Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Several changes at OTCMarkets profile today:
9/13/21, 03:56 PM
$MTRT
- update
Pink Current, AS: 15M, OS: 13M
Address Updated:
Removed: 6 Mohawk Drive, Clinton, CT, 06413, United States (GMaps)
Added: 420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 300, New York, NY, 10170, United States (GMaps)
Phone Updated:
Removed: +1 585-451-2563
Added: +1 212-479-2580
Incorporation Info
Added: 1976
Director(s) Added:
Kiwoon Biak, Director
Yunho Chung, Director
Pan Jong Kim, Chairman
Director(s) Removed:
Stanley A. Dahle, Director
Veronica M. Dahle, Director
Officer(s) Added:
Pan Jong Kim, CEO, President
Yunho Chung, Vice President, Secretary
Kiwoon Biak, Vice President, CFO
John Chung, Counsel
Officer(s) Removed:
Stanley A. Dahle, President, CEO
Email Removed.
standahle33@gmail.com
https://stocktwits.com/OTCshithead/message/379199298
Well said . . . .
(not exactly MTRT news, MTRT mentioned in passing only, with many other tickers, as having an "open invitation" for a future conference if they're interested.) Just want to keep it real and avoid building expectation for the wrong reasons. We have plenty of the right reasons. :)
(Question-to-the-board) I THINK I GOT MY ANSWER
Disclaimer:
I could be wrong!
But if I am, would somebody please tell me how and why I'm wrong, already?
Not some glib, cutting remark about how dumb I am or what a pumper I am, but in a friendly and intelligent manner providing the information I'm missing?
Otherwise I am becoming more and more convinced it's as cut and dry as below, and am just trying to be helpful.
Source outside IHub told me,
"IF I was MTRT management I would issue myself a control block. That would be 51% of 2,000,000,000 which equals 1,020,000,000. Assuming all 5,000,000 preferred/restricted are issued as the control block would require that 1 preferred equals 204 common shares. That leaves 980,000,000 shares for capital expansion or whatever. THAT'S JUST ONE IDEA. At this point really doesn't matter until they reveal the plan for expansion. Done talkin."
May be true after all.
Seems our eventual O/S depends, in large measure, on the 5,000,000 Preferred Shares' CONVERSION RATE.
(Which should be determined on Sept. 20.)
Not that a low conversion rate would guarantees a large S/S . . . (companies often authorize way more than they expect to issue, so they don't have to go through the entire process all over again, of increasing the A/S, since it's not easy.)
But IF a very high conversion rate is voted in, it WOULD tell us how many commons ARE EVEN AVAILABLE for issuance, meaning we COULD BE CONFIDENT to assume Medium isn't planning to issue very many shares any time soon.
FOR EXAMPLE:
(using the same math above
and assuming all 5,000,000 preferred shares are convertible and intended to be a control block)
If 180:1 is voted in, that means no control block; so can only guess higher. (5,000,000 Preferred shares times the 180 common shares each of them requires to be authorized, equals 900M of the 2B A/S, or less than 51%.)
If 204:1 is voted in, 980,000,000 shares would be available for potential issuance.
If 250: 1 is voted in, 1,250,000,000 token shares out of the 2B A/S would have to not be commons, so they could potentially convert to commons. Leaving 750,000,000 commons available for issuance. (5,000,000 x 250 = 1,250,000,000.)
If 300:1 is voted in (5M x 300 puts us at 1.5B shares that must be left alone and not issued out of the 2B), that would leave 500,000,000 shares available for potential release into the O/S.
If 350:1 is voted in (5M x 350 = 1,750,000,000 commons that can't be issued out of the A/S), that would leave 250,000,000 shares even available to potentially be issued.
If 380:1 is voted in (5M x 380 = 1,900,000,000 commons that can't be issued out of the A/S), that would leave 100,000,000 shares maximum, that we could expect to be in O/S.
If 395:1 is voted in (5M x 395 = 1,975,000,000 commons that can't be issued out of the A/S), that would leave a maximum of 25,000,000 shares we might expect in the O/S.
Which will it be?
I think we'll find out Sept. 20, or at least when we learn the results of the vote.
"Exhibit A" tells us THEY ARE voting on adding 5,000,000 Preferred Shares on Sept. 20.
So that much we know for certain.
