is...
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Very solid finish to the week after the impatient seller threw away 100k shares with a market order yesterday. Some nice capitulation and the stock finished strong after the fact. We may continue to consolidate on lower volume but every day that we hold here we're that much closer to our big move through .12. Patience will continue to pay off and things should get much more exciting once we're finally through that .12 ceiling.
Nope, it was absolutely positively a buy order for 100k shares. It was a limit order for 100k shares which started out as a bid at .085. That bid got a few small hits, then the order was moved up to .09 where it cleared out the offers at .088 and .09, then the remaining 56k sat there on the bid at .09 until it was eventually filled in smaller orders. The order was filled in it's entirety at 12:04:34.
It was a 100k buy order at .09.
Oh yeah? Those ones right there? The random trades from 12 years ago? Those ones specifically are 'frontloading'? That's quite the long con, isn't it? And what about the ones not in bold? Those aren't 'frontloading'? So they 'frontloaded' 10 million shares 12 years ago and have waited all this time to execute on their nefarious plan? Wouldn't that just be called investing? What's wrong with buying shares on the open market?
I have so many questions.
They don't look like they're required to file with the SEC. They don't have SEC delinquent status, just dark/defunct. They shouldn't be at risk of getting suspended.
The wall at .0004 is on borrowed time.
$DFCO is the only stock to break all the rules of logic. Nobody gives a damn about it yet they for some reason aren't selling. Someone holding shares in the green is called a bagholder. It's a pump and dump that is hovering and holding at 12 year highs.
You'd think other OTC companies would follow this magical formula instead of actually following the rules of logic, like how those stocks all sell off when no one gives a damn about them. And those bagholders are deeply in the red. And those pump and dumps actually lose all their gains and then some.
This is fun. See you at $1+.
I love it, the low volume consolidation at this range just continues to bake us into this base, from which we're setting up to breakout from. It will be glorious. 2.5+ years of holding and it's looking better by the day. See you at $1+.
My eye for accumulation has been developed over 15 years of trading and the criteria I use to distinguish it I've learned through trial and error. No one taught me it, it's what you could call a proprietary tool that I possess. What you call accumulation is not what I am referring to and painting has absolutely nothing to do with it, which proves you and I are not referring to the same thing when we speak of accumulation. Like I said, I've made a living off of this for a long time.
I don't even care to argue about whether this stock is 'legit' because what does that even mean? Enron was legit in the sense that it made a lot of people a lot of money before the rug was pulled. All I know is that we're going a lot higher and I will continue to sell small blocks into that strength and will ride out a lot for the long haul, with no risk at that stage. See you at $1+.
That makes no sense. If no one gives a damn, that means everyone holding would be selling. If you own something and don't give a damn about it, what do you do? Do you hoard it and refuse to sell it into the market? This is trading above 99% of it's volume over the past 12 years, which means that almost anyone can turn around and sell their shares for a profit. That logic is just beyond me. A 35k bid sat at 08 all day and no one sold into it. That's $2.5k right there if someone wanted it.. but they didn't sell because "no one gives a damn?". Come on. Look at all the volume from under .02.. anyone who is long from back then can do a lot of dumping into the bid and it would all be profits.. but they aren't selling because "no one gives a damn?".
See you at $1+.
Who cares? The company is selling a product and people are buying it! The shares here were accumulated and locked up a long time ago. The chart is the best in the OTC and we're a hop, skip and a jump away from new 12+ year highs. No one is selling.
I only understand one language, the language of the market. If the shares are getting locked up and no one is selling as the stock hovers at 12 year highs, that's enough for me. If the company has products and customers buying said products, again good enough for me.
I'm a chart trader who has done this for 15 years. Unique IP? May as well be speaking Greek.
Hive 9 looks to be killing it in Utah using our GlanHealth products!
http://www.findglocal.com/US/Kaysville/100764648256530/Hive9-Protection
Also Fatsachs showed me this today, more exposure for our 'pretend company'.
https://www.na-sd.com/2020/09/07/327169/alcohol-free-sanitizing-breakthrough-by-dalrada-health-s-glanhealth-
Trust me, I know exactly what the volume looked like, looks like now, and will look like in the future. This is a rare beast in that we moved up on all that volume way back when and the stock never fell from those highs. THAT is the important element here. Sure this isn't a liquid blue chip, it's a much different niche. That's apples to oranges.
The best plays in the OTC happen when a stock gets accumulated, the volume/liquidity dies off, and THEN it becomes liquid after the long spell of low volume. What you call a detriment is one of the most bullish aspects keeping me around. It's not that I don't care about the low volume, I actually love it! Market makers will always move a stock towards the trading ranges which attract the most volume and there's no sellers left to make that happen at lower prices. It's a matter of time before they have to move it up.
Mark my words, once we break .12 the $ volume and liquidity spikes and anyone holding and being patient will be rewarded. There are lots of ways to make money in the market besides trading blue chips, in fact I've made a living off of doing just that.
Wrong way, Jose.
I'm a chart trader, you're not speaking my language. I know what accumulation looks like on a chart, that's all I care about. Been doing this for a living for nearly 15 years now. What we've seen since the breakout of Jan 2018 is something a stock rarely does. You call it a pump but I see those all the time and they don't look like this on the chart. Show me a stock that trades it's entire float multiple times on a 1000% move then holds above that peak for any extended period of time, let alone 2.5 years now. Show me another chart like this in the OTC and we'll talk.
Pump/accumulation, the name doesn't matter. In my system I call it accumulation and it's a very bullish setup and an indicator that the price and liquidity are both set to explode.
