mickeybritt@outlook.com
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
speckulater
Why would any reputable CEO ever blog or post a visual time line. That
means not one thing. How about is needing glasses as he for years has
been seeing a audit in a few months, and even a few days and a form 10
and his vision was blind as none of it happened. This is what you call
baiting investors into thinking this clown is going to do something. Where
is a audit for 2016. 2015, 2014, 2013 to name a few? He even went so
far as to say the SEC had them and all was o.k. just needed one more thing
which was a real audit as he alledgedly hired a non accredited auditor
and bless his heart he never could find a accredited auditor. Ever hear
of a company that couldn't find a accredited to auditor? You see the
lies and false earnings will never be revealed. Hard to believe a
human being could live the life of lies and deceit that we have been
exposed to. Merry Christmas Eric.
JMO
Mickey
aceisaneight
Can you or anyone especially our CEO tell us what the number 1 selling dvd
HannoverHouse released in 2017 and how much money it generated
HannoverHouse. The talk about a dvd being the second or first money
producing dvd don't mean a thing if you can't show the revenues of
the number 1 dvd that HannoverHouse released this year. No way to compare
so making the comment is just hype with no foundation.
In all the years this CONGLOMERATE CALLED HANNOVERHOUSE has never had
a movie that made money, or a dvd that made money that we know of and never
one book purchased and marketed. Kind of poor results for a CEO that
brags about his great credentials but results say those credentials
are in his mind only as he wouldn't know a good movie, dvd, or book if
he seen one.
JMO
Mickey
speckulater
Same old crap always next year things are going to happen. The blog about
December was to be the greatest thing ever and we get a couple of flops. We will never see a audit or a form 10 completed and filed
in January, we have heard this promise for years and years.? Eric has to lie to keep the stock price from going to zero. In all his years as CEO not 1 single movie has been worth a thing and made us no money. If that is the best a CEO can do then we have a CEO that should not be in charge as he has no talent when it comes to understanding what the public wants in a movie. He was to busy hoping he could make a star out of his x wife and that didn't turn out so good and cost us a lot of money.
If Eric was a ball player he would have been released the first year, but
slick Eric got control and was insured of always having his position even
though he didn't know anything about what he was doing.
JMO
Mickey
FISH
I think I said after the net dollars for the year IDCC makes. I think that
is money after expenses so wait and see how much it amounts to. This is
my final post here as I am to stupid to be on this board. Gppd luck to all.
JMO
Mickey
If you have a Ira and must draw money out and haven't wait till next year
and pay the penalty I think.
Your lower tax rate should make you more money than taking it this year.
That is what I think but our board accountants can probably enlighten you
to what is best.
The stock should move up at least 5 points looking for the lower tax
rate in the future.
JMO
Mickey
Got a big time tax question?????
Since our officers have been granted a 11% bonus package, just how will
this affect earnings and the companies ability to write this off as
a expenditure? Also if the company can write it off this year wouldn't
it be better to award the bonus before year end or would it be better
to do it next year or years afterwards? It is apparent or I think it
is that the receipient's of this humongous bonu will be better off taking
it next year when individual taxes will be lowered? I may be wrong but
to the best of my knowledge I don't recall of a company awarding a bonus
that the total worth is worth more than what the companies profits are
for the whole year. After expenses the bonus at today's stock price
equates to more money than the company netted all year. So can some
of our accountants enlighten me.
JMO
Mickey
aceisaneight
Will you please answer what the number 1 selling dvd HannoverHouse had
in 2016 and how much money it made?
JMO
Mickey
olddog
You are right about I was in China, but wouldn't it be simple to just
That we have increased our buy back by a 100 million and we now have
a total of 186 million to buy back stock? Does anyone care how much they
spent in the past the market looks forward not backward.
Do you think they will spend that 186 million buying back stock this year
or increase the value of the 11% they get by buying back next year? They
are not about to dilute their bonus. The total value of this bonus is
more than half the total revenues of the company, like I said a good job
if you can get it. I can't blame the individual investors for approving
this it is apparently institutional investors with blinders on.
JMO
Mickey
They are some slick people in my opinion!!!!!!
If you increase the buy back why not make it simple as hell and say
we have bought back X amount in the past and we are now authorizing
and additional 100 million giving the company X amount of money to buy
back stock. Who gives a damn if the total since inception now adds up
to 500 milllion.. You don't tell your wife you have spent $1500.00 on
groceries this year and we will spend another $1,000 making out total
$2500.00. You most likely would say we have this much to spend this
for groceries this month.