Let's assume Medium succeeds in voting in their own proposal of 2B A/S and 5,000,000 Preferred Shares, a pretty safe assumption.
Since Preferred Shares are usually used for maintaining a control block and are convertible, I suspect they'll have to attach a conversion rate to them that same day.
Less than 204:1 would not yield a control block; and over 4:00:1 is not possible.
So it seems reasonable the rate will come in somewhere between 204:1 and 395:1.
Which means the potential O/S could top out somewhere between 980M and 25M shares, assuming they even do issue it all.
But since they likely won't issue it all for a significant amount of time (if ever), the numbers we'll ACTUALLY SEE IN THE O/S should be A LOT LESS than that.
Just my thoughts and opinions.
And I'm dying to know if someone can show me where I'm wrong.
IMHO
'MDL Test Lab' participants include big players generating more than ten billion dollars in annual revenue, for example Microsoft, IBM, Informatica, AWS, Cloudera, according to the Press Release at https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/hankyung-com-s-introduces-medium-inc-releases-mdl-test-lab-for-potential-clients-to-experience-15-000-tps-on-e-o-v-architecture-based-enterprise-blockchain-solution-1029799383
That was 10 months ago.
Makes me wonder what other "big players" might be participating by now.
[The below Press Release should be compared to the article at https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ko&u=https://themedium.io/bbs/page.php%3Fhid%3DMXP&prev=search&pto=aue . . . . and/or the images at https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=165877333 , the fourth of which has to do with the 'MDL Test Lab' and the patents/trademarks that appear to be attached to some of MEDIUM'S technology. ]
Hankyung.com's Introduces: Medium Inc. Releases 'MDL Test Lab' for potential clients to experience 15,000 TPS on E-O-V architecture based enterprise blockchain solution
PRESS RELEASE PR Newswire
Nov. 12, 2020, 08:10 PM
SEOUL, South Korea, Nov. 12, 2020 /PRNewswire
-- Following announcement covered by Hankyung.com, The test lab is currently running on AWS (Amazon Web Service) Cloud Server and is open to the public for anyone to try out and verify MDL's TPS performance through Hyperledger Caliper and J-Meter. Components of the environment include 3 peer nodes, 3 orderer nodes that use a raft based ordering service, 1 channel, and 1 organization. Chaincodes used in Hyperledger Caliper are Smallbank and Simple.
Medium Inc. is an enterprise blockchain solution company that focuses on advancing TPS(Transactions Per Second) performance of Hyperledger Fabric. Hyperledger Fabric is the most widely used enterprise blockchain platform in the global market. Medium is currently delivering its solution, MDL (Medium Distributed Ledger), to numerous public and enterprise environments.
MDL is based on Hyperledger Fabric with three major improvement points. They are:
Performance improvement using cache
Performance improvement using parallel processing
Performance improvement using preprocessing
Through these improvement points, load on the CPU core can be efficiently allocated and unnecessary recomputations can be reduced, therefore resulting in a drastic increase in performance improvement range.
A Medium official stated that "Participants experienced 15,000TPS with 1.6sec Latency directly on the system console and are considering improving their Hyperledger Fabric based systems/services with MDL". Many of these participants include players in the global IT industry that run operations generating more than ten billion dollars in annual revenue. Microsoft, IBM, Informatica, AWS, Cloudera are a few examples of names on the participants' partners list.
A commonality these big players share is that they need a system that is able to process large amounts of data with sufficient speed, stability and precision. In order to commercialize enterprise blockchain in the global marketplace, it is essential to introduce a high-performing blockchain technology solution at a serviceable level. Medium has reached this milestone with MDL and is on its way to further develop the technology to a level that is unrivaled. Medium Inc. is to open ways to practical and reliable high performance enterprise blockchain system builds.
Pan Jong Kim, CEO of Medium Inc, has stated that "through this test lab, global leading companies have started to pay attention to Medium's unique blockchain technology. Specific business discussions toward technology commercialization are in progress with participants, and more aggressive marketing activities are to be conducted through a process that will allow easy and convenient introduction of MDL around the world."
