CTR Investments and Consulting Inc (CIVX)

[Lime Time]

Super thin, can move up easily 🚀

[Backstabbed]

Boooooom!

[$treet Trader]

CIVX .0006 x .0007 , like to see it leave trips next week and run with updates

[$treet Trader]

.

[Lime Time]

Bigtime catalysts coming here end of year and into 2025 CIVX, fight to bring this current and the best is yet to come

[Hi_Lo]

they can do a private merge.

Just because you, an anonymous poster with no verifiable documentation says that, it doesn't make it true...it makes it just your opinion - your mistaken opinion.

[tradedays1224]

Few opportunities like this rn

[tradedays1224]

🫡

[tradedays1224]

Dude they aren’t going to the big boards yet they can do a private merge. Quit feeding lies on a fresh company with a new ceo you don’t know what they are doing.

[Lime Time]

Huge catalysts coming here. Only the expert traders know this 😀 🚀

[Hi_Lo]

It’s not currently a shell.

It doesn't matter what a company designates itself in an unaudited financial report. It's what the SEC designates the company, and the SEC has designated CIVX as a shell company.

Plus, even if it isn't currently a shell company, it was a shell at one point in its history so it has to file a Form 10 registration statement by filing a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1.

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2020/form-10-registration-statement/#:~:text=Both%20public%20and%20private%20companies,subject%20to%20SEC%20reporting%20requirements.

Q. If a non-reporting company was a shell company twenty years ago, is it required to file a Form 10 to cure its shell status for purposes of its shareholders having the ability to rely upon Rule 144’s safe harbor?

A. Yes, if a non-reporting entity was a shell company during any time in its history, it must either file a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1 in order for its shareholders to rely upon Rule 144.

...and CIVX is not registered with the SEC and its missing financials will prevent it from getting its registration statement processed by the SEC/FINRA because it violates FINRA Rule 6490.

Nice try at twisting information and deceiving investors. It didn't work.

[JMoneyHoops]

Thanks you as well

[tradedays1224]

Solid plays 👍 hope you bank on all of them.

[JMoneyHoops]

Top 5 Summer OTC Plays:
1. $CNNA (Stem Cell Therapy)
2. $HQGE (Sony Pictures Connection)
3. $CIVX (Clean Shell, No Convertible Notes)
4. $NGMC (Same CEO who made $MAYX go from 0.08 - 7.00)
5. $BCAP (Custo Play with the Potential Custodian being heavily invested (Jake Noch)

— JMoney💸 (@jmoney_hoops) July 17, 2024

[tradedays1224]

We going to mooooooon.

[tradedays1224]

It’s not currently a shell. Quit spreading lies

[Hi_Lo]

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2020/form-10-registration-statement/#:~:text=Both%20public%20and%20private%20companies,subject%20to%20SEC%20reporting%20requirements.

Both public and private companies can register a class of securities on Form 10. Form 10 is also used by shell purveyors to create inventory for reverse merger transactions that take a company from private to public company status. These shells are subject to SEC reporting requirements.

Q. If a non-reporting company was a shell company twenty years ago, is it required to file a Form 10 to cure its shell status for purposes of its shareholders having the ability to rely upon Rule 144’s safe harbor?

A. Yes, if a non-reporting entity was a shell company during any time in its history, it must either file a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1 in order for its shareholders to rely upon Rule 144.

CIVX is a shell company.



But some pumpers here are intentionally manipulating information and investors.

[Hi_Lo]

At the rate this junk is losing value, this will be back to .0002 in no time.

It's already lost more than half its value in less than two months.

[Lime Time]

Doesn't need a Form 10, Is fully Alternate Reporting Standard Compliant. Don't listen to the idiot that is misinformed here. The only thing we need is the assets/mergers coming via social media. Only 2B Float, oh my, loading up at these prices 🚀

[Hi_Lo]

Exactamundo!!!! He's not listed!!!

Christopher Martinez - CNNA's "consultant" is neither a lawyer nor an accountant - that is what the webpage you referenced lists. So that's the reason he is not listed.

That was a very amateurish attempt to obfuscate and confuse people here. A typical pumper tactic.

Christopher Martinez who is CIVX's "consultant," unless verifiably proven that he's not the same individual is a shyster.

This is directly from FINRA and OTC Markets.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm

[Ribo]

Exactamundo!!!! He's not listed!!!

[tradedays1224]

Don’t see a Martinez

[Hi_Lo]

None of your opinions have been verified by the company itself

Why would they if it's a scam?

