Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Very slippery facts there... :) Ok, so you are saying that A. WDRP was previously being traded in Canada in some way and B. as of right now NOBODY can trade any shares of WDRP in Canada. We all agree that the company officers and some scammers can't do it, very few people really. You are saying that it could be traded before and now NOBODY can trade it. Yes or no answer, nothing else, just yes or no.
So what are you saying that Wanderport is impersonating this lawyer? Why would they do that?? Maybe he signs them automatically, or copy and pastes the signature or whatever, how does that make any difference at all to anything? I'm sure there's some clerical reason for the date being two days off, maybe it's just a typo... It's like saying he used black ink instead of blue and it's a sure sign something is fishy. And anyway the letter barely says anything definitive at all, why even attack it so much... It's not like it proves everything is ok without a shadow of a doubt.
Anyway i'm getting tired of this, someone else take over please...
So someone's signature is almost identical to... their own signature. There's something there for sure. And it won't be good news for shareholders!
Pretty much what i've been saying all along, target of manipulation, only a few people barred from trading it, no investigation of any sort into the company itself, believe in the product, blah blah blah. Only thing I don't like is them saying yeah Andrew may have manipulated the stock but we promise he won't do it from now on... Really?
I said "as far as trading goes" it does not affect the stock. Which is 100% true. Five or six manipulators can't trade it anymore. Big whoop. Martel and Andrew can't trade it, again big whoop. up to here it's 100% a good thing in every way, again, as far as trading goes. Robert may or may not be able to trade, that could be a positive or negative depending on what his intentions were. It's not relevant anyway until March and by then this whole thing will be long long gone, for better or worse.
Robert's shares were always a part of the equation, we all knew that when we bought in. If the product is successful there will be enough money to go around. At least for the goals I have, can't speak for the people waiting for $5-10. And anyway he can't dump them all at once, and even if he could he'd be hurting himself too.
As far as saying that there's ABSOLUTELY negative PR coming... unless you care to back that up I don't know what to say.
Lol really, you post the definition of it? How is that relevant in any way? Where does it say that EVERYONE was prevented from trading Wanderport? Copy and paste the actual sentences that clearly say that. Anyway isn't there anyone on this board from Canada, this can be solved easy enough, you can either trade it or not.
Ok, so once and for all, are there some trading accounts (almost all belonging to manipulators) that are frozen or is EVERYONE in Canada barred from trading WDRP? If everyone where exactly does it say that. This is getting silly, we're not 5 here...
Where does it say it is cease traded in Canada??? You can't just say stuff like that... Was it even traded there in the first place? Like someone said earlier, there is no way it is halted in all of Canada and nobody mentioned anything on this board. Anyone out there ever bought or sold WDRP in Canada? Can you do it now?
Oh, really? If not even Robert is affected then the whole AMF thing really does not affect the company in any way shape or form, at least as far as trading goes. It's actually a 100% a good thing. Well, other than having their name linked to it...
Robert selling his shares could be potentially a very good thing if he uses the money to move things along or a very bad one if he dumps too many. But that was always the case, nothing new there.
See, if you say "the AMF has Cease Traded WDRP" 99% of people would assume that there is some kind of actual freeze on the stock. What actually happened is a bunch of manipulators got barred from trading the stock and NOBODY ELSE. Oh, the horror, no more manipulation, let's all sell...
As for the SEC having anything to do with this, we all know this is not true at all. Not even the AMF themselves have contacted the company in ANY WAY, much less the SEC. Because they are the TARGET of the manipulation, not the ones doing it. Don't know if the difference between victim and perpetrator is clear to everyone but it should be.
The message that things will get very ugly for shareholders is loud and clear, we heard it the first 20 times.
Ok, Jean-François Amyot, Andrea Cortellazzi and Andrew Barakett plus Martel and Simoneau. That's five people who cannot trade the stock. And it seems to me like a good thing for investors, not a bad one. I'm sure there's more people that that in Canada. Besides, who cares about Canada...
Where does it say that? It's only for like 3 people...
