Please post the headers to the email so it can be verified. This is just another SRGE copy and paste - how about a screen shot of the email. Here is an example of how nodummy confirmed the SCCO was nonsense (AS WE ALL KNOW). But, how about something more than you typing in a Quote tag - SRGE LMAO!!!



IG

Great information - ALL SRGE investors should follow up and read the SEC guidelines concerning reserves and feasibility studies.

What will come first the SEC halt of SRGE or TSX of BGL.

If you look at SAEI and the over the top press release about the Russian Mikhail Prokhorov buying Suptcha (very similar to the, ...One of the firms has already signed preliminary documents for the full acquisition of the Cinco Minas property....) I bet that SRGE is the first to be halted.

As we know SCCO has issued denials and classified the SRGE rumors as baseless in both written and verbal communication.

Plus, SRGE is not listed on the Mexican Government site as owning or mining at Cinco Minas - it has Bandera Gold. This is from the Ministry of Economy (where Tatiana works) and SRGE has zero mining concessions. Check out the site yourself as this is 100% verifiable information - unlike anything SRGE puts out.

Hey, you could use MexicoMiningCenter.com - I love how the SRGE DD refers to this site as the Mexico Mining Registry LMAO!

So without a doubt SRGE will be halted by the SEC.

IG

But, there is absolutely no mention of Cinco Minas! if you go to the 2012 PDF file for which is for "MINING PROJECTS OPERATED BY FOREIGN CAPITAL COMPANIES" http://www.economia.gob.mx/files/comunidad_negocios/informacion_sectorial/mineria/ProyectosMinerosCompaniasCapitalExtranjero-2012.pdf Take a look and tell me where SRGE is listed as mining in Mexico.

You posted a link that just has contact information. Please provide a link to show SRGE is involved with Cinco Minas - as I have posted the latest 2012 edition of what foreign companies are mining in Mexico.

IG

You can't use charts with a pump and dump.

IG

First, I am not a Bandera honk I have no idea about them - I do know they aren't presently running a pump and dump.

As for the grey sheets, you do know that all TSX companies are listed that way - check it out.

IG

Why is Minera San Jorge issuing a press release about the ownership of Cinco Minas when they were purchased by Coro Mining Corp and Fabian Gregorio, President of Minera San Jorge is now part of the Coro management team. Instead of a gmail account that the press releases use it would be: fabian.gregorio@coromining.com or info@coromining.com.

Here is the bogus press release:

Hmmm, PRNewswire - this has SRGE written all over it. Those guys are so obvious it is funny.

I find it usual that Minera San Jorge uses a gmail account - why not use the company email?

All of the press releases using this email address are in connection with making claims against Bandera or some other nonsense. I can guarantee this is the work of SRGE - you guys are showing your desperation!

But, there is absolutely no mention of Cinco Minas! if you go to the 2012 PDF file for which is for "MINING PROJECTS OPERATED BY FOREIGN CAPITAL COMPANIES" http://www.economia.gob.mx/files/comunidad_negocios/informacion_sectorial/mineria/ProyectosMinerosCompaniasCapitalExtranjero-2012.pdf Take a look and tell me where SRGE is listed as mining in Mexico.

You posted a link that just has contact information. Please provide a link to show SRGE is involved with Cinco Minas - as I have post the latest 2012 edition of what foreign companies are mining in Mexico.

IG

From the incredible press release - SRGE states that:

I see you are still using MexicoMiningCenter.com to verify SRGE is mining in Mexico.

You do know that MMC is not affiliated with the Mexican government - one thing it is a .com not a .mx

The site for all official mining business is: economia.gob.mx (the one Tatiana has been referenced a 1000 times). And there is not one reference to Southridge on any of the mining sites - but Bandera Gold is prominently listed.

Please explain why you are using a website that is a paid for inclusion to validate SRGE and that has no connection to the Mexican Government.

This has been the basis of everyone's argument that SRGE was real and mining in Mexico - bad news they are listed ergo they aren't mining.

IG

No there wasn't any evidence that FINRA did anything other than approve a dividend and on the pinkies and that it is notification at least 10 business days prior to the record date.

There has been no investigation of the share structure or verify the financials (I assume you are kidding) to think a full investigation could be done in 10 days.

IG

I see every other post reference $5 Billion in reserves - how and where is this information.

To do a reserve study you have to do a extensive drilling program and I have never seen the results of any SRGE drillings other than what is in press releases.

