Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Your rhetoric is BS with an exponent intending to scare shareholders. So tedious.
.
Everyone knows that the cashflow number is a paper, point in time number which can vacillate enormously during a quarter . In 2018 revs were $536K , with (cashflow was ($-456,419) , yet 2017 cashflow was positive $564,423.Derivative Liabilities effects cashflow and swings in pps are required to include CDs which have not been executed since 2016.
In 2Q the Company clarified and explained that lender by lender being settled, CDs canceled as well as ancillary interest and derivative liabilities.
This crap does not matter as DBMM has just began to return to normal business.
Trying to shake shares loose or depress pps on paper reporting which does not represent a debt or a real liability.
Shareholders hate a continuous stream of BS .
Read and learn 2QUpdate. No one is listening.
https://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholder-update-april-13-2023/
Let’s be clear. The SEC and PCAOB has instructions for filing reports quarterly. The Financial Statements are reviewed quarterly and audited annually. The MD&A is Management’s message to its shareholders. All shareholders are encouraged to read every quarter.
All non-shareholders and 1-share shareholders are encouraged to do their own Due Diligence and make their own decisions. Why then hammer multiple times of day to influence others? Why is that your role? Why does it matter to you?
Either you are a paid basher or a short seller or fronting for bad actors?
Shareholders do not need repetition, nor ill-founded motives.
The filings improve every quarter and will continue to do so. DBMM has significant wins —no more hurdles. No way to scare shareholders with nonsense.
Shame on the constant attempts to revise what is fact . Shareholders operate in real time. Bullies and name calling have no place with serious shareholders, despite memes, colored font in various sizes and repetition.
Not 10 years ago and not 6 months. A Business is iterative, not casual, superseded information which no one cares about and is no longer accurate or meaningful.
DBMM won 10, #11 and #12 on its way.
What a pathetic revisionist you are!
My portfolio has been blue chip companies in which I neither trade nor try to convince anyone else to buy. Certain small percentage has been allocated to the OTC because LovePink encouraged me to drill down and do extensive due diligence by reading every filing and every Update and every one of Court Papers and draw my own conclusions. Love*Pink is the real deal with integrity and facts. Take shots at him will not serve you well. That’s a bullying tactic and he is respected on this forum.
Always looking to the past while telling everyone how smart you are , while castigating others , is laughable if it wasn’t so pathetic. And the bashers reinforce each other while being paid.
I would never be paid like you guys as there is no credibility and is totally biased. Due diligence wins every time. Documents you guys dare call opinion when in fact they are public information. Your documents have been long superseded or vacated. Intended to create chaos and just clogs up the dialogue. Or you argue actions by judges , attorneys and Commission is wrong and a throwaway. Yet the result is positive for DBMM.
As a performer on a stage, the hook has come out . Supportive DBMM shareholders are simply sick of the antics. Grown ups move on, not bash every hour of the day about a Company which has prevailed with multiple regulators and decision makers including LTIs to help it cure , grow, and get to NASDAQ.
The rules have changed and the crap needs to stop with that fact. Out of your league, go hunt another
OTC purported victim needing self-proclaimed “education.”
Try and be a decent person and stop any of your unnecessary remarks directed at Love*Pink
You are a sad couch potato with no life but as a 25/7/365 BASHER
You must really hate yourself, disgusting A-H
Shareholders know that DBMM has plenty of supporters based on each individual’s own due diligence . DBMM has a plan to raise investor awareness as the presentation last week described and as has been included in the Company’s filings as a plan as soon as Final Order of Dismissal took place.
Short sellers hire people to depress pps. Twas ever thus. No amount of deflection will change that.
DBMM is on its way to increase all metrics from pps, market cap, Company valuation . Everyone will win, DBMM has delivered every time and the count is 10 and #11 and #12 on its way.
Fallacious reasoning! More self-promotion.
Here because no other platforms, and certainly not exchanges, where people get paid to Never.
DBMM will get to NASDAQ step by step, through growth and acquisitions and support from LTIs.
And Nevers still on the OTC revising history.
What is with the naysayer side of Jonathan Livingston Seagull missives to guide the misguided out of beneficence?
Why bother if not a short seller?
Why bother if not paid by other(s)?
Why bother to post thousands of the same words that are incorrect ?
Why bother to try and create chaos?
Why bother indeed?
Cannot make this crap up!
2011–then you confirm a defamation the year of the acquisition of Digital Clarity , finalized in 2012?
DBMM CDs canceled once litigated were taken out in 2012. What is the point?
There are no laurels to sit on. Self-promotion doesn’t sell and far better to not tell others you think you know, let others decide it for themselves. Don’t you read , even Dale Carnegie?
DBMM 10 wins and moving forward with #11 and #12 and they will just keep adding up.
Agree with Sporty for sure.
In my investing experience I have never heard so much self-promotion from an individual!
If you are so successful, why hide behind a moniker and never promote yourself to higher exchanges? Using pejorative language like bag holder is bully in the playground stuff. Portfolio investors don’t BS and certainly deal in facts. Fonts, bold , different colors are not facts or arguments.
The audacity to say you defamed DBMM and its predecessor company 10 years ago . FYI — during an acquisition and then a Reaudit? Laughable, no cigar. But ignore that LTIs have invested over $1.8million into DBMM from the cure of delayed filings forward , ALJ Dismissal ,then the sponsoring broker firm , Form 211 FINRA clearance to OTC Markets CE removal ?
Stunning—and frankly absurd. Embarrassed much?
DBMM always wins over Nevers.
No relitigation .Case Dismissed-Initial and Final Order. Done and dusted.
Is the world flat as well?
Like the crazy uncle at Thanksgiving who you keep away from the liquor cabinet! No relitigation of facts.
The final result is the only thing that matters. FYI- the word guilty is not used is SEC cases ever.
Also: DBMM stipulated to late filings with mitigating circumstances which was acknowledged and cited by ALJ Foelak.
DBMM on its way back to normal business and way way beyond to growth to acquisition to NASDAQ.
Nonsense. Repeat: Legal documents are iterative and not a one off
The Law of Cause & Effect says knowingly to file a Motion (10/28/16) you know to be a breach of a Federal Consent Decree (10/26/16) is fraudulent. Also extraordinary hubris as it is a felony! Order issued (1/2/17) under false pretenses was vacated in advance of Settlement after Judge became aware.
Therefore, a PR issued by them(5/2/17) further perpetrating the fraud is also fraudulent. Cause & Effect.
Do I have to publish the chronology of events again? All filed orders and Court Orders documentation.
Shareholders read Court Papers like Hope Capital Cease & Desist and Consent Decree (10/26/16) for Kramer network of companies. Fraud to try and steal DBMM thereafter. Didn’t work,
DBMM directed settlement in June 2018 .
A superseded , vacated order is not a legal document. It was vacated—ignored. Read the legal position: On repeat.
Opinions on legal matters must have accurate standing and in context. When superseded and vacated , is fraudulent to pretend earlier event.
An Order obtained on fraudulent basis when Kramer and companies precluded from seeking shares by Federal SEC Consent Decree and Cease and Desist Order , is fraudulent and was ultimately vacated, pre-Settlement.
Not mentioned anywhere in Settlement because legally no longer existed when Consent Decree surfaced and Judge knew there had been no disclosure to him.
Settlement 5 years ago to the benefit of DBMM as documented in audited 10-K 2018 filing .
Legal matters are iterative, not one offs. Over and out.
Socratic logic says you can’t prove a negative .
I defy the SEC to prove there was no breach . There are hundreds of open APs , how were the 42 companies chosen for Dismissal?
Internal Controls are malfeasance get people fired. The SEC knows the DOE overreached and the embarrassment of continuing with certain cases not acceptable. Dismissals for all.
Irrelevant to keep trying to relitigate. Doesn’t matter and no one cares. The final order is DBMM win— yet again
What crap! Relitigation by the Nevers not on as no one cares and legally the disclaimer has no legal standing. The Standing Order only overridden by Final Order of Dismissal. A PFR is internal and has no legal standing at all.
The Standing Order of Nov 12, 2019 remained as such through June 1,2023 on the legal record. The Standing Order was superseded by the Final Order of Dismissal on June 2 , 2023.
It doesn’t matter that DOE overreached, the Orders only legal standing
Opinions on legal matters must have accurate standing and in context. When superseded and vacated , is fraudulent to pretend earlier event.
An Order obtained on fraudulent basis when Kramer and companies precluded from seeking shares by Federal SEC Consent Decree and Cease and Desist Order , is fraudulent and was ultimately vacated, pre-Settlement.
Not mentioned anywhere in Settlement because legally no longer existed when Consent Decree surfaced and Judge knew there had been no disclosure to him.
Settlement 5 years ago to the benefit of DBMM as documented in audited 10-K 2018 filing .
Legal matters are iterative, not one offs. Over and out.
More vacated doc never on DBMM website. Superseded in litigation file? Or directly from Kramers? Interesting question.
That fraudulent email is nothing more than a vacated order once Judge made aware of Hope Capital Consent Decree prior to DBMM initiated Settlement with Asher.
Litigation Court Papers include Order , but like every other superseded doc posted, has no validity in case as the Settlement had no reference as was vacated. No legal validity just like Revocation vacated and remanded Order in 2017.
Settlement done to DBMM benefit June 18, 2018. 5 years ago.
