Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Busy day!! Just finally ate dinner about 30 mins ago!! Getting ready and focused an a potentially awesome $KNSC week!!
I have my buy order in to hopefully pick up some more $KNSC .0004s and/or .0005s at open before they are gone. There will be someone that sells!! Happens almost every time!
Oh! Yes! The storm is a comin'!! We should be hearing other news very soon after the Q was filed. Hope it's share reduction news...Like CEO conversion of common shares to Preferred and retire 3.2B commons off the log!! $KNSC
I hope everyone has their $KNSC tickets in hand...The $KNSC train is about to leave the station!! Real Revenues, Real Profits, Real Company!!
We should be hearing other news very soon after the Q was filed. Hope it's share reduction news...Like CEO conversion of common shares to Preferred and retire 3.2B commons off the log!! $KNSC
Get them Moon Bucks ready...gonna need them when $KNSC hits
the MOON baby!!!!
Have my buy order in...hope to snag some more 5s before she goes!!
There will always be someone not paying attention and keep those sell orders intact. Also, if there are any shorts left, they gotta get out!!!!
Yeah! Ok, Considering they would only refer anyone I know that tried to contact them to contact the company or company's attorney with questions. I guess you have a special pass to get info direct from OTCMkts?
If OTCMarkets told you this...Please tell me why they removed the Caveat Emptor from KNSC a few hours after your post!!!
From the 8K filed 29 Jun 17...
TEM 3.02 UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The previous management (Natario) advises that the share structure is as follows:
Authorized shares 5 Billion Shares
Outstanding shares approx. 3,3 Billion shares
Float approx. 900 million shares
This is the tweet they posted just prior to the last tweet...
Many inquiries if PSRU has any stock Reverse Split plans!? Absolutely NOT! NOT for the foreseeable future while this mgmt in control.!PSRU
Where is your compensation statement specific to $KNSC?
This is my favorite part of the booklet...
In practice, however, less than 10 percent of patent infringement suits are litigated to final judgment. In the vast majority of cases, the parties agree to resolve their dispute by entering into a settlement agreement: a written contract in which the parties mutually agree to take or forego certain actions in order to end the lawsuit.
https://www.fr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/A-Guide-to-Patent-Litigation-in-Fed-Court-2016.pdf
***A MUST READ - Patent Infringement Litigation Process***
This is for those who know nothing about the patent infringement litigation process and for those pc lawyers (aka bar stool lawyers) that think they know what they are talking about.
A few of you are spot on in what you are talking about; most of the other's; not so much!!
https://www.fr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/A-Guide-to-Patent-Litigation-in-Fed-Court-2016.pdf
Read the whole booklet. Below are a couple of key points from it...
This step has been accomplished:
Although patent litigation trials take place in federal district courts, it is commonplace for defendants in patent lawsuits to also initiate parallel proceedings in the USPTO, challenging the validity of the asserted patents. These are generally referred to as “post-grant” proceedings because they take place in the USPTO after the patent has already been granted.
The most common post-grant proceeding is called inter partes review (IPR) and involves a challenge to the validity of a patent based on patents or printed publications that predate the patent’s filing date. IPRs may be filed by the defendant no later than one year after being served with the patent infringement complaint. A successful IPR can invalidate one or more patent claims. Once an IPR has been completed, it precludes the defendant from continuing to assert in the lawsuit any invalidity defenses that were or could have been brought in the IPR. This is called “estoppel.
”Another common type of litigation-related proceeding is called a covered business method (CBM) patent review. CBM proceedings apply only to “business method” patents and generally allow a broader range of challenges to the validity of the patent. Unlike IPRs, they are not subject to a one-year filing limitation and do not preclude the defendant from using defenses at a later trial that could have been, but were not, asserted in the CBM.
Once an IPR or CBM has been filed, it is common for the defendant to ask the district court to stay (i.e., temporarily halt) the underlying patent suit pending the outcome of the proceeding at the USPTO. By statute, IPRs and CBMs must be completed within 18 months of the challenger’s initial request (with rare exceptions), and because the result of the IPR or CBM may substantially simplify the case, many judges will agree to issue such stays. If the IPR or CBM invalidates all of the asserted patent claims, this effectively ends the lawsuit.
Other types of post-grant proceedings available at the USPTO include post-grant review, ex parte reexamination, supplemental examination, and derivation proceedings. However, these are rarely used in connection with litigation. The following chart summarizes the differences between the types of post-grant proceedings.
This is where we are right now:
They usually don't disclose settlement talks during negotiation phase.
