Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
They hadn't registered as of the last time I checked but they were there last year. But, just because they haven't registered doesnt mean they won't be there working on deals.
40 million at .0005
I'm fine with waiting on what Amilya last told us through social media. "I'm looking to desperately send you guys ("my little stockholders") some more information. As soon as they allow me to put out the next press release, I will do that. Yes I'm paying attention. Do not think for a minute I'm not paying attention to all your little messages in the chat room. I'm not on vacation, I work longer and harder than most of you and I love what I do...I'm doing things by the rules."
So, we can expect to hear from Amilya as soon as she is able. If she can't update us officially with another 8-K in January, she will, no doubt, let us know by means of another social media statement.
Are you looking at the Media Assets page or a different one?
Small 10k asks in. Small lot traders running the show since the big lots were bought back in the low to mid 30's. Good sign!
That's right. But even if we hang out in the 4's for today and maybe tomorrow we're still looking at green day, green day, green day...and so on for the past two weeks. Pump and dumps take place over a period of two or three days. That's all the time you have before investor's figure out it's all fluff and no support. Straight up and straight down.
Not with TPAC. It's total DD supported.
Party in Seattle over the weekend!
China is building it's second aircraft carrier and has a third one in the planning stages. As was mentioned before, I wonder how many articulating self lubricating bearings for maritime use and how many of those type of bearings all those new aircraft will need. Oh, and guess who the PLA have to go to first for ordering??? Gee, I wonder why Bill put the manufacturing in China???!!!
That's right. Bill's back on the plane to China for the in country deals the next day (9th). At least Seattle is close to China! Bill needs to buy a house in Seattle too. He's been so busy I hope he's getting some rest in there somewhere...
Yeah, I know. Look at that...right back up to .0036!
Here's to wishin' I had more funds to drop on this gem.
I'm really looking forward to Monday the 11th. News from the Boeing talks on Friday the 8th may not come out til the end of the day.
That's what I'm talkin' about!
Just picked up another mil at 33. Nice.
May go a little lower but will continue up through the week.
Bounce Time.
I mentioned that Coopervision would be issuing the 8-K since they are authorizing and have control over the release of information.
TPAC RSI now at 30% (oversold condition)
RSI started the day at over 70% Overbought condition.
Selling should subside fairly shortly.
As some have said, some sort of retracement would occur.
Yes. It's possible that Coopervision will wait until the market has an up day to authorize the announcement through an 8-K. Should be 3 days of down from the news in China. Should see a stabilization or reversal by mid to end of week or at least by beginning of next week.
Yeah. I thought I saw a thread on it but didn't folow through. Thanks. I'll check it out.
Thanks b. I had heard between 6 and 7. Do we know the names of those companies yet? We do know that TPAC is the only one that has a production facility in China and that was a forward thinking coup on Bill's part.
We've waited for the agreement to go through. Now that it has, we're waiting for the COO to a knowledge it and an 8-K. There's more interest than ever. This is the calm before the storm.
If you're referring to CES2016 (Consumer Electronics Show) the dates are January 6-9.
You make the mistake of looking at the stock from a production standpoint like many others did. TPAC was in an R&D growth pattern for 4 years. In the OTC, that's almost a death sentence. It took time to develope the self-lubricating bearings for articulating joints. It took time to get NAVAIR certification on these bearings. It wasn't until the beginning of this year that they were able to build out the remodeled manufacturing facility and put the production machinery in place. All while not having an income stream. All R&D and infrastructure development.
Read the latest 10-Q from September, 2015. Where did the money come from? It says right in the 10-Q that Bill and the other officers of the management forfeited their salaries. Money came crom their own pockets and from scrounging up financing. Many investors got impatient waiting on the production to ramp up for the first P.O. So a sell-off occurred from the middle of 2012 to 2015.
From .14 to .0004 over 3 years.
But now R&D and infrastructure are complete and the production phase along with the beginning of particular type. P.O.'s have begun.
This is machinery manufacturing. Something entirely different than a hyped up energy drink. Do your DD. Read the 10-Q. Could it fail. It seems highly unlikely but anything's possible. All commercial and military aircraft need self-lubricating bearings. Period. TPAC is only one of 7 companies worldwide that make these They are very expensive but elliminate lubrication maintenance. That's big in the airline industry because the bottom line is about aircraft maintenance and downtime.
China is having stock market issues but they still need manufacturing and production in their country and the need aircraft parts. We shall see.
Read the posted 8-K's. Why does it matter where the money is coming from to retire shares from the float? Even if he is converting them to preferred stock, the shares are going into beneficial ownership. It's better than having them out as common shares where flippers slow share price down to make money.
This company will be supplying big time bearing orders. 2 separate have already come in, one for $100k and the other a 5 to 7 figure amount.
January 8th this train will switch into high gear and slow investors will be chasing the ask.
Steady men. INMG has a slow fuse but make no mistake, it has been lit.
Do your DD on Tom Coleman and the company. There's a high A/S but a comparably lower float of 1.7 billion. There's lots of room for the A/S to come down if need be. The financials are strong and will continue to provide support for the new projects. It seems that Tom has set his course with INMG. He may have a production or productions in mind that we're not yet aware of. We'll see. January and February will tell.
If you're correct even a small rise in pps to 6 or 7 would be a nice change of pace from .042!