I don't give a crap about what they bought in the past as all that is
a way of patting themselves on the back instead of just giving the
actual amount they have to spend. Almost deceiving in the first release
and then tell us later a new amount left. Jusst tell us what you have
to spend as the past don't mean a damn thing, it is tomorrow the street
cares about and they are not about to buy more shares back and decrease
their bonus you can bank on that.
JMO
Mickey
I must be totally stupid!!!!!!
Why would these clowns buy back stock and reduce the amount of stock they
would receive. If they bought back shares there 11% bonus would be reduced
because there would be less shares for them to receive so forget about
any buy back till they get their hand out of the cookie jar.
JMO
Mickey
aceisaneight
Tell us what was the number 1 shipment.
JMO
Mickey
Buying stock back!!!!
Lets say IDCC retired 6 million shares and the saving annually on those
shares on the dividend would be over 8 million dollars. I guess they don't
want to save 8 million and the share count would be below 30 million
and a $1.40 annually would be roughly .48 cents a share or with a 2- P/E
$4.80 share increase. Stock goes up stock dividend remains the same and
all they do is retire what they are authorized to do. Seems like a no
brainer to me.
JMO
Mickey
Strange that IDCC is authorized to buy back up to 500 million dollars
worth of stock as of September 14 2017.
Using the stock price of todays close of $74.25 the company could buy
back 6.7 million shares. That would more than cover the shares they will
be getting as a bonus. My opinion IDCC should not allow this manipulation
and step up and buy stock every day between now and year end. I think the
officers will be getting based on today price around 207.00 million worth
of stock. Now if that is not a good job I don't know what is?
JMO
Mickey
Mr. Parkinson I think you are a big time liar!!!!!!
Let me make it real clear you said that in January 2018 you would have
the audit and form 10. If any auditor that was going to provide you with
the 2018 audit then they with no additional cost could provide you with
the audit for the past years and then the final 2017 audit in January.
In other words no audit will ever be seen or before the sun sets today
your auditor would already have the past years available. It is no like
HannoverHouse is a big conglomorate as you have little to audit since
you have accomplished little except for bad movies and lies to us.
JMO
Mickey
What I find hard to believe!!!!!
For years and years the CEO has bragged about having just half the cell
phone market licensed and emphasized about best in class license team.
How stupid can you be to brag about half the cell phone market licensed
and the money it brings in and yet you can double the income with the
other half licensed plus back money and yet very little is accomplished
by our BEST IN CLASS LICENSE TEAM. In the mean time we are bragging about
our new inventions for 5G and Internet of things. Why don't you get off
your ass and get the other half of the cell phone market licensed and
back money paid? It is none other than the CEO who has to be held
responsible for this inadequate license team.
JMO
Mickey
olddog
Excuse me but didn't IDCC also expand on their BCDMA patents? Wouldn't
QCOM possibly be using some of the IDCC patents? Hard for me to understqnd
that IDCC was working on CDMA back when and also BCDMA and to not add
to the BCDMA patents over the years kind of makes no sense does it?
What you are basically saying is QCOM is ran by genuises and IDCC by
idiots. To be working on BCDMA and seeing how dominant CDMA and QCOM
had became using CDMA and not enhance your BCDMA would make no sense.
JMO
Mickey
olddog
I got you so all the CDMA patents QCOM license are expired and damn fools
are paying them.
JMO
Mickey
Does this agreement not limit QCOM'S acces to IDCC CDMA and BCDMA technology?
It says CLEARLY that QCOM IS NOT LICENSED Based on these limitations, Qualcomm is not licensed under either all of our
patents that we believe are essential to 3G, including cdma2000, or all of the inventions which we believe will be essential and which are
contained in pending patent applications. The proportion of essential Company patents under which Qualcomm is licensed has diminished
substantially over time as the Company has been inventing and acquiring technology at an accelerating rate since early 1995.
Looks pretty clear here to me. How is it QCOM seems to go forward and
license what appears to be they under this agreement don't have a right
to.
Additionally, in 1994 we entered into a paid-up CDMA-based patent license agreement with Qualcomm, Inc. (Qualcomm) that is limited
in scope. The Qualcomm license excludes, among other things, any rights under our patents as regards TDMA standards, any rights under any of
our patent applications filed after March 7, 1995, any rights under the patents and applications subsequently acquired, such as was the case with
Windshift, and any rights to any patents relating to cellular overlay and interference cancellation. The Qualcomm license agreement grants
Qualcomm the paid-up right to grant sub-licenses under designated patent and patent applications to Qualcomm’s customers. For some of our
patents, Qualcomm’s sublicensing rights are limited to those situations where Qualcomm is selling ASICs to the customer. For a limited number
of patents as to which applications were filed prior to March 8, 1995, Qualcomm may grant licenses under such ITC patents regardless of
whether the customer is also purchasing an ASIC from Qualcomm. Based on these limitations, Qualcomm is not licensed under either all of our
patents that we believe are essential to 3G, including cdma2000, or all of the inventions which we believe will be essential and which are
contained in pending patent applications. The proportion of essential Company patents under which Qualcomm is licensed has diminished
substantially over time as the Company has been inventing and acquiring technology at an accelerating rate since early 1995.
Certain existing license agreements may be renegotiated or restructured based on most favored licensee (MFL) or other provisions
contained in the applicable license agreement. MFL clauses typically permit a licensee
Can someone clear this up for me as it appears QCOM i8s violating the
hell out of their agreement.
JMO
Mickey
FISH
I am sure I am wrong on this but I thought the 1994 settlement with
QCOM allowed QCOM narrowband CDMA but later the BCDMA was IDCC'S I remember
somethinng about 10 GHZ and above belonged to IDCC. I don't see how
QCOM still holds the CDMA. But I am trying to do this from memory so I
am sure I have misunderstood this settlement.
JMO
Mickey
California talking about smart city1!1
I seen on t.v. a city in California talking about the future of smart
cities, with sensors in asphalt and lighting poles. Now will Hillcrest
be providing the sensors and IDCC the technology? Like I said IDCC
will damn sure be taking in one hell of a lot more from the Intenet
of Things than any lousy 100 million a year. Then add in the LG revenue
and surely ZTE, along with Lenovo, and Xaiomi and all of a sudden it
will be to the moon Alice.
If cities will be saving repeat saving 5 trillion do you think they will
only pay a $100 million a year to have that kind of SAVINGS?
JMO
Mickey
Question besides flops of the movies wasn't HHSE supposed to buy books?
I thought they was besides marketing movies they was going to acquire
books or rights to books. How many books have they got the rights to
distribute? We already know Eric has zero talent for identifying a
money making movie. In fact other than lying we are still waiting on
anything positive from Eric. I see why he works for hisself as no one
in the world would hire him.
JMO
Mickey
KL2640
Apparently you didn't read the amount of shares. This is worth a ton
of money.
JMO
Mickey
Great job for a small company pass the spoon as we dip deeply again.
INTERDIGITAL, INC. : Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders, Financial Statements and Exhibits (form 8-K)
Envoyer par e-mail
06/16/2017 | 03:20 pm
Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors;
Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of
Certain Officers.
(e)
2017 Equity Incentive Plan
On April 18, 2017, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of InterDigital, Inc.
(the "Company") adopted and approved, subject to shareholder adoption and
approval, the Company's 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan"). The
Company's shareholders adopted and approved the 2017 Plan at the Company's
Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 14, 2017 (the "2017 Annual
Meeting").
The 2017 Plan has an indefinite term, and provides for the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
performance units, performance shares and incentive cash bonuses to employees,
consultants and non-employee directors of the Company and to employees and
consultants of any parent, subsidiary or affiliate of the Company, as the 2017
Plan administrator may determine. 2,400,000 shares of the Company's common stock
are authorized for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2017 Plan. In addition,
outstanding awards under the Company's 2009 Stock Incentive Plan that expire or
terminate without being exercised or that are forfeited or repurchased by the
Company will be added to the shares of common stock available for issuance under
the 2017 Plan up to a maximum of 1,460,461 shares. The 2017 Plan will be
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Compensation
Committee").
The material terms and conditions of the 2017 Plan are described in the
Company's Proxy Statement dated April 28, 2017, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the same date. The description of the 2017
Plan contained herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text
of the 2017 Plan, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 hereto and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Grants under the 2017 Plan of time-based and performance-based restricted stock
unit awards to certain participants, including the Company's named executive
officers, will be made pursuant to the forms of agreement for such awards, which
were approved by the Compensation Committee on March 23, 2017 and are filed as
Exhibits 10.2 and 10.3 hereto, respectively, and incorporated herein by
reference. Option awards under the 2017 Plan will be made pursuant to the form
of agreement for such awards, which was also approved by the Compensation
Committee on March 23, 2017 and is filed as Exhibit 10.4 hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
Item 5.07. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
On June 14, 2017, the Company held the 2017 Annual Meeting. The matters voted on
at the 2017 Annual Meeting and the voting results for each matter are set forth
below.