They are going to try to catch anyone selling @ Market immediately at open as L2 flips to a current view.
L2 will not show accurate until market opens. Don't let it fool you before market opens. MM games!!
***A MUST READ - Patent Infringement Litigation Process***
Admin...This is not Off-Topic and has everything to do with $UOIP, Please do not delete!!!
This is for those who know nothing about the patent infringement litigation process.
A few of you are spot on in what you are talking about; most of the other's; not so much!!
https://www.fr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/A-Guide-to-Patent-Litigation-in-Fed-Court-2016.pdf
Read the whole booklet. Below are a couple of key points from it...
This step has been accomplished:
Although patent litigation trials take place in federal district courts, it is commonplace for defendants in patent lawsuits to also initiate parallel proceedings in the USPTO, challenging the validity of the asserted patents. These are generally referred to as “post-grant” proceedings because they take place in the USPTO after the patent has already been granted.
The most common post-grant proceeding is called inter partes review (IPR) and involves a challenge to the validity of a patent based on patents or printed publications that predate the patent’s filing date. IPRs may be filed by the defendant no later than one year after being served with the patent infringement complaint. A successful IPR can invalidate one or more patent claims. Once an IPR has been completed, it precludes the defendant from continuing to assert in the lawsuit any invalidity defenses that were or could have been brought in the IPR. This is called “estoppel.
”Another common type of litigation-related proceeding is called a covered business method (CBM) patent review. CBM proceedings apply only to “business method” patents and generally allow a broader range of challenges to the validity of the patent. Unlike IPRs, they are not subject to a one-year filing limitation and do not preclude the defendant from using defenses at a later trial that could have been, but were not, asserted in the CBM.
Once an IPR or CBM has been filed, it is common for the defendant to ask the district court to stay (i.e., temporarily halt) the underlying patent suit pending the outcome of the proceeding at the USPTO. By statute, IPRs and CBMs must be completed within 18 months of the challenger’s initial request (with rare exceptions), and because the result of the IPR or CBM may substantially simplify the case, many judges will agree to issue such stays. If the IPR or CBM invalidates all of the asserted patent claims, this effectively ends the lawsuit.
Other types of post-grant proceedings available at the USPTO include post-grant review, ex parte reexamination, supplemental examination, and derivation proceedings. However, these are rarely used in connection with litigation. The following chart summarizes the differences between the types of post-grant proceedings.
This is where we are right now:
I wish I could've posted it early this evening. Single dad...got busy with kid's activities/needs. Finally have a few moments to myself! CALGON.. Take me away!! LOL
This is exactly what I was thinking!! They didn't see eye to eye, so... "We'll see YOU in court!!!"
It will give the Cisco and the cable companies time to realize we aren't playing and they will be more open for a fair discussion.
I agree that the opinion or pump of the author should've been left out of the article. They should've just stuck to the facts and let the reader develop their own opinion of where the pps might go.
Ah! Saw this after my previous reply to your previous post!
Regardless of who the author was, the awareness article provides a consolidation of facts that can be backup with verifiable legal documentation. Therefore, it shouldn't matter if it was posted onto a pay to publish site. Someone thought it was worth their time and their investment to write up an article and pay to publish it to bring awareness to the on goings of the company and legal status of the infringement case. If I were a good writer, I probably would have done the same thing since there isn't any publicity going on to bring attention to UOIP other than word of mouth on chat blogs and the ability to follow the court documents.
$KNSC .0005 New company working hard to get OTCMarkets current and Caveat Emptor from old company removed any day now. Second amended filings pending OTCMkts review and pending second amended attorney letter submission.
New Company CEO owns 3.2B of O/S with plans to convert his shares to Preferred shares.
Currently, 2 active restaurants with 3rd opening soon and a 4th in planning stage. $800k revenues 1st Qtr with only 2 operating restaurants. Have heard a lot of news in the pipes once current status achieved.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/KNSC/filings
This is posted under ChanBond,LLC v. Comcast Corp Docket. The court has ordered all future filings for all case numbers be consolidated and filed under Civil Action No. 15-842-RGA, which is Atlantic Broadband Group's docket.