I am sleeping like a baby these days, I couldn't feel any better about my stake in this company. The chart showed massive accumulation 2.5 years ago and it's only gotten better since then. The company has slowly but surely updated us on the progress of the company and the dilution has been done tactfully and strategically. The company is well on their way to profitability, if this most recent Q wasn't. Bonar has emphasized doing this the right way. I don't care about any of his past forays, I'm judging based on what I'm seeing in the chart and how this has traded, based on my own criteria. My criteria is my criteria, and based on that and that alone I'm John Holmes long.
The fact that $10k in buying at the ask would make for such a sizeable spike in volume shows you how much of a powder keg this truly is.
Yes, it's completely misleading. You act like it's a death sentence for retail but the fact is that whatever happens to us, happens to the owners/sellers of Prakat, Likido, Shark-It etc. If they felt comfortable selling their businesses for only modest amounts of shares as opposed to a set amount of money via as many shares as that would take, then I absolutely believe that's shareholder friendly terms. We got value added to our company without toxic dilution. Almost unheard of in OTC.
So misleading. The owners of all the companies Dalrada has acquired sold their companies for common shares of $DFCO, and not very much of them. Plain and simple their interests are the same as our interests, they want the share price to go up.
And the 10m shares added (or one day will be added) via the S-1 are issued at .08. So anyone buying those shares quite obviously also believes the share price will greatly appreciate.
So all the recent dilution has been done on favorable terms for us and also reflect the value behind the company/share price. No one sold their company just to dump a few million shares into an illiquid market and receive pennies on the dollar for their business, and no one is buying shares from Bonar at .08 without a firm belief that the share price is heading much higher.
So yes, now this group does have a significant amount of control but they also have all the incentive in the world to use that control to make a lot of money, and their interests are lined up with all current longs holding commons.
Dilution is an effective tool for adding value to a company when a company does things the right way, and that's exactly what we've seen. Between the shares issued for the acquisitions (shows the faith that the sellers have in our commons and DFCO as a whole) and the shares issued at .08 to family and friends, this is one of the most user friendly use of dilution I've ever seen an OTC make.
A stock trading at a decade long high is never meaningless and there are few if any OTC charts doing what $DFCO's is doing. Hence it's not common and it's very meaningful.
This is the proverbial night before Christmas for longs here, a little bit more consolidation until it's finally time to breakout through .12, at which point volume and liquidity spike considerably.
Gotcha, well on the ignore list you go and everyone else probably already did the same.
They're trying to shake out shares as they've tried for the past couple of years. It's been a battle of attrition but the longs here have been amazingly strong and have steadily locked up the float.
Nope, that was for the fiscal year. Their Q was a solid uptick over the prior one but we haven't broken the million quarter mark yet.
Nice try but shells trade at decade lows, not decade highs. They start to trade at the highs when they begin to show potential, then they consolidate at those highs as that potential becomes realized.
Show me another chart like $DFCO if they're so common. Anything close to a 2.5 year base of consolidation all at 12 year highs.
At what price will you shut the hell up? Asking for a friend.
This is going much higher than .0004.
This is a ridiculously perfect play to blow up. Great chart, great s/s for this price, biotech with promise in the pipeline, company speaks up for the first time in years this year and is working to get current. I mean come on! $$$$$$$$$
Nice ask slap at .095, there really isn't much left for sale under .10. At any moment a buyer could come in and clear out everything at/under .10 and that's when things start to get a bit more interesting. Ever since we pulled back from our recent highs (which are also 12 year highs) we haven't seen much selling under .10 which is a great sign for us.
Breaking .10 marks a pretty big step for us but the real party is reserved for when we can finally take out .12, from there we'll see spiking volume as we breakout to new 12 year highs.
I can all but guaranty you that this will be moving much sooner than that.
That's not uncommon in the OTC, but that doesn't mean stocks like that won't bottom out eventually, see strong accumulation at the depressed prices, then have a major breakout. $ELRA is setting up for a big move just as soon as it breaks .0004. Of course it will never rally anywhere near the long term highs but for people buying down here there's a huge opportunity imo.
With enough time we'll do a lot more than that, imo.
The 1000% rally from early 2018 was on heavy volume. The lower volume consolidation above it have seen millions of shares traded when you add it all up. Who cares about 1 single day of trading? Big picture, you know.. don't miss the forest for the trees.
And once we've broken .12 we'll get our volume spike.
It's low volume bullish consolidation. In itself each day isn't a big deal but when you stack it up day after day, week, month and going on 2.5 years now of it, it's a sight to behold. 2.5 years worth of bullish consolidation entirely on top of a 1000% rally from Jan/Feb 2018, now there's something you don't see everyday in the OTC world.
The low volume down here doesn't matter because it's the build up for the breakout. .12 marks the ceiling separating us from new 12+ year highs, once that level is broken we'll see a significant spike in $ volume/ liquidity. We may only need another couple weeks of this, possibly less, before we're ready to test that massively key breakout level. It's an epic move in the making.
Someone was up all night drinking and message board posting. lol!
Like I said, this is setting up to run hard. Don't kick yourself too hard for missing it.
Ironically after all this time, with you thinking it will never run, it's actually now on the verge of blowing up.
In this case I don't think it is. I see something here I really like and it has nothing to do with Bonar. Maybe he's actually gained valuable experience through his failures and has a very promising opportunity he's taking advantage of. Or maybe it's such a promising opportunity here that it's going to pan out in spite of him. Either way I see numerous signs that the market has thought and continues to think that this stock is going to breakout out to much, much higher prices.
It's my money and I'm very happy to risk it in this specific instance, ie I'm not betting on any of his past companies, I'm betting on $DFCO right here and right now. If it looks super risky on the surface, good because that's the sentiment the market has when a stock is underappreciated and undervalued. As the sentiment gets better and better, the price goes up more and more - in a direct inverse correlation to it's risk to reward.