InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 71
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/01/2019

Re: Garden Rose post# 27076

Friday, 04/26/2019 11:55:35 AM

Friday, April 26, 2019 11:55:35 AM

Post# of 42618
Because there is no wording. It was a DEFAULT judgement. Which means the defendant failed to do something, ie. show up to court to defend itself. Therein lies a very good reason why no one would cease using the technology. There has been no opinion that I have seen that says the patent was infringed upon. I could be wrong, but the lawsuit against iSee certainly does not.

If someone files suit against you for causing a wreck, but you don’t show up, there could be a default judgement against you. That doesn’t mean you’re at fault in the wreck. It means you didn’t defend yourself. Same in debt collections, etc...

Do you understand that now?