Buy PM's
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You can get an Idea from George Waller's
43 Minute Interview, where I first heard him mention Comcast as a Customer Nov. 2013.
http://mediajobs.com/interview-strikeforce-70-market-norton-kaspersky-dont/3663/
He discusses customized and varied pricing for services dependin on what the Customer needs are and how which way they want pricing to be making it Great for the customer, but that maybe just on ProductID, for the Enterprise.
Lots of good stuff in the Interview, it's Audio and Text.. Dated but good nice to know stuff to know.. Like even back then in 2013 it was said :
Re: CEO Complaints
1) Not a word in more than three months.
PR's Come out when there is News, No Fluff PR's just to appease whiny shareholders Thank You very much Mark.
2) We the shareholders, want a new CEO.... Speak for yourself.
Not to many CEO' will take time to Answer the Phone when you call or personally answer Emails. Saves money hireing a Secretary and plus makes shareholders feel like good to actually communicate with the CEO and feel appreciated for investing in the Co. Not some someone answerin the phone with a script. Speaking of that......
3) Transparency ? Really ? Try Emailing or Calling Kay or Listen to Webinar Videos and Interviews to get a Clue, seems stuff is passed on about a few times a month there. That is if one takes the time to listen.
4) Management shorting the stock
5) The CEO doesn't appear to care about shareholders and is behaving like Vladimir Putin.
Liberals always have to have something to whine about. I'd hate to think What would happen if you see Trump playing a round with Putin on a visit.
"My main memory of playing golf with Donald Trump—preserved with more care now that he's the president—is that he really went after the ball hard. But the interesting thing is that though Trump's action might have looked a little reckless, it soon became clear that it was quite under control. Hmmm.Jan 17, 2017
http://www.golfdigest.com/story/how-good-is-donald-trump-the-golfer
6) We don't know the OS ? Try doing research, call Kay, or call TA.
7) Nobody knows what is going on in Edison, NJ.
Let me keep you current and up-to-date ....Most people are Sleeping right now!
TEMPERATURE Broke a record last Sunday, Warm... Currently 56 degrees
It's been sunny and in the 80's the past few days here in Cental Florida land of Theme Parks anD Shine and Rocket Launches
We the shareholders, want a new CEO. The SP is adrift. The company is rudderless. No one knows what is really going on or what direction the management is taking. We don't know the OS. Just look at all the speculation on this message board. The CEO doesn't appear to care about shareholders and is behaving like Vladimir Putin. Not a word in more than three months. This isn't a publicly held company--it's a pet project of possibly incompetent individuals. The share price is being manipulated openly and management may be behind the daily shorting and nobody knows what is going on in Edison, NJ. For all we know, they might be on vacation every day. This has reached a point of absurdity and I propose that the CEO step down and someone new is elected. Someone who understands the definition of transparency and knows a little bit about leadership
Yeah Blinkee I Agree - HardCore DD
Yeah I like Gold's posts cause their factual and entertaining.
Jtech and Z give straight dope too.
I'm too damn lazy for hardcore DD.
Just like to shoot my mouth off
"Wondering who's a paid promoter" me me.!
Ive Been Paid Nicely with the rise in PPS.
Not enough to cover my time doing Research yet, but the tomorrow's another day.
Ref: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129133687
****** http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=129133294
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=129133409
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129133159
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129132824
Oh the replies ! ROTHFLOL
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=129132341
EyeBall - Facts / IMO or words to that effect.
Don't know what your trying to say or imply.
The words then "it's not beyond the possibility"
Make it clear I'm not stating Facts.
Besides our conversation ended when you told me to FO.
Which is Rude, Crude and down right Socially Unacceptable.
'GuardedID or Product ID ?", Good Possibility Synthek, I have to go back and listen to both webinars. See if he mentions Firewall or some other Clue, before emailing Kay, he does not need more email if the information can be derived with a little effort.
blinkee KOOL, Thanks
percival77 / et al
Man I was dog tired after that long drawn out nonsense Merry-go-round.
Your comment gave me the energy to continue doing research for a little longer tonight.
As I had never said Intel was using StrikeForce's IP, just It's a Possibility when you put 2+2 together.
I'm Stating it again as I hate when people twist the conversation around making it sound like I'm saying something I did not. Or just twisting the words around to make it sound like they're right.
When I have Facts I post Links or Pictures, if not I make sure to say IMO or words to that effect.
"I basicly said if ACS/SFOR is working with McAfee/Intel and Intel is just announcing its Latest Microprocessors have Hardware MultiFactor Authentication, then it's not beyond the possibility, that Intel maybe Using StrkeForce's IP. "
Thanks Drifter, penny had said qvc.com Barcode, I knew I had never seen that.