Monday, March 06, 2017
106
ORDER re (102 in 15-cv-845-RGA, 102 in 15-cv-851-RGA, 103 in 15-cv-842-RGA, 102 in 15-cv-850-RGA, 102 in 15-cv-852-RGA, 102 in 15-cv-854-RGA, 102 in 15-cv-848-RGA, 102 in 15-cv-844-RGA, 101 in 15-cv-847-RGA, 103 in 15-cv-853-RGA, 101 in 15-cv-849-RGA, 104 in 15-cv-846-RGA, 101 in 15-cv-843-RGA) Stipulation and Order to Consolidate. *All filings in these actions shall be made only in Civil Action No. 15-842-RGA. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/3/2017. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00842-RGA et al.(nms)
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426392/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Comcast_Corporation_et_al
Why would one sell into the bid, bringing the pps down to the 9s when ppl were still actively buying on the ask in the .01s? Makes no sense!
Very informative post. Thank you crow!
$KNSC Previous company went dormant. New CEO, New Company trying to get everything current to reverse merge into this ticker. Once current status achieved, company vision, name and ticker change soon to follow.
Some MMs keep their feed open even after market hours and others turn their feed off.
Yes, I didn't think to deduct the Overcash shares.
No problem...I need commas to help keep my eyes straight on a series of digits!! Sucks getting old!! LOL
count your digits again...that's a little over 1B O/S; NOT 11B!!!
@snmglobal I will have an investor conference call Thurs @ 9am, May 25th to discuss recent filings and direction of company. 712-432-1630 code 1096509
I will have an investor conference call Thurs @ 9am, May 25th to discuss recent filings and direction of company. 712-432-1630 code 1096509
— SNM Global Holdings (@snmglobal) May 24, 2017
Would you rather Troy went dark and not tell us anything so we think he isn't doing anything until it happens? Or would you rather he keep us in the loop the best he legally can with a timeline of milestones HE HOPES to hit at a specific time, even if it results in not hitting it on the day he specified?? I prefer the latter, I own bags of shares in companies that had great plans; then went dark...not another word, 1, 2, 3+ yrs later.
I understand that some things are out of one's control. Or that someone might jump the gun and unintentionally give out info a little premature (possibly a result of many impatient shareholders repeatedly blowing up his phone wanting an update). Or thought something was good to go but realized, something got overlooked. Or a last minute deal popped up (we already saw a couple of those).
Unfortunately, many ppl take a projected timeline as literal. "OMG!! He said Monday, it's Monday, where's it at?? Although I sometimes like those days, because I can sometimes pick up more cheap shares. BUT, sometimes, one has to be flexible and have patience.
@snmglobal: I have a feeling everyone is going to be really happy in SNM world this upcoming week!
m.twitter.com/snmglobal
Thank you very much for the description of the establishment. Please do share any intel you may obtain during your nosing around about the acquisition from that end of the spectrum!
This is all we really have to go on so far. I don't really remember Troy discussing it on any of the CCs.
SNM Global To Enter Into $1 Million Term Sheet With Funky Biscuit; Will File A Tier 1 Reg A To Complete Acquisitions
PR Newswire
MIAMI BEACH, Fla., April 24, 2017
MIAMI BEACH, Fla., April 24, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- SNM Global Holdings an entertainment/media company has come to terms with Funky Biscuit in a future $1 million joint venture expansion project to expand the Funky Biscuit brand.
Established in 2011, The Funky Biscuit is South Florida's premiere destination for live entertainment and dining. They showcase all genres of national, regional, and local artists. The brand has a reputation of excellence around the globe and regularly attracts artists and patrons from nearly every continent.
"With our future joint venture expansion project with The Funky Biscuit, we have diversified our assets into the musical and dining industry in a very high end and well known way. The expansion of their brand we feel will be a very lucrative and exciting endeavor," states CEO Troy Lowman. SNM Global will now start the process of filing a Tier 1 Reg A filing to fund its projects.
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements: This news release includes forward-looking statements. While these statements are made to convey to the public the company's progress, business opportunities and growth prospects, readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements represent management's opinion. Whereas management believes such representations to be true and accurate based on information and data available to the company at this time, actual results may differ materially from those described. The Company's operations and business prospects are always subject to risk and uncertainties. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ are and will be set forth in the company's periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SNMN/news/SNM-Global-To-Enter-Into--1-Million-Term-Sheet-With-Funky-Biscuit--Will-File-A-Tier-1-Reg-A-To-Complete-Acquisitions?id=156872&b=y
Thank you for the 11's. Hoping to collect 10's and 9's. If I don't get filled, no biggie, I already recovered my principle from earlier purchases, I'm still holding plenty of free shares.
Minor set back today with the interview not appearing nationally on GMA. But it apparently did appear during the local coverage of GMA. The news is there!!
This will fly once everything falls into play.
That's old news...like 2014 if I remember correctly. I'm not sure that it ever evolved.