What can you do... People claim all sorts of wacky things on this board. Like trading's been halted, company's being sued, there's no product...
Ok, I said "pretty much" because it's a weird translation that is different people can interpret in different ways. I actually read it carefully, did searches for a lot of key words and even posted just the paragraphs that have anything to do with this company together, which by the way is far less than 40 pages.
Saying that "other" stuff might possibly shake loose doesn't really mean anything. That's true for any stock out there any day of the week. Of course waiting for the investigation to finish (assuming there even is one ongoing right now) will give more information but by that time it may be too late, someone could stay in a company that is a scam or leave one that is a great success. For now we have to make decisions based on the info we have. It looks like the AMF dug pretty deep and did their homework pretty well. It also looks like they found nothing on the company itself and even Andrew (definitely by far the shadiest guy involved with Wanderport in any way) still was not charged with anything definitive or fined a penny. Yes, things could get worse but they always can, with any stock.
Nobody here is basing their investment on the fact that microwave ovens can heat a cup of water. Of course the target is to get something competitive with existing models. UL has seen something in it, Gavin Owens has, Dave Myers has, Design1st has, that university from Canada has, they got a prize for it years ago, letters of intent from many customers, Robert has a track record of inventing stuff and so on and on. Bottom line yes, there are risks in any penny and yes the latest developments definitely hurt their image but overall people aren't crazy for investing. And if they handle it right (which I think they will) this could bounce right up.
I read the whole thing pretty much. There is no doubt at all that this Cortellazzi guy is a piece of work, as well as most of the other guys named there. It is very likely Andrew was into something too, even though his name is not really mentioned that much. But there really isn't even a hint that the company was involved in anything negative at all. He (Cortellazzi) even says at some point that it's a good investment and at another that they own a real technology. And yes, it was a shell company, it used to do something completely different and then it was bought by these guys to bring the heater to production, it was explained on the board. Of course there could be more to the story, it is a pinky, but from that document there's nothing really that incriminating for Wanderport. Anyone feel free to copy and paste fragments that you think look bad...
If we get news the product is working great and about to go on sale not many people are going to care there's a small chance the IR guy is involved in a little manipulation, couple of million shares, they'll be buying for sure, still easy money. Also, if we get news they fired him, message will be problem solved, stock won't be held down from now on (regardless of what will actually happen) again people will look at it as a great opportunity to get in on the dip and buy. With no news at all, who knows...
It is very true that for a few days while the stickies are there investors will be put off by them, that was my feeling too. But really on the other hand if they do any reading at all on the board the result will be the same...
Right now the company needs to draw a very firm line and say on this side are the good, honest guys with an actual product and on this side are the scam artists. At this point Andrew really looks like he is on the wrong side of the line. At the end of the day it doesn't matter who did what, all that matters is he looks bad and the company can't afford to be associated with him or those other guys. Of course when talking about a penny stock, separating the good guys from the bad is impossible but it's all about the image, the way things look. They may all be corrupted in some way (doubt it in this case...) but as long as they can look good that's all that matters. Yes it will hurt the image for a few days until things are cleared up but in the long run it's probably for the best. So far the company has not drawn that line at all, they've embraced Andrew and said it's all great which is 100% the wrong thing to do, regardless if maybe there is a small chance he did nothing wrong.
Maybe we have different trading strategies :) I tend to stay away from companies mentioned in investigations... but i suppose no pain no gain.
It is very true that if they actually show a working product, with numbers, it won't matter nearly as much that there are some slight clouds around their credibility. One or the other, either address that report in a professional way, with some actual facts, or show the product. Preferably both but the product is definitely the big one.
I completely agree WDRP is very special. I have so far not sold one single share and have put far far more money into it than any other penny ever. And this after having my fair share of bad experiences with some of them. But the mindset most investors have is any red flag move on. There are so many of these companies to research that I am not sure the average person spends a long time digging really deep to convince themselves everything is A-ok. Some of us have been here for two years or more, saw tons and tons of research, and still, honestly speaking, many of us are not 100% sure at this point that something fishy is not going on. The small doubts are not enough to make most longs abandon ship but as far as brand new investors, they may well be...