Unless I'm still missing something.
qvc.com statement.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129130572
Re: "Disguarded"- And it should be, that happened long before the ACS McAffee/Intel Partnership. And before MSFT was slapped with the Lawsuit I believe and at that time PhoneFactor was infringing.
You didnt ! Thats my point exactly ! Its unknown speculation read all day lol i post a fact linking the intel sfor patent prior to all this bs talk and its discarded
Thanks Jtech, I see the Available on Amazon on the Updated Website
The updated Keystoke Guard website which as I research months ago from the first NIIB webinar and determined this is StrikeForce, as Kay is training them on the HIPPA Compliant rebranded Program.
But sorry, I could not find not see a ups code.
I Had not been to that website recently, did not see it had been updated when StrikeForce updated theirs.. Looks much better / professional.
Not doing your work for you, its out there and in my posts on the board with Waller saying it, go search for it on your time.
Find where I stated this as fact
Show me evidence sfor is in intel hardware other than through microsoft which i have proven ! Til then your losing credit to the post of such matter
upc code..... ??? Sorry
Don't understand r00l
At the time Waller made that comment,
A while back now.
He stated the GuardedID program embeddeds itself on to the chip, meaning it loads just like any program that can Take Advantage of the TPM Security Chip.
That's got nothing to do with MSFT Period.
This is ridiculous bannter feedbacK I'm getting. Take your thoughts and speak them all you want. I'll just LOL.
At the time Waller made that comment,
A while back now.
He stated the GuardedID program embeddeds itself on to the chip, meaning it loads just like any program that can Take Advantage of the TPM Security Chip.
That's got nothing to do with MSFT Period.
This is ridiculous bannter feedbacK I'm getting. Take your thoughts and speak them all you want. I'll just LOL.
I don't think so.....
"Microsoft already paid the debt for that."
Blinkee, I did not state "Home Shopping Network",
When did Mark directly state anything about Home Shopping Network?
Did he just use the ambiguous phrase "TV Store" or something?
Was there ever any more clarification about that?
If so I missed it. Please advise.
Re: 2015 - Then Intel would just be another Infringer on the list, but with ACS Cooperation with McAffee I wouldn't say INTEL being on the Infringer List is highly likely. Would you ? So one can draw their own Major Major frigging conclusion.
As for MosscowSoft, I could give a CR_P. Except for the fact of SFOR being able to talk about a settlement win with them.
Intel added multi factor authentication hardware in 2015 ! Date check it then tell me how sfor is linked lol ... Microsoft
Agree carrusso, and let's not forget to add,
Major Major News with Major Major Players, and we still have the Network Shopping Channel coming.
Some may feel Mark is exaggerating saying Major Major. Mark was with JP Morgan for 26 years, I think he is just trying to emphasize not exaggerate. I hear Major Major as Pounding the Table with emphasis but that's just my Opinion, I could be Wrong.
We will eventually find out.
Same goes for the Next Lawsuits when they are announced. Will they be Major Major ?
Will we as shareholders be able to write to and Alert the AP, Fox Business News, and other Major Major News Centers to let them know ?
Big well known named Player Lawsuits can draw Major Attention easily. Then who needs to spend money on Advertising right away...
Then "might" we see one of the Company Execs on Fox Business News, etc. in an Interview ? With a Microsoft Settlement in their back Pocket waiting to be Pulled out and mentioned too ?
Me, I'm very Patient, and waiting for whatever happens to play out hopefully in a Major Major Way.
But no need to listen to this old Gold 49'er though, cause ma Nephew gave me one of them their new fangled Smarty Phones, loaded with Mobile Trust, so I'm just putting it to use, and Pointer, that's ma Mule, passes me good info too with each Carrot I giv'her.
For the Major Major Kay quote see my post:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129126533
And please no one need make any derogatory comments on the Network Shopping Channel, if that doesn't happen by the middle of April, then you can fire away at me. Mark stated it. Mark is not in charge of the Programing Schedule and most importantly he has not stated it was Canceled.
Re: Sorry if you find my Post annoying. DD
Yeah I saw it, Before it was _______________
Most longs here don't find them annoying.
So yes, no offence taken... LOL It does not bother me at all.
I'm also sorry if anyone has trouble putting 2+2 together when the equation is not all in one post.
Go to 9:30, On Keystroke Encryption "Being looked at by the Anti-Virus Companies as something they need badly and we are in some discussions with some and starting to get some Deals done in that respect"
All ik is if intel was licensing sfor patent we wouldnt be struggling inder a penny
Thanks, Love the Stuff, passed on to si Harvey.
Yes and someone else might be Out to Lunch.
