watching..
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Excellent 10000 ft summary which short term traders, mainly shorts, either don't realize or conveniently ignore/hide...Go longs $USRM.
Record was updated Jan 30th so must be stale database as it doesn't even reflect recent "reactivation" status.
How did your trip to USRM facility go?
good observation! there are clues everywhere so speculation is very bullish.
i will also support any effort in my capacity as my DD about CGM technology and its prmise enticed me to join ECHO's mission so invested a good chunk in it. special interests driving its fate to such adverse end is not digested to me as well.
i have a couple of $k invested and locked down in this stock. always took a long approach on the "bull" side but never quite understood what went wrong with this amazing technology and usefulness to the patient community. i hv a strong feeling that ECTE's patent space is STRONG and worth multi millions (if not hundreds) for any utility company venturing big in "wearable health gadgets" outside "commerial hospital utility"..its that gold nugget all these institutional funders, investors are after! say a company like Apple or Fitbit its a melting pot and we all know IP is worth everything even though you have no proven design prototype etc. i feel its just "time and money" it needs to frution OR any entity with cash would love to partner as well.
@USOB
checked out your post#5745 but sorry would ask many newbie questions.
PP refers to "Platinum and co"?
what is the stuff referred to by FBI intervention?
IMHO, you seem to have a bit of insider info OR a deep insight into their day to day operations etc? no flip flops like @ramads' so for now lets take it as savvy investor with good intentions.
@ramad's posts seem like a person or a small group rep whose fortunes align with some special interests in this whole game plan. posts do suggest a lot of insider info and acquiantance! however careful, they do spill some clues on facts behind the scene although their conclusions and opionions are naively biased.
i'm not familiar with many aspects outside this public forum so i'd be grateful to anyone like you with good insights to shed some light at their chance of success for "long" investors? or its better at this point to forget this money! thanks in advance.
appreciate your efforts to put all in "positive" perspective! i sincerely hope your attempt is not of an other cheer leader with similar great promises, hopes..finally leave board with lame excuses and reasons! some here claim constant touch with Mr. DF but to me they seem un-verifiable totally! i can tell first hand that he has responded to my calls/emails only 50:50 and worse is in last few weeks it was absolute 0 (zero) so only hope there is a good reason "behind the scenes"! i advise all on this board to insist for and count on only official "PRs" and no second hand info.
just wanted to mention: .."Therefore, the upcoming audits were delayed so as to account for the possibility of Smith Systems leaving."..haven't Mr. DF PR'ed recently that they will go ahead wrap audits with out Smith to meet timeline commitments? how can that be a hurdle? unless its apparently a sweet deal in play here!
definitely no significant next move until we hear something about audit reports IMHO. without that no one knows what the real intent of this stock and all the people behind!
positive:
(1) CEO has skin in the game with a lot of stock, he is on-track and we will make hit a jackpot (2) all in shape with audits and no SCAM (3) CEO lined all ducks for fierce momentum of stock so worth the wait at end
negative:
(1) a material change with CFO hire was not timely communicated or CEO is lying (2) someone says auditor said "no audits in progress" so hit a road block (3) CEO is inconsistent and an indefinite delay in audited results means a things blew up somewhere..don't trust CEO
I am mostly on "positive" side up until now but running out of patience with CEO's radio silence.
any info or guess which subsidiary it has conflict with? does it also imply future earnings have to be adjusted for that?
@WealthWithoutGreed: post makes total sense.
@HubSwirl: yes but remember new acquisitions don't come at no cost..so the bottom lines may improve and thus compensate for added dilution coming off of unused A/S.
all becomes clear only when we see "audited" results and SEC compliance, hopefully soon! IMO 'm hoping mgt do all they can to restore investor confidence and preserve shareholders value.
i'm one of those "really longs"..and for a while had lost interest to post msgs so stopped fully. not sure what it is but lately i kind of see all positive atmosphere and most notably good decency among posts' content with reasonable arguments and mutual respect and its noticeable!! pl keep it up!
watched first hand many different bunches of folks coming here ran each "run", made $$$ and and moved on..i really hope this time it teaches "shorts" and "special interest" a good lesson and make us all real "longs" rich good luck to you all folks!
-IMHO-
nothing personal but that "till at least fall.." gives a sense a moving target and speaks a lot about uncertainty. i think even your messages in past year referred to march'16 to see some good movement. many longs (incl me) hv been following this board for a while and that sliding target is just hope and not doing any good as we wished for!i too still think CEO is business and doing all he can but all the numbers in PR does paint a rosy picture but until audited results come out, they are just numbers! anticipation of news followed by no news OR mediocre news adds frustration..seems to think "no news" is probably good than just too much unnecessary chatter.
now key things we should hear about and track: (1) clearing out the last decisive debt settlements or any outstanding critical lawsuits (2) audits of results (remember a new CFO, change of auditors are not news, at least for this one) (3) some major funding from "big" accredited investors or a big credit line from major bank or fin inst.
i'm just thinking M&A news really don't mean much until "trust is earned" with good progress on #1,2,3 as we also witnessed no move in SP with Acq of "millions" worth. I REALLY WISH US ALL LONGS THE BEST.
if CEO has serious news..he should simply PR it..no need for sneak peek..cheerleader squad. i knew there is some gamble element in this and i took the risk..still long..sure frustrated..etc
but sure nothing is personal, all here are in to make money. hope this doesn't get deleted for silly reasons
yes today' move was solid and gives a sense of confidence to longs here
website made public, new CFO, a new acquisition, and positive guidance by CEO..should we read $IFCR turned the corner? but..somehow i'm not quite sure why/how such a steady stream of good news can't sway the stock northwards!!
Cambridge researchers study -- stem cells as safer regenerative medicine
URL: http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-12-stem-cells-safe-regeneration-medicine.html
@Cosmic, @GL:
as much as I like to hear positive news at this moment, shorts and peeps have more reasons to disbelief in this stock, IMHO. Not to mislead but CEO in the past responded to my email twice, talked over phone once and he seemed, just..just in my opinion, very legit and honest guy, and however my recent call, email were not responded. I always wondered how some folks seem to draw his attention (at least claim to) and get responses so easily! unless its a valid "red" flag I'd also be like a "cheap date", like GL said. not only that honestly I'm stuck until it really pops many folds back due to my early entry anyways! my take is we shouldn't fall for anybody's spin unless its official via filing or PR.
If substantial debt is reduced, lawsuits settled with dilution and should't executives have plan for audit costs? I've been a big supporter myself all along but all it needs is some prioritizing to spare from revenues to cover audit costs as they are what bring the trust back in stock and SP to bounce back and mainly to keep shorts at bay. This ticker has great potential to reverse its course any day but honestly its more frustrating to hear such a thing in eleventh hour. CEO Mr. Fuselier has to pull this off at all costs!
Hi G&L, any update from Mr. Fuselier? I tried to reach him over email and no response yet and thinking anybody has serious update on IFCR?
if we have belief in company's fundamentals, were in for some real big gains..these temporary short flips, blips are not a big concern. hope mgt deliver as they have consistently promised, and all of us will win!
any word from CEO? little odd that no one even said received a response from him lately? 'm also waiting on an email for few days myself! anyone in touch with him? thanks!
any specific reason why you think its beneficial to have R/S?
i did see this PR reading..
reverse stock split will elevate the Company from its current "penny stock" position enabling institutional investors who are precluded from investing in companies below certain price per share ranges to potentially consider investing in U.S. Stem Cell, Inc..
who is this from? IR folks?
can you clarify a bit more specific on your affiliation to $IFCR? nothing to doubt but CEO has been easily accessible to "serious" folks here already and many are in good touch with him as well! is there a way to make it official?
i certainly would like an official "iHub handle" so we don't have to always just rely on someone randomly just saying spoke-to/email him with some info that could even be fake!! not an experienced guy in this, but i think on some boards company executives directly keep an official mouth piece as a means of PR to communicate to investors/traders. can't it happen here?
sorry typos..
during/after
posting
cheers!!
everybody's perspective is different but may be, IMO, CEO is working hard for the same reasons to establish a good length of history with these filings to have audited filings back his consistent PRs! but to work with limited sources of finance and struggling to win the trust back in company duting/after turnaround is apparently a tough job!! we wish him success instead..
hey btw, to be clear, i'm not on $IFCR payroll and pisting here..?
is it true? filings to SEC, even unaudited, have no bearing legally? if audited results only are facts..why major stocks move do drastically with CEO ' future guidance etc. and if that's a fact- companies don't even need CEO or other exec. auditing is merely validation of accounting procedures, plus financial numbers given to them. no legal protections. companies can go broke even after audited filings AND why SEC sometimes even bar some CPAS etc.
only valid question is why big boys didn't jump in? generally they put more in so obviously need more facts, longer history, ratings, recommendations their own fact finding than just a removal of stop sign..but who knows it may well be under way! not all retail investors are here to make a quick 10-20% profit in shortest possible time and bash until next entry!!
yes also IMHO, XBRL filings is a strategic move and in practice you don't need this for a pinksheets' ticker but would be a must and pre-req for even reaching out to a I.I. OR even bringing more formal lending institutions to fund them in near future..
CEO seems having strong opinion against toxic debts and systemic risks that result from it at times, but remember a company in turn around phase can only have limited options so i won't blame them for dilution w/ notes..but IMHO that phase is over and now more upwards momo with many possible alternative funding routes
ok..my limit on posts is over and think turned in my assignments for today
me too! i have a bit more than that..yet not bothered for a couple of months unless some major changes take place!
on a side note..spoke to CEO yesterday for a good 20 mins and clarified many questions that were sort of answered on this board anyways but just wanted to hear first hand! (1) he seems a very genuine guy with humility and apparently he and Hank are serious about turn around efforts and they deserve a bit of respect folks, def. more than what some screwed ups went overboard on some occasions..i know how it feels when SP is down 'cus i am one of the victims of some manipulations but i'm less worried for minor things due to my long position (2) he certainly talked very professional than many scamsters that run pinksheet scams!