View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hankyungcoms-introduces-medium-inc-releases-mdl-test-lab-for-potential-clients-to-experience-15-000-tps-on-e-o-v-architecture-based-enterprise-blockchain-solution-301172479.html
SOURCE Hankyung.com
IMHO
QUESTION FOR THE BOARD PLZ
with Google's "Best Futurist" now on our team
Google's Best Futurist Joins KOK Play-Medium
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165870041
"The Future Favors the Bold." - Dr. Thomas Frey
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165875629
IMHO
Korea Testing and Certification Agency(KOTCA) performance test results
Measurement date 2021.1.27
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ko&u=https://themedium.io/bbs/page.php%3Fhid%3DMXP&prev=search&pto=aue
Nice catch Welcome2Pinkyland.
LOOKS LEGIT.
That certification was from back in January.
Now compare to the below, which seems just as legit:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165873478
Do you disagree it's factual that MTRT would have to authorize enough shares to allow preferred shares to exist, assuming a conversion feature might/perhaps be attached to the preferred shares? (Which we won't know until finalized?)
And if at that time we learn a conversion feature is attached to the 5,000,000 proposed preferred shares, would that guarantee at least a portion of the A/S would not be available for issuing commons? (Unless they increased the A/S yet again?)
Please, I'm interested in learning what you know about this matter.
Thanks.
"In fact" is just a figure of speech lol
I never claimed it was a fact!
In fact (pun intended), I literally stated "we won't know until the re-structuring is complete."
How'd you get me claiming a fact, out of "we won't know?"
Oh, you didn't know that's how it works?
RE: the Sept 20 MTRT shareholder meeting@Medium HQ in South Korea:
Plenty of possibilites. Some will assume the worst. Others will take chances on the best. We don't even know the full 2B A/S proposal will pass, seeing that number may have been selected by MEDIUM's management when the stock was less than a dime. Any number voted in smaller than 2B, will be seen as a large and immediate catalyst. At the same time, we shouldn't assume or build expectation for that. I suspect they might pass the full 2B, but I also suspect it will be passed mostly as a formality to allow preferred shares to exist, with no intentions of ever issuing many shares. In fact, depending on the conversion rate of the preferred shares (which we won't know until the re-structuring is complete), it's not even possible for more common shares to be issued beyond the token shares authorized just so the preferred shares can exist. So if the conversion rate comes in lower than expected, that too would be an immediate catalyst.
A/S does not equal O/S. Market Cap is per O/S not A/S. I would hate to assume the worst, only for a better-than-expected share structure to actually emerge, on what's really starting to look like the biggest reverse merger the otc will ever see.
What we do know is that MTRT's CEO and MEDIUM'S CEO is the same person https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165814485, that he's the one behind (and signing) MTRT's " Exhibit A" https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165868883 , and that MEDIUM owns what appears to be trademarked/patented technology https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165873478 that looks to be literally taking over the world:
***MUST SEE*** 3-minute video HARDWARE/PATENTS/TRADEMARKS-->
Outstanding post! Perfect example of A/S increase for structuring a merger NOT translating to O/S:
Adding shares to A/S MOST LIKELY to facilitate a merger... I wonder "who" we might be merging with?
These guys? https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165870457
But why do I say most likely "to facilitate a merger?"
SHORT EXPLANATION #1:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165869314
***MTRT@MEDIUM Headquarters4shareholder meeting& Medium CEO our CEO! ...
MTRT at MEDIUM Headquarters for our own (MTRT) shareholder meeting, with Medium CEO presiding as our own (MTRT) CEO?
Indicates "nothing"?
Really?
"EXHIBIT A" ATTACHED AND EXPLAINED
I received it from the Transfer Agent after market close Friday, and thought to keep it to myself until I bailed.
Gotta be honest, when I heard that the vote concerns a 2B A/S increase, my first reaction was how am I going to sell fast enough Monday morning?
But your post really made me think.
In fact, I have totally changed my mind. (About bailing.)
Allow me to babble for a moment or two.
Apart from today's developments so powerfully validating a merger,
whether partial or full,
here's what I am beginning to realize:
If MEDIUM wanted to issue preferred shares to insiders just in order to maintain control, and if, just for example's sake the preferred shares had conversion rights of 400:1 (again, structured mostly for purpose of maintaining control), WOULDN'T THEY REQUIRE A LARGE ENOUGH A/S TO HYPOTHETICALLY CONVERT THEM EVEN IF THEY HAD NO INTENTIONS TO CONVERT THEM?
The point is, IT IS POSSIBLE -- we don't know yet -- that the 2B A/S proposal is mostly a formality so they can have their 5M preferred shares (and maintain control). (5,000,000 times "400" = 2B.)
