Although he looks alone, somebody wants him on the phone.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Unemployment claims are up unexpectedly, yet the market seems to be shrugging it off.
I want to be a player today, but haven't made up my mind which way to go yet.
It's completely applicable here.
We have a stock priced at .014, the value of which is entirely extrinsic. Some people on this message board are looking forward to an increase of around 1,300% to take those warrants into the money.
An increase of 1,300% in extrinsic value?
Dreaming is free... Unless you of course you have paid for it, I guess.
Either one. It depends on my sentiment for a given day.
Like these ETFs you can't hold long or time decay will take it's toll. But with puts, you put the decay of the ETF itself in your favor. It's just another way to make the slightly slim odds work slightly more in your favor.
With volatility high, puts are expensive. I'm just thinking VIX under 25 might bring some opportunity. Don't really know yet.
Hey... That's my bid!
The VIX is once again approaching 25. That's the limit I had set for myself before resuming my favorite way to play FAZ/FAS... Buying puts.
You've changed the subject.
My point is that warrants to buy QASP at twenty cents are worth less than QASP shares, and will always and forever be, no matter what share price does. That is why they have no value.
Real stocks have intrinsic value. They are backed with equity and a reasonable expectation of earnings. Price multiples make up the extrinsic value of a stock.
You mention gold bars. What is a gold bar's intrinsic value, when compared to an equal weight in seed corn?
There is a valid argument that gold has no intrinsic value at all.
I'm glad to help you in your research.
Options are not warrants.
It's a way of fooling you, at no cost to the company.
If Mr. Newby really thinks this stock will trade at 30 cents, then he would want the stock. That way he makes 30 cents per share, instead of only the 10 cents he gets when he exercises the warrants.
The warrants are worthless.
A warrant is an option. Nothing more, nothing less.
Now if the warrant was to put the stock to the company at twenty cents, it would have value. But they are calls at twenty, so they are worthless.
Math works the same, regardless of my country of origin.
Why would you exercise the priveledge of buying stock at twenty cents, when you can buy it on the open market at a cent and a half?
What is a twenty cent warrant worth in a stock which trades at one and a half cents?
Nothing.
That's a pretty big slug of Kool-Aid there.
Warrants are simply OTM calls... ultimately worthless.
You have no way of knowing insiders holdings.
There is always a buy back going on. Sure there is.
900 million contract? For QASP? Sure.
Revenues? What's 3 times zero?
Audited financials are almost about to be released. Always, just about ready to be released... all the time.
Those helicopter parts are worth probably less than a nickel on the dollar. Parts manufactured as military spares for export would not comply with order 8130, and even if they did, parted out Hueys are a dime a dozen.
You can project anything you want to project. Might as well project a billion trillion. It means about as much.
Uh oh, the naked short selling excuse is showing up.
That's always one more indication that this is moving right along the usual stinky pinky life cycle.
When share price doesn't meet the great expectations, it is blamed on manipulation by MMs in collusion with hedge funds engaged in naked short selling.
The fact that there are no earnings and little to no equity is always somehow overlooked...
FAS's drop at the open is an opportunity. Looks like a FAS day to me.
The analysis shown on that QASP chart is an outstanding example in showing that the true strength in technical analysis is it's ability to create stategies that pay off very, very handsomely in back testing scenarios.
Maybe you can comiserate with this poor guy: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=35944838
The irony is that his post is over a year ago, and the stock he was refering to still shows more life than RMDM.
If you're still in this, don't get out now. You never know, RMDM could re-awaken, you just need to be patient. But if it pops, get out, Out, OUT!!
Ain't that guy in jail?
Because they are trading equity for debt. Economics 101.
Less equity + more debt = lower share value.
Retail numbers are brutal this morning, FAS getting clobbered in pre-market. But I'm thinking if Eutope stays strong and closes positive, FAS will work it's way back up from a lower open.
Cuyahoga County Airport in Cleveland?
No, that is part of the real Atlantic Aviation. They don't do flight training, but if you go in and ask, they can probably refer you to someone who does.
Research is the most important element in being successful with stocks. And that's why we are here; to be successful with QASP.
All stock I hold long is continually viewed under a skeptical eye.
If research leads one to hold QASP long, so be it.
But from my viewpoint, this company holds almost nothing in the way of cash generating businesses, and exagerates about what it has. It has hocked it's assets (equity) for a cash loan, and also dedicated 51% of future income against that loan.
