Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There's just as much chance as the stock going to three dollars a share as an SEC suspension. Again, a statement with zero proof.
I predict once the new team is in place that the main part of the business will be in strong hands and this will take off
Wasn't that stuff like 20 or 30 years ago?? Oh, right ... it was decades ago.
Any proof to back up that claim???
You claim that "Goldberg has diluted INOH by 1,750,000,000 shares during this most current P&D"
Any proof that the CEO of this company sold even 1 share, let alone 1.75 Billion????
I'm talking about real facts to support this bold claim ... have any??
100% INCREASE IN PPS TODAY!! :)
Woo-hoo! The PPS doubled today. Good things are coming in my opinion.
GO INOH!!
Not significant at all. Considering that over the past 6 months, most of the volume was a few hundred million shares per day and that there was at least one day with over a billion shares traded, 10M shares is a pretty insignificant trade and insignificant volume.
Patient hands will prevail and be made very happy, IMO.
GO INOH!
INOH is representative of someone who does not give up. INOH is building something great for its shareholders and investors and will overcome anything in its path. INOH represents the American People who do not give up and use adversity to make themselves stronger.
GO INOH!
A new week and a new beginning here
GO INOH!!
Any proof to support this factual claim?
You stated: "he (the CEO) sells 200-300K dollars in stock per year"
Any proof? Tax returns? Anything? Inquiring minds want to know.
Thanks!
Agree with you 100%. Many others would have given up long ago but this CEO is trying to maximize return for investors!
GO INOH!!
I don't see this stock getting suspended anytime soon. Simply no facts to support such a wild accusation.
As for the current cash held by the company, let's wait and see current financials. Also, money could be raised by new partners. Just my opinion.
Those who are patient will be very happy, IMO. Can't expect a huge turn around overnight but it will come.
GO INOH!
I agree with what you're saying right here: Goldberg has other plans. He has plans to make this company great again. The rest of that stuff, I disagree with your opinion
Watch and see! Go INOH!!
.0001 will be the lowest but certainly won't be the highest! When this pops, watch out!!!
GO INOH!!
There is no RS coming. PPS going to increase substantially IMO.
GO INOH!!
Building something great IMO, but won't happen overnight. Good thing happen to those who wait!!
GO INOH!!!
Stay the course. Big things coming for INOH!!
GO INOH!!
So no dispensary opened today?? No CBD beverage product line introduced today for sale in supermarkets across the country?? LOL!!
Of course, not. That's not what this company is doing.
However, IMO patience should be employed.
IMO, INOH is building something but that it will take time.
I'm in it for the long haul.
GO INOH!!!
INOH did not open a marijuana dispensary today?? LOL!!
INOH never said it was going to open a marijuana dispensary ... I never saw any such claim by the company. So the fact that it cost $2M to open one? So??
No such claim by the company. Ever.
The business venture that is coming is clearly just being established. IMO, it will not be established tomorrow morning or the day after. Takes time and patience.
GO INOH!!
Agreed. Very boring lately.
That's OK ...building a successful new business venture does not happen overnight or in a week, month, etc.
GO INOH!!
100% increase in PPS today!!
Whoo-hoo!! (LOL!)
I had a feeling that the recent increases in the AS were not going to hurt this stock/company. Instead, this stock closed at a 100% increase in the PPS from yesterday!
GO INOH!!!
This information is patently false!
The information you post about the FDA's view on MJ or CBD in a beverage is false. There are numerous products on the market that are both edible and in a beverage. The FDA is concerned with labeling and marketing of products and claims about medicinal effects.
More importantly, the regulations are changing all of the time especially as more and more states are decriminalizing marijuana and permitting medical and, in some cases, recreational use. The treatment of MJ or CBD is different today than is was last year and will be different 6 months from now and even more different a year from now. States are evolving and loosening restrictions all of time. Also, there are numerous articles posted by those in the industry (including articles from legal professionals) which discuss the involvement of the FDA and reach conclusions directly opposite from your blanket statement that the "FDA website clearly states it is illegal". I see that there is no link posted ... just your false statement.
As to the cost to begin or continue with the develop of products (or a product line), while I have no verifiable facts, IMO the recent increases to the A/S is being done to raise money and get other companies/individuals involved in developing INOH's new line of business.
While I have no viable proof (other then reasoning and common sense), there is no verifiable proof that the recent increases to the AS is based upon dilution, dumping, etc.
GO INOH!!
New Business Venture ... Finally about to turn things around!!
I have plenty of patience. Building this company for the future. Don't care about the past. New people being brought in. Looking forward to seeing it happen. Many will be surprised, but not me.
GO INOH!!
I have plenty of patience. MJ will be a very lucrative field and will continue to grow stronger in the months and years to come (IMO). INOH is getting into this line of business but will not be established overnight or in a few short weeks. IMO, pieces are being put into place and that will move the PPS higher.
GO INOH!!
Thanks for posting this. The premise of the article is that "dilution" is not always bad for the company and, in fact, can be a good thing.
Here are some passages taken directly from the article which, in my opinion, apply to what is occurring right now with INOH and its new MJ business venture:
"Penny stock investors will often hear the term dilution and assume the worst. Dilution is often viewed as a negative thing for an investment, but like most things in the stock market, it is a little more complex."
"Any newly issued shares are sold to investors, and the company uses the money for working capital, or to pay debts, or make an acquisition." and the reasons may include "Paying executives and key employees: Companies regularly pay their key employees, or lure top talent, via shares or stock options. Penny stock companies are particularly fond of this maneuver because they may not have much cash to compensate executives but are able to offer shares that have potential to increase in value."