That is a very good point... We are shooting ourselves in the foot here by keeping it going. But at the same time anyone doing any DD at all will come across the whole AMF thing and the Wanderport PR dealing with it, with a link to it. And there is no good response by the company for it, just them saying it's all ok, nothing to worry about. We need a PR to balance it out, to say yes, they said that about us but you should trust us because... these FACTS and this is the story. We need it badly. The longs may keep the price up for a week or so but in the long run... If I came across WDRP now and saw their current response to those allegations I would not touch it with a 10 foot pole. Sure, nothing is proven against them but why take the chance, plenty of other fish in the sea.
The stickies definitely should go down, no doubt.
Even if the pps recovers a little, at least for now, the company still needs to come out with an explanation. That report links them to some very unsavory people and credibility is all they have at the moment. No history, no finished product, nothing else. And this is probably the most crucial moment for the company, when the product is about to hit the market, when they need distributors, manufacturers, funding for production, advertising and all that. Being linked to this scandal can hurt them, and us, big time.
They really need to come out with some FACTS as to WHY things are ok, not just tell us it's all fine. Before they even investigate and make any decisions they need to come out with their version of the facts, why they were linked to these people, when, who's listed on the company board at the moment, what exactly did or didn't Andrew do and everything else in that report. And they need to do it ASAP. If general opinion becomes this is just another penny with the usual scandals and skeletons in the closet, the fact they have a revolutionary product might not be enough on its own.
Posts ran out. Of course I see Andrew insider trading as a problem but him doing that, allegedly, was what we knew since the very start when the AMF decision came out. The question was if any other principals were involved and if the company itslef was accused of anything. Which according to the larger document is not the case it seems. What I was saying was that it isn't as bad as it could have been. I don't disagree that he should at least be suspended until more is known, been saying that from the start. If he stays we need some very good reasons why the AMF accusations are not true, with proof.
Also, in case anyone doesn't have time to read the whole thing here are the paragraphs that concern Wanderport:
[13] It places particular emphasis on handling Ia securities that Wanderport
have taken place recently. The investigator in the record has received three warnings, including
a barely went back to June 25, 2011. It is therefore scheme and consequently, a
compelling reason to issue the order sought. As a company Neuro-Ia
Biotech inc., The Authority has no evidence to promote the tracks on this |  • it.
[26] This should benefit the intimate giving them the right to
hear and respond directly to the facts proven by the Authority. All this being said,
it appears all the same I'abondante I'Autorite proof that certain facts are
occurred more recently and Iaissent believe that some manipulations of securities were
place recently and that should be acting on them. In the case of Ia company
Wanderport, I'enqueteur of I'Autorite has received a warning in June 2011 showing that
is trying to lather Ia value of this title at Ia rise.
[29] As a corollary, Ie Office is also ready to order closure of Ia
Internet <</ tsa / Ibu / /. Net "which is made by the company IAB Media inc. having served at
relaying alerts Ie Wanderport titles. But it is the only decision Ie
2011-O26-001 PAGE: 10
Office is ready to decide without hearing the parties. The allegations about the
manipulation of securities EGNI have no contemporary character that would justify
Ie Office prohibits negotiation Ia Ia based on compelling reasons.
[31] In view of Ia Ia scope Iimitee decision of the Bureau, it is satisfied that He is not
Ia necessary to file with the Registry of the Superior Court. In addition, Ie Bureau took
knowledge of Ia request of the authority for a special mode of service of
Ia this decision to the companies and Wanderport Neuro-Biotech. Plaintiff
desire that their meaning can be made through a press
Ie press I'Autorite website.
