Background is in Investor Relations and portfolio management focused on energy stocks. Always looking for opportunities to learn & share more.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You are so right when you point to past successes and how few manage to score big-time. I see USEI in the same light---our CEO is taking time to decide on the most promising ventures---this, we know from his missives as well as those coming from others in his operating circle. It would be so different, were he to settle on a couple of simple hits just to appease us loyal shareholders.
Many years ago I owned Apple shares when they first started out. I loved the concept and supported the garage-turned-lab home base. I'm ashamed to admit I sold for a large profit---$3/share!!!
If only I'd had the last thirty-odd years of investing and trading experience I have today. That's life, huh?
Meanwhile, USEI should benefit handsomely. Tony has created a bunch of companies beginning on a shoestring only to reach towards 25 cents, 50, 80-odd. Multiply a penny by that sort of profit magnitude and anybody can see the incredible opportunity here. A million shares at a single cent could become a million dollar monster in a year or even less, depending upon how things come together. And it may not happen, too. That's the odds we face. So it's a case of become rich or guarantee staying poor.
I know one thing: It takes courage to prosper in this work. Sure, it calls for an outlay of cash...so does living and dying! You can't survive without paying the bills and the undertaker won't even cook you without $800 for the barbeque.
But when I consider the odds of spending a whole lifetime chasing regrets instead of pots of gold at the next rainbow ahead, it's damned easy for me to execute my plan.
Cheers to all here! A pretty neat bunch, imo. Speaking of which---everything said herein is my opinion.
Outstanding of you to post this update. I find it very comforting to see that initiatives abound in critical spots across this vast nation of ours.
Thanks to you for your help!
The Republic of Guinea? Not related to our stock pick. And I don't trust any of the info for it remains a country where most are unable to gain an education, most homes (huts) are not equipped with electricity or running water.
The US is currently challenging the business tactics of a US oil and gas exploration company suspected of colluding with the Guinean government back in 2006. Charges of bribery abound and there are no less than 13 class actions in progress.
Yours is one of the smartest posts I've read in recent times.
I'd suggest one added point & not a correction:
When dealing with a solid blue chip such as GE, for example---the value side plays perfectly to averaging. This is so due to the steady dividend style exhibited by the Company and, in some cases, an accelerating upward bias as is evident in GE.
ERBB may do exceedingly well at some point in the future. We're not there yet but this may well be the ideal time to build a position.
My opinions only!
One of the problems with averaging down is that it feeds an ego. But often a stock drops in value because people fail to see value. ERBB looks like a better value to me today because I can buy more cheaply while recent news makes it appear more valuable. I don't care about averaging down, I just want profitable trades and that's about selling---not buying or buying cheaper.
Brokers like to push averaging as it encourages more trades and that spells commissions. It also puts investors on a path towards accumulation. It's not always a good idea to accumulate.
I especially like your line about the financial planner:
i know your financial planners tells you this is the way to go and if you liked it at 100 you'll love it at 80
Yeah, right! Let's watch the bottom drop out and add to the speed it drops by risking more money.
One item I disagree with:
Stop losses won't work when trading is suspended. Also when the bottom falls out due to an unforeseen event--- your shares set up on a stop loss will be victims in free fall. Better to baby each position and have parameters in place so you can micromanage safely.
My opinions in all this, of course.
Any interest paid was agreed upon mutually by ERBB management and the stake holders. Do you see something bad in that?
Also---all this talk about dilution and too many shares---companies in their early years have no choice but to sell shares in order to raise the capital with which to operate. The ability to attract buyers is often faith in leadership and little else. Not every business out there is developing a guaranteed success in the form of a golden egg. Good business models must be put together piece by piece, block by block and a few prayers along the way, too, if that works for you.
Most companies publicly traded would not exist were it not for the occasional "offering." People run from the "dilution" word but it's silly for it is usually the only way to maintain "going concern" status. The alternative is six feet under in the land of bankruptcy. I'll take "going concern" any day. Dilution, too.
My opinions above and nothing more than those;.
Can you clarify your point? I'm not sure I understand.
Thanks!
ERBB is fast becoming a poster-child for a newish sector goody-goodies love to hate, I'm fearing. My bet is that there are a lot of closet-weed lovers out there who are unwilling to be identified with anything tainted historically by dope, pot, weed or smoke. It's so childish but this is a country with many adolescents.
Today's news from ERBB is really quite favorable, imo. Yet my instincts told me that today might nevertheless present a good buying opportunity. As the morning hours wane, this seems to be proving the case. I'm thinking we'll be at .043 later but I don't see us dropping under that, if at all. That spells opportunity.