Again, give or take; I just pulled numbers out of the air for sake of example.
More likely would be slightly smaller conversion rights, because it would leave room for share issuances for business needs, acquisitions, etc.
For example, 300:1.
Just to issue 5M preferred shares (for whatever reason) with conversion rights of 300:1... would require precisely 1,518,095,802 A/S.
(Because 13,095,802 shares are already issued and we would require an additional 1.5B more authorized just so the preferred shares could exist, plus another 5M for the preferreds themselves.)
But in that hypothetical case, a 1.5B A/S would leave no room to issue a single share for business needs or acquisitions.
If they wanted to issue at least some shares, which of course they do, it would make sense to make the A/S a bit higher than the portion that allows the preferred shares to exist.
For example, 2B instead of 1.5B.
Is something like this what MEDIUM has in mind?
I think so.
Maybe.
Maybe not.
But it would be quite the shame for me to bail now,
after being so convinced of the enormity of MEDIUM and
the almost certainty of either a partial or even full
merger of all their assets into MTRT,
only to find out later that MEDIUM only ever
intended to issue a few hundred million shares
in the first place (the rest being
just to accomodate preferred shares)!
Another consideration:
What did HMBL do after raising their A/S to 7.45B upon the merger with TSNP (almost 4 times as high as the 2B proposed for MEDIUM)? Gave insiders preferred shares? With the massive A/S increase but a formality making it possible for those preferred shares to exist? Whatever the case, here we are nine months later and HMBL STILL has less than 1B O/S.
Again,
A/S DOES NOT EQUAL O/S . . .
and
a huge A/S increase that's never intended for actual issuance, is often used for facilitating the required conversion rights of preferred shares which are strategically used for maintaining control . . . AND having room to issue shares for acquisitions, etc.
Light bulb moment for me!
I HAD THOUGHT for a moment that a large A/S increase would make the enormity of MEDIUM irrelevant;
but upon some reflection, it turns out the enormity of MEDIUM would make a large A/S irrelevant instead!
A final consideration:
WHAT IF Medium's securities counsel knows what they're doing?
I mean, and has told the company what we already know?
That is, WITH SUCH AN UNUSUALLY LOW FLOAT the only way to have sufficient liquidity would be to do AN EQUALLY UNUSUALLY LARGE FORWARD SPLIT?
1:10?
1:20?
Even 1:50 would only put us at 654M O/S, not hard for that SS to trade at a few bucks per share . . . . TIMES 50!
I've some of these unusually large FS plays before.
And they were some of the most monstrous gains I've ever seen.
HERE IS THE FULL SHAREHOLDER LETTER,
INCLUDING "EXHIBIT A":
IMHO
It's as simple as that
board of directors?! MEDIUM'S CEO is on board of directors, but is ALSO literally MTRT's CEO! LOOK for yourself . . .
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165814485
That's something that IS for certain.
Also for certain is we're holding the MTRT shareholder's meeting in MEDIUM'S headquarters. LOOK for yourself . . . https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165856775
No, nothing's certain about what comes next, I agree.
But sometimes you take chances based on connecting the dots the best you can
JMHO
No, change of control already occurred!
This vote must represent something else.
Namely, MEDIUM moving ahead Sept 20 with their plans for MTRT.
They are voting on precisely "how" to proceed with Medium's business through the ticker MTRT.
somebody pinch me
IMHO
"MTRT SHAREHOLDER" MEETING WILL BE HELD NOT AT SOME HOTEL BUT IN MEDIUM'S OWN OFFICE ON SEPT 20
HERE IS THE ADRESS MEDIUM GIVES AT THEIR WEBSITE:
https://themedium.io/bbs/write.php?bo_table=contact
CONTACT US
A.
