Cox Communications is a privately owned subsidiary of Cox Enterprises.

A GREAT DAY INDEED !
Like GB, I have been around since 2007. Long wait for all of us - longer for some - and a few who will smile down from heaven! As GB is laid to rest today, may his family find peace and comfort in his memory and may GB rest In peace smiling after court today.

GLTA

Looking forward to the big meeting with all of you.
Stay well.

I have been here since 2007.
I was part of the big split (IceWeb days).
Purchased a large amount at .00001 however, cost average pretty poor due to the split.
CA = .001
Definitely a millionaire on Cox alone!
Congratulations to all who stayed.
Many thanks to all who contributed.
Hopefully - we can all meet one day.
Stay well!

HI MIC - if you are planning to move with the fishing retirement crowd, you need to spell it correctly - Islamorada. And the Dolphin fishing takes everything away from any fishing you have ever done! I live on the west coast - near Tampa where Grouper and hog fish are the best! Go out every weekend I can get the boat down. One canal from the gulf and the tides get skinny sometimes. The "KEYS"..4 or more times a year just to fish! I have been here since ICEWEB days and am excited this is almost over the finish line...with more to come! GLTA and maybe we will meet on the "ultimate fishing charter" in the KEYS!!
Cheers!

CommScope stock down as Hickory company reports earnings

https://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/news/2020/02/20/commscope-stock-down-as-hickory-company-reports.html?ana=yahoo&yptr=yahoo

Carter is a shareholder - what part of THAT is so hard to understand!
If shareholders get ZERO that means Carter gets ZERO!
This stock isn't trading - why the interest?
There must be some concern that shareholders WILL get something out of this - the reason for paying close attention to the board?

ZW and others, this may have been asked and answered. I read posts everyday and do not recall.

QUESTION: Billy is a share holder the same as all of us. How can he be making "the deal" with his controlling interests? I do recall seeing a list of people standing by as officers to the company and cannot find it. I don't quite understand how BC can be part of any negotiations while he as controlling interests in CB. Am I thinking too far into this or am I missing information somewhere along the line here?
Thanks in advance for your reply.

Folks - if you open the link and go to July 25th - "Petition", page 3 mentions CommScope.


RULE 29.6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CommScope Holding Company, Inc. is a publicly held
company that owns 10% or more of the stock of petitioner
ARRIS International Limited.

David N. Watson serves as President and Chief Executive Officer, Comcast Cable and Senior Executive Vice President, Comcast Corporation.
Comcast chairman and CEO Brian Roberts

Daubert hearings occur when the validity of an expert's testimony is challenged due to the methodology used to form their opinion. Chanbond's testimony was challenged. We are currently awaiting the judge to post a date. Pacer updates (enclosed in stickies)can provide more details.

Hi UOIP investors,

There are four of us still around (know personally) reading posts everyday but do not feel the need to add to the guessing / speculation. That is all anyone can provide until there is a PACER update. Even then we only have guessing / speculation until the PACER update provides more detail other than dates!
Personally only looking for a pacer update and "skim" the rest of the posts. Until the Daubert / court, there is no need to add as everyone covers every angle,every day! As for the WAG - it would be amazing if there were an actual get-together when this is all said and done! I want to meet those who have contributed the most and have been around as long as I have (2007)!
GLTA

I am wondering (at this point) what the post will say when it is over and ChanBond wins? The posts are similar all around the board and there has never been a post indicating that posts were all a mistake!

has anyone ever seen this...
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/sec-filings/11010807/content/html

We are private now - why can't someone call Billy and report back?
Is he mad about the Cisco Appeal?
Does he care about it?
Where are we today as far as negotiations?
He could not talk before - he can now, can't he?

I was not quoted - Zomby was quoted in court papers. Would have to go back and look for it.
The "ZW Report" (Zombywolf Report) is referencing the report ZW provided us after he attended one of the court proceedings.

Looking forward to the "ZW report" like last time! Maybe they will quote you again in the jury trial!! Cheers to you and the wifey!
This has been a long road and we are reaching the palace!

ZW - thank you for the post. I like your little birdie! Are you going to sit on the court room for Cisco with Mrs Wolf this time?

a question for the team....
Prior to yesterday, everyone was calculating the OS when placing WAGs on the outcome. There is no OS now. So any settlement/buyout will only go to those holding shares (minus expenses). There are no more OS to come into play now - is that correct?

A motion for leave is a request to file something that is not automatically allowed under the law. Often, a motion for leave to file is used to request a time extension from the court. Once the court receives the motion, the judge may either grant or deny it.

Rules of procedure, which vary between courts, govern matters related to filing lawsuits. If a party must deviate from the rules in any way, that party must generally file a motion asking the court whether the deviation is acceptable. Sometimes, if a party does not request leave to break the procedural rules, the party may lose the lawsuit and have their claim dismissed or receive a judgment against them.

We have to remember, CISCO sold this part of their business a few years ago. This case will not affect CISCO if at all! Their infringement ended when they sold! CISCO still owes for past infringement up to the point of selling that division - but not current infringement. So there should be no change to CISCO

let'a shoot for my prediction of $6.35 and hope it's close that that!!! YIPPEEE!