I will absolutely agree with that and maybe that's what he's holding the 9.9 billion A/S in reserve for. Either as a gradual retirement to keep the eventual rise in the share price momentum going that should begin within a month, or a large retirement at the end of Q2 in conjunction with the much anticipated 10-Q. I'm not sure how many he can retire from the Issued, but if he at least brings down the A/S to a reasonable level, it will attract more attention. Yes, I do not think we'll see .05 without it.
I will absolutely agree with that and maybe that's what he's holding the 9.9 billion A/S in reserve for. Either as a gradual retirement to keep the eventual rise in the share price momentum going that should begin within a month, or a large retirement at the end of Q2 in conjunction with the much anticipated 10-Q. I'm not sure how many he can retire from the Issued, but if he at least brings down the A/S to a reasonable level, it will attract more attention. Yes, I do not think we'll see .05 without it.
Well, I definitely see an initial bump in the pps for EPGL once Coop puts it officially on notice, but after that it seems like the royalties will be in the distance and not immediate. That's why a larger upfront would have been nice from a short term standpoint. EPGL has a lot more patents to release licensing rights for to others like AT&T and Intel, but if those also work out a deal where the upfront is minimal and it's all about the royalties, then EPGL will definitely get huge, but mostly in the long term when the developed technology is marketed.
I'm not concerned about it. It just changes my investment strategy to long term (1 to 5 years) rather than short term (3 to 6 months) along with my expectations. I do believe, regardless, that EPGL is a good place to see your long term funds appreciate.
That seems a little steep at this time. It will more than likely not qualify for uplisting until next year, so the pps will definitely have an opportunity to hit .10 by then and then rs to qualify on the NYSE or NASDAQ, but .50? That would be great if it were possible by Q2 but you'll probably be sitting for a long time before you sell, at least into 2017.
I wonder though if Coopervision's stock might rise at a faster rate since they are the ones who will be marketing the actual product. If the upfront to EPGL is a lot less than most on the predictions posted, like if it's in the millions and not tens or hundreds of millions, the royalties from Coopervision's sales figures are the only support to EPGL. Since the agreement was for exclusive rights to licensing of the patent(s), no other companies can license this particular patented tech and therefor we'll see the EPGL pps rise much more slowly and steadily based on what Coopervision does with their newfound licensing rights.
Thoughts?
Or the NYSE Listing Standards:
Standard #3:
1.) $2 pps
2.) 50 million market capitalization
3.) $15 million market value of public float
4.) $4 million stockholders equity
5.) 2 year operating history
Definitely a possibility.
Definitely not until 2017 at the earliest. If they could get an average market cap of $850 million over the 2016 calendar year and revenues of at least $90 million then they could uplist under rule #3 in a one year span. That's a pretty tall order. Unless they can hook up with the bearing order for that new A/C Carrier and all of the planes. That would do it.
Sounds ambitious. Hope you're correct. I'd be happy just to see this get to .03 by the end of January.
40M shares.
NASDAQ Listing Requirements (from investopedia):
Listing Requirements for All Companies:
Each company must have a minimum of 1,250,000 publicly-traded shares upon listing, excluding those held by officers, directors or any beneficial owners of more then 10% of the company. In addition, the regular bid price at time of listing must be $4, and there must be at least three market makers for the stock. However, a company may qualify under a closing price alternative of $3 or $2 if the company meets varying reequirements. Each listing firm is also required to follow Nasdaq corporate governance rules 4350, 4351 and 4360. Companies must also have at least 450 round lot (100 shares) shareholders, 2,200 total shareholders, or 550 total shareholders with 1.1 million average trading volume over the past 12 months.
In addition to these requirements, companies must meet all of the criteria under at least one of the following standards.
Listing Standard No. 1
The company must have aggregate pre-tax earnings in the prior three years of at least $11 million, in the prior two years at least $2.2 million, and no one year in the prior three years can have a net loss.
Listing Standard No. 2
The company must have a minimum aggregate cash flow of at least $27.5 million for the past three fiscal years, with no negative cash flow in any of those three years. In addition, its average market capitalization over the prior 12 months must be at least $550 million, and revenues in the previous fiscal year must be $110 million, minimum.
Listing Standard No. 3
Companies can be removed from the cash flow requirement of Standard No. 2 if the average market capitalization over the past 12 months is at least $850 million, and revenues over the prior fiscal year are at least $90 million.
Added comment: A company can RS to attain the $4 PPS qualification.
A company has three ways to get listed on the Nasdaq, depending on the underlying fundamentals of the company. If a company does not meet certain criteria, such as the operating income minimum, it has to make it up with larger minimum amounts in another area like revenue. This helps to improve the quality of companies listed on the exchange.
http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/121.asp#ixzz3w92mjLuG
Don't let the silence from Tom Coleman fool you.
Look to modest growth when 2015 10-K comes out on or before March 31.
Look to accelerated growth with Q1 10-Q due on or before May 15.
Look to a faster growth with Q2 10-Q due on or before August 15.
.05 in August possible if he's developed additional assets.
If Tom files an 8-K in January we could see .0006
If he files an 8-K in February also, we could see .001 without the 10-K or 10-Q out yet.
This went to .0004 before the previous 10-Q even came out.
All speculation, but 2016 should be interesting.
Do you feel there will be a retracement Monday that will hold it in the 30's range for a couple days or do you think we'll clear .004 by the end of the day?
It's certainly worked so far. No reason to think it will change in the short term. Obviously any major news would be put out on an 8-K, especially as we get close to an uplisting.
Well said!