Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Does anyone know if you can move shares between brokerages intact? I'm thinking of opening another account in another brokerage, and when ST does that, just transfer that block of shares to the other brokerage. We've had it happen on 5 or 6 stocks now.
PennyMaven, see my post 33643 on glcc. If you can add anything after trying, pls let us know. THX LC
Some people will do anything for three free meals a day. Welcome back.
LOL PapaRay, you got me, caused a 'senior moment' experience. I read your response, then I went back, and looked over my post to see where I had missused "rein/rain" DUH LOL My chuckle for the day, but probably not the last DUH on this end. Oh, and I agree, they missed a lot of those in the PRs.
Just fine, thanks. About two feet of clearance at the highest water level. On a ride around we saw some others that weren't so lucky.
We are waiting for some other movement to provide some $$$ to load up here. Makes it much easier to be patient. Until you go to the other stock, then the opposite emotion kicks in. LOL. Price next summer should be up enough to buy both hotdogs, AND buns from the profits. Nicer cookouts. We will all be HAPPY. GLTY LC
Post Unavailable
Additional Information
Good morning Jim, hope you and yours avoided any of those floating coffee table situations this past week. Wierd, storms gone, and water still rising for some.
October will be the move month on SRSR, I think. Patience All. GLTA LC
When this hits, you can buy a new computor, with a button that isn't stuck.
And I agree with you, Argonath. I just checked, and I have 22 on Iggy at this time, some I suspect to be the same persons, different names. Makes for a much more enjoyable read on the board. I think we will be pleasantly surprised by the developments in the next two months, or sooner even. GLTA LC
I'm sure they can. However, for HOW we need someone that actually knows the intricacies of the laws at the governing agency/agencies. I would think that the regulation would done by (in glcc's case)just China, but because it is on the american exchange, it could possibly involve some proceedures that are controlled here also,as a condition of listing.
I'm not up on the shell game, and that really is what it would end up being. The private company would have to retain ownership of the majority of the stock in the public one, and would probably want to by a big margin, to cover future A/S changes. I don't know how close they could keep the public company in that set up, but they could certainly make sure all management choices went their way. Technicalities are deeper than my knowledge level, but very interesting situation.
Marine-1, I would think since they can sell off portions, departments, shells, or designated subs, to other companies, without showing any effect to the main stock, they could sell any portion to a buyer that wanted to take that portion private. Large companies divest themselves of unwanted departments all of the time on the big boards. Granted those usually go to another publicly traded company, but it wouldn't have too. The question would be which part was going which way, and what would remain on the stock ledger as the base company. With the majority stock position still in a management controlled group, they can vote anything through that they want to do.
Msg rec'd, Thanks.
Yeah, sad isn't it. Who ever said, "Silence is golden", didn't invest.
My point on the earlier post. Business persons move around a lot, he could be talking to the China group, but they could be standing in South America, or Canada, for all we know. International is anything BUT the US.
Someone who is obviously a diehard nightowl.
PM, thanks for the call, and post. Encouraging. Just waiting, and counting the raindrops from Fay.(or flowers on the wall, take your pick) GLTY LC
His post said an International Phone Call, that doesn't mean it has to be China, or China, in geographical China. And yes it is 12 hrs earlier there, on the clock. It's confusing which way it goes, but the volleyball we will see live at 8pm est on the eastern US coast is being played at 8 am, of the same day, China time.
I agree. Let's hope we have enough power to avoid that fate. You have a PM. LC
Looking, the trouble is the henhouse raid correction is expected to be done by the occupants of the fox den.
A friend gave me an article a few years ago, after I unsuccessfully lodged a complaint with the SEC about an obvious case of theft by price manipulation by a full service broker, that showed the path that many of the SEC investigators took to get their jobs. Suffice it to say they were now expected to investigate, and punish their former bosses, and co-workers. They said the challenge was to find someone who didn't have ties to the traders. Don't expect any help for us until the change comes from above in that organization.
seabiscuit, very nice post, we seem to think alike on this one. If the MMs, & hedge funds, don't cover until they have too, an announcement of the sale completion could catch them with a large position, hopefully rapidly escalating pps, and thus lost profits. Poor MMs. If you have them, I will need their SM addresses to send them sympathy cards. GLTA LC
Anybody in the US that can use the Roth IRA system to their advantage would do well to look into it, NO Capital GAINS, and all withdrawals are tax free after 59 1/2. But there are many uses where withdrawals are permitted at reg income tax rates for those younger investors; ie first house, college, etc. The real savings is evident in figuring the compounding of your money. You are way ahead if most of it is going to remain in the account for future investing. You can double it a hundred times, and keep it all. GLTY LC
Posted on wrong reply; was being sent to risk v reward, sorry
Risk, for shock effect, I highly recommend dumping $250,000 in cash bundles the teller's window. It will get her attention, I guarantee. In a small town, it will get you looks, and whispers for months. Good Luck. LC
Roth, none.
In the 80's, we had an archery store move into a converted paint company building. Nice storeroom on the back. 21yds from the entrance to the back wall targets. There were five shooting positions from 8yds to the 21 at the door. We used various size targets, twisted shooting stances, and blind screens, to make the shots more competitive. He even had a tree stand position in one corner. One guy shot an arrow straight into the floor out of it one night. It hit at about 10 yds. Slipped off of the rest just as he shot, he said. Pinched the arrow I think. Someone painted a circle around that one before the next week. He heard about it for many shoots, believe me.
During one tournament we had a recurve night. We all brought our old recurves in, and shot the same rounds with that equipment(fiberglass or wood arrows). Of course we practice with them the week before, or the month before for some, but you should have seen the scores plummet. At 8 yds, hitting a dime is a lot easier with a compound set at 75, than a recurve pulling 55. But it was always a lot of fun. I found a range near here. Hoping to get back into it this year.
Nice picture of him shooting what I think is a full size Kodiak, E/w the revolutionary bow quiver that was quick detachable. The bow sold for about $130 if I remember right. It was out of my league back then. In 1974 I had a chance to go bear hunting in Canada. So I needed a good bow. Three of us caught a deal through a dealer friend, and got three Kodiak Magnums for $65 each, about $30 off of the list. Didn't get a bear, but it killed many a deer. Those bows with the full window changed the whole game for the back yard archer. You now had something that was actually consistant, and fun to shoot.
Kwickee marketed their version of the quiver for those that bought at K-Mart. One version held 4 arrows, and the other held 6. I told you it brought back memories. Thanks.
I hope you put your B/W graphic back somewhere, it is a nice print.
Just looked at the Ibox, very nice job. Especially like the picture of Fred. The shop is good too, lots of toys for a bow enthusiast. One thing that I would suggest to change for us older purists, though; move the B&W graphic from below Fred's picture to some other location, maybe to the top, and replace it with one that can represent him. That one is nice, but it shows a compound bow silhouette. Fred Bear was a snap shooter, and, even though he produced compounds for his customers, he always shot a recurve. You couldn't snap shoot the earlier compounds, especially bows set to 75 to 85 lbs, the drastic breakover interrupted the fluidity of the draw. I don't know if you can snap shoot any of the modern ones, either. He had some really nice recurves in his line of bows. I still have my Kodiack Magnum from the early 70's. Lots of good memories come to mind when I take it down from the rack. But, to be honest, the recurves didn't perform anywhere near as well as the compounds.
Why don't we use the bears to our advantage. Wait until the drill rig is on site. Pick the slowest, least productive worker, coat him with honey, and stake him out overnight. Bear or no bear, production will increase tenfold. F.Y.I.; bears prefer young, tender, succulent morsel type of humans, look at picture in IBOX, Scott is safe. GLTA LC
Then how do you differentiate 50 cents, 5 cents, .5 cents, and .05 cents; 50 cents is $.50, 5 cents is $.05, .5cents is $.005, and .05 cents is $.0005. There could be an unintential miss statement by them, but for the value you are saying, what they needed to say is 3.8 cents, or $.038. What they represent with .038 cents is the value = .o38 of a pennie, or just a little more than three tenths, almost 4 tenths, of a pennie. Remember .5 cents ( 1/2 of one cent ) is a mil or $.005. Big difference when you put a decimal in front. Lets hope they just wrote it incorrectly.
Ok, first, Thanks for the reference to young persons, I left that realm 4 or 5 decades ago, depending on your definition, so any connection like that is good. LOL. But I use the old stuff, the numbers were better.
The figure I used is in several posts, but use helraiser's posts 107584 & 107585. Shows a dividend of .038 cents, not 3.8 cents, but .038 of a penny(1 cent), that's much less than a penny ( .01 X .038 = $.00038 of a dollar). So take the (.038 X .01 = .00038 dollars) times the 9600 shares, and my calculator gives me $3.648. Unless the .038 cents is a typo, or erroneous. Believe me, I would much prefer the $364, but something has to be wrong with the number given, for that to happen. IMHO . I won't object to being wrong. GLTA LC
No, I have 9600 shares from my original EFGO days. The way it was given was .038 cents, which is .00038 dollars. I have 9600 shares after they did a most beneficial reverse split ( at least I was told it was to my benefit, but my calculator must be mal-functioning, because I can't get it to prove that theory), that gives me -- 9600 X .00038 = $ 3.64. Add that to my $9.50 mona value, and I have $ 13.14 in the account. Only $ 1086.86 to go to break even.
WOW, how soon can I receive my $3.64 dividend? I'll be doing some DD to try and find some good stocks in which to reinvest it. Maybe I can catch a dip in one if I'm lucky. Should I put all in one stock, or split it multiple ways?
This a problem I have with relying too strongly on some of the elements of TA. If the MMs have transposed the actual numbers, they have screwed up the calculations, and it isn't reflected as such in the end results for the day. You then make reasonable calculations based on purposely erroneous information. The practice should be outlawed by the sec, its a form of manipulation, I think.
Goes under OLD BUSINESS. look back about 3,000 posts for resolution discussions completely covering issue. Not immportant to HCPC.
Good Man, much better choice.
I think you will find that the term 'Youse' is from the, shall we say, less educated people of NY & New Jersey. People who used it were/are dropouts, and are usually proud of their ignorance. It does not represent the normal people of those cities. You are stealing from someone who uses it while slamming our Native Americans to get more of a rise from the sensitive posters on these boards. You would do well to pick a better roll model. LC
Actually, I have been assured that I will get the Mona 1100 half, and the other 1100 half back in my GLCC divies. Still waiting for the call from Mr Winters about the restriction lift date on those. And it might help if that sp went up a tad. On your suggestion; from what I've seen, I think you would be triing to sue an empty mailbox at FedEX -- Somewhere. JMO LC
Gives me more time to find loose change, for more shares, by walking around the WalMart parking lot. As soon as it gets too cold for that, it can go up.
Maybe everybody is just pissed at MONA. I'm still waiting for my $1100 worth of MONA to just get back above $10. If everyone else is in a simular boat, I can understand why they aren't too jovial on here.
I hope you are correct on that, I was told my cost would be $95, but it was stated in the format of; DTC charges $95 for a new cert. I got that at ST and I think at Heritage, but that could be a senile moment memory there. Anyway, you helped make my day better, thanks. LC
Our local ST office is fortunate in having a very good manager, and assistant. Not all are that lucky.
It is the method they use to seperate the tradable, and restricted shares of the same stock. Some just used the cusip number. Do you have GLCC shares that you bought besides the divies, if so, how do they keep the shares seperated in your account. Incorrect seperation is what happened when they were first issued, and some people were able to trade the divies at that time. That will cause them great problems if not resolved, I have been told.