Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Buy June 14 Calls, strike 40.
So are you folks still happy with the price action?
This video of iphone 6 concepts shows "hinges"; a natural fit for lqmt technology/alloy.
If it " feels good" it could become a " feel bad" later if there is nothing of substance driving it; what are the business drivers at this juncture?
What will dilution from a potential settlement / additional annual mtg to vote in, for the innocent, potentially in February, do to the pps of this stock? What are the "new" developments driving pps?
Test
I'm thinking gdx/nugt continue bounce ( just a little at most) and then continue lower. GL
Hopefully people ( if any) feel intimidated or influenced by crowd peer pressure ( e.g. Taints, etc.), that they realize that there is an open market and other opportunities, and that you don't have to hang around ( especially when nothing is happening); that you cam always come back later, etc.
BTW, some options strategies can generate the gains that some are hoping for here and there are many securities that offer options ( this stock is not one of them).
Me too but sooner than this stock can generate it and with a higher quality security.
There's more than one game in town; for us/me at least, it makes sense to shop around.
I kind of think this stock in a way gives people something to do or come back to when nothing else is going on, e.g. takes up idle time.
There is probably more to get excited about ( occasionally there is a leak), but most people don't have the privileged info, come and go, etc.
For those that do, there may be something worth holding onto; they just can't say it; so instead they might make this a home.
I'll be eager to see what transpires whether I'm in it or not because so much intrigue surrounds it.
As for those with privileged info that resort to taunts, etc.; to heck with ya; if you operate on inside info at others expense we hope you get a big SEC fine for doing it.
I thought the last CC was much better, but it still didn't imply that progress would be made quickly.
If the company will focus more on disclosure and transparency, it will be better for shareholders even if the price if the stock doesn't appreciate.
Good day folks, our Sandy like bet is someplace else.
...and is it legit.
That's the question.
Is there actual transfer of wealth going on or not.
...meaning, do the large shareholders acquire them without inside i formation, or do they continue to acquire shares at general shareholder expense, e.g. dilution and pybacks, etc.
I don't think it matters if you are small or large in terms of share price; what seems to matter is who has the most shares and how they come about getting them.
...the point being, believing the company was a mistake.
Does that make an investor a moron?
If the company talks openly about a large potential contract ( being on the cusp of one to attract investors) and then the notion disappears without an explanation, who then are the morons?
The investors that believed it.
Unfortunately, it seems that way.
If their performance is gated by big customers, I wish they would make it clear.
In defense of the technicals, a bollinger band squeeze is headed LQMTs way; the question, will it expand upward or down.
...meant, not brassy.
The color options are spot on with trends in clothing, e.g. subdued natural colors, vs. Bold, bright, or metallic.
Motorola's motomaker:
https://www.motorola.com/us/motomaker?pid=FLEXR1&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=moto+x+launch&utm_term=motomaker&utm_content=purchase&gclid=CIC4uYuDobsCFe9Y7Aod3AwAAA&gclsrc=ds#exterior/backplate
If color choice is vogue, wonder if an all LMT case for AAPL meets the trend.
They may still be in the process of finalizing agreements, e.g. Joint licensing, marketing, sales agrements; who knows.
....enter VPC and another agreement negotiated when the company was in a "precarious" financial situation.
If LQMT hadn't secured financing to keep going, AAPL could have gotten all the patents; negotiating those terms in their agreement was an example of AAPL looking out for their future.
In other words, one could as easily say that AAPL wasn't going to save LQMT if they got in trouble before a specific date; no bailout.
Another example, when LQMT was about to run out of money ( the press pump that initially caught my attention), notice that AAPL didn't lift a finger.
If LQMT had "foreclosed" ( or gone insolvent ) by a certain date, AAPL would have gotten all the CIP patents.
I have to tell you that having experience in private industry ( big corps, etc.), corporations screw each other over all the time; it can be pretty competitive and cut throat.
For example, the agreement with VPC, that allowed for using Engel, etc., doesn't seem unusual at all in terms of how a company might position themselves and their future.
