Probably sell 4 .015 now. Multiply by 10...

I'm thinking & deducing more like "Times 100+" or $1.50+ per share.

JMO, Scruff

Latest Wild AStoniShing Guesses (WAG) 4 Buyout/Settlement

And the winning buyout/settlement figure is...
x.xx = Mr. William R. Carter, Jr, aka, "Sir Billy The Great": For the little guy(s)

And, of course, anyone can update or play (if long).

0.24 = psychocharttrader
0.30 = TonyJoe1957
0.33 = Proudfoamer
0.39 = sointrigued
0.45 = Specialneeds (+ royalties)
0.46 = ice2014
0.48 = MorrisG
0.49 = SonamKapoor
0.56 = Nestegg McMuffin
0.58 = 00dylanplott
0.59 = GhostTazac
0.60 = zombywolf
0.65 = I_Am_Ram (+ royalties)
0.67 = BUNDO (Rounded 0.666 to 2 decimals)
0.70 = Targun
0.71 = VC3
0.72 = Gmc2020
0.75 = justus1
0.76 = nyheat
0.77 = TechStock (+ royalties)
0.80 = Bitcoinmoon
0.83 = gooferball
0.85 = khenry458
0.87 = faqt
0.89 = Aftrmidnyt (Rounded 0.888 to 2 decimals)
0.90 = Frankp
0.91 = AllinFun
0.92 = Toanoman
0.97 = CDUB27
0.99 = rstar
1.00 = stockfan100
1.05 = Nicasurf (+ royalties)
1.09 = tsand
1.10 = BillySlong
1.11 = flyingboozeman
1.15 = WhoMadeWho
1.17 = Gm1850 (with possible royalties)
1.20 = magnus_invest
1.24 = Ultimate Warrior ($2B + royalties)
1.25 = skyway430
1.26 = maxamil
1.27 = BrokeAgent
1.38 = NewbieDoobyDoo
1.41 = Mic ll
1.50 = thunley1
1.56 = Jaredx24
1.61 = Gonfishun
1.66 = jrt03
1.68 = Katoprimate
1.73 = easyme
1.75 = MickHurst
1.76 = rockie101
1.90 = Lonzo
2.18 = Ranger185
2.30 = Scruffer
2.32 = Evilbean
2.35 = 18 wheeler
2.41 = rbd1
2.55 = buster57
2.65 = money2013
2.81 = kid shaleen
2.99 = Goodbuddy4863
3.00 = AdamBaum
3.15 = Kevwizz3
3.23 = Engle1488
3.25 = MjMilo
3.33 = My face
3.54 = locard
4.00 = handMMJ
4.25 = bubba1234
4.69 = jbbb
4.80 = 2dollarbill
5.00 = Long term
5.01 = Philhump03
5.56 = stormcloud96
6.00 = doughnuthole
6.35 = Parker61

I/O = 1,614,601,069; Float = 663,868,192

This is for a buyout or settlement. New game if trial.

Lastly, thank you for playing.

Good luck, Scruffer2.30

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147627699

WAG still on. No news = Nothing 2 post

Since grey, little volume, no real trading market and delay, delay, waiting game.

Okay, something to get you going.

Unfortunately, do not think we'll ascend, but other grey market stocks seem not to be held down.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140280566

LONG & STRONG ÜÖIP (all together now--"LONG & STRONG ÜÖIP......... ÜÖIP, ÜÖIP, ÜÖIP."),

Persevering Scruff

P.S. I think BA & others have posted something regarding Cisco due soon.

"Bought shares here to sell right.."?

Do you mean sold shares to buyers here and now?

Also, are you still trying to buy? Or did you get your blocks?

Remember seeing something about only wanting to buy in 100k blocks.

Thought was you but not sure.

And then found this.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148888242

Whoever is getting fills (at these prices) is lucky.

May be getting close to last call for alcohol.