The CEO is prepping shareholders for the coming necesity of a Reverse Split to uplist to the AMEX. But that won't happen. Like all pinkie R/S, it just leads to a new round of dilution.
So the determination is made that this in no investment, but certainly it has flippability! But even if you are only in it to flip, you must still be completely familiar with the company, and what is going on with it.
Time spent researching stocks is never a waste of time.
Buy active pinks at new lows. It's almost always a sure winner, but they must be active.
I don't know how high this may go from here, or how low. But when an active pink hits a new low, you have a pretty decent shot at a profit.
The key word is active, and this one is.
So far as being a legitimate aerospace conglomerate; you've all seen the results of my research.
You guys are too hard on me.
What I want is to buy this at .014 amd have it go to $5 or $10.
Unfortunately, what I want, and what I think will happen aren't always the same.
So, I'm just going to have to try to grit it out with a few trades.
I'm here to make money.
I've done my DD and shared it with the rest of the board. Now that I have drawn my conclusions, I'm sharing my strategy.
Isn't this what Ihub is for??
I would never deign to advise long term shareholders. I tried. I learned.
I'm just telling you what I'm going to do.
Yeah, but it ain't is it?
If you would like to buy it from me at a buck and a half, I'll keep going back and getting it at sub-penny. And I'll do it to you four times, no problem.
Seriously, I can't get in unless I have reasonable expectations of a return.
I'm guessing it's worth a few flips on the way to triple zeros. First target is .005. It's the best I can do with it.
Sorry, I've looked at this hard. That's all there is.
LOL, it means he signed over the assets in four days.
But he hasn't got a dime to show yet!
I thought I had used the word "patience" in that post.
It's impossible to tell where these will go short term. But as long as they are active, and have a lot of "investor" interest, it is pretty safe to buy at the new bottom when you see it. Just don't be greedy, you have to sell into any rally in price.
Buy it back at .005, sell at .01.
Patience. It should be good for a couple flips in that range.
Hmmm, no buy back after all.
O/S nearly maxed out.
Assets have been hocked for a cash loan.
Mr. Bradley is reaching for the D-ring...
Is Meredith going to be on CNBC today?? Gotta buy FAZ on that news. Usually they roll her out when I've already bought FAS, and I get kicked in the head! One day they had her and Nouriel Roubini on within a half hour of each other. Of course, I was in FAS that day, probably lost 5% while they were talking.
Actually, I'm not sure I'll get into either yet today.
And look at GS. P/E under 6. That's only a little higher than BP's... a company with serious real trouble.
Goldman's trouble is that they make a great political whipping boy. The fundamentals haven't changed, and while they won't like finreg, they'll deal with it. Bottom line: They make money, and the stock will ultimately reflect it.
I don't know what to say. You are picturing an airplane designed and certified prior to WWII, and built to CAR 3 standards. And it is pictured with a fixed float system. And in later posts there is a King Air pictured with fixed floats attached to imaginary hard points.
That's not what we are talking about with the Tigerfish system.
It's like calling a Ford Model A the direct ancestor of the Ford Taurus. Of course it is. And then again... they have nothing in common.
Believe whatever you desire.
Done my DD, I'm here to flip this pup. The price is just too high right now. I'm standing by.
Well, there is only one type of DD on the QASP board. The type one agrees with.
I spent the morning looking through a dissassembled King Air 200, trying to refresh myself about the internal structure, and the way the landing gear was mounted in the nacelles. I also spent some time talking to people whom I had been involved with in heavy aircraft modifications all those years ago.
I posted the opinions I developed: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=51100410
It was fun, I had a good time doing it. Sorry the results don't support the idea of floating King Airs. But I think the RAPT system is a neat concept, when applied to the type of aircraft it was developed for.
Engineers are no nonsense. You can't pay them with shares. It's probably $150 to $200 an hour. So it gets a little expensive to have them work on nonsense.
The way it usually works is that you have all of your design work finished, and you pay them to run structural and conformance analysis. You don't assign them to invent something, that's just not how it works.
You probably aren't going to gain anything by paying them a visit. I would imagine there are confidentiality agreements in place.
Well, let's hope they hypesters are smart enough to listen to the engineers. Engineers speak the truth.
I have a feeling the hype was developed before anyone really talked to anyone with any real engineering bones.
So someone needs to ask in the C.C. how that meeting in Wichita went.
If you mean the contracted company, KTM, they are based in Greenville, S.C. That's what I was meaning to point out.