You know desperation to twist facts , wrong every time. Haha
Why would one tell shareholders how wrong they are to invest in DBMM? Shareholders know
Yes they want our shares all to shake shares loose
Shareholders do their own due diligence and surely are not stupid.
The Q is the beginning of DBMM’s growth post Final Order of Dismissal. Shareholders look forward to growth, Uplist and all metrics up, up and up.
Never executed, never was Asher an owner ever or even close because they tried it on and was caught and outed.
Every line item in chronology is documented. No deflection. Management closed matter at a discount 5 years ago!!!
Again
Chronology:
October 26 2016 Asher Motion to Turnover shares Civil Court
October 28,2016 Consent Decree -Cease & Desist Order SEC Federal
No disclosure to Civil Court
January 2017 Never Executed was it?
May 6,2017 Fraudulent PR by Asher
May 16,2017 DBMM OIP
Oct 2017 LTIs in for Cure-NASDAQ
May 31, 2018 Super 10-K filed
June 18,2018 DBMM settled to benefit of shareholder at 50% discount.
Every date from start to finish on list is documented. Not Opinions when filed events. Why not do some proper due diligence. Not like resharing the old remanded and vacated Revocation Order. Or the fraudulent PR. Goes on and on and shareholders know why.
Do I need to post the SEC Hope Capital Cease and Desist again. Do you not understand it?
Never underestimate DBMM Nevers-0 Shareholders-10
If not fraudulent, why was dated Jan 2017 and wasn’t executed??
The Cease &Desist and Consent Decree was discovered by DBMM, blew the plan. Can’t breach a Cease & Desist and a ConsentDecree, is Fraud— a Felony.
Do you think anyone believes Asher wouldn’t have executed the Order to
steal a non-US operating business , if they could?
Or settled at 50% discount?
Get real.
Stop the nonsense. No interest in guesswork as I deal only in facts and documented facts.
Both the Company and the transfer agent has stated no way of knowing about the existence of phantom, counterfeit and synthetic shares which existence globally.
Actually SEC actual cases were posted today which clearly could have a NSS aspect.
The regulators have as a priority the ferreting out of NSS . Let them do their work.
Just like bearer bonds, illegal in US but prevalent globally.
Stopping the nonsense would be welcomed.
Shareholders know: FRAUD By Asher. Has been posted many times by me as Corrections of the false statements of omissions and superseded events. On Notice.
Chronology:
October 26 2016 Asher Motion to Turnover shares Civil Court
October 28,2016 Consent Decree -Cease & Desist Order SEC Federal
No disclosure to Civil Court
January 2017 Never Executed was it?
May 6,2017 Fraudulent PR by Asher
May 16,2017 DBMM OIP
Oct 2017 LTIs in for Cure-NASDAQ
May 31, 2018 Super 10-K filed
June 18,2018 DBMM settled to benefit of shareholder at 50% discount.
Need me to share the link for the Fox defamation case?
Encourage to read the thread of posts as correcting for the zillionth time .
The Fraudulent PR on May 7, 2017 objective to attempt to steal DBMM .
-CKramer and Asher filed Motion in Civil Litigation on Oct 28,2016, to “steal” DC, 2 days after Hope Capital SEC Cease &Desist and Consent Decree to not seek shares in public companies . Link in my earlier post .
- Asher had obligation to disclose to Civil Court Judge as they breached the Consent Decree. They did not.
-Instead knew they were red flagged with SEC , DBMM got OIP for late filings May 17,2017. Coincidence? Of course not, but thought they could get DC the subsidiary in hand and could not disgorge a non-US entity thereafter.
- DBMM kept things in play until they could file the Super 10-K , done May 31,2018.
- DBMM struck settlement with Asher, DBMM’s terms with cash at 50% judgment, interest waived, derivative liabilities canceled with CDs.
-DBMM would have taken Asher into Federal Court for breaching their Consent Decree and non-disclosure to Civil Court Judge is fraud, if settlement wasn’t agreed.
These facts in SEC and Asher litigation Court Papers and testimony and have been put forth over a dozen times. Am now going to put it aside as your false statements have been corrected multiple times
Never underestimate DBMM.
Here is another case of fraudsters being caught. Everytime one of these cases is put up which are off topic creates chaos as they are not relevant. But a false conjunction is attempted with the trigger words of penny stock or microcap. Read the details—these are the bad guys who hire other bad guys.
However, as a shareholder every fellow shareholder is encouraged to scroll down and carve out the time to carefully read the Complaints.
Unregistered shares, insider trading, nominee accounts , boiler rooms, counterfeit shares, bad actors involvement—cases over time, this is their “career” many many offshore havens as (movable) addresses, beneficial ownership….it goes on and on.
Shareholders are alert as to the constant hammering on DBMM with false information.
