Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Up to 1 TRILLION dollars in resources may be present at Pebble mine.
A: Please understand the definitions of "inferred", "proven" and "may" etc.
EPA over-reach has been beaten back legally.
A: Strong assumption to think the fight is over, third party activism hasn't gone away, strong legal backlash is a possibility.
The short interest is absurdly high, and impacting SP.
A: For good reason, lots of risk remain even according to their own pump report. No partner no future.
The float is moving into longs hands, and a short squeeze could happen soon.
A: Conjecture. Again, lets understand definitions "COULD" is not "will".
The mine exists on land set aside for mineral extraction.
A: So what?
The management has made good on their ambitions to advance this mine and is speaking with several big miners to partner.
A: Speaking to interested parties is not the same as signing on a partner. High risk remains.
Miners have partnered in the past, spending 500 million in pursuit of this mine. That's not chump change to anyone.
A: A simple tax write off, who cares? Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Miners will go where there is money to be made, and NAK management will make sure a deal happens. This is a life changing investment. Good luck to all longs.
A: Again, lets check our definitions "make sure" insinuates a guaranteed result. sigh.
So what's left after all the fancy talk? No partner...No future.
STRONG SELL
You are incorrect IN your usage of "debunked", price does not necessarily reflect fundamentals (101)
I repeat and digress:
NAK= NO PARTNER=NO FUTURE
That is the one "fact" that will have any real merit on the future of NAK.
Everything else (paid reports,short reports) are speculatory..(including recent sentiment price action)
Institutions can also sell.
I asked a simple question. You are suggesting because the price has risen since kerrisdale (EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE OTHERS), that itself is self evidence of debunking?
Who has debunked? A neutral or vested party?
NO PARTNER NO FUTURE
STRONG SELL
NAK history= paid pump article, price goes up slightly, reality sets in shortly after, paid pump article, price goes up slightly, reality sets in soof after..talk about ad nauseam.
Even their pump reports have heart stopping disclaimers.
The price is stuck in limbo for one reason.....
NO PARTNER NO FUTURE.
STRONG SELL
"There is little doubt a partner and consortium will advance this mine to begin permitting this year."
More speculation.
NO PARTNER, NO FUTURE
STRONG SELL
NAK=Strong buy.
If you can wait 85 years for partner announcement.
CANTOR: Just a bunch of fluffy dreaming pump advertisement.
The only facts in that document can be found on Page 37, this is simply a paid positive opinion, what's new?
Page 38: note: This is a paid report, for cantor fitzgerald.
Cantor's "REPORT" was a shameless biased pump article, how does that put an end to anything? The disclosures were indeed telling.
Alternatively, those who disagree with a negative report will accuse shorts of spreading falsehoods.
It's simply a difference of opinion.
Who really cares what's in or not in the ground??
To cut through all the noise...it's really is as simple as:
NO PARTNER NO FUTURE.
STRONG SELL
Smart longs sold @3.00. Agreed, those longs are better off.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/AMEX/northern-dynasty-mnl-NAK/chart
FACTS are above ground.
NO PARTNER, NO FUTURE.
STRONG SELL
Just a bunch of fluffy dreaming pump advertisement. The only facts in this document can be found on Page 37, this is simply a paid positive opinion, whats new?
Page 38: note: This is a paid report, for cantor fitzgerald.
Interestingly, also on page 38:
This report was not intended for public disclosure pursuant to "NON US BROKER DEALER DISCLOSURE.
The question is, how did you access such a report (you will say you are a broker/dealer/firm)
The more serious question is, why did you break the disclosure criteria by disclosing this document to the public. (REGARDLESS IF NO NON PUBLIC INFORMATION WAS DISCLOSED?. It is still considered a breach.
I wonder what the SEC will say about this?
Mike Kozak knows you disclosed this internal report publicly? or if you are mike kozack..you have exposed yourself to regulatory scrutiny.
GLTU
SUB $1.00 soon.
STRONG SELL
This junk only crashes and burns. Market opens...crash and burn..rinse and repeat daily.
NO PARTNER, NO FUTURE.
STRONG SELL
Nice post. Logic and reason will prevail. The losses will continue to pile up here.
STRONG SELL
Apparently you have a comprehension problem. Longs are hilarious when they are losing.
MORE LOSSES ON THE WAY. DEAD MONEY PLAY. GLTU
STRONG SELL
Sure you did. Good luck with that make believe dead money move.
STRONG SELL
LOL, now that's funny. You have no idea. Thanks for the laughs.
STRONG SELL
Which part are you having difficulty with?
Why are we here? Hmmm...That's the greatest question ever asked. I assume its best left to the philosophers to grapple with.
Need to help others? yes, we need more of that sort of thing in the world imo.
jesus complex? No, i'm not much into religion.
Can't control?, Not sure I understand this question.