JMO, Scruff

Good morning WAGGERS & Happy June

00dylanplott
18wheeler
2dollarbill
AdamBaum
Aftrmidnyt
AllinFun
BillySlong
Bitcoinmoon
BrokeAgent
bubba1234
BUNDO
buster57
CDUB27
doughnuthole
easyme
Engle1488
Evilbean
faqt
flyingboozeman
Frankp
GhostTazac
Gm1850
Gmc2020
Gonfishun
Goodbuddy4863
gooferball
handMMJ
I_Am_Ram
ice2014
Jaredx24
jbbb
jrt03
justus1
Katoprimate
Kevwizz3
khenry458
kidshaleen
locard
Longterm
Lonzo
magnus_invest
maxamil
Micll
MickHurst
MjMilo
money2013
MorrisG
Myface
NesteggMcMuffin
NewbieDoobyDoo
Nicasurf
nyheat
Parker61
Philhump03
Proudfoamer
psychocharttrader
Ranger185
rbd1
rockie101
rstar
skyway430
sointrigued
SonamKapoor
Specialneeds
stockfan100
stormcloud96
Targun
TechStock
thunley1
Toanoman
TonyJoe1957
tsand
UltimateWarrior
VC3
WhoMadeWho
zombywolf

Scruffer

Here 2 report...NO NEWS. Have a good day.

https://www.google.com/search?q=(chanbond+or+uoip)+site:+-investorshub.advfn.com&source=lnt&tbs=qdr:d&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwil5-HSgcniAhVGWq0KHY3aDj0QpwUIJg&biw=1280&bih=891

Search format as provided by ice. Thank you.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142538844

Scruffer

Morning team. Hope all safe from flooding.

Oh, & the very overlooked & underappreciated...

-- Border Agents too.

A herculean task indeed.

Once again, thank you ALL for your servitude to this country.

Ono, Scruff

Good morning & an early "Thank you veterans..."

Thank you deeply for your service (Memorial Day, Monday, the 27th):

- Veterans
- Army
- Navy
- Marines
- Air Force
- Coast Guard
- Police Officers
- Fire Fighters
- Paramedics
- EMTs
- and all the 1st responders and those that serve(d).

- May those service men and women (& canines) RIP that gave the ultimate sacrifice.

LONG & STRONG UOIP.

"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
— General George S. Patton, Jr.

Yes, going with probability or % of winning.

WAG was/is for per share dollar amount of buyout/settlement.

Posting had been slow so just asked the question (for fun) of "Odds" of winning something.

Putting feelers out to see where everyone stood. Curious too.

Thanks, Scruff

So ChanBond will not wait for the PTAB reconsideration ruling?

Thank you (and in advance of final question) AllinFun.

Question . . . If ChanBond wins Cisco appeal?

If win the ChanBond-Cisco appeal, doesn't it revert back (or whatever the legal term is) to the PTAB for re-review and reconsideration?

Also, still grey so wonder if someone "On standby" made contact with the SEC.

To a wacky, wonderful, winning Wednesday,

Scruffer

P.S. And thanks for playing. Board had been slow.

I definitely like the way U all think.

Have no idea of the timing, but if win the Cisco appeal, doesn't it revert back (or whatever the legal term is) to the PTAB for re-review and reconsideration?

The good news is... We all have shares.

Hard to come by these days to acquire any substantial quantity.

Just gotta keep nibbling away to try to accumulate more.

Moreover, still grey so wonder if someone "On standby" made contact with the SEC.

Keep the faith, Scruffer

And gÖÖd minds think alike.

Same as me--basically.

What odds do you all give a win?

A win being a monetary award, being a buyout, settlement, verdict or judgement.

FWIW...Set odds > 85% of a WIN.

For what it's worth, I set the probability of a win at greater than 85%.

The odds are far better than a crapshoot.

Only payoffs and corruption should be able to stop ChanBond.

Why? The inventors understand 100% all the details of the cable modem.

-- Hennenhoefer; Earl (Harrisburg, PA),
-- Snyder; Richard V. (Harrisburg, PA),
-- Stine; Robert D. (Dillsburg, PA)

If the cable companies infringed, these highly skilled artisans know it.

It's my belief a settlement will occur prior to a jury verdict.

The only reasons this could go to trial is:
-- Cable companies (30-40% of them?) need for indemnification
-- Then appeal

But can Arris/Commscope risk it? Treble damages! Comcast was put on notice!

The ChanBond-Cisco appeal should provide more direction.

