Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ka ching indeeeeeed ..but
the answer to a sober question ?
should we expect ..could we expect.. the naming of
our big time, real world partner in any contract..
and in its announcement ??
leaving aside the finalising of the stats/ tests, the
contract timed with installation seems to be more than
confident of their general success...
any guesses as to the name to be named ? or the kind of
company it might be ? a whoppa ? Exxon ?
whoops - sorry -i blame two double vodkas
Smile
thanks for reminding me of that pre-installation contract..
i did not understand your reference to the two previous
contracts ..
surely pre installation the contract would have to mention
the partner's name ??
as much as possible ?
zeroed in
my understanding of what was said at the AGM
was that QS wanted terms to establish as much independence as
possible
i am not sure if those terms will allow any deference re disclosure of the
stats which are owned by QS
there may be favourable terms re first sales to the partner
but that's very different..
hopefully the partner has agreed to be named once the
stats are established..
very good to be a long (idiot)
i wonder if there will be a daily progression
henceforward
the last trade yesterday was 9 cents higher than previous
one and for 100 shares ?
I wonder if this is all going to co-ordinate with
CEO interviews and any other pre-results publicity..
wish i could buy some more..
where are all the longs of yesteryear ??
next green wave is our PR company ?
we've been slotted in beside a specialist in
dope and medicine ??!
thanks to 02 and zerosum ...a question
which is this 'another F0rtune' company ?
the current installation partner?
or have I missed something ?
any guesses as to the ID of this partner?
I suspect for various reasons that it's
really rather large and well known..
there's a new document/ item just posted
green wave..or what was it ??
wow - when John V moves on
you know things are moving on in a very big new
way; end of an era and huge thanks to John
any company that can do without him - well, it must
be in good shape and moving into a new league
new pr and new investor relations and another
engineer for Shannon Raz
good handover of the site from QS to the partner
Q1 is the big one ?
the 2,000 kms in NW ASIA
i wonder if this might be in Russia
as I recall, the AOT produced sensational stats
in cold/icey conditions
more russian money for more english football
clubs !
Thanks AISI - a perfect assessment
what were we doing without SHannon Rasmussen ?!!
and Jason Lane of course !
great meeting.could not have been more upbeat
25-30 companies in the frame for the all-important
data
shame that the new partnering / client can't be named
sooner but good to know it's a global player based close
in USA
its all being thought through very thoroughly and long
term
with some local manufacturing for overseas clients
but with better timings and prices available through
multiple sources..and with Shannon Ras always improving
the design
10 q soon
8k not so clear but a general commercial document in
November I'm hoping
straight and narrow
the problem is that you are not tuning in
to what the reality out there is
haven't you learnt anything about NDA's or the process
of the commercialisation and the absolute need for 100% success when the tests start ? whose pace of progress would you prefer ?
where's the fraud in executives who buy shares ?
etc etc
aha, there you are Armour, glad to know
you are still with us
i think the patent side of things is sorted,
as you suggest
rather like QS being ready for Nasdaq
they were prepared by which one, Kyte or BIgger ?
everything is ready
those ducks are grandparents !
well said Pandavoine
good to know that you are still dropping in
here from time to time
hope you are well
hydro-testing : the facts, as always
hydro testing is highly regulated and its methods
are well known in the industry
central to this knowledge and custom is that all proofing and calibration certification - without exception - has to be conducted by a third party firm and one that is licensed
to suggest otherwise is simply ridiculous and speaks
volumes
jaymark - you ask for something more concrete
forgive me, but i don't really see how things reported
in real time and about real time could be explained more
truthfully or more in concrete terms and as the context dictates
the tech is being proven and improved and commercialised and at each step the whole process is realised and validated
how could this latest milestone be more concrete,or the pilot installation,or the definitive documents etc etc ?
instead of expecting to hear what clearly cannot yet be said,
why not trust where the process is so obviously going ?
and why not celebrate that the CEO and SHannon Rasmussen have prised their way into the heart of the oil business and from which position
so many things can begin to happen...no more secrecy or doubt..
no more NDA essentially..that is a big step for sure
will the market respond to an 8k
which was chosen as the right format over and above
a mere Update on its own ??
great news about the milestone reached
and with definitive documents now in sight
a Letter in an 8k is a first I think
a formal kind of progression in itself
yes Gecfly, how are you ?
all is well with you I hope
odd that I was just talking about you and that
26 cents - new to me - has echoed my thoughts
and I am sorry it's been so long since we have
spoken - since the chaos and frustration of that
AGM ..five years ago ? ..when your efforts were
not properly appreciated ...