Keeping it as realistic as I can, I expect follow-on announcements. We need definitive moves not LIKELY to enhance share holder value---but, instead, SURE to increase cash flow. No business can grow without cash flow if we're talking about profitability. Yeah, companies sell equity (shares)all the time. But that's akin to a vampire slitting his own wrists for a swig.
Dilution is normal for start-ups. ERBB is NOT a start-up, been in the kitchen for a lot of years. It's time to get out of the kitchen and into the dining room with MJ-oriented dishes and technologies that customers will die for---while paying lots of money for the privilege of associating with our company.
My opinions only.
Yes! Thank you for making the connection.
Thanks to you as well.
Thanks to you for your help! Apparently, the prevailing arrangement governing fees is similar to what strip malls pay---usually 2% or so of their sales is added to a base rent.
Mr. Shearin maintained on CNBC that the Company will not make anything on sales of MJ product. I've been assuming this would be due to restrictions on the sales of cannabis and ERBB is not a legally certified dispenser of such items. Is this in conflict with what you're saying? And if so, do you think you can clarify some of the confusion?
Much appreciate your help! I've got dry powder but the water is a bit muddy. I need clearer vision to justify additional investment.
Listening to Mr. Shearin's interview yesterday, I recall he stated ERBB would not be getting a cut of machine-generated sales. I was surprised by that for that's where I was thinking the big profits would be. So now I'm wondering about the size of the market for these machines---also potential output figures for the Company? And I wonder about patent protection capable to deterring China from duplicating our patent book and producing their versions of the Zazzz?
I'm thinking there's just so much a dispensary will pay to rent a vending machine.
As an investor, I usually have a feel for marketability specific to stated goals found in a corporate mission statement---it's easy enough to quantify things, as a rule. Not so this time---I'm at a loss. Too many expectations from too many possible channels. I'm unable to gain a clear picture of where this thing might be a year from here.
Any help on this?
TIA.
An old line goes this way: "No news is good news."
Do any of you folks sense that USEI's share price is actually benefiting from there being no news?
For a time now I've been applauding Mr. Miller for not putting out nonsensical pieces but I just noticed his last item was published well more than a week ago. And I'm thinking it's clever to not do as some conspicuous others in the MJ arena have been doing---to no avail, moreover. So my take-away is that he will not release a PR that is anything less than startling.
This is why our share price isn't languishing, I think. As a matter of fact, we've been all over the place price-wise, haven't we? Yet---despite all the hoopla surrounding ERBB's news in the wake of PHOT's awkward fall from grace, we seem to be holding up rather well. I won't pretend to know who should get credit for it, yet I am in awe over a process that has sister companies gasping for air, if not mercy.
And I don't see how the next missive from our CEO could fail to move our share-holding public. After all, the only PR that would make any sense at all will have to present well defined goals built on a platform of contracts.....contracts that will be mutually beneficial for us as well as the other guys in the deals.
I'm feeling pretty good about this. Actually? Very good!
My opinions in the above commentary & not more than that.
You are undoubtedly correct when you point out that it's all up to Tony. Don't leave out Zev's company, though. Remember Tony has engaged that firm for the sake of guidance. That's a big deal in my mind for Mr. Miller is tapping into a level of professional expertise that likely goes beyond his own business experience. It speaks to his humility in that he is publicly demonstrating a willingness to delegate rather than micromanage for the sake of absolute control. That's a big deal, imo.
Publicly traded companies do listen to oft-voiced themes reiterated ad nauseum on public boards. In a way, we are the "voice of the people." As such, we are the sounds of footsteps approaching from the distance much as our ancestors put an ear to the ground. Not to say our CEO should or will address every comment, only that I've seen him respond to themes voiced herein. That tells me a bit about our leader and it pleases me.
All in my opinion!
Well stated! While I lack the means to know for sure that our CEO is going to prove successful in the months ahead, I get the sense from his PRs as well as Dok and Zev that we're all pretty much on the same page. This tells me Mr. Miller deserves my attention and I trust he'll make some smart and very well thought out moves destined to enrich us.
My hunch is that Mr. Miller is fully aware of the importance future PRs bring. I doubt there will be anything one could label "fluff." I fully expect PRs will present at least a few goal-point destinations embracing mid-term and longer term potentials. I'm excited.
All comments made herein are my opinions only.
