Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
nothing about a lawsuit? he has to be aware of the train coming eom
Keep the faith..... Things are improving. Few things travel in straight lines.
A few notes for you:
http://stockcharts.com/public/1164099 on page one (today)
http://chartpatterns.com/wedges.htm
Compare wedge configuation guide to annotations on RTGV chart
Wedge configuration touches by price are usually in Fibonacci numbers - 1,2,3,5,8,etc Last touch was a 3. Technical conditions were favored before. See purple Slope Tag line in cci? It was backtested on touch 3 without fail. I think we are approaching the next lift-off or in its infancy.
MMTC dilution confusion eom
Breach of what insider info?
All I have shared is an email from an attorney who claims to be in legal action against MMTC and one other. His name has been checked out as has the legal firm name, telephone numbers, education and background.
A confirmation process has been verified and agreed upon before voice communication can begin. That process is underway. If the process confirms all research is correct and the attorney is genuine, things may elevate.
If curiousity kills the cat, I will likely open the file and then honor the nda.
I find it alarming that this board cannot accept a potential legal action coming considering the actions taken by MMTC. The wrong is so obvious, if my speculation is correct.
after this ESm12 long, I'm done fer the day!!!!!
I do not have a case #. All I have is communication with an attorney who is involved in legal action against MMTC and a document I have not opened detailing some or all aspect of the case. It is my understanding that if I open the file I am bound by a nondisclosure agreement. I am waiting to hear from him now.
And like i have said again and again, you will learn of this action when it is presented by the attorney(s). I really don't care what you believe. Keep an eye on MMTC news.
I was told by AOAC the MIT1000 was the device to be tested. That does not mean it exists or not. AOAC never sees or touches the device. AOAC is more or less an administrator in the process. The criteria used to test them would not be shared by MMTC, AOAC or laboratory por who performs the actual testing. If they cannot share the testing criteria, especially MMTC, I assume there is no criteria, and probably no testing.
The single most surprising find was the Listeria certification with no subsequent utility. In other words, MMTC has this wonderful device that performs miracles in a needed science but has no record or mention from peers, universities, or any reliable review from anyone other than itself. If the device is as good as their claim, why is it not producing revenue through licensing, patent inclusions or as a stand alone device where Listeria is commonly found? The answer can be only one thing and it ain't good.
There may be a few here chosen by the attorney. Like I said, time will tell. This can prove to be very serious. I told you I will tell him to visit this board. What more could you want?
I did not say meet. I said have a home. Any city of any size has a hotel or convention facility. LOL
AOAC helpers...........
Nora Larkin Marshall
Administrative Coordinator
AOAC Research Institute
481 N. Frederick Road, Ste. 500
Gaithersburg, MD 20877
Garlon Riegler, Sr. Director, AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Enjoy!
I was sharing my discoveries just as you do. Some of yours may be relevant and some not in my opinion. We are each different in what we value and what we think is appropriate.
I have not searched Brennan or Nunez about houses they own. Probably will if I can remember. I find that informative. Those three Florida cities just seem to attract criminal types. I don't know why, it just works that way. Try it. Search otc crooks you know and see where the houses they own are located. Chances are Brandendon, Sarasota or Boca Raton will come up in some of your searches. I think the birds of a feather thing applies.
Its about sharing your finds so good decisions can be made.
Back later on..... neighbors are coming over.
No. You guys claim Newhuis works for Toshiba Computer. He does not. You guys claim he has great financial experience working for large financial organizations. One such organization has only three employees. Another deals only with automobile financing. Did I mention he has a residence in the con capital of the US as do many otc crooks? I looked for his title with Toshiba Machine and could not find a listing of any kind for him. Can you share that information?
Sorry. But I cannot find any good in MMTC management. Newhuis has a little something behind him but his record is slim overall. Brennen may prove to be the genuis of the bunch - having left at the right time. Nunez has a quite poor record with criminal tenacles.