Facts please no speculation - I would like to read the reports that states there is $5 Billion in reserves.

IG

You do realize this is SRGE provided information - it has not been verified by a independent third party.

The only information about SRGE is from press releases and posts on this board.

IG

None of what is posted is correct. Remember this is information from the same person who claims the mexicominingcenter.com is the Mexican Mining Registry and is under the auspices of the Ministry of Economy - which is completely incorrect.

With that in mind you need to read FINRA Rule 6490 and FINRA or SEC Rule 10b-17.

First, the SEC and FINRA for the most part let the pinkies trade completely unfettered (they feel that it is just knuckleheads screwing other knuckleheads) until something grievous happens - see SAEI (which is very similar to the SRGE press release).

The rules state that issuers that pay dividends must ensure notice is provided to FINRA at least 10 days before the dividend record date.

Issuers who fail to provide the required notice to FINRA could be subject to a $5,000 fine.

There is NO INVESTIGATION, they don't verify the share structure or coordinate anything with the TA - it just doesn't happen.

For the pinkies it is a formality but you do have to provide notification. That is all FINRA is concerned about at this point.

Why don't I call them Monday and let them know about all the malfeasance that is going on with SRGE. I promise they don't know about the gagged TA and the over the top press release.

IG

Please post how you verified this:

If that were the case none of the SRGE DD would be stickied as it has proven to be false.

I love the DD guys using MexicoMiningCenter.com to verify SRGE is mining in Mexico - hey where did the .mx go.

Just as the documents stating SRGE had mining concessions - that was blown up the last few days.

IG

Nice call Sam,

You can't make this claim:

LOL!!! let's see Fake Financials (why did SRGE go dark 2 years ago and hasn't filed with the SEC since 2008) - I know the answer - to deceive and fleece investors. The financials are unaudited so they can be anything - I have proven that SRGE is not mining in Mexico.

Buyout has proven to be in SRGE press releases and Sierra blog only. SCCO has responded both in written and verbal communication that the buyout rumors are baseless - LMAO!!!

IG

Then provide the proof! You are saying that nodummy fabricated the SCCO emails - why would she care one way or the other.

I saw her email but I have never seen any proof of anything by SRGE.

I see SRGE using MexicoMiningCenter.com to validate that SRGE is mining in Mexico - MMC is a paid for inclusion site that is not connected to the Mexican Government in anyway.

Just one link to the Mexican Government to show SRGE is mining in Mexico.

IG

Then how about a link to a Mexican Government site that verifies your claim.

Where are the links to prove SRGE is mining in Mexico???

It is interesting that the SRGE DD always includes mexicoMiningCenter.com as proof that SRGE is mining in Mexico. MMC is a paid for inclusion site that makes money from that and banner ads etc. Here is the esteemed SRGE DD that uses MMC, there is over 50 references to validate SRGE. You guys did notice that it is a .com site and not a .mx (MMC has absolutely no connection to the Mexican government. Here is a list of selected posts using MMC to validate SRGE:

How about a simple link that shows SRGE is mining in Mexico. I have provided detailed proof that shows Southridge is nowhere to be found on the Mexican government site - if you have proof otherwise please post the links.

Oh, don't try to pass off mexicominingcenter.com as a way to verify SRGE is mining in Mexico because that is a paid for inclusion site and has ZERO to do with the Mexican government.

IG

So is that the reason SRGE went dark two years ago and hasn't files with the SEC since 2008.

The reason they gagged their TA???

How about a explanation - I guess not.

IG

Of course you mean most fraudulent and misleading PR ever written that will most certainly hasten SRGE's demise with the SEC. But, it was very amusing:

I hope you are kidding. First, I did my searches using Southridge and Bandera - as much as you don't like it, Southridge is nowhere to be found on the Mexican government site.

Why don't you mozy on over to the Ministry of Economy site and take a look for yourself. Here is a hint to get you started: http://www.economia.gob.mx/

The only thing misleading to to say Southridge appears anywhere on the Mexican Government site concerning mining. The file name is: ProyectosMinerosCompaniasCapitalExtranjero-2012.xls. And the URL to checkout the PDF file is: http://www.economia.gob.mx/files/comunidad_negocios/informacion_sectorial/mineria/ProyectosMinerosCompaniasCapitalExtranjero-2012.pdf

Take a look, the companies are listed alphabetically but go take a look yourself and post your results - SRGE isn't mining in Mexico.





Oh No, Where in the world is Southridge - missing! But those photos of the documents - LMAO - what a bunch of frauds.