Be alert, watch the return to normal business roll out in the light of day and listen. DBMM is on its way one step at a time.
Shareholders are delighted that the SEC is catching fraudsters.
These are unregistered and/or counterfeit shares .
Everybody should read the 3 separate Complaints and Map that are at bottom of PR. Read the types of transactions and where. Unregistered shares et al.
Facts are everything.
Shareholders know that I correct with facts. No one has to designate me when as a shareholder doing due diligence know where to cite the facts.
$DBMM
Shareholders (and regulators) aren’t stupid! They can follow a thread to one's first post.
CK (and RICO)network of companies were precluded from trying to steal Company in Civil Court by their Consent Decree in Federal Court. That is fraud.
Asher settled at DBMM’s terms to the benefit of Company with 50% discount. CDs canceled, interest canceled, Derivative Liabilities canceled. All that benefited shareholders.
No deflection from continuous attempts with false information or omissions to damage the Company.
False again. No “guilty “ anywhere , provide link. The word is never used in AP cases.
Best to leave the legal language to attorneys with knowledge and experience.
Judicial discretion is available in every case. Your concept of no penalty requiring a review is uncorroborated opinion, as is the Judge’s prerogative.
The fact that an ALJ Dismissal had never had a PFR requested is testament to a Judge’s judicial discretion based on mitigating circumstances of the case.
The Dismissal of the case now stands.
False, prove it. An S-8 is required to pay for services with equity/shares.
The Company’s Q will prove your statement false Out next week.
Defamation - eg intended to damage company as no evidence.
NSS are illegal and Company and transfer agent have said the regulators are determined to ferret them out.
I posted facts from Hope Capital Court Case with the SEC in which CK and his network of companies were precluded from taking shares in a public company or its subsidiaries.
Can’t obfuscate the Federal ruling in a Consent Decree overrides a Civil Court Motion with undisclosed contract with SEC. Non-disclosure is fraud.
You have been corrected many times
Defamation is real. Documented
Defamation definition proof :
1) false statement
2) communication to third person
3) negligence
4) harm caused to entity
$DBMM
The Company said their filings were late, but mitigating circumstances in play (with evidence.)
The genesis of the mitigating circumstances was the Reaudit of 3 years . Which had nothing to do with DBMM was Sanctioned auditor re Chinese US public companies. Cost DBMM $157K+.
DBMM case was dismissed and for the first time in SEC history, the DOE asked for a review of an ALJ Dismissal!
Keep proving the obvious. That false statements continue. I have posted facts many times. Read Undertaking section of Hope Capital case in Oct 2016. Federal Consent Decree, no public company or subsidiary.
Two days Guilty of fraud to try and steal DBMM with after filing Civil Court Motion. That’s fraud as should have disclosed to Civil Court Judge.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239.pdf
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239-s.pdf
Defamation is real.
Defamation definition proof :
1) false statement
2) communication to third person
3) negligence
4) harm caused to entity
Are traders paying for pps to be depressed? Regulators continue to be concerned about manipulation.
“…to help the less educated”
Where is the punch line here? Wrong again, either totally, or through incorrect assumptions and inferences, which can depress the pps.
Every day posting bid/ask as price being depressed by some agreeing with each other onslaught.
Shareholders and others know.
Shareholders believe of short sellers and other bad actors who
Depress and Manipulate the pps down, many of whom get ....to do so, are the scammers.
Maybe they should be vetted by regulators and brokers like DBMM was.
Shareholders share a view that a scam is when false statements are made by people who get you know ......
Depress the pps ok but when Company shares positive plans, it is a pump? Not hardly.
Said it before defamation is on front burner these days, just ask Fox and their shareholders. How did that turn out?
Fact: Shareholders Know
“educator” on a chatroom is not a credential. It is an opinion which may or may not, be accurate, often not.
opinions are biased without legal or financial credentials. Ridiculous to suggest one would know better than the series of reviews DBMM has successfully “won.” Won each step to move on to the next.
Yes Shareholders know that "education" is very one-sided we know ;)
To use a RS 8-10 years ago reported in filings and say “I exposed….”
Is truly absurd.
One Never after another? No one buys that kind of excuse .
DBMM made law with their Dismissal for mitigating circumstances with evidence. Proven evidence. Never a scintilla of issue or comment about anything untoward. Never a comment.
A true unbiased and honest “educator” is objective and doesn’t create chaos and opinions then have value.
Shareholders know one step at a time.
Opinions are just that and shareholders need to do their own due diligence in documents like filings, court papers, industry information in the public sector.
Educate? Hahaha
Do you really think anyone at all is buying this nonsense?
Depressing pps by short sellers and bad actors in desperation before Q out.
No debt due.
No facts
Outing the nonsense line by line will be fun!