Maybe VPC should have recognized the implications of it from the beginning.
Also, if LQMT agreed to margins they can't live with, that would be short sighted on their part also.
I guess I don't really see the arbitration as that big of a deal in terms how it can do , e.g. How it can go.
To give an example, Motorola used have a relatively large budget for suing, etc. And it was considered cost of doing business.
For small businesses it's probably pretty bad. For big ones or officers coming from large organizations, it could be considered a tactic.
I didn't make this stuff up ( don't shoot the messenger).
I guess there are those that like the management and those that don't, etc.
I could appreciate the CEO more if he could communicate to the level of their bloggers about the potential of their business relationships, etc.
In my view, he speaks at too high of a level, e.g. broad sweeping statements, etc. without sufficient detail to be able to tell if they are making real progress, etc. In some ways, he also seems to undermine some points, etc.
Communications seems to be a weak point if they have more to communicate about.
I don't have a military background but i know that in private industry the terms can be used that way ( probably because civilians really don't know, etc.). To me at least ( no military, etc.), I see some similarities in cornerstones and beachheads. Either way it's a place of presence. As for getting beyond that point, it's all execution and more planning eight.
A cornerstone i plies to me at least that there is a belief that something can be leveraged in the future. Since no details are given, it remains to be seen what he is really referring to.
Making excuses for poor management is like making excuses to a significant other as to why there is low performance where both depend on it; no wonder this stock has resulted in failed personal relationsships, etc.
This stock seems to be a good one for investors in denial.
You may get your pop and then can do the taunt thing, or even get a good exit ( will be needed right).
BUT consider taking a good look in the mirror and ask yourself if you have enjoyed the ride.
They may be short on funds from time to time, but making outright misrepresentations and saying nothing to explain why they haven't materialized is a gross oversight in management in our opinion.
If you are settling for that, you may be settling for less in the future.
I would think that informed investors would be expecting more despite any other progress.
I agree with comments that the Engel relationship could be huge and that could be considered significant and progress made by the management, etc.
What has been lacking is their demonstration of negotiating contracts and partner agreements that lead to profit.
Examples of shortsightedness that have been stated many times:
1) gave away the CE market ( in exchange for IP, R&D, etc.)
2) negotiated an "exclusive" manufacturing agreement with limiting associated terms (low margin (split)->low/no profit).
3) an insatiable appetite to spend spend spend
4) misrepresentations about a potential large contract ( on the cusp), and then no mention of why it has not materilaized, NOTHING
Pity the long term investor that makes excuses for it.
I think when he says " cornerstone" it's kind of like " beach head"; something that can be leveraged as a potential starting point, e,g. A strategic position from which potential future execution could stem.
It is still all "talk" and no action; beach heads are only valuable if they can be leveraged going forward. It's possible they may not get beyond that point, or it's possible that LQMT's exit strategy is to plant seeds at these cornerstones with a lot future implied "potential" that an acquirer with more market presence and power could use as their starting point; the " valuation" would be based on more convincing " potential" than a prototype here and a prototype there, etc.
Note: trash attracts trash; avoid it.
Is that expected to increase or decrease share price?
Will it be a similar trading environment post conversion?
How long do you think this security will be around? When might it be delisted? Any perspectives on that?
How long do you think this security will be solvent?
So basically, BAC and Citi can't really be trusted; just stick with GSs position on a drop in gold. Why can only 1 out of 3 be trusted; can they be?
All, we hope you get a great return on LQMT for your patience and diligence. We are not presently invested and decided to check in periodically (monitor less).
Good luck with your investment.
Which poster is Kang and why would he bother posting on this board?
If he has the wealth and shares implied, we wouldn't need to, right ?
I hope that everyone has a few relaxing days off and a packed refrigerator.
"oh the weather outside it frightful .... Let it snow let it snow let it snow ....."
It does. I wish I knew more. Engel/LQMT could probably answer that question.
"Contact Us" submissions on LQMT's web site are responded to. They would probably respond to your request or put ou in touch with someone who could.