Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
and thats ontop of the new lqmt formulas/machine process invented with the maze outside of cip/apple.
are you claiming patents dont expire?
the mta tta xyz are dead long live the pla
there is an enormous difference between making a complete consumer electronic that is sold directly to the end user/consumer and making parts for a consumer device that are supplied to assemblers/oem.
the maze/lqmt/lugee supply ce parts to manufactures.
the maze/lqmt/lugee do not sell ce devices to consumers.
lqmt does not compete against apple in the ce market.
so you could say lugee fiduciary duties to eon shareholders and the chinese government would be to make lqmt profitable.
outstanding !!
thanks again josh for the informative posts.
both case studies linked in the md&m post only promote lm105 so its possible there are engel machines at the yihao facility now that lake forest is closing local production.
just guessing it would be from time of parts delivery to assemblers?
could take upto 120 days to pay suppliers
the first time know of yihao existence in the maze was november 2016 courtesy of josh.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126828084
i understand what your saying but for all those years that josh has been laying out the logic a handful of 'no ce/106’ posters have been demanding links/proof of his foresight while continuing to make false claims that lqmt/lugee and even eon are banned from ce markets and championing the ip theft conspiracy.
so much for all those lengthy/numerous claims that lqmt is forbidden from ce/106.
but but but how do we know the article is referring to our lqmt and not some generic amorphous metal since it is written with 2 words as liquid metal so just because it says 'liquid metal' does not mean its our liquidmetal.
yes yes i jest but just wanted to highlight the absurdities of late.
now let me tell you a couple of tall tales of how lqmt and its ceo/chairman/largest shareholder have no rights/use of 106c and that they are not allowed to manufacture ce parts contrary to what they advertised on linkedin/tradeshow booths/lqmtchina/yiaho websites.
as always josh thanks for your posts.
yes textured silica glass mold
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=8&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22amorphous+metal%22&OS=%22amorphous+metal%22&RS=%22amorphous+metal%22
hafnium is an impurity of an amorphous alloy lugee invented
9to5/patently apple have got it wrong the back of iphone is not metallic glass its silica glass with a frosted finish via etching of some sort.
the patent lists lm105 and other amorphous alloys not silica glass.
the mold is silica glass with a textured finish that is transferred to the metallic glass during molding.
no translation issues jay both descriptions groove/trench are in the patent.
http://pdfaiw.uspto.gov/.aiw?PageNum=0&docid=20150121677&IDKey=F1633049740B&HomeUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fappft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO1%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526d%3DPG01%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.html%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526s1%3D%25252220150121677%252522.PGNR.%2526OS%3DDN%2F20150121677%2526RS%3DDN%2F20150121677
ahh yes once again we claim lugee has no interest in making his 415,000,000 lqmt shares profitable and while we are at it lets claim lugee has no fiduciary duties to lqmt and other shareholders in america.
we rely on lugee greed to make sure revenue only goes through eon without articulating how lugee is going to justify a proper business reason for doin so to his other shareholders.
assumptions for your assumptions
-penny parts
-expensive machines
-60% split to maze
-doubtful any meaningful revenue if any shared with lqmt after factoring initial outlay for machinery investment by maze.
after all those expensive machines have to be paid for first and its obvious lqmt didnt pay for those machines.
but dont worry look at my profile pic big money parts are on the way
still waiting impatiently for the apex to be released.
what makes you think lqmt wont get any revenue from apple when lqmt has already been paid for previous work/research by apple and so now you are claiming yihao does make the face id frame for apple.
lugee will make sure some of that revenue goes through his 45% holdings in lqmt
coincides well with lugee maze build out and apple 5g modem.
1 final year to accumulate lqmt.
https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/09/25/kuo-2020-iphone-will-borrow-from-iphone-4-metal-frame-design