This is a good background summation of ChanBond's case.
http://www.reexamlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ChanBond-Complaint-ded-1-15-cv-00848-1.pdf

All along, you've been asking questions we all want the answers too.

Mr. William R. Carter, Jr, aka, "Sir Billy The Great" = "Our Rainmaker".

P.S. I wouldn't invest in this otherwise. It's my only OTCBB, Pinky, Grey, Revoked? stock.

Moreover, I don't invest in sheet (if can help it)!

Upon reflection & review, more implied "Sue".

I understand now.

When reading your post, saw the quotes so thought actually stated that to one of the inventors.

Overlooked, their (Comcast's) lack of response as "Implied", like:

-- Well, what are you gonna do about it?
-- Go fudge yourself
-- Piss off
-- So sue me

Some mornings have too much coffee, not awake yet, in a hurry or peruse through all non-read posts & don't read carefully enough.

Anyway, Comcast was clearly "Notified, warned and alerted" to their infringement in 2011-2012.

It still would be ideal to see where documented could test filed patent while still pending.

This would only further Comcast's stealing of the "Informed of and tested" technology.

http://www.reexamlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ChanBond-Complaint-ded-1-15-cv-00848-1.pdf

Have a great evening all,

Saturday night Scruffer

Exactly. 100%. Explained it perfectly. Nailed it.

That's how I see it anyway.

Okay, it's Saturday.

Ono (over-and-out) and thanks, Scruff

Yes, missed that one.

Didn't learn of stock until June '17 and didn't know what was going on.

If was part of a published record, one would think Mishcon has it.

Would be very comforting indeed CBV communicated to Comcast able to test/use/try from 2007-2010.

Thanks, Scruff

Toanoman's post. If so, attorneys have.

Also, not sure if has to be presented during discovery.

If not a requirement that would be the ULTIMATE ACE-IN-THE-HOLE.

"So sue me". That would be so AWESOME!

That would be unbelievably AMAZING if ChanBond can PROVE IT.

Wow! I had never heard about that.

Appl. No.:___12/068,102
Filed:_______February 1, 2008
7,941,822____May 10, 2011

Filing Date___Dec 27, 2000 (Related U.S. Patent Documents)

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=4&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=cbv&s2=Hennenhoefer&OS=cbv+AND+Hennenhoefer&RS=cbv+AND+Hennenhoefer

All 3 links below to the same 4 patents:
CBV and each inventor's name:
Hennenhoefer; Earl (Harrisburg, PA),
Snyder; Richard V. (Harrisburg, PA),
Stine; Robert D. (Dillsburg, PA)

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=cbv&FIELD1=&co1=AND&TERM2=Hennenhoefer&FIELD2=&d=PTXT

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=cbv&FIELD1=&co1=AND&TERM2=Snyder%3B+Richard+&FIELD2=&d=PTXT

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=cbv&FIELD1=&co1=AND&TERM2=Stine%3B+Robert&FIELD2=&d=PTXT

Awe-Inspired Scruffer

Ordinary Skill:

But first and once again, inventing something toward the future (new, useful & not obvious) is extremely, EXCEPTIONALLY difficult, especially getting all the precise, specific and 100% details worked-out and debugged, that is, getting it to work EXACTLY as envisioned.

In hindsight, many innovations seem obvious. Ideas are easy, but getting them to work properly are entirely other matters.

Can say that about smart phone--Many tried, but only a few successfully.
Can say that about electric car, but still have battery and fire issues. (And much of this technology has been around).
Can say that about intermittent windshield wipers, which the big 3 tried to steal from Robert Kearns.
Can say that about almost anything created and accepted by the marketplace over time.

As Thomas Edison famously coined, "Genius is 1 Percent Inspiration and 99 Percent Perspiration".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_having_ordinary_skill_in_the_art

A final exam bonus exercise should be given to the top graduating EE classes and see how many can complete a new and pioneering innovation just on the forefront of technology.

Ordinary skill my gluteus maximus.

Simpleton Scruff

But this isn't frivolous & patents validated!

http://www.reexamlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ChanBond-Complaint-ded-1-15-cv-00848-1.pdf

So ChanBond is supposed to sell modems?

What about Robert Kearns? He didn't sell windshield wipers, did he?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kearns

The fact is ChanBond's patents improved the speed of cable modems.

Their technology was, without question, stolen and incorporated into existing products.

Thank you for your reply,

Scruffer

Please explain how not used (stolen).

Thank you very much IG.

These companies use high speed transmission of data of fiber-coaxial hybrid networks using a technology which comes under the patents of ChanBond. Cisco has already attempted to deny their claims by filing to get the ChanBond patents invalidated.

However, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rejected all six petitions from Cisco that asked for reviewing of ChanBond’s patents.

https://www.eprfinancialnews.com/2017/06/14/7833-the-story-of-chanbonds-fight-for-its-patent-infringement/

https://www.eprfinancialnews.com/2018/08/03/the-saga-continues-between-unifiedonline-chanbond-the-13-cable-companies/

Scruffer

Then why file? A win is a win.

Just one less thing to worry about.

Lots of defense tactics, gambits and filings knocked down-and-out.

And they've thrown and still throwing everything imaginable at ChanBond.

But we have the valid, upheld and infringed upon utility patents.

Plus, you're fortunate, getting a 70-90% discount since grey.

Float doesn't matter; O/S = 1,614,601,069

The 13 MSOs would still have to acquire Carter's shares (> 900M) so do not follow how control PPS.

Total shares issued and outstanding = 1,614,601,069.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139474848

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147627699

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/profile

The issues 4 me have always been and will be...

>> Money (Pay-offs, bribery, etc.)
>> Corruption and
>> "Behind-the-scenes" getting to decision maker(s)

Other than that, it should just be a matter of time until monumental, possible record-breaking, judgement, verdict, buyout or settlement.

Latest Wild AStoniShing Guesses (WAG) 4 Buyout/Settlement

And the winning buyout/settlement figure is...
x.xx = Mr. William R. Carter, Jr, aka, "Sir Billy The Great": For the little guy(s)

Updated mine b/c of such a vivid dream. (Only had once though).

And, of course, anyone can update or play (if long).

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148742589

0.24 = psychocharttrader
0.30 = TonyJoe1957
0.33 = Proudfoamer
0.39 = sointrigued
0.45 = Specialneeds (+ royalties)
0.46 = ice2014
0.48 = MorrisG
0.49 = SonamKapoor
0.56 = Nestegg McMuffin
0.58 = 00dylanplott
0.59 = GhostTazac
0.60 = zombywolf
0.65 = I_Am_Ram (+ royalties)
0.67 = BUNDO (Rounded 0.666 to 2 decimals)
0.70 = Targun
0.71 = VC3
0.72 = Gmc2020
0.75 = justus1
0.76 = nyheat
0.77 = TechStock (+ royalties)
0.80 = Bitcoinmoon
0.83 = gooferball
0.85 = khenry458
0.87 = faqt
0.89 = Aftrmidnyt (Rounded 0.888 to 2 decimals)
0.90 = Frankp
0.91 = AllinFun
0.92 = Toanoman
0.97 = CDUB27
0.99 = rstar
1.00 = stockfan100
1.05 = Nicasurf (+ royalties)
1.09 = tsand
1.10 = BillySlong
1.11 = flyingboozeman
1.15 = WhoMadeWho
1.17 = Gm1850 (with possible royalties)
1.20 = magnus_invest
1.24 = Ultimate Warrior ($2B + royalties)
1.25 = skyway430
1.26 = maxamil
1.27 = BrokeAgent
1.38 = NewbieDoobyDoo
1.41 = Mic ll
1.50 = thunley1
1.56 = Jaredx24
1.61 = Gonfishun
1.66 = jrt03
1.68 = Katoprimate
1.73 = easyme
1.75 = MickHurst
1.76 = rockie101
1.90 = Lonzo
2.18 = Ranger185
2.30 = Scruffer
2.32 = Evilbean
2.35 = 18 wheeler
2.41 = rbd1
2.55 = buster57
2.65 = money2013
2.81 = kid shaleen
2.99 = Goodbuddy4863
3.00 = AdamBaum
3.15 = Kevwizz3
3.23 = Engle1488
3.25 = MjMilo
3.33 = My face
3.54 = locard
4.00 = handMMJ
4.25 = bubba1234
4.69 = jbbb
4.80 = 2dollarbill
5.00 = Long term
5.01 = Philhump03
5.56 = stormcloud96
6.00 = doughnuthole
6.35 = Parker61

I/O = 1,614,601,069; Float = 663,868,192

This is for a buyout or settlement. New game if trial.

