Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Looks like SpyShelter is by far a better choice than GuardedID. It by far out performs GuardedID not only in functionality but price as well.
You do realize Bill has already confined they were paid for right? They are not real.
Or it could continue on its downward trend and reach no bid by weeks end. Thats also an options.
OK sure thing. BOEING doesnt even know TPAC exists. Bill still hasnt produced 1 TPAC bearing. Hard to sell bearings when you have never made any. LMAO
#21 on the breakout board. Distress call answered. Your welcome SFOR. Whats this company do? Oh who cares its a scam. Flip flop.
They will never purchase bearings from TPAC. They dont meet BOEING requirements. Even if TPAC does get the AS9100-C they still wont be a financially healthy company. That is also one of BOEING's requirements. And the 10k said TPAC needs 2 million dollars just to stay open. The 10q says 1 million but who knows what the real number is. Bill never tells the truth.
TPAC
No AS9100-C
No NAVAIR A Certification
Thank you for finally agreeing I was right. Its just like Microsoft to steal off of others much like they did with Apple. Anyway this POS will just continue its downward spiral till it hits now bid. But hey by all means load up the boat. Take out a second on the house. this baby is on the verge of nothingness. Sorry but I cant play anymore tonight. Have a good evening and enjoy the SFOR decline in pps.
Yes its unfortunate BOEING would never give TPAC a shot. Seems they dont have the needed qualifications to sell to BOEING. Plus lets be honest here. Why would BOEING ever even consider TPAC in the first place. After they started a background check on them they would run away. Not just because of Bill's continues lies but also because BOEING has a strict policy to only deal with companies in strong financial health. TPAC is broke and will have to close shop if they dont get 1 million dollars in the next few months.
What does a stock board have to do with TPAC accumulation taking place? The number of posters on any particular board is no reflection of the Accumulation/Distribution line of a chart. LMAO
Again that is incorrect. You can not gain access or authenticate to an application, device or network without existing code. It simply does not work that way. Computers are told what to do and how to do it thru code. That includes authentication processes.
Right thats for existing distributors. How many do they currently have?
But by then this will be a mute point anyway because technology will have advanced. This is already old technology to begin with. By 2020 it will be obsolete.
No thats constant EOD paint jobs to make the cart look that way. But charts dont matter down here in OTC. Just a useless tool to hype a POS like TPAC.
You can find the 8k at the upper left side of the page beside the ibox on the SFOR page.
I didnt say they did. I said Microsoft's code infringed on SFOR's patents. They could not do that without having code that violated the patents. LMAO these things dont run themselves. They have to be told what to do.
Please explain how Microsoft can infringe on SFOR technology with out writing or stealing their code. They cant. Even network protocols or access control is operated by code. LMAO
Only up to 2020 then they forfeit all sales. The 15 % only applies to existing distributors they currently have. Not Cyber Safety's
No need all of TPAC's information is listed on NVSOS. This information pertains to Bill McKay and his partner/sidekick/lover. Not sure what to call them.
Wrong.. They gave it up. They however do still have control of them till paid in 2020 or sooner if the note is paid in full. After 2020 they will no longer receive revenue from any sales
WRONG AGAIN.. First its claimed Microsoft code didnt infringe on SFOR's patent. I have provide that was indeed the case.
My post is 100% correct. Lets say Microsoft does still use their code. They paid 1 lump sum and will never have to pay them again. As of 2020 they forfeit all revenue from the patent sale to Cyber Safety.
How will SFOR profit? They sold the patents to Cyber safety. SFOR has to wait till 2020 to even get that money.
Yes with the exact street address and phone number as the Bill McKay that operates the TPAC scam. Bill either has a sidekick or a lover not sure which. LMAO
LMAO thank you for proving me right. Simply speculation or baseless opinion till the filings are released.
LOL I certainly wouldnt be missing anything of value. So leter rip tater chip..
Enjoy the mockery you have made here Janice. Ill find the information elsewhere.
Coming from you that doesnt mean allot. I used tot think you had a good understanding and were someone to look up to. Now I see I was completely wrong.
If you really cared what Im looking for then you would have already seen I dont buy these POS stocks. And I have to ask you, why would someone come to this board if they are looking for a ticker thats going to the moon as you call it. LMAO
I agree thats where you need to be posting. This boards needs to be free of clutter. If it goes dead on the weekends why does it matter. I dont think this is in competition to hit the breakout boards LMAO
Any board I go to if they are not posting on the topic then hell yes I tell them. Otherwise why not just have 1 board for everyone to sort out the information they are looking for.
I would agree 100%. I dont normally post here but I do use the board for DD. Its to a point that where its getting out of hand IMO
Yes they did. But its for crap already in use. Not for new release. LMAO they are not buying or paying any further licensing to SFOR. They settled on one lump sum for the use of code in pre existing products. Its not being used in any of Microsoft current coding . Thats called DD.