Barchart.com lists this as a strong sell.

http://www.barchart.com/quotes/stocks/SUF

I don't know that I'd go so far as to say it has that much potential. At least not in the short term. I've just got a feeling about their technology. I've written this off for a while and will just hold on to it. It will either go up and I'll take a nice profit or it will go to nothing and I'll have it as a write off. Don't spend your wad on this. It's a long road ahead.

I couldn't agree with you more. Doubled my position last week in anticipation of numbers and then that bomb of a PR drops. Sucks... Down 30% right now. I'll hold though; this isn't a flipper for me now.

The trade volume is too low for flippers. I'd rather point to a lack of interest in new players. If no one wants in people will naturally want out. Couple that with a lack of liquidity and you see a pull back. It's only two days of very light to non-existent trading. It's not time to panic and fear monger yet.

Time will tell. The recent sell off of shares by the company has me very curious. They have a huge amount of debt now as well. So much, in fact, that I suspect they will have to dilute for years if there is no customer soon.

A customer; a paying customer. One refinery testing the product sent it up and that cancellation sent it down.

It's a great concept, but I don't know why no companies are picking it up. Must be pretty expensive to implement.

Did you get a tiny bit sloshed?

Midget wall street porn?

Man oh man I wish I had UIS. They are on fire lately. I am kicking myself...

Right now I'm waiting for my account transfers to go through while I switch from ChoiceTrade and Sharebuilder to Scottrade. I've got 5 more days before I can really do anything. I'll be adding once the transfers are complete.

Are you suggesting Monkonuts migrate?

I am having problems with the scottrader tool, the new one. It's been flakey all morning.

Yep; can't flip without trade volume. Frustrating... :)

FTR: I still haven't flipped or sold, but I have tripled my position, in the last month.

Nothing like a little mystery to pique one's interest. We shall see. Without some numbers I hope there's no negative reaction to today's PR. I was hoping for a pick up in trade volume going into the next few weeks.

Totally. So far though, the company hasn't been too bad for making money. I'm up 900% from flipping and some long holds.

The suggested acquisition of insurance products has me baffled. Are they trying to buy a health insurance company? Who knows... Interesting to say the least.

I really love messing with the eternally euphoric:

Maybe it's code for them trying to acquire Accretive Health: http://www.accretivehealth.com/

Ha! Couldn't resist.

Sweet. Glad you heard from them. If my dang accounts ever transfer from my old brokers to my new I'll add to my position. I hate waiting... :)

SANW - S&W Seed Co. - Agriculture

The article below is from a "stock picker" site so it could just be a P&D. It trends OK though. May be worth a look. As far as I can tell they are not owned in whole or part by Monsanto.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/247864-s-w-seed-co-worth-risks-for-small-cap-agricultural-play

Totally. Have you been watching DLM? I'm not in them, but I've been looking for some of their vendors to play.

Yep. I've been out of it for a while and have been watching for a low entry point. Sure missed that. :) Someone is making a killing right now though.

UIS - Don't know if you have been watching them, but it's been fun lately.

You shouldn't have asked on iHub then mate.

Especially since Ms. Sharapova is currently at my house and she is wearing a Princess Leia outfit.

I couldn't agree with you more. There's a reason I posted multiple explanations. One should never trust the machinations of a single source.

I am no expert and freely admit that. I think that you may mistake my post as arrogant pedantry, however, I assure you, it is not.

I had two read that to times too understand it.

Ha!

Back when I was an IT project manager I had to deal with Apple Legal on two occasions. They were very clear about "Proper Use" of their logos. I had to submit anything published (on the web) with their logos or trademarks for approval. Approval was fairly quick though; it took about 10 days.

Yep. I am ready to load up a bit more heading into the numbers. I haven't heard any more about upgrading platforms, but I have also not really been looking. Since this is so predictable on it's movement I've been lax in research. Probably ought to get off my bum on this.

Here's a couple of explanations on what those numbers mean.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=54296242

I'm not posting this to be a negative Nancy; I just think it's important that people are able to understand what the daily numbers actually show and how they are reported.

I did not write the quoted posts.

Well... At least they are announcing what they are doing. Too bad they are announcing that their stock is worth a nickle less than it was trading. Bummer.

Yep. Wonder if any of them find it suspicious that they are being asked to send SIGNED shares to the TA?

Well it's not a bad sign. Did you bump your order to the ask again when it went up?

It's a great company, but there's no real interest as evidenced by the fewer than 20 trades per day average. I agree that it's a great time to load, but unfortunately, there's time. Which means I'll probably sit on my hands for a while and continue to watch it.

And try to mention that to the koolaidians and you get roasted and branded with a scarlet "S" as shorty.

It's fun to watch them squirm around for new ways to blame everyone but lack of demand for a pps in stagnation.

I'm especially fond of the notated charts. It's an even bigger bonus when the security has fewer than 100 trades per day.

Why bring logic and reason to a koolaid fight? :)

That would be an acceptable trade off.

Sure would be nice if the shorty, FLD, NSS, and other stupid arguments were cause for immediate and unconditional removal from iHub.