the storms actually had little impact on supply because natural gas storage was at or near record levels both before and after the hurricanes struck the Gulf Coast.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060307/ap_on_bi_ge/midwest_gas_prices_1;_ylt=AiPF6Xxh5QTKBudQkY57.YeAsn....
Lax Oversight Blamed for High Gas Prices
By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 36 minutes ago
[...the incompetence never ends]
WASHINGTON - Too little oversight of financial markets — not supply and demand problems — are to blame for skyrocketing natural gas prices, top law enforcement officials in four Midwestern states said Tuesday.
Comparing natural gas trading to "the wild, wild West," the attorneys general from Illinois, Iowa, Missouri and Wisconsin urged Congress to increase regulation of markets they say are vulnerable to abuse and manipulation.
The officials — all Democrats — issued a six-month study of natural gas prices. They said they want to debunk the commonly held view that a lack of supply and surging demand are responsible for sharp price increases that have caused a 25 percent to 30 percent rise in winter heating bills in the Midwest and elsewhere.
"It's stunningly annoying to sit here and have to literally say the moon is not made of green cheese," Missouri Attorney General Jay Nixon said at a news conference. "Supply and demand did not cause the spikes."
The price surge has affected more than half of all U.S. households that heat with natural gas. Many of those who rely on electric heat have also seen bills go up because a large number of power plants run on natural gas.
While natural gas prices are up about 28 percent this year, usage is down 5 percent. At the same time, supply has remained steady.
"How can you have demand down, and price up and supply level?" said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller. "It doesn't make sense. To get to these big increases, you have to look at the financial side, at the trading."
The report prepared by Mark Cooper, research director for the Consumer Federation of America, concluded that one reason for the upward climb of prices is a huge influx of money into largely unregulated financial markets.
Under current law, Miller said, only about 20 percent of trades are reported. The lack of transparency allows traders to gain huge positions and potentially manipulate the market, he said.
"It's sort of like the wild, wild West in terms of trading," Miller said. "There's very little reporting of trades."
The officials urged Congress to make market trading more transparent by requiring registration of traders and reporting of all trades. They also want stricter limits on positions held by one entity, longer settlement periods for short- and long-term contracts, and restrictions on how much the price of natural gas can fluctuate before trading is temporarily halted for a cooling off period.
Sandy Crockett, a spokeswoman for the Natural Gas Supply Association, blamed the recent price spike on "unprecedented and massive supply disruptions" in the Gulf of Mexico during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
"Both the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have, in fact, concluded that this winter's price fluctuations were entirely consistent with market fundamentals at that time," she said in a written statement.
"We support their ongoing efforts to police natural gas markets for any evidence of manipulation or abuse," Crockett said, adding, "We remain comfortable with the level of oversight provided by these regulatory agencies."
Wisconsin Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager said the report was commissioned before the hurricanes struck and took them into account. The report found the storms actually had little impact on supply because natural gas storage was at or near record levels both before and after the hurricanes struck the Gulf Coast.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060307/ap_on_bi_ge/midwest_gas_prices_1;_ylt=AiPF6Xxh5QTKBudQkY57.YeAsn...
30 trillion? eom.
re: "...The constant gardening at the bid..."
...didnt that win an oscar for best supporting actress?
Performance by an actress in a supporting role
Amy Adams in “Junebug” (Sony Pictures Classics)
Catherine Keener in “Capote” (UA/Sony Pictures Classics)
Frances McDormand in “North Country” (Warner Bros.)
Rachel Weisz in “The Constant Gardener” (Focus Features)
Michelle Williams in “Brokeback Mountain” (Focus Features)
re: SYCI now SYDI, as of today...
50% of the 95M OS [as of the 2/10 def14c filing] held inside
http://xml.10kwizard.com/filing_raw.php?repo=tenk&ipage=3953218
AS increased from 100M to 3B [yowzer...and a toxic cornell CD as well!?...but, read the above filing]
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9977130
...me thinks its going to get very interesting from here
OT: mariner, thanks for the mention on HPNN...hardly anyone was talking favorably about it before that post
S.D. Governor Signs Abortion Ban Into Law
AP - Mon Mar 6, 3:43 PM ET
[God help us...now it goes to the Supreme Court...didnt take long for the bush cronies to set this up]
PIERRE, S.D. - Gov. Mike Rounds signed legislation Monday banning nearly all abortions in South Dakota, setting up a court fight aimed at challenging the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion. The bill would make it a crime for doctors to perform an abortion unless the procedure was necessary to save the woman's life. It would make no exception for cases of rape or incest.
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/US/Abortion_Rights_Debate
specOlations continue to run rampant...
..."specOlations" being a very generous way to put it
[perhaps distortion of facts/knowns would be more accurate?]
what may become the new logo for many of the so-called debates:
painting titled: "circular thinking"
this "gem" may yet have its day...but imo it wont have anything to do with fundamentals, but rather what drives 99% of these issues...when its critical mass is reached
GLTA
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
Allotti, good luck with that, ROTF! eom.
Domerfan17, do you also have a problem with comprehension?
what it says in their PR:
"...Blackout Media owns 20% of Blackout Communications, a private Canadian company who in turn owns The Fight Network, also a private Canadian company..."
i dont dispute or argue that statement as far as it goes to the "20% of Blackout Communications"
past that point NO ONE knows what internal arrangements they may have
[and is why i posted that link re: multiple level corps]
not about to get into your circular thinking so-called debate about it
NO ONE knows...that includes you and me
over and out
Mike Allotti, problems with comprehension?...
"...you speak of pr'd agreements" I speak of this..."
huh?
BKMP PR
Blackout Media's - Fight Network Taps Trajectory Sports to Assist in Expansion Plans
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/news.jsp?url=fis_story.asp%3Ftextpath%3DCOMTEX%5Ciw%5C2006%5C01%5C20....
i posted a very comprehensive site a while back
that helped shed some light on multiple layer corps
do you remember it?
perhaps i will try and dig it up again
you keep believing that. eom.
no....
"... Blackout Media owns 20% of Blackout Communications, a private Canadian company who in turn owns The Fight Network, also a private Canadian company..."
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/news.jsp?url=fis_story.asp%3Ftextpath%3DCOMTEX%5Ciw%5C2006%5C01%5C17...
re: "...Flamingos are ready for a nice run!..."
analyzethis, BKMP revenues?...really?...
got a link to substantiate revs of even $1?
re: "I wish we had all the info!"...FAQs inside!
"... I wonder what the delay is if they were in NY a month ago trying to strike a deal. I wonder if their meetings were successful or not. I wish we had all the info!..."
BKMP FAQ's?: