Charting
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wow Clay is still doing video charts informing us all how to trade . Good to see ya my man
Ha ! got my but kicked day 1 on the come back ... My first actual scan pulled up GBSN for 700 and I missed it. Went in on MJTK and got my butt handed to me.
Nothing like starting back and getting your butt kicked out of the gate. Going to be a fun ride and excited to be back on the the EPIC otc
Mikey whats up bro?? Just giving you an Epic hello and saying guess who is back???!
Doing some DD Epic style ?? guess who is back ??
I'm no newbie that is for sure but want to keep it real on my comeback . I will be blunt actually this will hit .05 min ??
Not going to lie I expected breakout today but it's the otc there is no given . My butt got took behind the woodshed and you know the rest . Charts are not 100% but a great tool that has brought me great profits . I'm just now jumping back in the otc after years away and this was a nice lesson so far . Far from over only however and I will turn this into a winning trade ??
Wow really?? The chart peaked my interest here and now I'm reading notes are paid off ? This is HUGE and the company is working toward being the Groupon of MJ! Great catalyst and a steaming chart . Here is what I like about the charts
Both 30 min and 60 min are setting on the 50 ma support and pinching between it and the upper Bollie. She is wound up tight in there.
Daily Shows a classic bull flag that has held 38.3% fibs to expect a break out of previous high . Also note the 50 ma is under the current price and the 200 ma is setting up at .88 cents !
Weekly - This is the crazy one. The Weekly chart is still oversold with tons of room to run because the way the setup is here.
MJTK bull flag
http://schrts.co/LxQXOs
In MJTK here classic bull flag and perfect fibs to take on new highs per chart tec
Checking into this one but seems each spike is lower and lower . Never to truly break out . Thoughts?
http://schrts.co/uS2TPL
MJTK ran fibs and its held the 38.3 rule so far if I am charting it right. Looks like classic flag .
With target do you use previous high break of the wick or the candle?
Nice job being patient on MJTK - looks like classic flag here . Could see a nice pop and .05 area overall based on chart tec
MJTK classic Flag? BMSN trip lotto ? volume spikes in bottom channel
I mean where is the DD sticky post showing the dolls with links to these major retailers ? How many penny stocks have real product in major retailers ! Ummm none or very few . The links are easy to find even . You guys are upset with current sell price of stock but no real DD links of products are on this board. Rare chance here in otc land but if nobody knows about it then . Well.,, you see what happens nothing . How many people that buy these diversified dolls even know OWOO are behind it ? Prob very few . With all that said come OCT and official products in Walmart would be very surprising and odd for the price to be where it currently is . Markets are odd you never know
Lol you guys need to put out what retail investors are looking for . The product! Order the dolls from Wal mart take pics of dolls and order etc . Proof is in the pudding . You want retail to notice get the goods take the pics post the info on the boards. It's not rocket science.
You have product going in 2900 walmarts , it's avail for order on Walmart.com ,toys r us .com etc and you guys are under a penny ? Where are the DD post with pics and links ? Short answer there are none . Let's think about this 500 mill share AS with natl product rolling out to Walmart , toys r us and under a penny . I have seen companies with 2.5 bill AS launch a energy drink into Walmart like a few hundred stores at most go to 3-5 cents . Think about it . Get the pic the real DD and share it . Simple good luck
Yeah that would be a game changer but clearly they do not have that kinda cash to spend buying shares . They continue to take new notes out to pay old notes to stay afloat it appears . The toxic debt has been relentless here and I like many thought they would get it handled as it appeared this one has huge potential . However just like any other penny stock once they do the reverse then debt converters get to continue to dump all over again . It's a repeating cycle in the Otc .
Be sweet if some of you seeing the displays could snap a few pics and post them here
maybe you was meaning .05 lol
No the TA has been running 1-2 days behind since Tesla has kept track . So likely it's higher then the current number we all see
Maybe you should stop telling the board conversions are over . Clearly nobody knows when that is . Once the o/s stops growing each day then maybe it can be suggested
Oh boy! Exciting times finally ??
nah they just want to tax it lol
yeah its just like anything else.. big shots want a piece of the pie so they try and regulate and tax everything. Its typical and expected actaully for companies that have great product and natl distribution like ECIG does they will can survive any reguluations unlike all the other small ones. Also ECIG big elsewhere not just U.S>
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KCRA) —E-cigarette users could see their privileges snuffed out under a controversial new bill just introduced Monday at the California state Capitol.
