Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We all have been happy to see if Phil became a current reporting stock. This has now happened and Henry came through as he said he would. BUT because of being current, the CEO now has the option to be either passive or aggressive in the management of his dialogue with his shareholders with truthful statements regarding progress with the company. Henry may be a good religious man, and that is great. But as shareholders we should expect not to be in the dark until something of substance is released. Dips should be short and not collapse the price. That’s what keeps the MM’s from destroying value of your shares. Henry keep informing us about progress so as shareholders we can continue to invest in your company.
Henry said that the partners couldn’t jump onboard until Phil becomes current. Now that has happened and we wait and see if they do and he lets us know.
Not sure how the rules work in this situation. If a stock is under review by the commission is it in jeopardy while the SEC is conducting an investigation or making a decision on the matter?
MM's and flippers will drive the price down. This has nothing to do with the value of the company. It's stock minipulation 101. Don't let your shares go, you will pay more later to buy in....IMO.
A CC to shareholders is a matter of public record and can be used by the SEC in a trial. Henry was trying to convey that he is the CEO and was delivering facts to the shareholders. If you remove the noise and transcribe the words, there was a lot of great information in the CC.
The process used today was to keep the price below a penny.
They weren’t investors… they were bashers working for the MM’s.
This could have been a good deal worse after the call. It’s holding strong while the MM’s try to upset the run.
The good news was confirmed items that are now SEC legal company statements to shareholders by the CEO of the company. Not third party speculation.
After seeing some of the chats today, it would be best if Henry used print and releases to update shareholders. Some of the ZOOM’ers need to get a better perspective on this ticker. It’s not an overnight win, it’s a long term investment.
This is a future play. If we had big revenues then the price would be much higher. That’s not what we are doing here. We are buying into higher expectations…IMO!
Game playing by market makers to keep the price down.
They didn’t lose either!
This was already done through the courts.
So you agree that this transaction is meaningless…right.
A $50 Sale of shares is nothing but smoke and mirrors!
I strongly believe that if the Commission does not issue ANY response one way or the other and the clock runs out, a lawsuit will be in the future from DBMM for retaliation directed at DBMM and it’s shareholders.
Henry knows what the new SEC rules are. He would not put his company in a bad position!
Henry says current coming soon maybe days. This is a good thing!
They may not overrule the Judge but they might request a review by her if more evidence is included in their Commission duties. IMO of course. You see I’m not in a facts matter protection program.
The commission is not in the ruling business. They might possibly make recommendations back to the court but that’s all. IMO
More volume just now.
Some of us have a different opinion on whether DBMM is a good company.
Does anyone remember if GS ever mentioned requiring a R/S when he was seeking custodianship of this ticket? Now I see he is mentioning it in his tweets.
I cannot find the justification for the SEC to revoke DBMM at this late date. I also don’t really care about any short stock either. Just get back to work being an OTC current filing company.
Happy to be part of PHIL!
Heard Henry was soldier in Vietnam. Shared that experience too in … 1968.
Look up in the sky…I think you will see a pig fly soon!
This one will sit until something important is posted from the CEO.
Trying to move up impossible with this stock right now!
Some have posted that after May 25th DBMM shares are worthless. The platforms will not allow buying of Gray shares only selling. So with no buying allowed what can you do with your shares. The answer is you do nothing. Because DBMM has not been revoked at this time, but it is only in limbo awaiting the Commissions findings. To add to that, the Judge did not suspend, revoke or sanction DBMM, but in her findings she said that she did not find any suitable damanging decision to apply to DBMM. But she told DBMM to walk a straight line in the future and not come back again. However, this was not the decision the Feds wanted and they were insulted to say the least that they Judge did not agree with their position. Hence, we now have politics at play waiting for the Commission to state their views or direction and therefor the Judge's decision was made moot for the time being. But, unless the Feds now revoke, fine or maybe suspend trading of DBMM, we wait to see if we have shares worth money or not. Theres nothing more to do until then. But, this is just my opinion.
People smarten up there are some trying to drop this stock to buy cheap...don’t let them take your money.
Will the feds protect the shorts?
I think the price is being draw down to make way for many more shares to be purchased at record lows. JMO
A great deal of interest in this Ticker!
The Judge is not a beginner. She has creability and a senior position. Slap her with a negative response to her ruling... I don't think that will happen....the SEC has taken this as far as they can. If they lose, they will still be in power and so will the Judge. Case closed...IMHO! Buy the way, I think that some in a short position in DBMM have some explaining to do too.
As I remember, the Commission already suggested in the review process, that there could be possible sanctions or any other orders less than revocation given.
Maybe the dog eat the brief...lol
Also give more time for MM's to get the price of a share to even cheaper
levels for investors to buy.
As a long time investor in DBMM, I would like to add my two cents into the mix. As we all know the Judge of very high standing I will say, disagreed with the SEC as to haveing this ticked revolked and de-listed. The SEC disputed the Judge's ruling as to her merits in her decision. So be it. But after the review was accepted by the Commision, it was stated by them them the two parties will deliver briefs for review. Fine nothing wrong with that. Here is my big BUT to add. Although the SEC did not agree with the Judge, the review process opened up a whole lot of possibilites for a remedy. How to safe face with the esteemed Judge, and also get the SEC some merits too. So, I feel that after all is said and done DBMM recieves a fine, possibly a limited sanction or maybe something else. BUT no revocation of the ticker. Everyone wins with something, the Judge, the SEC and the company. Again this is just my opinion!