Moving the Shrimp to Fiji, if the plan works.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There was some life insurance. I think that was sold off, and it out of the picture. The 2009 MBO will clear everything up.
It looks like you found something. What is CO-2?
Try another broker. If I had funds, I would try mine. It looks good. According to the TWKGQ DD they control 16 million of the common. It could be the brokers are using it to short the box.
Something is weird here. I thought I saw where TAC owns the shares, but isn't there. Did the Ibox change, or was I seeing things? TAC is an LLC, and they are entitled to a part of canopius, according to what I read elsewhere. Something in the numbers is not right.
I looked for a TAC controlling interest, and couldn't find it. So it would be up to the owners to hire a new CEO if the funds are given to the TWKGQ shareholders. LaSalle holders could get voting interest in a new corp, but if they did, should lose any right to preferential liquidation.
Don't let any of these guys steal your rights.
Amy almost saved my business. I stayed liquid far a few extra months because of that play. She was sweet, but now she is a ghost. How is eva? Do you love her 4eva?
Fire sale? Just because the number is disconnected?
I got a piece of it.
I like the fact that the CEO is a sharp lawyer. If I keep pumping his shell, I might need one.
I am pretty confident in the DD on this wreck. Hold tight.
I am glad somebody did. I am almost tapped out. I had to buy some MRDG shares. That's rough when all you can do is buy the BK's in the dirt.
What did you call my girl? A tumbleweed. Take it back or we'll be meeting at the OK corral for a showdown at high noon.
You know the buy high, sell low strategy? That's our favorite!
You need hope and faith in the research, and a strong stomach, and it wouldn't hurt to grow a pair.
In the I box? Are you certain of the accuracy? I have some trouble trusting it knowing the current value of TWKGQ. I see about $15 per share ballpark, and more is it becomes a going concern.
How did TAC get 16 million shares? Is that in the O/S? How many O/S do we have now?
Is 20% our designated percentange? How much does TAC get?
I am not really sure, but it is there. Do you think they deserve it for management? I don't. They have management fees for several years. They were managing our money.
C'mon W3, where are you? Where are my pals from the UK? Are you guys gonna buy this, or steal a half a billion?
Amy is quite a ghost. She says buy. It looks like a diamond in the rough. That sounds like a golfers philosophy. When you find yourself in the rough with a bad lie; most of the time you consider all the options, and finesse your way out. Sometimes, but very rarely, you just hit the sucker with all you got.
Your not paranoid if they really are out to get you.
I noticed some informal groupings here, and the MM's are surely out to get us all.
I called the telephone number, and got a recording from the phone company. I suppose this one has gone and bit the dust without further ado. No forwarding number was given.
I missed the 90k. I only saw a couple of 500's.
Makes me even happier to have picked up the slack and wiped out the ask at .021 (15k shs at 15:14:20)
Whoever bought that one paid more commission than he paid for the shares.
I'm just a brakeman on this trainwreck. I try to take up the slack between the cars unless the Jester throws me a lump of coal.
They almost caught him asleep at the switch.
That sophisticated and knowledgable trader picked up a few.
The "fairy" dust must be working. I just saw a few of them walking down Santa Monica Boulevard.
Some of the more aggressive personalities from Yahoo would call us longtime "bagholders." A lot of us were buying a 30 cents thinking that our ship was coming in. Then it sank.
No, he told me he standing on the sidelines. It must be another one who uses the same brokerage.
What is your version of the punchline?
My version is that everytime a certain "savvy investor" places an order, it shows up as AUTO.
I happen to know that this trader is "knowledgable and sophisticated."
The group at AUTO seems to be a few sophisticated and knowledgable traders who are trying to squeeze the shorts;)
My research on this is so old, I am just going by my memory and what you guys provide.
But don't take me for a sucker, if you guys come up with anything that looks fishy, I will go fishing through the reports to verify. I am an old RR fan: "Trust, but verify."
I figure this is w2. w1 was the run to .05 ish. w3 could be a long time coming. The w2 retrace cannot take out the old lows, but it can come close without breaking the spirit of the Elliot theory.
If it exceeds the old high quickly, then it might even be a resumption of w1, and cancel the w2 designation.
He might have just been really offended when they chose Becker as the CEO and overlooked him.
I think he did some actuarial work for reinsurance, and had some related claim adjustments.
He was actually very knowledgeable about the insurance/reinsurance industry and very helpful in some ways. If he was here, he would have to eat a lot of crow, so he might take on the personna of a basher. On the other hand, he could apologize one simple time, and become a respected member of the researchers here. As stuck as he was on the likelyhood of a poor runoff, he should be able to respect that the runoff has yielded returns for at least the La Salle portion, and has cleared most of the TWKGQ outstanding debts.
If you ever bumped heads with a Teacher who followed the script of a pencil pushing burocrat, and taught from an incorrect textbook, you might have an idea of how much I learned from McLaren by thinking for myself.
Triple Axle? It sort of reminds me of a Lutz, which for some reason reminds me of a guy named McLaren.
You would want to examine the repective interests, and how the TAC sale affected the interests in the BK court. You would also want to see what, if anything, that syndicate has remaining if you can find such info.
It should mean that the LOC is closed, there is no associated debt, and there is no more opportunity to draw against it. As long as the line was open, there was a danger of drawing on it.
That might have been the LOC(Line of Credit). I believe it was basically carried on paper through the Canopius sale or one of the LLoyds syndicates. There was no actual debt incurred, but evidently they held it over the BK liquidation until recently. It's disappearance is welcome.
Is there any new info on this? I did a search for the CEO and found nothing. I found a few BK filings for the subsidiaries. Will this be a clean shell, or even an operating entity?