MEDIUM B1, 2F, 3F, 4F, 211 Hakdong-ro,
Gangnam-gu, Seoul,
Korea Seoul Gangnam-gu Hakdong-ro 211, Basement 1F, 2F, 3F 4F
AND HERE IS THE ADDRESS ON THE SHAREHOLDER LETTER INVITING MTRT SHAREHOLDERS TO SOUTH KOREA TO VOTE:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165854237
211 Hakdong-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, South Korea 06052
Massive DD thread/LINKS on one page, in case you missed it
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165823490
Agree...place your bets...also possible they do a FS to increase liquidity?
whatever the case Medium is confirmed,
which is beyond huge
Main thing is MARKET CAP IS CRAZY LOW for any decent merger, let alone perhaps "the" biggest otc merger imaginable
(these guys taking on FAANG stocks with billions in investment https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165823490 )
But you're correct, would be nice to know what we're voting on.
not meaningless, for one thing Matt not going to email Exhibit A to just anybody on the phone (without confirming they are shareholders),
and for two,
the letter we did see confirms IT'S MEDIUM inviting MTRT shareholders to South Korea to vote!
Just got off the phone with Matt myself! StockRocket telling truth, thank you SR!...
MEDIUM (not Stan) HAD MATT SEND OUT A LETTER to MTRT shareholders "who had certificates or who were on the register".
I told him I have shares I bought over the internet, asking if I would get the letter; and he replied, "Not if you bought on the street, probably not."
Categorically false claims that INTRO fake & coming from iPhone -- THE PICS IN INTRO CAME DIRECTLY FROM MEDIUM'S OFFICIAL YOUTUBE CHANNEL, and were posted there a year ago.
(i.e., impossible for them to be part of a current scam.)
I'M THE ONE WHO CREATED THE SCREENSHOTS OF THEM!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165781770
Watch these two videos from Medium's official YouTube channel, and see the INTRO IS 10,000% LEGIT:
1)
Um… incorrect— haven’t sold one share, planning to buy more.
Re: "the merger"
Not just change of control, as if we have no idea what MEDIUM gonna do with shell,
but prior owner literally calling it "the merger":
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165761872
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165761963
another email confirmation
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165763430
I, Frank, personally confirmed with prior shell owner
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165778917
Yet another confirmation
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165781227
To be "the next MTRT"... a ticker would need the following and a lot more
What have we gotten ourselves into? That's OUR CEO.
The Metal Arts Company, Inc. Announces Change in Control and New Management
New York, NY - August 30, 2021 – The Metal Arts Company, Inc. (OTC Pink: MTRT)(“MTRT”) is proud to
announce that on or about August 25, 2021, as a result of a private sale of 7,665,000 shares of common
stock of MTRT, control of MTRT passed to Medium, Inc., a company incorporated under the laws of
South Korea.
A new board of directors of MTRT, consisting of Messrs. Pan Jong Kim, Kiwoon Biak, and Yunho Chung,
were appointed. In addition the following individuals are now officers of MTRT: (i) Mr. Pan Jong Kim is
now serving as chairman and chief executive officer, (ii) Mr. Kiwoon Biak is now serving as vice president
and chief financial officer of MTRT, and (iii) Mr. Yunho Chung is now serving as vice president and
secretary of MTRT.
MRTR is still a shell company as that term is defined under Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We will change "the digital content market"
I THINK what they are referring to with those words, is competing on a serious level with Google, Apple, Netflix and Youtube, as explained in the article entitled,
KOK PLAY receives $63 Billion Dollars to take on Google, Apple, Netflix and Youtube!
https://robertshim.medium.com/google-beware-this-company-is-coming-for-you-a997f9222dec
In other words, the very real Times Square advertising ("We Will Change The Digital Content Market") seems to be confirming before our eyes that too-good-to-be-true, pie-in-the-sky article about a $63 billion investment enabling them to take on the FAANG stocks.
Think about it.
The common denominator of those biggest companies, Apple's hardware division aside, IS WHAT?
Digital content.
Which is dependent on speed.
Which Medium alone HAS!
Which is why we're advertising in Times Square that we will change what?
THE DIGITAL CONTENT MARKET.
I really don't think Medium plans on "doing nothing" -- or doing small things -- with their MTRT shell.
Do you?
IMHO
To those anxious about "hearing from the company"
That not how it works.
We're on their time table, they're not on ours.
We may or may not hear for them for who knows how long.
What you gonna do then?
You have the option to buy in sooner... or later.
Before everything is certain, or after the fact.
Different sorts of plays, with very different returns.
If you wait until after the fact on a play of this magnitude, you'll likely pay exponentially more per share.
Which is fine, if that's what you want.
But this ticker is worth $50.00 if there's EVEN A CHANCE Tech Giant Medium, Inc. is going to trade with our letters.
And a chance, there is.
There really is.