I can't remember the
details I'm afraid but I know that feelings were
running too high ..and that the convoluted communications
did not help..
your efforts helped to first get me into STWA back in the day -
2003/4....
i'll try your e-mail
well,look at how long you've
been presenting yourself here as a knowing..what..investor?
carer ? whistleblower ?
hi Pandavoine..I agree and I wish I could buy
i think I understand the concept of 'perfect storms'
and this strikes me as one of them
one of these days this kind of downwardness and volume
will correspond to the imminence of a material event
exciting ..even if I'm in a very cheap seat !
painful
where it has always been
and it's not worth repeating
not concerned thanks
it's all been said before
the pilots are what we need and that is what we are
getting
thanks Zerosum ..just what I wanted to hear !
my frustration is dealt with
and of course there are no
cover ups or guilty secrets eg re KMI or what is not
being said
having seen the QS counsellor/shrink (myself), I realise that I have
a very bad and strong reaction to seeing the word ' samples'
in long awaited QS docs....especially when these samples are awaiting customs clearance in some lonely facility...
inevitably, the mind turns to samples of another kind,
and ,as the sanitary example, how my brain tissue will have declined since my investment and journey here began, back in the days
when I could run 10 miles before breakfast
looking forward to rejuvenation via an Update, up up up !
i agree Pilot
especially re tracking
would it be so hard simply to refer to each aforementioned
project/ publicity - and its timelines - and then bring us up to date
even if it is/was to report no or minimal progress ?
and i repeat - to 'believe' something about a Minister for
Hydrocarbons and a policy strikes me as ridiculous - or maybe
even desperate...
is it namedropping of a weird kind ?
but please explain Zerosum how or why this
report of new clients is good news if it can also replace all other news of the older clients/ projects and their timelines ?
(if they are new - how on earth can you tell them all apart ?)
because they are now nearest to actual earnings ??..all of a sudden,
having leap-frogged all the others ?
Or now we're supposed to be excited by the domestic/usa factor ?
to add to the allegedly seamless global mass of interest / discussions/ samples//bla bla
i thought the focus was on a South American country or two ?
did I miss that in the 10q ..or has it blended into another
project reported on ??
talk about vague
everything is still being pursued and why, as an example,
do they 'believe' something about a Minister for Hydrocarbons ?
either there is a standing order re energy needs or not ?
what's a 'belief' doing there ?
and why, oh why are they STILL reporting on samples being
sent back to Temple & yet again about waiting for customs
clearance ? that kind of substantive = supposedly substantive
- news was being reported years ago...why is it still recordable as an achievement ?
and it reminds me of how many other projects (with samples probably) that have been ..what..forgotten ? stuck in processing the murky world of...everything ...oh yes, they are all waiting for the successful demonstrations too ? is that the..implication ?
it is impossible to know or to follow any particular project, to distinguish it from the others ..and to know which one is being
talked about at any one time ...how many have been ignored and for how long ?
where are the actual achievements ? have sites been agreed ? what is
distinct from the 'active seeking' ..ie what has been actually nailed and is therefore being no longer sought ?
painful in the extreme
next stop the 10q ?
some news to go with it , just before it
perhaps ?
it's got to be soon
and surely to goodness, the next communication
can only be material
and not about some subsidiary factor - eg being shortlisted
for a Canadian government grant...or...
strait and n
if you haven't learnt the answers to these questions
by now ...
why not focus principally on the situation evolving
whether in South America or generally ?
there is no simple correspondence between the situation on
the ground and the share price,as you must have grasped : the share price is not going to go up as some event/update approaches
quite the opposite
thanks zerosum -
i guess the simple answer is that it depends on the
application - some will not need to prioritise a pilot
phase, some will
the good news being that any first tests on the heaviest
crude oil - the most challenging so far ? after condensate ? - will logically apply to whole pipelines and questions of how many units are needed across an entire network or country or continent !
rocket science !
that 900,000 bid was confirmed ?
i couldn't see it
will look again
general query, wondering : do we think any clients or
potential clients are prepared to do a deal without
a pilot installation first ?
would they be waiting for someone else to commit to a
pilot first...before they themselves commit to a pilot or
even a contract ?
i cant see the point of endless chats with the global clientele
-- lets say Irag or Russia or Anywhere....and going back years even,
if the only resolution and progress is going to be via a pilot
scheme..????
Thank you AISI once again
there is no scam within any part of QS practice
there is general cluelessness, it seems, about the timescales
involved
and there is the ongoing and relentless secrecy etc
both of these being bad luck for the Longs who dipped in
many years ago and possibly now can't understand or remember
why !
blaming their green toes !
feel free to quote the hype from QSEP
not from its shareholders
you think that statistics re viscosity reduction etc represent
hype ?
stats from tests that could never have happened before ?
zzzzzz indeed
dialogue ? any chance ?
any thoughts on the nature of the patents pending ?
things discovered on the way ? going back to
Electra or JHS ?
i guess they have to be documented somewhere..
Great time to buy
I wonder if the gentleman sitting on the wall
is also buying
after he falls off the wall, to complete his
imitation !!
well said Alkaline
it is simplistic and selective beyond belief
not to focus on the commercial prospects
like judging the interior of a house by the
idiot sitting on the wall
how long can documents take to prepare
when there is agreement about the technology, its potential,
the statistics ?
does every nut and bolt have to be legislated ? every barrel
of oil forever costed and accounted for ?