The lawsuit thing will surface in due course, I'm sure. I will direct the attorney to this board. Maybe he will speak with you. It is not my place to invite you or anyone else to the interview. He may be interested in seeing you in some capacity. You guys do swing the vine in the opposite direction of what he is about, you know. Maybe you can compare notes or something like that.
Hey, guy. I have an order in but have not gotten hit. CMGO appears to be the way it should be done, unlike the other.
glta
I had your post bookmarked but overlooked it. sorry.
I question the report too, but it is all we have.
Insiders of otc companies do not have to report trade executions for up to 6 months after the fact. That probably continues. And that could go far in explaining decrepancies in share counts with various reports from transfer agents, Q's and K's, and such. It is the actual shorting that is the real question. My experience lends shorts are often posted on the ts with double entries. That has not been seen on those reports.
Albeit, the volume being seen and labeled "new shares" in another possibility could be a very large position being systematically distributed by a single maker. Another possibility is private placements, although those things are usually of larger blocks than seen here and done rather quickly. I'd say the mystery volume is new shares being sold or someone with hundreds of millions of shares are liquidating in-between to make it more difficult to see.
One other thing....... I have been accused of disclosure violations, fraud and other nonsense. I have not seen the documents involved, only their titles. And those who understand case progression know there are periods when things are flying around like butterflies. If my posts were read with care, you would better understand what appears to be going on. Instead some want to expand on things that just are not so.
All said, it appears there are many angry people out there who want MMTC to suffer or retrace history. I'm just looking for the truth and far from the legal thing until scooped up in someones battle by an attorney.
Have a great Sunday!
Oh! Being you know how to do it, I'll do like you, okay?
I was looking back at failed MMTC technical scenarios that have proven relatively reliable over the years in other vehicles - Alvim Alpha, synchronous mathematical events, spd's and found few have generated expectation in this stock. Those in lavendar are failures. It seems these are the periods where new share distributions have circumvented the gift given to the stock.
Perhaps. A few characters in MMTC have a quite questionable past. While connection was a metaphor of sorts, you out-did me literally. Good one.
In the last 9 months MMTC has lost 85% of its value. Not bad.
I think you are looking in the wrong direction. I think you should look at dates and events that have occured. Whether you hear the beans from me or someone else, you will hear them. Look at what has recently happened..... what really happened...... not some guessing of where the dots are.
I did not say i signed the nda. It is there before opening the file. I will not open the file unless i find it necessary and safe. I hope the telephone interview will be adequate to flow the norm. you know...... MMTC sucks and all that.
Thanks. You proved Newhuis is with Toshiba Machine Co..... I also found one of the companies he worked for has only 3 employees. Odd.
What is/are the lawsuit(s) over? I have an idea, but it is speculation at this point.
Why have I been chosen to communicate with the attorney(s)? I have no idea but I believe I was found through my inquiries with the AOAC.
It seems I may be walking a high wire of sorts. A non-disclosure statement is included with the document. The forwarded document(s) is/are of exceptional length.
From my own research I believe May 3 may be a critical point in time. When was the shareholder meeting? There may be a connection somehow.
Titles of items found at this point lend aggression may be in its infancy.
I really don’t care if you or anyone believes me. It appears the magnitude of things has escalated to where everyone will soon know about it all. If my speculation is correct it will prove immense in the direction of the stock.
To keep my MMTC friends informed of honest information. Isn't the truth wonderful?
What you overlook about Toshiba is the Toshiba thought to be involved with MMTC is the machining business, not the computer business.
EDIT Someone on here posted the MMTC short interest - it was only 11,000,000 shares. New shares are shoving this thing down the tubes...... not shorts. Financiers will arrange benefit for shorting only if it is to their advantage. I'd say they know what is going on and want to get out and away from MMTC very soon...... afterall, there just isn't much left to short anyway
Micro Imaging Technolgy has two lawsuits levied against them eom
I have a file given me of some details. I have not opened it because I have been getting threats through email and such - don't want viruses and such. So, I have scheduled a telephone interview with this attorney who represents one side in the case.