More likely than not they will, since they took control of MTRT, as confirmed repeatedly by the old owner of the shell.
I highly doubt they took control of the shell (and instantly made it PINK current) "for nothing."
Worst case would be they only merge in a "part" of their gargantuan business.
(Why else buy a shell?)
I don't care which "part" of their business it is, if you put it into a 7M float shell, it's going to go higher.
Then again they might just haul off and put all their divisions into MTRT.
We just don't know.
And won't know, until Medium decides to tell us.
Either way, they are professionals, know what they're doing, apparently had counsel find the cleanest shell out there, and likely will only do BIG things with it.
One way to trade, not the only way, is to buy dirt cheap tickers about which you know very little, and let them "age."
(Or see what information does eventually come out.)
At our current $45M market cap ($3.49), I do consider MTRT to be dirt cheap given what I do (and don't) know at this time.
And am planning on letting it "age" over time.
That's the way the ABSOLUTE BIGGEST MONEY is made, assuming good things do in fact come out.
For example, those that made the biggest money in TSNP and ENZC didn't buy and hold "after" much was known, but bought dirt cheap when very little was yet known, and they held IN CASE more info came out... (which it did).
If this is how you want to play, which I do, it's best to pick tickers with the best chances of having eventual big developments (like ones that have a tech giant take control of their shell! lol), and buy them while yet CHEAP (in terms of market cap) . . . which means BEFORE everything is certain.
If you'd rather wait until everything is certain, can only complain until we hear from the company, and feel happy to keep raining on our parade, please... just leave this board and go play with blue chips.
I'm as comfortable as I can be, with what I do know (and don't know) about this play at this level.
So PLEASE STOP with the FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt)!
IMHO
MTRT to ride the low-float mania it created:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165793866
MTRT $3.50 is about to ride the same low float mania that it caused!
"The Next MTRT" . . . is MTRT!
All you need to know is Medium has an inconceivably fast, world-changing blockchain hardware solution, is in talks with industry giants, ready to make possible the sort of smart cities only imagined in the movies (https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165793326), and that this same Medium just took control of the 15M A/S MTRT shell.
What exactly Medium does with their shell, we don't yet know.
But I'm not going to be on the sidelines when we find out!
Everything else is details, and it's going to explode before we get more information, with or without you!
IMHO
quite the article there...
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/medium-launches-testnet-up-to-10-000-times-faster-than-bitcoin-300945427.html
Medium launches TestNet, Up to 10,000 times faster than Bitcoin
NEWS PROVIDED BY
Medium
Oct 25, 2019, 02:00 ET
SEOUL, South Korea, Oct. 18, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Medium recently launched TestNet, a high-performance blockchain platform of with speeds of up to 100,000 TPS, which is 10,000 times faster than Bitcoin, more than 3,500 times faster than Ethereum, and 250 times faster for EOS, Medium said.
Medium BlockChain
The TestNet at Medium has achieved 100,000 TPS based on the Hyperledger Caliper. Medium's high-speed blockchain starts from Blockchain Processing Unit (BPU). BPU is a completely different process from the existing CPU-driven software acceleration, and the core of the technology is the innovative improvement of blockchain processing speed through dedicated hardware.
According to Medium, the TestNet launch was prepared for security and stability with the participation of Korea University Blockchain Research Institute (Professor Inho Ho), who specializes in information security.
A Medium official said, "The speed of the medium blockchain is currently exceeding 100,000 TPS and 300,000 TPS is expected. We plan to implement 1 million TPS within this year." It will provide 100,000 TPS, which is significantly higher than the blockchain speed."
"Individual participants can realize the speed they had imagined, and the capacity can be adjusted according to their needs. It means that the day is not too soon to experience smart city, which is only seen in movies."
Medium's hardware-based blockchain is currently in talks with blockchain hardware supply contracts with overseas giants, a media official said.
According to the medium, the blockchain industry has a common opinion that hardware-based blockchain technology will become the core of the blockchain ecosystem in the future.
SOURCE Medium
that was 2019 . . . wonder what kind of progress by now lol
IMHO
When did SDVI become "Transfer Agent Verified" Status?
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SDVI/security
https://stocktwits.com/frankafol/message/376555146
likes...reshares...comments...will get more eyeballs on us
(at least it will point them to this board to get ALL OF YALL'S TOP-NOTCH, JAW-DROPPING DD!)