Lastly, thank you for playing.

Good luck, Scruffer2.30

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147625565

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147627699

Oh...........Sweet Mama.

Happy Mother's Day UOIP Long Moms.

Scruff-Daddy

Tax paid now; no taxes (NONE!) later.

Better to pay tax on 25k now than 2.5M later.

At least as of now.

Congress hasn't changed the law to raid this basket of money yet.

And they shouldn't but never know.

Seems like pirated everything else.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148697008

I 100% agree. They are interested in this.

One has to reasonably calculate, about every grey goes BK.

Should NOT, NOT, NOT be the case here!

P.S. You'll make an even better, comical and crazy emcee.

Or the broker made $34.

Sold and bought back (for the WTF happened newbies).

0.019 - 0.0122 = 0.0068 * 5000 = $34

Thought would post 2 C if "Have" it

Plus it's Friday, few posts and slow day.

On Sunday morning, April 21st, I awoke from a dream.

(Reason remember is sent my UOIP stockholder friend a text that still have).

It, the dream, was sooo vivid and seemed so real.

Was on Schwab (not StreetSmart Edge) but older, original site.

Prefer this one when make trades.

I also have TDA and use original site to make trades as well.

StreetSmart Edge & ThinkOrSwim (elaborate GUI's) just have too many bells and whistles (afraid gonna fat-finger & screw something-up).

Now going off tangent some so back to dream.

Typically, I monitor a SP on TDA and use Schwab to see market activity.

I looked at a stock price THIS DAY (morning) on Schwab for some reason and saw 2.30.

Then thought, what symbol do I have entered? It surely can't be UOIP.

But then looked at symbol and IT WAS UOIP.

And the stock price still displayed 2.30 when glanced back over.

Then I awoke from my extremely lucid dream state.

You know the kind when your hand falls asleep, but cannot move b/c you're in sleep paralysis.

Anyway, that's my "Freaky Friday" story for the day.

If happens, that would blow my mind.

Sane, or insane, Scruffer

LONG & STRONG UOIP.

Missed this. Was there a link or pacer?

T¥ BA.

Excelente, Awesome, Brilliant, Smart Dudty.

Now we just need a win and our windfall.

It's gonna be difficult for me to wait longer than 2019.

Getting antsy now.

Can't even imagine 6-10 years.

Maybe time to visit my PCP and get some relaxing meds.

Where'd this October date come from?

Some are posting nothing until October. Did I miss something?

>> No date for summary judgment hearing
>> 1st trial NOT scheduled until CAFC complete; not occur for several months

Several = More than two but fewer than many in number
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/several

1/2 May
June
July
>> Aug ?
>> Sept ?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148705395

TGIF & thank you, Scruffer

Yes, but does submitter alter or court (clerk)?

Meaning, does the defense or plaintiff get to submit their redaction to the court?

Then, once approved, emailed to all parties?

These were by the defense so could leave in somewhat misleading Irrelevant comments which seem to favor their side.

That's all I'm wondering.

I'm not sure how anyone makes heads or tails out of redacted invalidity combinations.

So many exhibits and pages are omitted.

Being an experienced judge, to me, it appears Judge Andrews is just listening and replying with questions.

We have no idea.

Moreover, this is the defenses reply brief so not sure who, what, how info is submitted in redacted version.

If defense submitted, yes, of course, they'll leave misleading interpretations in it.

I have no idea, but thought limited to 4 max combinations and it was agreed upon by both parties as ordered.

It all seems WILLFUL or EGREGIOUS 2 me.

It's grey hell. Anything goes. Brokers collude.

We've been through this song-and-dance too.

SP doesn't mean anything.

Judgment/verdict/settlement/buyout should be based on revenues and infringed lost dollars.

ChanBond needs to be made whole (and then some if willful or egregious).

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=145822647

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147417729

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=144159888

You're dealing with a very educated, knowledgeable and savvy crew here.

LOL, Scruff (and the +1 year LONGS)