Not so. Autologous means the cells come from the same body. This is extremely important as it portends a lessening of the need for cell rejection issues and their respective remedies.
There also may be undesired side effects resulting from actions taken in order to reconcile imbalances resulting from chemical intervention.
Phew! That sort of rolled out effortlessly for some reason. I'm not really that smart. lol
I'm really hopeful this company of ours can do wonders for some of the afflicted among us.
Anything to substantiate this or just wishful thinking?
Agreed, save for the ridiculous after-market activity. Looks like reverse painting on just a few hundred units effectively unwinding the day's gains.
Personally I don't see any impact on the morrow's trading.
It appears you've quadrupled your money in ERBB. I'd be letting go of at least half my position right now. Pigs make it home to face the big bad wolf on their own terms whereas hogs wind up looking and tasting like apple-cured bacon.
The balance of your shares will remain positioned to improve your lot.
I thoroughly disapprove of anyone putting his nest egg into just two stocks. Thirty thousand original dollars is no trifling sum. It will buy a decent car or a quarter of a house in most anywhere in America. Diversifying is extremely important. I'm in 19 different companies, myself. I have major gains in some, moderate ones in some others and a couple of totally suckable dogs, too. I look for balance at all times, and invariably treat every dollar as important. I hope you'll rethink your approach which looks like all-or-nothing to me. It's extremely dangerous.
So I'd vote for taking some profits and staying the course otherwise, so long as it fits your comfort zone, instincts and intellectual understanding.
My opinions herein.
I use TD Ameritrade. However, Schwab works well for many people. It just happens they refused to honor my friend's determination to purchase penny stocks. This sort of behavior might change at any time. Fidelity disappointed as well. Also E-Trade now that I think about it. Yet each of these can be perfect for some, just not me as I blend high-dollar positions with penny stocks. Some brokerages refuse to dirty their hands with pennies. That leaves me out.
Let me suggest you call any broker directly and ask flat out:
"Are there house rules governing what sorts of stocks I'm free to buy? And what amount numbers of shares--- any limits?"
Also---some brokerages will hold your deposited check for as long as nine days before letting you trade with your own money! I believe this was mandatorily reduced to a maximum of five days recently but still---five days is a long time when you consider they are holding your money. Rest assured they are using it! That pisses me off no end. So be sure to ask about the holding period governing deposited funds.
Lastly, find out how long the settlement period is. This refers to house rules limiting your use of funds received when selling a stock. Say you buy $600 of stock tomorrow. Sell it a month later for $800. How long do you have to wait before you're allowed to spend your own money? I've seen friends butchered by these lopsided house rules. The norm is three days and is set by the SEC. So it's not all shady treatment by any means. But there are sometimes abuses attached.
I hope I'm not frightening you by all this---I just want your experience to be fun, exciting and profitable. I love my trading life whether teaching, analyzing, studying SEC filings or scrutinizing interviews. It's all incredibly wonderful stuff. Feel free always to ask!
My opinions above.
My previous post omits an important point I meant to address:
When I read tweets, I'm often wondering if they are truly from those whom they say they are. Perhaps it's just me but I need to feel safe when I read tweets I deem controversial. So many people will create phony identities, probably because they never found a way to earn their fifteen minutes of fame.
So I'll encourage everyone to read and then scour for deeper meanings. When I first read a tweet or two from DOK, I immediately distrusted him. But I explored some of his posts on USEI and other companies and found a knowledgeable young man who is insatiably excited by market gyrations. He looks at far more than mere numbers, looking instead at the people in managements---their character and integrity and their very nature. That tells me he trusts his instincts far more than self-pumping remarks coming from would-be saviors claiming they are leading companies for the greater good. He is a special person. I'm sensing good things in Zev as well.
My opinions.
Wow! That's a really smart question. Unfortunately I'm not certain I can answer you as my work experience is older-school. However, I often see Tweeters claiming to be connected or somehow representing managements. to tell you the truth, I didn't join Twitter until last week and even then--because I was feeling old and out of the loop.
I can tell you this much:
Anyone legitimately connected to a traded entity, holding any executive office or retained as a Director or consultant--- means that individual will be immediately responsible for disseminating any information capable of influencing the company's bottom line. I'm betting that if Zev or Tony or anyone else in the employ of the company and fully aware of insider information as only an executive will be---such person (s) will surely be held liable if found to be deliberately misleading investors or would-be investors. The idea behind the SEC's rulings on this pertain to protecting possibly naïve investors. While many analysts claim to despise SEC rulings, I've witnessed many instances where those rules have saved good people from finding themselves massacred by knowledgeable manipulators. I sometimes take issue with the SEC but only because life might be more fun if we didn't have rules. Hell, we've gotta be good or Santa won't stop on our rooftop!
I bring Zev into this because he may not be employed directly by the company but hired consultants sign NDA's to protect both parties. His company is probably working on a bonus basis pending time periods reflecting benefits of his company-led efforts. His style has been exemplary, distinguished by his very careful comments---never saying too much as it would be dangerous. If I saw him slip however subtly, you can be sure I'd be alerting him via personal message---or calling him without dispatch. However, he has been a reassuring voice going out of his way to comfort us.
I hope this helps!
All in my opinion, of course.
You may be right---and we may all be dead tomorrow as well.
Unless someone went to you for investing counsel before starting a position in ERBB, I can't imagine a reason to trust your counsel now.
My opinions only.
Interesting to me in that I haven't run into any issues, myself. Friends with Schwab and Fidelity had a completely different experience---were told what they could or could not buy. I wouldn't put up with that---I decide how to spend my money. I have a friend who is unable to purchase ERBB at his brokerage. I told him he needs to switch brokerages.
It looks to me as though some brokerages are more concerned with their in-house safety measures than focusing on customer needs and wishes. However, they are certainly entitled to their own interpretations of things. In the end, the process may enrich all of us. I hope so!
My opinions herein.
I very much want USEI to succeed---I as much as you and all others. Where we differ is in how the written word is to be interpreted. When someone says there will be sales this month---the SEC recognizes the words "will be" as grammarians often refer to as the indefinite future tense. Simply stated, there is no certainty that there will ever be sales! We dare not cling to every word spoken for there is no way anybody can guarantee such things.
There is a list of disclaimers attached to PRs as required by the SEC. Words such as "will" always head up the list and for good reason. As shareholders we want to avoid discrediting management for to do so hurts all of us for we are co-owners of the Company.
At the same time, we have ways of trying to better understand things we find confusing. This is a big part of why companies hire Investor Relations directors whose job is that of disseminating critical information to the investing public. Take a look at a few PRs and jump down to the small print at the bottom. You'll see what this is about. And if you have doubts, why not call USEI's Public Relations contact person for clarification? My impression is that your call will be well received and even appreciated.
My opinions herein.
You can't go wrong with TD Ameritrade, imo. Their base rate is $9.95, I believe. When you build your portfolio to above $100,000 you can tell them you want a lower commission rate. I pay $6 and there is no limit to the number of shares to be traded---without additional fees involved.
There are other excellent brokerages, too, although Barron's Magazine praises Ameritrade as the best.
Hope this helps!
All in my opinion.
Sometimes there are order imbalances as the trading day finishes up. This is often due to the last-minute rush to expedite orders before the closing bell. I don't see any reason for suspicion.
What I am seeing is ERBB down a little despite being profiled repeatedly on national TV. Whereas USEI is up a trifle on no news.
Methinks the public is priming the pump for a major move higher on any meaningful news suggestive of soon-to-come prospects for positive cash flow. It's the only way I'm able to explain our share price stability of late.
Pretty neat in my opinion!
Allow me to add a PS:
Order imbalances surface when the trading machines get jammed up due to excessive data transmissions. I've found reconciliations occurring as much as twenty minutes after the official close of trading---but not including after-hours activity. For this reason I don't record each trading day's results in my tally book for at least a half hour following the close of trading activity. On rare occasions you may find higher numbers posting after the close and then find these are brought back to earlier levels. My advice would be to wait a half hour following the close.
By the way, let me suggest that a serious trader might maintain a journal listing each day's closing value and change. I maintain four portfolios with 19 stocks. By maintaining a tally I'm able to see in an instant when I was beginning to do noticeably poorly.
Shares formerly belonging to an insider can be placed outside of the Rule 144 realm---ie handed over to a trust under a different (unrecorded) name. A relative or friend or uninvolved business associate can become a handy individual to have around. I've seen this numerous times. Slime can get away with anything.
Only my opinions herein.
One of the most interesting things about USEI of late is that nobody within the company is spewing worthless tripe aimed at selling newly minted shares and little else. Refreshing!
Many years of in-depth stock analysis and meeting with investment professionals tells me that we probably won't be spending much time in the .02 range. If anything, we'll sail on through to the mid-.03-to-.04 zone.
Patience is key here, we all know it. Yet during this quiet period, we've watched as other companies take the spotlight only to suffer in the glow of nothingness. ERBB is a perfect example, up ever so slightly thus far today. I'm hoping to see acceleration over the next ninety minutes with a close nearer .06.
On the other hand---when Tony finally comes out with remarks justifying this quiet period, I'm trusting he knows only too well how important his commentary will be. Guys like me will be splitting every available hair in the hopes or finding hidden secrets within his words---testing and teasing and subjecting every morsel to possible elucidations.
I'm expecting he will come out with the big reveal pulling things together with solid infrastructure backing everything up. I never did regard his public remarks as fluff as did some. Rather, I viewed a man determined to be as upfront as possible without risking non-disclosure agreements along the way. Protect the biz!
Any takers for .035? I don't want to feel all alone!
My opinions here, not more than that.
In my opinion, you are absolutely on the money---the tax money, that is. This issue of decriminalization is the lone obstacle surrounding legalization. Some will insist that there are legitimate pros and cons but it's about controlling societal elements. Simplistic as it appears, control the people and you control the elements. Nobody can control alcohol or cigarettes but politicos can and will do their best to scare the crap out of you so they can control you, the consumer. This is the mindset of a politician believing himself/herself to be above their constituents. And it is incredibly ugly for all its manipulation.
Not to suggest booze and tobacco are good for us for we know there are real threats lurking in the shadows. At the same time, there comes a point in terms of social evolution wherein folks will predictably rise up and declare, "I won't take this crap any more!" I believe each of us retains the inalienable right to decide on matters concerning his/her fate. I've had to face cancer in the eye this past year. That doesn't translate into my allowing someone to tell me I'm not allowed to smoke a cigarette or use fake sugar or eat those cancerously delicious barbequed ribs if I choose. I will live as I see fit and I choose what fits.
Most of this debate surrounding cannabis is really about a select few doing their damnedest to retain control over masses of people. Notice I don't refer to "the masses" as that's ambiguous and might be interpreted as "them asses." There will be a day when women insist upon the right to nurse their suckling babies without having to do so in a bathroom rather than out in the public eye. But try telling that to a founding father whose ambition was to renounce the very notion of equal rights. Countless instances of irreverently harsh treatment of factions without our society abound, pot now the pricker in the eye.
I'm pissed! I am not willing to surrender my executive privileges. I'm not a dog to be wagged by the tail held by politicians. I hope to see good people all over this great country of ours insist on THEIR EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGES!
My opinions are stated herein.
According to very close friends living there, you can smoke weed publicly. You'll go to jail if caught selling it.
My opinions only.
Washington State is already a legal state. What is lacking is the means to guarantee that the taxing authority will get its cut on every single sale. Accountability should be forthcoming shortly.
As for everything else you say, it sounds more like wishful thinking than fact-based reality to me. I love your spirit but I doubt you'll convince people of anything by speaking to what USEI "will have by the end of the month." You couldn't possibly know this will prove to be the case. But you and we can all hope.
Whether or not the Company hired a salesperson or not doesn't correlate to anything meaningful in terms of bottom line enhancement. There are some really sucking salespeople out there---we've all experienced them. And without products to sell, even the greatest salesperson on Earth will be of no value.
Telling us that USEI will be big---and throwing in some exclamation marks to prove your point? I hope it makes you feel good but I think it cheapens the image of our Company when folks new to the Company and this board visit and see a bunch of overly happy and giddy kids oohing and aahing over a company yet to launch meaningfully in a new direction.
Sorry if I'm dousing your sparks---I appreciate the fire but I think there are several solid attributes here---Tony's patience, his hooking up with a Public Relations firm for guidance and business savvy, his refusal to yield to impatient investors living for the next bit of printed news to make investors rich---and traveling constantly in search for the best possible options. These represent real value. Tony is doing something right. Go to some of the other MJ-oriented websites and blogs and it's quite a different story when the supposed faithful are full of suspicions and doubts due to less visible management.
These are my opinions only. My wish is to be of help to others. I'm well off enough now. Future earnings are earmarked for a charitable trust.
Try dividing that amount by the three and a half BILLIONS of shares issued. How much does that translate into when reevaluating the current share price?
It's so easy to get carried away because of the groupie thing and the fact that we're on the cusp of decriminalizing weed But we've got to constantly question what we're finding so exciting. And separate that from what is meaningful from an investment point of view.
Those shirts are a novelty at best. Others will come along, made in China for sure. And they will be cheaper than free, if necessary, to more readily identify the sponsoring company. This is business.
Then there's the cost of the shirts themselves. And the merchandising---manning the phones and website to accept and direct orders. There are bookkeepers to journal sales, accountants to offset costs, people to package sold goods, etc.
Suddenly, $10,000 in sales means nothing at all. And when a company has serious debt on the books dating back for years, it is common for management to reimburse itself in kind and often generously.
I don't believe ERBB will be profitable as a seller of campy T-shirts---not after a ten year history of getting nowhere.
But that's just my opinion and as a fellow share holder, I sure hope my analytics are wrong.
Zev, first off I want to give you a major hug for opening up here. Speaking for myself and probably many others, I feel fortunate in this opportunity to join hands with fellow investors, the common interest being USEI.
I like getting to the point:
This is a company doing its best to find its feet. It must rely upon opportunities resulting from social change and governmental leniencies newly available. Anybody should be able to envision this moment as distinctly similar to years ago when it became legal to consume alcohol. There was no doubt then that America would soon enjoy formerly unthinkable freedom. Similarly, there can be no doubt now: We are spawning a new freedom of expression and finally a popular pot culture is finding it way onto center stage. This is very much a reflection of the will of the people.
We can't look at USEI and find a stunning history of accomplishments. But we can find that our CEO has a straight-forward history of making small-to-medium mountains out of mere molehills. He's managed to raise a lot of money with which to develop his entrepreneurial ventures. This is what motivated me to accumulate several millions of shares.
I've raised a lot of money, too. But I did it as a salaried writer and public speaker. I was trained in these duties. Tony, on the other hand, came upon these skills ostensibly by jumping into the trenches and digging his way through businesses by speaking his heart out to lots of skeptics, no doubt. Yet he persevered. Today, what I see is a man who is patiently turning over each rock (boulder if he's in Colorado. lol) and carefully considering pros and cons while not ready to commit until he's convinced he's seeing things coming together in his creatively engaged mind. His patience and ability to raise money impress me.
When I look at other companies in the MJ spotlight, I see blogs cluttered with doubts about leadership. It's beyond me how people can invest hard earned money in doubtful managements. Companies never run themselves! Only managements do. Why put your money into hands you don't even trust? I study every single word coming out of the mouths of managements responsible for my investments. When I have doubts, I disengage. I have a favorite line for this: When in doubt, DON'T!
This brings us back to you. Of course you don't dare preempt Tony by leaking out news regarding his actions other than to reassure listeners that from your vantage point, he is the real thing. And that lends credibility to your presence as well, for I sense you wish you could say more. The only reason you'd like to say more is to defend Tony. That tells me you are fond of him and respect him. He has become your friend.
I believe you have come to this blog to tell people you like our CEO and you respect his leadership ability. That works for me!
Thank you for being available and caring. It's got to make many of us here feel better about more than merely the dollars.
Who are you? I see your stage name is "zpaiss" but I've noticed a few things:
1. You say you know branding well but not the other stuff. My background is in Investor Relations and that means I must be understanding of analytics and standard metrics by which corporate progress may be measured. My understanding was/is that you co-lead a Public Relations company which aligns very closely with my field except that you might be more involved with the "off-campus" affairs whereas I'm involved internally except for presenting to brokers. Yet you say:
"I know nothing about investing but a lot about building lasting brands and organizations. My "money" is on USEI for the long haul."
Something isn't making sense to me---unless you are NOT the co-head of a much flaunted public relations company. Are you or not?
2. A week or so ago I publicly replied to your post with an embedded question. It was not answered or even acknowledged.
3. Your photo is that of a youth, not the photo of a mature man whose face adorns the Paiss website. Is it a 20 year old pic or???
Your posturing isn't adding up sensibly for me. I'm unable to see a difference between your comments and those of others who tout the company's virtues but fail to demonstrate substance.
Would you mind filling in some of the blanks? I'd very much appreciate it. It may help others, too.
Thank you.
Correction---a million must be it.
I think you meant to say 100,000 shares, right?
Congratulations on your brilliant success! That's remarkable, really.
With all the hyperinflating and flatulating posts here, it's wonderful to hear of a genuine gain without attitudes attached---just honest-to-goodness profits made by your application of nerve, instincts and mindfulness. Bravo!
Like you, I hope we all achieve at least part of our collective dream.
Just about any positive news coming out of USEI next week should catapult us to above a penny and a half, imo. We stand to benefit from Tony's easy manner. I'm sensing he's not willing to endanger negotiations by leaking bits and pieces of what might become major stories.
I certainly can't complain about my 20% gain since February 19.