E-CIGS
E-cigs
(Jan. 26, 2015)Mike Luery/KCRA
VIEW LARGE
Watch report: California bill to ban e-cigarettes sparks fight
E-cigarettes are very popular, especially with young people, where usage has tripled since 2011, according to the Centers for Disease Control.
But that may change under Senate Bill 140, by Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco.
The bill would prohibit the smoking of e-cigarettes at workplaces, schools, day cares, restaurants, bars and on public transportation. It also defines e-cigarettes as tobacco products.
"These small e-cigarette start-ups are now being purchased by Big Tobacco," said Leno, adding that those tobacco companies would "own 75 percent of the market within a few years."
But the regulation attempt is discomforting to 26-year-old Eric Cooke, who was vaping his favorite flavor, strawberries and cream, at the Vapor Room on the Grid in Midtown Sacramento on Monday.
Cooke said he’s a big fan of e-cigarettes.
“I enjoy them a lot actually," he said. "They helped me quit smoking four years ago."
Many vapor enthusiasts believe e-cigarettes have helped them kick the tobacco habit.
“I haven’t smoked a cigarette in like, eight months," Anthony Bacigaleupo said. "And I started this and I love it. It tastes good and it doesn’t bother other people."
But the new trend does bother some medical researchers, including those who found formaldehyde in e-cigarette vapors, according to an article published this month in the New England Journal of Medicine.
E-cigarette use would be banned in most indoor places under the Leno bill.
The senator said he believes the e-cigarette promoters are targeting kids.
"In flavors such as bubble gun and raspberry and chocolate,” he told KCRA 3. "So, they are marketing to children, again -- an attempt to hook a new generation through the poisonous product of nicotine."
Leno’s bill is sponsored by the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Action Network.
“The primary use of an e-cigarette is to deliver nicotine in order to sustain a nicotine addiction,” said Tim Gibbs, a Capitol lobbyist with the Cancer Action Network. “Nicotine is derived from tobacco. And that’s why we believe e-cigarettes are tobacco products and should be regulated as such."
But there is strong opposition from e-cigarette advocates, including Shawn Kreb, co-owner of the Vapor Room on the Grid.
"It’s ridiculous," Kreb said. "Because it isn’t tobacco. I mean, it’s like comparing vodka to water. They look the same, but they’re completely different."
Senate Bill 140 does include an exemption for private smoking lounges.
Public hearings are expected to begin in March.
The scientific community is divided on the question of whether e-cigarettes can really help people quit tobacco use. One British study supported that contention. Read it here.
Yet, many health experts believe more research is needed before any definitive conclusions can be reached.
Joe Nocera commentary: E-cig study was a lot of smoke, but no fire
ALSO IN OPINION
Editorials
Op-Ed Columns
SUBSCRIBE TO THE DISPATCH
Sign up for home delivery of The Columbus Dispatch and find out What's In It for You.
SUBSCRIBE
Already a subscriber?
Enroll in EZPay and get a free gift! Enroll now.
Wednesday January 28, 2015 5:00 AM
Comments: 0 11 1 68
So I suppose you heard about the latest e-cigarette study, the one that said that the vapors e-cigarette users inhale contain multiple forms of formaldehyde. It was much in the news last week, after its authors, five scientists from Portland State University, published a peer-reviewed letter outlining their findings in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine.
“Before you vape: high levels of formaldehyde hidden in e-cigs,” said the headline at NBC.com. “ Can you guess what cancer-causing agent researchers just found in electronic cigarettes?” asked The Motley Fool. “E-cigarettes not safer than ordinary cigarettes,” claimed the online publication Tech Times. The New England Journal of Medicine tweeted: “Chemical analysis of e-cigs’ vapor show high levels of formaldehyde,” it read. “Authors project higher cancer risk than smoking.”
The study focused on a device known as a premium vaporizer, which heats a flavored liquid containing nicotine. The heat causes the liquid to turn into vapor, which the user inhales. Most of these devices also allow the user to control the voltage. These devices have become increasingly popular as a way to ingest nicotine without smoking.
In the study, the Portland State scientists ran the device at both a low voltage and a high voltage. At the low voltage, they did not detect formaldehyde. But at the high voltage, they found some. Formaldehyde is, indeed, a carcinogen, which also exists, among hundreds of other toxic chemicals and dozens of cancer-causing agents, in combustible cigarettes. The authors concluded that someone who was a heavy user of a vaporizer at the high voltage was five to 15 times more likely to get cancer than a longtime smoker. Or so they seemed to say.
Studies like this have an impact on the perception of e-cigarettes. Even though cigarettes result in 480,000 U.S. deaths each year — and even though it is the tobacco, not the nicotine, that kills them — many in the public-health community treat e-cigarettes as every bit as evil. Every dollop of news suggesting that vaping is bad for your health, much of which has been overblown, is irrationally embraced by anti-tobacco activists. One result is that, whereas 84 percent of current smokers thought e-cigarettes were safer than ordinary cigarettes in 2010, that number had dropped to 65 percent by 2013.
Worse, close to a third of the people who had abandoned e-cigarettes and returned to smoking did so because they were worried about the health effects of vaping, said a study published last year in the journal Nicotine & Tobacco Research.
The Portland State study fits right into this dynamic. It is, on the one hand, true that vaping at an extremely high voltage will cause formaldehyde-releasing agents to develop.
But this conclusion is misleading. People don’t vape at a high voltage, because it causes a horrible taste — “a burning taste that occurs from overheating the liquid,” wrote Konstantinos Farsalinos, a Greek scientist and vaping expert, in an email. Farsalinos has done studies and discovered that above a certain voltage — lower than the high voltage test on the Portland State study — people couldn’t inhale; the taste was unbearable.
Indeed, the study actually conveys good news. When used at normal voltage, vaping does not produce formaldehyde. “Rather than scaring people about the dangers of vaping and alarming them to the ‘fact’ that vaping raises their cancer risk above that of smoking, we should instead be regulating the voltage and temperature conditions of electronic cigarettes so that the problem of formaldehyde contamination is completely avoided,” wrote Michael Siegel, a professor of public health at Boston University, on his blog. But given the way the Portland State authors characterized their research, it’s no surprise that headline writers took away a different message.
When I spoke to David Peyton, one of the authors, he insisted that the study had been mischaracterized. All it was meant to do, he said, was compare the levels of formaldehyde in e-cigarettes versus cigarettes. “It is exceedingly frustrating to me that we are being associated with saying that e-cigarettes are more dangerous than cigarettes,” he added. “That is a fact not in evidence.” Well, maybe.
When I read him the tweet from The New England Journal of Medicine — “Authors project higher cancer risk than smoking” — he was horrified. “I didn’t see the tweet,” he said. “I regret that. That is not my opinion.”
“There is a lot we don’t yet know about e-cigarettes,” said Peyton toward the end of our conversation. He is right about that; e-cigarettes are still so new that they need to be studied carefully. And he and his co-authors are planning further studies. Perhaps the next time, they will produce something that doesn’t serve mainly as a scare tactic to keep smokers away from e-cigarettes.
Joe Nocera writes for The New York Times.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2015/01/28/1-e-cig-study-was-a-lot-of-smoke-but-no-fire.html
Anti-Vaping Researchers Called Out for Misleading Cancer Exaggerations by New York Times Columnist
By opposing e-cigarettes, anti-tobacco activists are very likely killing people
Ronald Bailey|Jan. 27, 2015 1:46 pm
Email
E-CigecigsLast week, my colleague Jacob Sullum questioned a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine purporting to show that vaping is more dangerous than smoking actual cigarettes. The reason? Because vaping at high voltage produces high levels of the carcinogen formaldehyde. The New England Journal of Medicine even tweeted: “Chemical analysis of e-cigs’ vapor show high levels of formaldehyde,” it read. “Authors project higher cancer risk than smoking.”
But as Sullum pointed out, most people avoid vaping at high voltage because it produces very unpleasant flavors. Naturally, an uncritical media ran with scary headlines like "Study: E-cigarettes could be more deadly than regular cigarettes." Sullum thoroughly debunks those claims.
Today, New York Times columnist Joe Nocera takes on that study and more or less forces one of the researchers to back down on the claims. From the column:
When I spoke to David Peyton, one of the study’s authors, he insisted that the study had been mischaracterized. All it was meant to do, he said, was compare the levels of formaldehyde in e-cigarettes versus cigarettes. “It is exceedingly frustrating to me that we are being associated with saying that e-cigarettes are more dangerous than cigarettes,” he added. “That is a fact not in evidence.” Well, maybe.
When I read him the tweet from the New England Journal of Medicine — “Authors project higher cancer risk than smoking” — he sounded horrified. “I didn’t see the tweet,” he said. “I regret that. That is not my opinion.”
“There is a lot we don’t yet know about e-cigarettes,” said Peyton toward the end of our conversation. He is right about that; e-cigarettes are still so new that they need to be studied carefully. And he and his co-authors are planning further studies. Perhaps the next time, they will produce something that doesn’t serve mainly as a scare tactic to keep smokers away from e-cigarettes.
As I noted earlier this month, a December 2014 editorial in the journal BMC Medicine flatly stated:
Although there is no doubt that smokers switching to electronic cigarettes (EC) substantially reduce the risk to their health, some tobacco control activists and health organisations discourage smokers from using EC and lobby policy makers to reduce EC use by draconian regulation.
The hostility to EC may be related to a moral belief that nicotine use should be eradicated rather than allowed to morph into a relatively harmless activity. If EC are allowed to compete with cigarettes and develop further, smoking is likely to all but disappear. Discouraging smokers from making the switch and reducing EC competitiveness with cigarettes by unwarranted regulation will delay this opportunity or squander it altogether.
In fact, there is now sufficient evidence available for health professionals to recommend to smokers who cannot stop smoking with existing treatments or do not want to do so, to try several types of e-cigarettes to see if they can find one meeting their needs.
By opposing e-cigarettes, anti-tobacco activists are very likely killing the people they claim they want to help
http://reason.com/blog/2015/01/27/anti-vaping-researchers-called-out-for-m
New MM GUGS bidding
Notice the short and dilutive MMs now on bid side? Seems the tide is changing for a great Feb Apostle. Supply is diminishing finally as demand rises
yeah your right take the emotions out of it.. check the chart you will see a deep daily pincher not on the 30 min chart
no check further Wells FArgo was takign them public it was real . few reasons it fell thru includiing at the time bad press on ecigs
Clay you may do some DD check the filings with the incoming revs and also the failed IPO to Nasdaq. This is not your typical penny bro. Also MSL* did this a few years back . Went r/s and uplisted to Nasdaq
I agree Obi great update from the company. This is no typical penny with pending r/s .. also wont even take effect until late March early APril ! Have to feel the end goal is to get that uplist to NAsdaq done
I agree they pr a huge natl million dollar add deal and in the meantime say nothing to shareholders and let the death spiral finance take everyone out back behind the woodshed. I mean throw shareholders a bone pay some of the note do something !
exacty at this point would eat thru more shares to max it faster at a lower pps . What sucks is they killed the market in this for now and the volitility to even trade it has fallen bigtime.I like most retail i think thought this debt would get restructured long before maxing out the o/s but looks like the o/s will max and now its dragging on way longer because buying volume is gone is gone sucks
what do you mean meeting? For the r/s and a/s vote?
exactly that was my point also. many false predictions
ok then this statement is BS... because like I said a r/s of 1-100 and a raise at this price would killl all current shareholders no doubt about it
Dan O’Neill commented, “I am extremely excited to be joining ECIG and to lead this enterprise in one of the fastest growing and most interesting consumer goods opportunities in the past twenty plus years. The first priorities are to restructure the Company’s balance sheet and to improve overall cash flow management. The opportunity to replace tobacco cigarettes is not only a great business endeavor, but also represents an excellent opportunity to do something positive for society. ECIG is the best positioned company globally to take on this challenge, and with a strengthened and restructured balance sheet, coupled with a portfolio of strong brands, the potential of ECIG is tremendous. My goal will be to drive controlled, profitable growth globally and to deliver superior and sustainable returns to our shareholders. I look forward to working with our CEO Brent Willis to deliver on these commitments.”
I agree and if your long here your banking on this statement by the new guy. If he follows thru with his word it would not include a big r/s right now as that would be the opposite of what he said here
Dan O’Neill commented, “I am extremely excited to be joining ECIG and to lead this enterprise in one of the fastest growing and most interesting consumer goods opportunities in the past twenty plus years. The first priorities are to restructure the Company’s balance sheet and to improve overall cash flow management. The opportunity to replace tobacco cigarettes is not only a great business endeavor, but also represents an excellent opportunity to do something positive for society. ECIG is the best positioned company globally to take on this challenge, and with a strengthened and restructured balance sheet, coupled with a portfolio of strong brands, the potential of ECIG is tremendous. My goal will be to drive controlled, profitable growth globally and to deliver superior and sustainable returns to our shareholders. I look forward to working with our CEO Brent Willis to deliver on these commitments.”
What needs to stop are posters saying 8-k tonight , or debt DONE! or shareholder conference call next week! This is all BS and gets traders or investors hoping for that and when it does not happen you get the sellofff. Nobody knows whats going on behind the doors of ECIG its all a guess