1) ORDER INTERDlCT | ON OPERATIONS IN SECURITIES, UNDER ° ART | CLE
265 THE Lo: ON THE SECURITIES AND ARTICLES 93 AND 115.9 OF THE Lo:
the authority of the FINANCIAL MARKETS:
• It prohibits persons whose names appear here after all
activity to eftectuer of operations in the securities of Ia company
_ \ / Vanderport Corp., Namely:
- Wanderport Corp., Its officers, directors and employees;
- 65705442 Canada inc., Its officers, directors and
employees;
• Advice Hilbroy inc., Its officers, directors and
employees;
• Jean-Francois Amyot;
- Andrea Cortellazi, and
• • Andrew Barakett.
• IT AUTHORIZES the signitive of the present decision to the companies
Neuro-Biotech inc. and Wanderport Corp. etfectuee be using Ia
publication of a press release on Ie website of the Autorite
financial markets, Ia provided that such attempts also to
serve them by registered mail to the respective addresses Ieurs
United States;
• IL permitted Ia significance of this decision to put in
issue in this case is made to the attention of the persons whose names
2011-026-001 PAGE: 13
appear in the description of these said defendants at the beginning of Ia
present decision.
G. Wanderport Corp.
31. Wanderport Corp. (The after <<Wanderport ") is a company incorporated Ie
March 29, 2006, under Iin Temtex Industries, Inc., pursuant to Iois | State of Delaware.
32. January 8, 2007, Temte Industries, Inc. Has changed its name to Wanderport Corp.
33. Wanderport leaders are Richard Mantel (President), Jean-Francois Amyot (vice-
president communications) and Robert Simoneau (VlCE president technology).
34. The address is Wanderport 17445 U.S. Highway 192, Suite 1, Clermont, FL 3,471,461,
USA. Wanderport has no known address in Québec.
35. The shares are traded on the Wanderport Ie Pink Sheet.
44. Several other natural and legal persons are involved in this issue:
- Proactive Computer Services is a company that is not Andrea Cortellazzi
registered with the registrar of companies in Québec and who holds
no registration with | Authority. This company was used by Andrea
Cortellazzi within the framework of investments in Wanderport. _ A
. 8
Barakett • Andrew has been involved in handling securities Ia Wanderpoit and has
also compromising the title of Wanderport through Ia company 6570542
Canada inc. Ie which he is chairman and largest shareholder;
46. July 12, 2010, the Authority began an investigation in relation to investment activities
Andrea Cortellazzi, Serge Ollu, Wanderport and M45 (now Neuro-Biotech).
47. The survey showed Vexistence ploy to manipulate the securities of any
Wanderport, Neuro-Biotech and EGM, as explained here after.
B. A Wanderport
48. Within the framework of | 'survey, Finvestisseur one who has subscribed for shares of Wanderport
Through Andrea Cortellazzi, was encountered. The investor made a statement a
mentioning the following facts;
- It has been introduced e M. Cortellazzi through an acquaintance in July 2009.
~ - Mr. Cortellazzi IUI said IE | was stockbroker, IE | Making A
V very profitable investment and IE | owned <<Shell. "
- Mr. Cortellazzi told IE | could | help by placing their money in a <<shell "
he had the control, a <<Green as "very profitable Wanderport. This placement
should be safe, he could not lose. `
- He has met many times Mr. Cortellazzi, most of the time has offices
business at 1212 Redpath Crescent in Montreal. •
- It has invested an initial $ 20 000, rernis by check at the offices of Mr. Cortellazzi
located at 1212 Redpath Crescent. A Ia latter's request, he did check Ie
• | Order Proactive Computer Services, a company belonging.
Mr. Cortellazzi.
- The check was cashed in a nursing collection.
"Mr. Cortellazzi IUI handed, IORS another meeting at 1212 Redpath Crescent, a
Proactive Computer Services letter confirming the receipt of | 'money even
Finvest that in Wanderport.
~ Mr. Cortellazzi I'a recontacted a week later, indicating IUI IE | had made
thousands of dollars in prot. He also told her that a second wave of
Investment came in Wanderport, a place became free, he should invest
at again to make more money and that it was urgent. It has agreed to invest
his business partner, Yinvestisseur 2, another $ $ 70 000, again at
by two certified checks at I'ordre Proactive Computer Services.
l - M. Cortellazzi IUI said that He was to get back quickly difhcile money because
that He was blocked in the U.S. and it proved out that small amounts of e Ia
times to avoid detection by the imp6t United States and Canada.
- Mr. Cortellazzi then explained that Wanderport and M45 shells which are
is the owner. It has also said that shells are and how
it proceeds to give them value Ia. He said any compromise on these securities from
IE multiple accounts | checking with small amounts and in consultation with
associates who were Ia Ia same thing to mount value of the security.
- Mr. Cortellazzi IUI said he paid in shares of the promoters (including <<Hilbroy>>
<<It's all Bull "and" "Gold Spoon") and controlled the market and the time
or it was withdrawing its lnvestment. The aim was to rise slowly in the title
attracting other investors. It was the proht this way.
51. On June 17, 2011, Internet searches conducted by the investigators I `Authority have
Ie found that itsaIlbul website |. net, operated by IAB, including the fact
promotion as Wanderport.
52. In addition, IAB member sends to the website alerts that are promoting as Ia
Wanderport of which contain analysis of current Ie of this title.
Wanderport
- About Wanderport, it indicates that this is not his project, but the
Andrew Barakett, a long-time acquaintance.
_ - II has been contacted by him there are more than two years atin key | help set up at
this shell stock market.
- His duties were to find for Mr. Barakett a transfer agent and a lawyer
United States.
. - To do this, he obtained more than two million shares of Wanderport, actions that
has been sold or distributed.
• - Mr. Barakett, which has no specific title in Wanderport, was commissioned by
former board Wanderport,
"Following a transaction with a Quebec company, represented by a
Richard Martel, Wanderport had to have a real asset, a technology
the field of water heaters.
- The transaction Wanderport so that the shell possesses | assets would still
'Not completed. `
- Mr. Cortellazzi contends that at no time did he solicited investors for
purchase shares of Ia society.
- He knows that Hilbroy ltsallbull and are involved in promoting Wanderport Ia, but
IE shows it | was not involved at this level.
- In fact, Mr. Cortellazzi pretend to have had a role in that very Iimité Wanderport,
or only to find an agent and a lawyer for transfen Ia society.
M45-lNeuro Biotechl
'- M. Cortellazzi Ie said to have been in some past owner <<shells "
shells traded.
- The key was M45. Mr IE indicates Conellazzi | was his <<baby "and
the main project he was involved in recent years.
"M45 is listed on the Pink Sheet would have bought there are several
years. The company was the main objective and acquisiti0n | 'explorati0n of
Ia mining properties in Matagami area. .
89. Testimony and evidence gathered within the framework of the Venquéte
I'Autorité Ia show the presence of a network that has developed a scheme to
manipulate the securities of the companies Wanderport, Neuro-Biotech and EGM.
90. Specifically, they use a network of associates and brokerage accounts of ann
deal in securities of companies whose securities are manipulated to create artificially
a transaction volume.
Yeah I'm not entirely sure of all the details. From what I can tell the whole shell thing was earlier, maybe before Andrew was even involved. It says before June 09. Then when Andrew came into the picture, along with the new Wanderport, the one we know now, he apparently asked this Cortellazzi guy to find an attorney in the US and something else to do with promoting I think, don't remember exactly. With the new Wanderport their relation to Cortellazzi was pretty limited. But as to why Andrew chose him and who told him to do that, that's the biggest question, don't know... Maybe he knew this Cortellazzi guy from before, maybe he knew he had been involved with the old Wanderport so that's why he chose him.
That's what I was saying it would be great if the company came out with a PR saying yes, our relation to person X is this this and this, to person Y it is this this and this etc and the confusion arose from the fact that this and this... Right now everything is really muddled. The bottom line however is that the price may have been manipulated (which is what many people were saing all along) and Andrew may be involved, even if just slightly but there isn't a single word in there that suggests the company itself did anything wrong. Doesn't mean they didn't, but not according to that document at least. Also, there's a quote saying that Cortellazzi thinks it will make money for sure and another saying that they actually own a technology, an actual product.
Thanks for doing that, great work. I found it useful to do a search for the word Wanderport in there. For the most part it says they were just the target of manipulation and things seem to actually be cleaner for WDRP than for the other companies involved. There doesn't even seem to be anything that incriminating about Andrew... Maybe he's actually not that dirty, just got his name connected to some bad stuff...
I don't understand why the company or their lawyer doesn't go over this document like we have and address the details in it. It's the best thing to do. They must have already talked to Andrew about it and were happy with his replies, or at least they're saying they were...
The most interesting part was:
Wanderport
- About Wanderport, it indicates that this is not his project, but the
Andrew Barakett, a long-time acquaintance.
_ - II has been contacted by him there are more than two years atin key | help set up at
this shell stock market.
- His duties were to find for Mr. Barakett a transfer agent and a lawyer
United States.
. - To do this, he obtained more than two million shares of Wanderport, actions that
has been sold or distributed.
• - Mr. Barakett, which has no specific title in Wanderport, was commissioned by
former board Wanderport,
"Following a transaction with a Quebec company, represented by a
Richard Martel, Wanderport had to have a real asset, a technology
the field of water heaters.
- The transaction Wanderport so that the shell possesses | assets would still
'Not completed. `
- Mr. Cortellazzi contends that at no time did he solicited investors for
purchase shares of Ia society.
- He knows that Hilbroy ltsallbull and are involved in promoting Wanderport Ia, but
IE shows it | was not involved at this level.
- In fact, Mr. Cortellazzi pretend to have had a role in that very Iimité Wanderport,
or only to find an agent and a lawyer for transfen Ia society.
M45-lNeuro Biotechl
'- M. Cortellazzi Ie said to have been in some past owner <<shells "
shells traded.
If they average 10c they won't be as rich as the guy averaging 1 or 2c if investing the same money. And $10... Don't know about that. Sure hope you are right :). Personally I would call anything over 25c a great success. $1 or 2 is definitely possible if it all goes well, in a couple of years.
That's probably the best thing that can happen right now. I doubt we'll see any definitive resolution to the whole AMF deal any time soon. Will probably drag on a while. So the only thing that can save the pps is some news about the product. Something really good would make the pps go crazy at these oversold levels with so much money on the sidelines. I only hope it's not fluff, if there ever was a really bad time to put out one of their fluff PRs, it's now. And yes, I would feel a sick pleasure watching the people who got out chase it up :)
Agree with you on the letter, not very convincing. Although it does say Andrew is not involved in the decision making and is not employed by those two companies directly. That's good information i guess.
As for 1.5c, I really doubt we see that. There's no solid evidence against the company and no proof the product isn't real. Selling at 6c makes sense but at 3, you'd have to be stupid... jmo.
Wanderport, it's not enough to tell us everything will be ok. You have to tell us WHY it will be ok. Either A. you have information that shows nobody associated with the company did anything wrong, B. you are investigating and are fully prepared to take whatever action necessary and/or C. the product is proven and about to go into production any day now. Anything else just shows lack of professionalism and lack of respect for investors. You cannot expect anyone to just take your word for it saying it will be ok, you are not a blue chip.
I'm not saying they're not but in the mean time they can give us way more information. Nothing about even considering an investigation, no details at all about what Andrew's excuse is, nothing at all about the product in forever... All they say is Andrew is great, and this right after he was named in an investigation. Come on, that is weak. At this point we are just sitting here not knowing if this is a great life-changing stock that just happened to be linked to a minor investigation or if it's a dead-end or a scam like the majority of pinks are.
Thanks for sharing and emailing him.
But that really says nothing. Why not tell us why they think he's innocent. They just say stuff like "Andrew has been more than forthright (regardless of certain accusations)". Tell us what the story is and why everything is ok and we should trust the company. Until then it's just another penny stock involved in another investigation...
Market's been open two and a half hours, after a weekend, and still no PR?? Wanderport, you can't just stick your head in the sand on this one. Here is what you NEED to PR:
- What is Andrew's exact role in the company and what information does he have access to.
- What is his contract, when does it expire.
- What is being done by the company to investigate the allegations.
- What will happen with Andrew and Hillbroy until the facts are straightened out and what will happen after if they are found guilty.
- Exactly what stage the product is at and what the ballpark efficiency numbers are at this point.
This whole "Andrew is doing a great job, nothing will change" and "we won't PR anything about the product to protect intellectual property" is all BS and it is not what a real company that is on the level would do. Pennies don't have the luxury of not being 100% transparent. Time to act like big boys.
Beer, just saw your message. I don't have PM. That thing he posted is what we all saw and it's not as bad as two people try to make it seem. As far as them hurrying up with the product, yes, we've all been saying that for a long time and now it's ten times more important. As for the traveling part, I don't know, I didn't think that was the case.
100% agree. It always has been really annoying the whole secrecy BS they were using to keep everyone in the dark. Especially now that they may need some money to put the thole thing in motion they really don't want to keep investors in the dark like they have been doing until now.
For a long time (maybe still) the product was nowhere near the verge of being released. So insider information would have been very useful for just flipping the stock, just like any other penny. Even if they wanted to accumulate it's still great to know whenever a PR is coming or when one is not coming for a long time. Averaging 2c will make you far more money than averaging 6. But all that is just speculation, we still have no real info at all, nothing other than that one, fairly vague, AMF release.
Oh, wow, really... THAT is the so-called court order naming Wanderport as a defendant?? That's just the decision of some Canadian regulatory board saying a handful of people are barred from trading the shares. We've seen that a million times, it has been addressed repeatedly on this board and by the PR they released. It does not in any way accuse the company of any wrong-doing. It even specifically says that the mentioned companies were pumped and dumped by these people. It happens big time in penny land every single day. Does not in any way mean the company is accused of anything. I am not even sure it's even technically possible to accuse a company of insider trading, only individuals.
We've had much better efforts on this board over the last two years.
Where is this "court order" where the company is mentioned as a defendant??? If there was such a thing around I'm pretty sure that's what we would have been talking about all this time, not the fact Andrew may be very loosely linked to some bad stuff.
Trading was NOT halted, only a handful of people were barred from trading it. Huge difference.
If Andrew is the inside man "inside" WDRP then that must mean the rest of the company is not guilty of anything and is not in on the whole deal, or else they would not need an inside man. As soon as they distance themselves from him, which they will have to do as soon as he is charged with anything at all, problem solved.
Good effort there but not quite convincing.
OMG, really?? WOULD be a great CANDIDATE??? That is 100% conjecture and 0% fact.
The facts are:
1. WDRP was in no way mentioned as having done anything wrong. It was the TARGET of manipulation.
2. There is absolutely no plans mentioned by the AMF, SEC or anyone to in any way investigate Wanderport.
3. Andrew is the ONLY person mentioned anywhere, not Martel, Simoneau, Mayers, Ovens, Design 1st or any of the many people involved.
4. Andrew was not even fined even a cent or charged with anything.
5. Andrew is the least important part of the whole WDRP story, he is only a contractor, not even directly employed.
The company really needs to address what is happening better but until then lets put this to rest.
Yeah mine too :) Oh well... Maybe if these guys have their way the pps will drop a bit and we all get some cheapies...
All part of investing in a penny I guess... :) Dirty work but worth it most of the time. Normally I would say that no way would some comments on a board influence pps, and in most cases it doesn't, so we shouldn't care and just ignore these people... But in the case of WDRP I'm not so sure. 5 mil shares can move it big time in one direction or another and people on this board own far far more than that so...
You have a good point for sure but there is a very big difference between "nothing was proven, we are certainly investigating everything and will make a decision once we have more information" and what they said which was "he's great, nothing happened, things stay as they were and how dare the AMF say anything bad about the company". They could have struck a far far better balance between reassuring investors that they take these allegations very seriously and at the same time not washing their laundry in public and jumping to any conclusions about Andrew.