Don't bring Kool-Aid to a adult party.

IG

I used all of the numbers that were in the MoMo photos - so you are saying that he was photographing the wrong documents.

Post the correct numbers then.

Just what I thought - it can't be done because SRGE is a scam.

I think I smell a shareholder revolt.

IG

Also, please post the reason SRGE went dark 2 years ago and hasn't filed with the SEC since 2008?

Why has SRGE gagged the TA??? OH NO TELL ME IT ISN'T SO:

Are you talking about the unaudited fake financials. SRGE went dark almost two years ago and hasn't filed with the SEC since 2008.

Let's see, going dark and gagging the TA - lots of real companies do this nonsense.

SRGE = SCAM by their own actions.

IG

WOW, lowest dividend ever paid, $0.00003 per common share. If you own a million shares you get $30.00 - LIVIN LARGE my man!!!

The dividend is just part of the pump and dump - it will get newbie and gullible all giddy.

IG

Do tell, hmmm, I went to the Ministry of Economy (where Tatiana works) and retrieved the documents using numbers straight from MoMo's photos. Pretty tough to deny that they aren't authentic - check them out yourself instead of just reading posts and thinking that is verification.

Seriously, Southridge Minerals is nowhere to be found on the Mexican Government site.

The whole scam is falling apart before the touts very eyes - it is truly a beautiful thing!

But, please show me where you have verified that SRGE has the mining concessions at Cinco Minas - that's what I thought can't be done because it is a scam.

IG

I am not sure how much more of a inaccurate statement a person could make:

THE FINAL NAIL IN THE SRGE COFFIN!!! OK, how does the SRGE posters explain the issue with the CONCESSION TITLES. From MoMo's post: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79792636 The evidence suggests, actually it proves the documents are forgeries.

On one of the photos taken with a newspaper you will see the following document number: 220533 and on the other 221756. These are the document numbers you can see in the photos and the claims that SRGE is the holder of the Concession Title (actually, stervc posts once a week about the DD and includes these photos). The same is true for document #'s 221455 and 221864. Plus, the ending is the same also:

ATTENTION ALL SRGE INVESTORS - The site mexicominingcenter.com is not in anyway part of the Mexican government site. But, it is the only place you can find SRGE associated with Cinco Minas. mexicominingcenter.com is a paid for inclusion site.

Responsibility for the mining sector belongs to the Secretaría de Economía http://www.economia.gob.mx/ This is the office that the oft mentioned Tatiana works.

But the odd thing is that nowhere on the official Mexican government site for mining - you can't find Southridge Minerals anywhere.

But, Bandera Gold is shown as the company mining Cinco Minas-Gran Cabrera.

Please provide me a link to show that SRGE is mining at Cinco Minas.

The SEC loves this stuff - the over the top press release today should bring some more attention to SRGE.

But, instead of faked documents just post a link to the Mexican government site so we can verify SRGE is mining Cinco Minas.

IG

I was going to post the press release - it is truly amazing.

This was precipitated because of the posts about going to the Ministry of Economy site and downloading all of the mining projects in Mexico and oddly enough I couldn't find Southridge but Bandera was there (this is in no way claiming BGL is any better than SRGE). Also, someone posted about Cinco Minas being suspended - abandoned.

What is funny is the SRGE guys use the following to validate SRGE is mining in Mexico mexicominingcenter.com which is a data scraping site with possible paid for inclusion option.

IG

stervc, you didn't address your statement:

That is not correct. If the mining company is privately held they don't have to do anything it is their money to make or lose.

But, a public company is completely different. They are supposed to be responsible for the shareholders money. To start mining without a feasibility study - especially with the huge outlay of cash to get the mines going. I NEVER see SRGE address the costs associated with bringing the mines to compliance.

BTW, do you have any idea when the mines were last operational? I didn't think so.

There so many holes in the SRGE story and it is obvious not many know anything about mining.

IG

I am not sure how you do a reserve study without extensive drilling.

An example would be a coal mining company would hire Marshall-Miller to do a Engineering report which would be the equivalent of a NI 43-101 for Canada. The cost of a MM&A report for a medium sized coal company would be between $150k and $200k.

If you don't drill you can't claim reserves.

The only thing I see SRGE do is reference studies paid for by someone else many years ago.

IG

So stervc, from what you wrote it seems like you are saying the following is a good thing. There is nothing to lead anyone to believe that there is any value in Cinco Minas: