Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wow! Flyin' this morning!
You called it! They just increased the OS to 8,199,034,371 on 5/16/23.
Obviously though, it was 7,749,662,225 on 5/15/23, and we didn't see that kind of volume yesterday, so I have to assume they are adjusting the numbers from slow dilution that has occurred over the last couple of months.
Sweet EOD action! And the bid size was piling up all day. May see 6's tomorrow. Moving up!
$PLPL Reverse Merger! Getting ready to pop!
Awesome! Looking good.
Quarterly out now. About damn time-
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/371092/content
Money moving around, coming out of big boards. Hopefully it comes into OTCs!
5's movin' now! Good sign.
I feel like if Tad were going to do that, he would have done it immediately after the 3/9 supplemental, such that he would have decent volume to support such a large dump. So I am not really worried about that now.
I'm also not sure if that would cause problems with the merger paperwork if Tad starts messing with the SS now. Seems like it would just slow things down.
Go $PLPL! Get shares while you can before the big event!
Yeah, I have had a similar thing happen twice to me in the last 10 years. One of them ($VRUS) looked like it would work out really well, and the price went up at first, but the new guy jacked up the AS one day to 50B! And it was all downhill from there. They have since reduced the AS, but it's too late now.
ByoPlanet looks really good though, so I am not expecting anything bad to happen.
That's right. still crap.
Yeah, they are pretty sweet. That is why I bought in, and have another buy order sitting at 4 (I may move that up to 5 in two weeks if I don't get them). I actually bought in a little before the 3/9 supplemental disclosure, purely due to the ups and downs in the share price (that is something I like).
ByoPlanet looks like a solid company, and I look forward to making some money.
I said there was no indication the new guy would do that. Just speculation.
I agree. No reason for the new guy to care. The real danger is if the new guy decides to take his new toy and turn it into a piggy bank and dilute it into the ground.
No indication he would do that though.
Totally. It's worth a roll of the dice at 0.0001.
You're welcome, and thank you for the kind words. We will see $0.01 if we are lucky!
B.S. is Bachelor of Science BTW
Yes, those are required fields of study, both for my ME degree (double Bachelor's) and for work. Thanks for asking.
Hilarious. i stand corrected.
I'm an electrical engineer. You are the one that seems to have a problem understanding it. Read their patents. None of them describe a novel method of charging the micro-droplets. They use the same charging scheme everyone else does, because that is what the physics involves dictates.
The only advantage they have is the nozzle design. It allows them to get smaller particle size from a pressurized liquid stream without needing to use an ultrasonic fog type device.
The smaller particle size allows the "wrap-around" effect.
Yes, an update of how things are proceeding would be nice.
No, its not. That is how patents work. I hold 2 patents myself, so I would know.
1) A finger position sensing mechanism for computer interaction
2) A method of seeding fiber laser amplifiers to prevent self-pulsing
But, it makes no difference if you understand it or not. All we need here is newbies to buy the ask value and drive the price up so I can place a market sell and make money off them.
That is how this game is played.
Its not "induction". They put a charge on the particle. No induction needed. They use the word induction because the average person doesn't know any better. They even say themselves electrostatic sprayers have been used for over 60 years.
None of their patents relate to the charging the particles. They are spray nozzle related (utility) and design (cosmetic) patents.
I feel the same. Get it done. Rip off the Band-Aid. Then we aren't worried about it happening at some random time latter.
Normally we would see good "anticipation" buying before a big event like this and the price would move up, but they haven't given us a fixed date when that will happen, so we sit in limbo.
And I think there is some skittishness about what will happen when the new dude takes control. - Restructure when the name / ticker changes, or wait till later?
In the end, it does not matter. If ByoPlanet can sell more of their equipment and chemicals, then they make more money.
I agree. It works. But modern patents don't require proof. The patent author can make whatever claim they like, as long as they are not infringing on a previous invention, the patent office is happy. Some companies purposely write the description of the invention in a subversive way (don't give all the details) to prevent other companies (outside the US) from copying the invention, or changing a small detail, and then patenting their own version with the claim that it is better in some way.