"Issuing new shares can help a publicly traded company by giving it the greatest flexibility to take advantage of opportunities as it implements its business plan. The benefits can be great, as long as the company is cautious of the potential for causing shareholder dilution."
There are obvious detrimental effects of dilution as well. Form your own opinion. But do not automatically conclude that the issuance of new shares is always horrible. This is especially true when a company with an already maxed-out AS (like INOH) is entering a new business venture and bringing on new members of management to run a brand-new division/venture as has been the subject of at least the past 3 press releases.
GO INOH!
That's inaccurate and misleading.
The FACT that INOH is embarking on a new business venture in the cannabis market is just that. If is is forward-looking by the obvious on-going nature of the statement, so be it.
The FACT that INOH added (past-tense) two people to their team in the cannabis division is not limited by a 'forward looking disclaimer'.
Again, any FACTS you may have to shed light on these two particular press releases that you care to share??
Posting an unsupported message on this board saying he is a "quack" does not mean it has "already been shown".
Thanks for your opinion.
Intelligent people can have different opinions. Any facts or proof to show that the new people added to management are unethical? Other than the fact that they elected to join this company and Goldberg despite your own personal misgivings? Any facts to support your opinion that Dr. Kenneth Hughes (who has a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Purdue University and is a former Chemistry and Biochemistry professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology) should be called "Dr. Quack"? If so, please share.
Thank you.
GO INOH!!
I did provide facts to support my statement that INOH is "building a new company and going into a new business venture" as you requested.
INOH has added at least two new people to their management team and are entering the cannabis market. In the past, the company had nothing to do with this line of business. Thus, it is a new line of business.
Just bc you call into quesiton those facts (with absolutely no proof that anything in THOSE PARTICULAR press releases is false), does not mean that that they are not facts. By contrast, they are not opinions.
If you are claiming that they are not facts, let's see what you have? If you have nothing about THESE PARTICULAR press releases, then you have nothing to disprove that they are, in fact, facts.
GO INOH!
Thanks for your OPINION.
Do you have any PROOF that anything in any of THESE PARTICULAR press releases (announcing the new direction of INOH and detailing what has been done so far) is not true???
Words or statements that say I should look at history will be ignored. The topic is THESE PARTICULAR press releases. Anything in any of these that you have PROOF is false??
Right ... a board for INVESTORS
and, as to your question, here you go:
In Ovations Holdings, Inc. Announces the Addition of Dr. Kenneth Hughes as Chief Science Officer
Enters Billion Dollar Cannabis Market With a Seasoned Scientific Professional
NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwired - Jun 21, 2017) - In Ovations Holdings, Inc. (OTC PINK: INOH) has hired Dr. Kenneth Hughes to lead INOH's entry into the Cannabis Industry.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/INOH/news/In-Ovations-Holdings--Inc--Announces-the-Addition-of-Dr--Kenneth-Hughes-as-Chief-Science-Officer?id=162718&b=y
In Ovations Holdings, Inc. Introduces Innovative Water Source Product For The Legal Cannabis Beverage Marketplace
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/INOH/news/In-Ovations-Holdings--Inc--Introduces-Innovative-Water-Source-Product-For-The-Legal-Cannabis-Beverage-Marketplace?id=163277&b=y
In Ovations Holdings, Inc. Appoints Gary Williams as its Lead Advisor of Operations for its Cannabis/Hemp Division
NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwired - Jul 19, 2017) - In Ovations Holdings, Inc. (OTC PINK: INOH) today announced that Mr. Gary Williams has joined the company as the Lead Advisor of our Cannabis and Hemp Division. Williams brings to In Ovations Holdings more than 20 years of experience in global operations. His experience includes coordinating the operations of large scale companies, and being responsible for their end-to-end supply chain management and product delivery.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/INOH/news/In-Ovations-Holdings--Inc--Appoints-Gary-Williams-as-its-Lead-Advisor-of-Operations-for-its-Cannabis-Hemp-Division?id=164961&b=y
HA! There is no need for "proof" when anyone can easily read the comment for what it is. It needs no interpretation.
What happened to the "MJ P&D"? I would not know bc it does not exist. It's like asking "where did the unicorn go?".
Fact is, INOH is building a new company and going into a new business venture. It will not happen overnight. It will not happen in a matter of weeks. But those investing in this company will ultimately profit (in my OPINION)!
GO INOH!
Still flawed.
So people who hold stock could post on the board, but his/her posts should be discounted or ignored due to the ill-founded "financial conflict of interest".
It's a distinction without a difference.
Please enlighten us as to the meaning of your sentence: Financial conflicts of interest in inoh clearly impacting pro inoh perspectives
If you say I have it all wrong, I would like you to explain the meaning in your own words.
Thank you.
GO INOH!
Nope. Flawed analysis.
The comment provided the opinion that those who own stock in this company have a "financial conflict of interest" and, thus, his/her view is impacting and should be discounted, if not wholly ignored. While it did not directly state this, that is the only logical implication.
So I raised the point that this is a stock message board for investors or prospective investors (hence the name: investorshub) and that simply owning stock in a company does NOT give rise to a "financial conflict of interest" which should be taken into consideration when a person reads a post by an investor in the very company that the board is about.
Wrong. The words I used are not identical, but the meaning is the same. That is not reasonably disputable.
Bid keeps rebuilding. A very good sign.
Each time a nervous trader or group of traders wants out, the bid keeps resetting. Earlier the bid was down to 10M shares and now the bid is right back up to nearly 60M. Looks like plenty of smart traders want to buy and hold.
GO INOH!!