InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 3633
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/14/2020

Re: Stock_Barber post# 312815

Sunday, 07/16/2023 1:12:09 PM

Sunday, July 16, 2023 1:12:09 PM

Post# of 349974
What a pathetic revisionist you are!

My portfolio has been blue chip companies in which I neither trade nor try to convince anyone else to buy. Certain small percentage has been allocated to the OTC because LovePink encouraged me to drill down and do extensive due diligence by reading every filing and every Update and every one of Court Papers and draw my own conclusions. Love*Pink is the real deal with integrity and facts. Take shots at him will not serve you well. That’s a bullying tactic and he is respected on this forum.

Always looking to the past while telling everyone how smart you are , while castigating others , is laughable if it wasn’t so pathetic. And the bashers reinforce each other while being paid.

I would never be paid like you guys as there is no credibility and is totally biased. Due diligence wins every time. Documents you guys dare call opinion when in fact they are public information. Your documents have been long superseded or vacated. Intended to create chaos and just clogs up the dialogue. Or you argue actions by judges , attorneys and Commission is wrong and a throwaway. Yet the result is positive for DBMM.

As a performer on a stage, the hook has come out . Supportive DBMM shareholders are simply sick of the antics. Grown ups move on, not bash every hour of the day about a Company which has prevailed with multiple regulators and decision makers including LTIs to help it cure , grow, and get to NASDAQ.

The rules have changed and the crap needs to stop with that fact. Out of your league, go hunt another
OTC purported victim needing self-proclaimed “education.”