Re: "struggling inder a penny" sorry LOL 4-ALL
All ik is if intel was licensing sfor patent we wouldnt be struggling inder a penny
Re: face recognition CAN'T be fooled with photo
The face recognition can be fooled with photo , its been around for few years
???"Balance does not require misrepresentation of facts."
Misrepresentation? ??
I present the Facts, Links and Evidence backing up my post.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129039308
All I see are one and two line digs, I see no Facts, no links, no Screencaptures, to backup short remarks made.
From Reply feedback from others, I must be right on the Mark.
Thanks Longs.
Jumping to the subject of recent ecological disasters, with a lot of lakes and streams drying up, they are leaving fish to die out of water.
Re: "so you posit that you are "in the loop"
Oh, so you posit that you are "in the loop"?
You don't understand the platform infrastructure.
Yea, good luck to anyone trying to find Kim's 2FA Patent on Google patent search what ever names you use given in the article.
Not saying it's not out there somewhere but 20 min using the information given come up with zip, nada.
Yet do a search on the Net, not even a Google patent search for Ram's patent and Bam there it is.
Re: "submitted software to the Intel validation lab."
Quote: Blinkee
However, as per Intel website they are partnered with SFOR ACS.
koog
This means they submitted software to the Intel validation lab. Intel determined the software worked properly.
Intel publicizes such validated software. It helps them sell the new utilities they include in Skylake (the new CPU).
reply 49'er
A partner program, which may also be referred to as channel partner program or alliance program, is a business strategy that vendors use to encourage value-added resellers (VARs), managed service providers (MSPs), consultants, systems integrators (SIs), original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), independent software vendors (ISVs) and distributors to recommend or sell the vendor’s products and associated services.
http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/definition/partner-program
Which goes along with Kay's Statement "and yes we do sell products though McAffee also."
Putting two and two together above, Intel is a Channel Partner of SFOR/ACS.
Dare I go one step Further, proving my Point that SFOR/ACS is a Channel Partner of Intel/ McAffee, Read the page below.
Again it must be hard to be Not INSIDE INTEL AND OUT OF THE LOOP.
AS SFOR IS INSIDE INTEL AND IN THE LOOP.
It does get tiring restating the same thing over and over a different way for everyone who wants to debate the facts.
How many times has that Screencapture been shown now Longs?
Re: "This means they submitted software to the Intel validation lab. Intel determined the software worked properly. "
This sounds contrary to what you stated months ago when You said "SFOR'S Software was not Certified by Intel".
RE: koog - Incorrect No.
You are incorrect. The foils you posted say no such thing. If you had ever been involved in the design and production of microprocessors, you would know. This is not a slam. Most not involved in design would not understand this.
Interesting stats. I miss seeing wolfgangrene and 1stockmans analysis on stock price movements. Both were so consistent with their methods. In particular the charts that stockman used interested me as it was the 1st time I had seen that method. So many names that I have appreciated input from over the years. Thank you to all who have contributed their thoughts and shared so freely for the benefit of all.
I originally invested in minera before Rob entered the scene and enjoyed perusing the forums on a couple of other forums in regards to my investment.
Unfortunately those forums regularly disintegrated into egos posturing against each other in the same manner seen with every YouTube comment posted.
This has been the BEST forum and beyond compare for the wealth of information and level of class displayed by most everyone. Everything starts from the top. We all owe JW@KSC a debt of gratitude for maintaining and holding the bar high for all of us. I humbly thank you for all your effort JW@KSC. May we all continue to contribute to the benefit of all.
I'm Sorry you are so far behind the Curve since leaving Intel.
So very misleading. The authentication is software executed on the CPU, just as programs like Windows, Word or Solitare are executed on the CPU.
Nothing is "designed into" the Intel device.
No, I Stand Corrected see my post,
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129019393
Nothing is set in stone until we see it in writing.
Then it's time to Party!
As waterchaser pointed out the post by d0phintom with an Email From Kay, I now see how the deal went down.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=122119975
I had never seen that post or have anyone point it out before. So I'll have a waterchaser after drinking a Rusty Nail as punishment for not realizing it after all the DD I've done.
As far as Tremble Damages I'll believe that when I see it if it occurs.
So posting to me about that Stuff as well as Aliens and Elvis, has no bearing on any of my posts, so don't lump it in when posting to me.
Right you are Pennydream, in fact Mark stated in an interview that ACS/Cyber Safety would make payment as soon as some Deals are complete.
On GUARDEDID and Mobile Trust, SFOR always will be able to sell the Products, which is why getting them in to retail stores now is a big plus. NAME Brand Recognition.
But I look forward to seeing StrikeForce MultiFactor Authentication designed into INTEL Chips. I Hope what we are seeing in Print by Intel is in fact what many of us are thinking. Come on PR's......