Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I’m missing that part then. Where he held them responsible. I haven’t seen that document. It’s not in the sticky on here or any archive site I’ve found. I’ll keep looking.
Then please enlighten me with your legal expertise. Explain how a default judgement proves that anyone has been held responsible for anything. If I have missed some legal documents somewhere, I’d love to know, honestly. Because what I have been able to find does not show that a jury or judge has found that iSee or any other company has infringed on BRK’s patent rights. I’ve seen a default judgement.
I’m behind BRKK and am hopeful they get more lawsuits going and prove by a preponderance of the evidence that their rights were infringed. But this notion that some are promoting that their lawyers are being lazy and they should have the money already, etc... just isn’t reality in most cases. I mean, it could be the case, but that cannot be deduced just from what I’ve seen doing research.
And I’m not saying that BRKK would not have won. I’m replying to the other person who said something was fishy if others are still using the technology and aren’t getting sued. BRKK could very well have easily won that case and any future cases. However we do not know at this point because of the reasons I have stated.
I’m it going to argue about it. Do your own research. It’s filed and anyone can read what it says. Rule 55(b).
Because there is no wording. It was a DEFAULT judgement. Which means the defendant failed to do something, ie. show up to court to defend itself. Therein lies a very good reason why no one would cease using the technology. There has been no opinion that I have seen that says the patent was infringed upon. I could be wrong, but the lawsuit against iSee certainly does not.
If someone files suit against you for causing a wreck, but you don’t show up, there could be a default judgement against you. That doesn’t mean you’re at fault in the wreck. It means you didn’t defend yourself. Same in debt collections, etc...
Do you understand that now?
I’m not going to get into degrading someone over the internet, but you may choose to do so if you wish. I do know quite a bit about lawsuits and the court system as a whole.
I’m not saying something isn’t “amiss”, I believe I stated that. Just that simply because a judgement was made does not mean that $ gets handed out immediately and others don’t simply stop doing what they’re doing. Many times there are behind the scenes negotiations prior to lawsuits or the ceasure of using technology, names, etc... Again, much depends on the WORDING of opinions and judgements as well as WORDING in patents and other legal documents.
And if you aren’t still learning the day you go into the ground, then you’re doing life wrong, internet warrior.
That’s all I’m saying on this topic. Good day to you.
The judgement wasn’t made until earlier this year, so it hasn’t been a year. Once a judgement is made, there is more to do, but even without $, a lawyer would do it because the firm would get part of the paid settlement. The only reason not to is if the at fault company has no $ to pursue.
However, depending on the wording of the judgement and how the technology is being used by others, a firm would go after other companies without up front $ from BRK because they would know they’d get 40% plus expenses.
So your logic is flawed. Yes, there may be something going on regarding lawsuits and the infringement, but lack of money wouldn’t be the reason. Look more towards the wording of the judgement and how others are using the technology.
I decided to try average down but hasn’t gone through yet. Looks like I may have to up my bid a bit.
What do you see that makes you believe an acquisition is imminent?
50MA is trending down and nowhere near the 200MA. Only thing crossing 50MA is 20MA. But still, even if that was a golden cross scenario, the 50MA is trending down.
Would love to see a run leading up to the release then a rocket launch after that.
Any insight regarding how long it usually takes the SEC to approve Regulation A offering?
I’m considering averaging down but I’m hesitant because of the way the PR was handled and the vagueness of the toxic debt. The stop sign has me wondering if I should as well. I have no doubt that if the stop sign and toxic debt would go away, this stock could at least get back to penny land. Decisions. While there is research to be found, it’s tough to follow and in my mind what makes it harder is that we don’t have a clear direction that the company is looking towards. We know they are “exploring patents and other technology” but is the technology they possess good enough for major contracts and are they in the works? I’m rambling.
That’s quite possibly the best most simple explanation for yesterday’s nonsense.
Not at all. And if this is the guy to take the company to the next level, then I’m very pleased. But that wasn’t explained and the lack of explanation concerns me. If it’s good enough for a PR, then structure the PR a LOT BETTER.
I guess in the end, I let the hype get to me and shouldn’t pay quite as much attention to posts here. Obviously, I have the option of holding or selling, as we all do. So, that’s definitely my fault. I hope the progression upward begins this week!
I don’t necessarily agree with you. A kindergarten press release, alleged texts from the CEO promoting a huge PR, people trying to read into the PR when all it said was Joe Schmo is now committed to the company (when he should have already been since he’s been CTO for 2 years). That does not instill confidence at all. When people believe this company will somehow sign contracts with major league sports or ESPN or whoever, todays little show leaves a lot of room to wonder if the CEO and others have the intellectual ability to finalize a good deal.
Either that or they’re scamming people.
Just the way I see it. I lost a lot of confidence in their handling of this and why they even put out a PR. Mickey Mouse it seems. Hope they prove me wrong.
Regardless of whether you have a long term or short term outlook on BRKK, if your objectively look at the preceding weeks “claims” and today’s “PR”, you have to come away thinking this CEO is a joke. If it is that great to have this CTO, then a good investor relations would explain why.
I’m long term at the moment, but this makes me weary to stay too long. Compete cluster.
???? this is becoming a joke.
So that was in the “works” and was taking time to get finalized and is really great news?
Again, if this guy was some genius, I MIGHT understand. But short of that, it feels like manipulation to me. I guess it’s on us for believing it though. Glad I didn’t buy in just because of the alleged amazing PR dud.
I’m not in disagreement. I guess that’s why we are all her looking and waiting.
I agree that it could be looked at in that light. However, if he is going to pump out info that there is going to be big news, etc.. then releases some crap about a CTO that may or may not have been working there for a couple of years, but doesn’t elaborate, then there is some serious explaining to be done. Unless it’s the second coming of Steve Jobs a new hire isn’t exactly BIG news. And he and everyone else knows that.
1) Where is this “news” even being announced besides here?
2) If this is incompetence, then I’m scared for the direction of the company. However, I would think that if it was a mistake, it would’ve been corrected by now.
3) It’s all VERY fishy. And BS.
Crossed my mind as well. If that’s the case, I’m not sure I feel good about this company, regardless of where their technology might end up.
I was thinking it may have been a mistaken release of an old release. It happens and I hope it is the case, but wow. Big mistake.
Instead of insulting people, why don’t you add some intellect to the conversation and discuss why you think BRK is a bad buy, with relative facts? Everyone is entitled to their opinion but no reason to just be a jerk and not back up your position. Just sayin.
Embarrassingly 0.01
I hope this goes up soon. I was an idiot and got in on the high side. Been bleeding $ ever since. Waiting semi long term though. It’s tough.
Who sells 150 shares @ 0.004?
The only problem I see in regards to MLB is that pitchers will not like the view it will give opposing hitters. They may seriously balk at MLB using this because of the ability of hitters to study a pitchers arm angle and other aspects of their delivery.
I use Schwab right now.
I’m new to this and learning from reading your posts. One thing I don’t know is how y’all see what the ask/bid on orders is. I see the trades, but just # of shares, etc...