I have researched the attorney name and the organization said to be involved. Everything has checked out. Thus, the coming interview. If he tells me he sent the file, I will open it.
In my investigation of MMTC I have left an odd but an acceptable signature in my wake. This law office is using that signature. It was used in two places - AOAC and an independent laboratory por. It seems he and I have similar ideas in finding the truth.
You will receive information as soon as I can verify any degree of accuracy - good and bad. The truth is what it is about, right?
The truth hurts. I understand. I've been where MMTC longs are. It stinks.
Yes. Two lawsuits are pending. I am speaking with an attorney involved in one of the cases (on Monday).
multiple lawsuits are being levied against Imaging Technology Inc. Is that good news?
I have been contacted by one attorney in one of the lawsuits concerning MMTC. It seems MMTC has been a bad boy. I have a telephone encounter scheduled Monday........ Yep! I'll let ya know about it.
Even with all MMTC claims, competitors are superior in affording the best overall detection solution. I think it was SDIX that in short thought has the best device I searched so far...... That one and a company in Europe...... and I have only looked at about eight out of 20 or so that make them....... and all of them use technolgy 7 years or older
outta here!!!!!!!
The pr was on this board. And now that you mention it, you are correct - they ordered 100...... and took possession of 20.
My bad.
Done fer the day. Nice one too$$$$$$. Nap time.
Being you understand, tell us all how it works. I will have many questions for you, I am sure. Can you tell us which manufacturer is used to supply the laser and what type it is? Are the histogram productions relavent to time, space or both and how much computing capability is necessry to produce those? Why does MMTC not address growth periods in it assay commentary for any organism? Is it the aim of MMTC to offer a bb gun when an elephant gun is the norm?
I have more.
And the same for E Coli, Salmonella and so on. But the grocery scanner, patent or certification or MMTC pr, does not address incubation and growth periods requiring 48 hours and more before recognition can be made. Is it strawberry, chocolate, vanilla, so on? If this is the case, the user would need to purchase multiple brand machinery to test for every organism on the block. There is no need for that if a competitor device is in hand....... and this is still in an assumption MMTC actually has a machine that works. Remember...... MMTC pr's state they have 100 machines in their possession that no one nowhere has seen or reported on.
What seems to be overlooked here is the reality of the situation.... and sometimes the outright hiding of it. I raise legitimate questions not addressed here and point out interesting facts when found. Is this not the reason for the board?
If MMTC were an automobile with a six cylinder engine in which you bought or contemplated buying, would you want that engine to utilize only one cylinder of six or more? Would you want the car clean, legal, and genuine with integridy? Would you want the car to serve its intended purpose for you?
I am bringing light to concerns anyone should have with MMTC if they were genuinely concerned with being a shareholder.
Is this the same Gregg Newhuis who resides, in part, in Brandendon, Florida. In my 25 years experience trading cheapies I have found Brandendon and Sarasota and Boca Raton capitals where stock scammers and cons live. I am sure it is just another MMTC coincidence.
What you do not understand is there are at least six different Listeria organisms that require six different tests. If the great and almighty MMTC tests only one, the machine, if it exists, is meaningless as far as Listeria goes.
A trait of the Listeria organism, especially the more complex varieties, is its growth rate. One has a minimal 24 hour development period before it can be recognized, another has 30 hours and another has 48 hours.... that no one on the planet can get to move faster. This is why some Listeria is found after passed inspections.
Can MMTC get nature to change its course with its grocery scanner? Or does MMTC only test for the single most common Listeria organism making the device worthless?
These are very legitimate questions which no one here has appeared to even discuss in topic. I am sure you will, right?
Does anyone know why Listeria was the first certification sought and how many assay accomplishments were acheived? This is very important. There are six or more different organisms and if only one is recognized, the MMTC accomplishment is meaningless. The brief I read, I believe, states only a single accomplishment was made.
for the third time....... once I am finished with my query you will have ALL the information available on this board. Interesting stuff, I must say.
A great day to be trading, isn't it?