There are piles of patents where the author claims to know how something works, but because the patent office doesn't care about that, the patent is granted anyway. The "Dean Drive" is a famous example- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_drive
Yeah, I think people are a little gun shy from the previous announcements.
All I know is- At some point, something will happen, and then someone will make or loose money.
I have never really cared what the companies I invest in actually do. They can make baby poison for all I care. I have made the most money off of OTC yield stocks with negative revenue. It is all news driven anyway. Buy the rumor, sell the news as they say.
I will just wait and see.
Gauss's law says the maximum charge a perfect sphere can obtain is determined by its radius. So, no matter how the charge was obtained, there is a limit to the charge a particle (liquid or otherwise) can carry. Variations can occur if the conductivity or density of the sphere is changed though. So, yes, its size does effect the rate it can collect a charge and the quantity of charge, since the current source (or sink) used to apply the charge has a limited current capacity, and the interaction time of the particle with the source of the charge matters.
The "induction" charging is a sales gimmick .Induction in a conductive material only induces an electric field in the material while the magnetic field is changing. Once the material is out of that changing field (or the particle has moved beyond it), the electrons just move back to where they where, and no net charge is created. Inducing electric fields in spheres (as we will have with a liquid due to surface tension) is even more complex due to the way Eddy currents move in spheres, and often doesn't even result in a net electric field being created.
That is not what I implied at all. The smaller particle will certainly react differently due to its size. As I said, particle size matters. Even though a particle of larger radius can store a larger charge, the additional mass of the larger particle will cause it to react differently than a smaller particle would. If the particle size is small enough, the viscosity if the air itself allows the charged particle to remain suspended long enough for the electric field it experiences to draw it to an oppositely charged surface. Even around curved surfaces, and around the back of an object, if the particle gets around the back of the item, which is not difficult with a "fog" of particles. Coulomb repulsion keeps the particles of like charge separated, and the closer they are to an oppositely charged surface the stronger the electric field they will experience (inverse square law).
It makes no difference how the charge was applied to the particle. Micro-droplet or otherwise. Particle size is what matters here. Particles of 10um or less can stay suspended for many minutes in still air, and below 5um can stay in air (nearly) indefinitely (think cloud in the sky) because the viscosity if the air itself becomes a major factor.
The EPA requires chemical manufacturers to register with them. The EPA has no authority to tell ByoPlanet or any other manufacturer what type of sprayer is used, as AKATITUS is claiming.
You can use your Eco One and make all the disinfectant you want in any concentration. Then load up your Jet H2 Ultra and use it to soak your entire house if you like and not require EPA registration, because you are not selling the chemical, and only making the chemical in (relatively) small amounts.
https://store.ecoloxtech.com/byoplanet-and-ecoloxtech/
What the hell is going on with this company? Can't even get their filings up to date.
As you like.
No. Smaller particle size. Reduces the amount of chemical needed for a given square footage. The technique used to apply the charge to the particles makes no difference.
Ive read them. They can claim whatever they want. Is does not work that way in the real world. That is simply the manufacturer trying to keep people from buying chemicals from other suppliers.
I don't mind waiting for a good profit also. But I have always liked the volatility of OTC's and higher (potential) profits. Big board stocks just don't do it for me. So if they get up into NYSE price range I would probably just take the money somewhere else.
LOL. I think we will be fine. I just watch the price run up, and as soon as the price starts to roll over, place a market sell order, make money, wait for price to bottom out, re-buy. Repeat as needed. I'm not a "flipper" though, and won't bother selling at less than 100% profit, and I don't mind waiting a year or more if necessary.
It has always worked for me as long as I can get it at a good price. I am usually pretty good at buying the bottom, but not so good at predicting the peak, so sometimes I don't make as much as I could.
I still think it is a good gamble at 0.0004 or less.
The EPA has no authority to determine how chemicals are applied. Ultrasonic, electrostatic, or otherwise. They can only regulate the chemical used, and the amount used, in an open environment. In closed quarters, such as in a hospital setting, the FDA gets involved.