Paid pumping troll? Paid, yes. Pumping, only my fists on a Friday night after work. Troll, no I'm not that ugly to qualify.
PPT, sure why not, I have been called worse.
STRONG SELL
NAK being barely suspended on nothing but air, more down trending looming. Ouch
Strong sell.
My brokerage accounts are very green indeed. It's all about limiting the downside, and leveraging the upside.
Nobody's perfect, I'd much rather wished I made more profit, than losing what I have.
Hanging around pro traders long enough, you learn to swim the diverging tides, deep dive for the quarry, rather than standing on the shore wishing and hoping for a fish to wash up at your feet.
Strong sell
I must admit, I'm more familiar with Goldman than most. Trust me, they goof up too, they just have a knack for always come out clean in the end, if it blows up. (unlike most retail)
STRONG SELL
Institutionals were also loaded on Enron, WorldCom, Madoff Ponzi etc etc. Institutionals can be wrong sometimes. They are human beings, prone to mistakes.
Strong Sell
No demand for this stock. Worthless with no partner on board IMO. down she goes. Dead money play.
Strong sell
CEMENT CEILING. DEAD MONEY.
STRONG SELL.
$10.00 you say? hmmm...your rocket ship seems broken.
STRONG SELL
EHHH...are we there yet?
I thought longs promised this was going to the moon after EPA ruling???? This junk stuck in the mud...just flush it.
STRONG SELL
Be careful, you are asking very serious and uncomfortable questions here.
OR...Could it be a more simpler explanation?
MAYBE...There is simply very little demand for this stock??
GLTU
"That's a lot of capital.". For whom? Its all relative.
Understand the effect of highly leveraged accounts/platforms, HFT gray markets etc.
Small retail is outgunned, has always been, and will remain so.
Nice action here. Solid momo trading, congrats to the profit takers.
Nice post. This action here is like watching a morbid slow motion version of musical chairs on a sinking ship.
The party is winding down, the liquor is wearing off.
Here are some of the BOLDED comments pieces from the transcript that were made by Ron Thiessen and Tom Collier during last Friday's conference call that keep SKEPTICAL(and not excited about the future prospects of) NAK:
Ron Thiessen: We have, obviously, more than one and I think there’s a great opportunity, in fact, for the potential of a consortium to be the ultimate developer at Pebble. In terms of timeline, now – aspirationally, we’ve said that we looked to complete something by the third quarter of this year. These are things that we believe we can do, but I don’t want to draw hard lines in the sand. We’ve spent a lot of time with different companies going through the data room and over the intervening period of this litigation. So, I feel pretty confident that there’s a very high level of interest in the project and that we should be able to accomplish our aspirations.
Ron Thiessen: I just feel that given the interest level and given the quality of the Pebble Project we’re going to be successful on that front. So, that’s just my belief. So, it’s – when you look at Pebble – when you look at the alternatives out there for companies to undertake, this is really a tier one asset of unique proportion.
Ron Thiessen: There’s a couple features that, that we looked at. I mean number one, is the 30 months to get into permitting. And that’s important from two prospects. Number one, we really want to get into permitting quickly, but that’s Northern Dynasty. A lot of major mining companies they don’t want to do things in a big hurry, and, so 30 months we think is very reasonable timeframe for everybody to get very comfortable with the project. It’s should go on to permitting. We think we can do it much quicker but again, with 30 months, we’re not putting any pressure on anybody to accomplish that.
Tom Collier: And we’re eager to be the, kind of, the first ones through that process and we think that we’re going to be able to get our permit granted in record time. Now, I’m not suggesting any corners are going to be cut, or it’s not going to be as thorough or rigorous, but I am – I do believe, very strongly, that it’ll be much more efficient and can move along much more quickly.
JUST A BUNCH OF ROSY AFFIRMATIONS, ANEMIC CONVICTION AND VERY LITTLE IN WAY OF CLARITY OF CURRENT STATUS.
STRONG SELL.
Nice call imo.
LOL What? Sir may I suggest you educate yourself a bit more about how markets ACTUALLY work before bandying around these candy coated schemes.
But by all means carry on, if it sounds legit, it must be true I guess. GLTU
Can't eat your cake and have it too. It's comical to suggest that the reason why the "alleged" consortium the CEO is "communicating" with requires a non- public release of names clause, as to not effect a potential bidding war? Give me a break.
Excuse me, it's not like this project is not already having a 10billion megawatt powered spotlight on it??...releasing names wont have any negative effect on whatever confidential negotiations are supposedly underway.
In fact, it raises a more dubious question, why isn't there currently an all out bidding war??
Smells like a bunch of BS. Release the names...IF YOU HAVE ANY. (Dooubtful at this stage imo)
The same thing we've been trying to explain to this board. Logic and reason must prevail in order for proper trading schemes to be successful.
Some learn the hard way.p
They refuse to listen to reason.
Seasick yet? This is the dump part.