IG...https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=315636449
For your information - please note the date of June 14th - that is today!!

June 14, 2019 4:49 PM ET
Company Overview of ChanBond, LLC

ChanBond, LLC was incorporated in 2014 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. As of October 27, 2015, ChanBond, LLC operates as a subsidiary of UnifiedOnline, Inc.
2633 McKinney Avenue
Dallas, TX 75204
United States
Founded in 2014
Key Executives For ChanBond, LLC
ChanBond, LLC does not have any Key Executives recorded.


SOME COMMENTS ARE WORTHLESS - JUST TAUNTING!

As the story goes....they (patent/technology inventors/ creators) allowed the cables companies to "use /try" the technology from 2007 to 2010...while they got their patents approved. The cable companies then took advantage - and here we are!

My prediction (since the WAG game started) is $6.31...and I am holding the number!!

I found a link to the "scare" the last few days:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2019/34-85194.pdf

It doesn't say UOIP will be revoked on March 11.
"...UnifiedOnline are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by March 11, 2019, why the registrations of their securities should not be revoked by default due to their failure to file an answer and to otherwise defend this proceeding. When a party defaults, the allegations in the OIP will be deemed to be true and the Commission may determine the proceeding against that party upon consideration of the record without holding a public hearing..."

Feel free to comment.

Here is what I have found regarding "public to private"....

If a company is turning private, it either means someone else is buying them out,(probably behind the scene scenario here) or they've made enough gain to make themselves self-sufficient (not the case for UOIP). Either way, your stocks are safe. To address the scenarios in reverse order: if they've gained enough profit without passing them onto the shareholders, they basically have to buy back their own stock. If they're being bought out, that newfound parent (be it another company or a single person with lots of money/way too much free time) can only demonstrate its ownership by taking stock in the company. It's technically impossible to render a share completely null and void without the company going utterly bust; that share, by definition, entitles you to any success the company enjoys, especially when it's doing well enough to be made desirable by an outside force.

A good example of this is Rareware (the guys who made the Donkey Kong Country games); they were owned 60% by Nintendo. Rare bought that 60% back from Nintendo, then turned around and sold themselves 100% to Microsoft. They went from being a Second-party developer (like Retro Studios or, once upon a time, Silicon Knights), to being (briefly) a Third-party developer, to finally becoming a First-party developer!

So the worry about public to private should not "worry" any of the long here!
Just my opinion!

VirnetX™ Holding Corporation (NYSE AMERICAN: VHC), an Internet security software and technology company, announced today that on September 20, 2018, pursuant to a Court’s order, attorneys from VirnetX and Apple have conferred and agree without dispute amounts for Bill of Costs and Prejudgment Interest totaling $93,351,141 to be added to the $502,567,709 jury verdict for VirnetX in the ongoing patent infringement action between VirnetX Inc. (“VirnetX”) and Apple Inc (“Apple”).

Hi "Teen"...did your "close" relationship provide you with information leading to your "TOP" price of $7.00/share prediction? Do you have any other news for us to "scrap" about?

Another great dismissal..awesome!

My point - 5G will 'exist' with WI-FI - will not 'replace' WI-FI.

JBBB
I just saw your post about "time" and "5G"....you are speaking of cellular networks - not WI-FI.
There is a big difference between cellular data (4G to 5G) and WI-FI.
Cellular (4G/5G) is offered by mobile carriers (ATT, TMOBILE) - covering large areas (cities/towns). WIFI is setup in your home/work and provided by ISPs (internet service providers) - covering smaller areas (your home, Starbucks, etc.)
You should google this if you want specific technical background about the difference between them.

***LONG UOIP***

Can we stay on UOIP / CHANBOND topic? If you want to discuss the weather, you can go to the weather channel ihub site:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/THE-WEATHER-CHANNEL-7924/

none of your shares are worthless.
But if you believe they are or will be, please post when you are selling, what brokerage firm, and at what price...I am sure the shares will be picked up.

your question comes about every 2 weeks or so and the main contributors on this site have answered it every time...so asked and answered!

ARRIS is not named in our process. They are indemnifying some of the cable companies they are partnered with. If ARRIS is purchased and we win, the debt ARRIS owes their partners will become the debt of the new company. ARRIS purchase has nothing to do with our settlement/patent buyout.

Hard feelings!! Absolutely not! This is a BIG WIN for all of us holding shares! It has been a long road for me personally since I held stock when this was IceWeb.
I really think it is hard to grasp how huge this really is!
I am long and strong with UOIP and in it to win it with everyone else here.

I would like to put in a guess at $6.35. This will be an unprecedented (guessing around $10B+...3 patents, 13 companies) win since the use of the technology is massive ~ world wide. I also think many of us cannot put out heads around the huge win this could bring. Good Luck to all.
$$$ UOIP $$$

thanks

Isn't today the day Deidre is to appear?
Zomby, will you be in the court room?

Let us know what they say. I would hate my share count to be missing a digit! But an added digit would be fine!!