GLT all as always!
i' m a free member and limit on posts makes me think twice before I post..but I must put this out to crowd today..
if there is anyone who made a fortune on this ticker it ought to be "ysung" with his flipping sides! sure must v'en one heck of a day trader...he does just that it seems! like always - GLT him and all the rest!
is this relevant? also talking about momo..and adding too much instant gratification goals..wanting CEO to time Q results like he is already hiding 'em in his drawers and gaming it!!!
if you're trading everything matters..investing wisely on company credentials means nothing!! folks you decide??
thanks for clarifying. after posting, i also did check the post history and it seems same person brought up a couple of times and seems not satisfied with replies and kept bringing it up few times over last few months! i would argue, posts' timing is questionable!!
looks like market eased a bit on $IFCR today and hope all longs stay-put and always do their DD but not panic on baseless(fraudulent) claims and show middle finger to crooks and special interest Weeeeeee(did I get 6 or 7 'e' s) TEAMS, if their intent was not clean. i'd certainly watch for folks whose position is not clear, talk sweet when stock soars and suddenly flips to not bash *directly* but sow seeds of doubt and suspicion when road is bumpy to cause panic and gain from it..etc.
only time can tell if this stock really brings fortune to longs but so far all looks legit on record (of course IMHO).
does anyone know anything about this? this dates few months back and interestingly never remember seeing any reference to this on this board? that makes me curious. is it big enough to keep IFCR stock down?
Sorry to hear that, but as I told earlier I'm in the same boat! Problem is some folks are just naive traders scaring the hell out when times are bit bumpy and hype more than reality so if we are too sensitive to whatever they say..we are taken for free ride. I'm not a very experienced myself but I put in what I can risk..and trust in the financials...unless some fraud surfaces about this company I'm just optimistic..I may be wrong with this one..but time will only tell.
SAME HERE! like a wash, rinse, repeat cycle..a couple of folks (different handles each time?) cheer up the crowd like it's a sudden pop next hr or next day..and causing more damage either knowingly or unknowingly in the process..hope it really pays off for all!
in normal terms its not! but the irrational behavior of investors(traders actually) here..take home message here is the interactive reporting is a tool gives better consolidated picture of ones business terms and most commonly the scattered disconnected reports are taken out of context by interest groups and make fuss about it! this kind of reiterates "all in nutshell in front of you and make your informed decision moment"..a simple yet consistent token gesture by MGT to public to gain their trust and in pink sheets its nothing wrong as we all know even scam events are posted as updates and make them look legitimate so this is at least better than that, right? just IMO..
#Money Maker 1, #G&L Only, #WhiteFish:
Thanks for the updates. Myself got scared a little honestly too for a minute but my gut feeling managed to persist as nothing seemed normal to me. The fact that CEO was available when this took place and that alone speaks for his character and his skin being in the game. Ups and downs are inevitable but those loose hands should better be gone out anyway! All I want is Mr. Fueslier to stay put and all longs make a fortune. I know its a risk we took and hope it pays off.
sure, keeping my fingers crossed just at times needed some validation by other pros and seasoned, to reaffirm if on right track and not making rookie mistakes in this not-thoroughly-known turf.
thanks, yes- i think understood that part! better for stock holder value but never quite understood on how we can control the predatory MM manipulation practices, if one existing!!
take IFCR for example, for all its credit a seemingly legitimate business, revenues, acquisitions and CEO/President right on with their turnaround operations so why is market not believing it and longs take control of this ticker. its not a perfect world, people but in most cases some true institutional believers should already jump in and take hold of it already by now, right? one thing i learned and got accustomed to quickly was a lot of folks on this board are after short term!
You are one of few folks whose posts and insights I always liked! your seemingly long sentiment also inline with what I'm may be that was the bias for it
I'm not a pro trader, but wondering how would a company pay with stock? I mean who would accept stock in-lieu of their dues? Wouldn't that stock they eventually end up with MM and at their mercy to short manipulate the stock? If CEO doesn't like toxic debt in theory but how can he control the debt swaps whether they eventually end up in wrong hands? The premise of his belief would be to find true private investors(with long sentiment) and issue stock for money. Could it trigger a death spiral this way too? Don't get me wrong I am long with this stock (actually very long) and my avg is at 0.0025 so just genuine questions on what our CEO's strategy here and game plan is? all are welcome to enlighten me on this!
what was all the fuss we have since yesterday? a lot of new faces on board, mostly re-posting same old stuff etc.thought IFCR gained some real traction but the same enthusiasm did not reflect in any stock trading activity for sure. the only gain was it ended up on Breakout board toppers. for most longs, it shouldn't matter and just stay put until the very obvious 3rd milestone is met! this is so undervalued and "real" buyers would only rush after that and it sure wud be too late to grab at discount! good luck guys!