[Ribo]

Prohibited Service Providers
https://www.otcmarkets.com/learn/prohibited-service-providers

[tradedays1224]

Bashers are desperate here to get validation in their life.

[tradedays1224]

Quit spreading your false opinions just because you got burned before by other stocks. None of your opinions have been verified by the company itself

[Hi_Lo]

Pumpers here are desperate to spread false information so as not to let the truth out.

Cavan has not verfiably denied that the company consultant Christopher Martinez - the indicted and FINRA banned ex-broker and financial advisor and consultant is not the consultant for the company.

This scammer has the same name, was a broker before getting banned by FINRA and was/is also a financial advisor and consultant.

Christopher Martinez who is CIVX's "consultant," unless verifiably proven that he's not the same individual is a shyster.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm



Why is there no direct link to an actual verifiable post from Cavan about Christopher Martinez, the company consultant not being that indicted, FINRA banned consultant?

Especially with all the lies being spread by pumpers on this board.

Just a denial from a screenshot from a personal email that can be easily altered doesn't cut it.

He's been the CEO/Owner of multiple companies that he took to the OTCQB and has advised others that have gone as far as the NASDAQ.

Then why doesn't Cavan list these companies so that people can do proper DD?

Penny stock CEOs often lie so that the cat doesn't get out of the bag. I've seen it many, many times...especially with all the regulatory problems this stock has.

Unless documented verifiable proof with a direct link to information about the company consultant can be verified, it should not be believed.

[Hi_Lo]

This stock will never get a Form 10 approved. Period!

[tradedays1224]

“That is not true. Issuing new shares is not considered a corporate action by FINRA.

https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/corporate-actions-public-companies-what-you-should-know”

You are wrong you clown. It certainly is.

“Additionally, FINRA’s Rule 6490 details that corporate actions also encompass “any issuance or change to a symbol or name, mergers, acquisitions, dissolutions or other company control transactions”

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490

[Hi_Lo]

Issuing new shares is considered a corporate action. CIVX issued 80M new shares in 2022/2023.

That is not true. Issuing new shares is not considered a corporate action by FINRA.

https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/corporate-actions-public-companies-what-you-should-know

[JMoneyHoops]

Once they’re cleared out should move to dubs easily again

[Backstabbed]

There is only one loser sitting at $0.0006 - the rest of the MMs are above $0.001

[tradedays1224]

It’ll come hard very thin 👀

[Tomuggly313]

Big run coming imo

[LCJR]

What do you expect him to publish that isn’t already public knowledge? He said they’re looking for a candidate, which takes time and resources. It’s a very tedious task, with tons of research and interviews on the perspective candidates they find that might be the one. I hope they already have a few in mind so the process is quicker, but who knows?

LCJR

[koolmc]

he just said this per last pr "INVESTORS* PLEASE Refrain from contacting the Company regarding Merger. All Information will be made Public via Company Press Releases. Thank You." So he ain't gonna say anything till they get a candidate

[Backstabbed]

Good. I will continue to accumulate at these prices.

[TRADER99]

Cavan doesn't seem like the pumper type. Owning his own finance company you would think he's professional. Paperwork and filings for what's coming.

[Backstabbed]

this doesn't mean that it's Cavan dumping. this may be flippers that grew impatient

[tradedays1224]

Did I speak too soon…

[tradedays1224]

Yeah for sure we know Cavan isn’t dumping and we are just at a stand still we most people holding for the big news

[Backstabbed]

$CIVX - Volume brings volume. we need volume.

[FelixOTC]

What’s the point till it’s the account for the company taking over?

[uptick1000]

So far this Guy has not been to good at being the new CEO.. No twitter account , no communication to shareholders , just one pr over a month ago and then complete silence...he needs to come out of hiding and speak to the market like the other CEOS who stock are not sitting at 0006...

[TRADER99]

Yea he said he will

[Tomorrowneverknows]

Exactly

[Backstabbed]

Did someone suggest it to him?!?

[TRADER99]

Need that social media account by Cavan. He wouldn't have bought so many commons last year if he didn't have a plan. Having his own financial company and getting new legal counsel shows he does.

[Lime Time]

CIVX it looks good. We need company updates. The twitter/X account and maybe this week we get the updates.

[Market Makers Exist]

Issuing new shares is considered a corporate action. CIVX issued 80M new shares in 2022/2023.

If what you're saying is true, why did FINRA allow this corporate action? Shouldn't be possible based on what you're saying.