(i) The following individuals were elected as directors of the Company to serve a
one-year term until the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2018 and
until his or her successor is elected and qualified as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Broker
Votes For Votes Against Abstentions Non-Votes
Jeffrey K. Belk 21,122,108 574,040 307,060 9,292,915
Joan H. Gillman 21,335,148 331,619 336,441 9,292,915
S. Douglas Hutcheson 21,089,181 616,413 297,614 9,292,915
John A. Kritzmacher 21,073,102 590,682 339,424 9,292,915
John D. Markley, Jr. 21,069,594 592,924 340,690 9,292,915
William J. Merritt 20,903,753 1,010,123 89,332 9,292,915
Kai O. Öistämö 21,062,302 633,438 307,468 9,292,915
Jean F. Rankin 21,068,028 622,426 312,754 9,292,915
Philip P. Trahanas 21,101,844 588,631 312,733 9,292,915
(ii) Shareholders adopted and approved the 2017 Plan as follows:
Votes For Votes Against Abstentions Broker Non-Votes
19,482,041 2,442,276 78,891 9,292,915
(iii) Shareholders passed an advisory resolution to approve the Company's
executive compensation as reported in the Company's 2017 proxy statement as
follows:
Votes For Votes Against Abstentions Broker Non-Votes
20,513,958 1,410,434 78,816 9,292,915
(iv) Shareholders approved, on advisory basis, a frequency of "one year" with
respect to future advisory votes on executive compensation as follows:
One Year Two Years Three Years Abstentions Broker Non-Votes
16,936,165 253,415 4,724,468 89,160 9,292,915
Based on these results, and consistent with the Board's recommendation, the
Board has determined that the Company will hold an advisory vote on executive
compensation every year until the next advisory vote on the frequency of future
advisory votes on executive compensation.
(v) Shareholders ratified the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2017 as follows:
Votes For Votes Against Abstentions
30,581,946 519,258 194,919
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits.
†*10.1 InterDigital, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the
SEC on June 15, 2017 (File No. 333-218755)).
†10.2 Form of Agreement for Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards
under 2017 Equity Incentive Plan.
†10.3 Form of Agreement for Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit
Awards under 2017 Equity Incentive Plan.
†10.4 Form of Agreement for Option Awards under 2017 Equity Incentive
Plan.
* Incorporated by reference to the previous filing indicated.
†Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Not much to say other than wow wish I was on the receiving end of this
bonus plan.
JMO
Mickey
max411
This may show how the pigs have been at the trough.
Advertisement
InterDigital Inc IDCC
Add to PortfolioGet E-mail AlertsPrint This PagePDF ReportData QuestionQuoteChartStock AnalysisPerformanceKey RatiosFinancialsValuationInsidersOwnershipFilingsBondsOverviewExecutive CompensationInsider ActivityKey ExecutivesBoard of DirectorsCommittees
2016 Executive Compensation Compensation vs. Performance (1-Year % Change)
Total Compensation 1-Year % Change CEO Compensation Stock Return Revenue Return on Equity Net Income
$8,493,760
-2.72 %
5.89% 88.11% 50.84% 102.91% 159.17% Total Executive Compensation IDCC
201220132014201520164 mil8 mil12 mil7.80 mil9.06 mil7.92 mil8.73 mil8.49 mil
Stock Price
Note: Currency in USD.
Advertisement
Trade on your terms at E*TRADE.
See Salary, Bonus, and Pay details for Jobs at IDCC Key Executive Compensation IDCC
Name/Title 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Key Executive Compensation 5,122,489 9,056,516 7,916,855 7,661,892 8,493,760
William J. Merritt/President and Chief Executive Officer 1,877,937 3,348,148 2,617,073 2,560,817 2,711,731
Richard J. Brezski/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 609,947 740,549 1,145,881 1,099,174 1,192,159
Lawrence F. Shay/Senior Executive Vice President, Future Wireless and Chief Intellectual Property Counsel 1,021,487 1,984,715 1,582,835 1,519,165 1,692,055
Scott A. Mcquilkin/Senior Executive Vice President, Innovation 898,420 1,685,422 1,520,486 1,455,276 1,579,803
James J. Nolan/Executive Vice President, IoT Solutions 714,698 1,297,682 1,050,580 1,027,460 1,318,012
Now if I think I am understanding it correctly they are to get 11% of
the company this bonus. If right wouldn't that be around 3.5 million
shares? Now that if right is one hell of a chunk of money even if the
stock is at only $75.00.
Not my opinion but facts.
Mickey
tw11
If you want to take the company private and rip the shareholders off you
buy back stock and issue big bonuses and have 1 or 2 major institutions
side with you and you have enough shares to go private. The bonuses of
free stock must be halted. How in the hell can in 1 year they get a 11%
bonus? Better watch the hen house as the fox is damn sure watching it.
JMO
Mickey
olddog
If I was IDCC I would tell ZTE first we will seek a cease and desist
of sales by you and second we don't have to have your money to be
successful and we have decided since you want to keep the fight on lets
go all the way and see what kind of rate the court sets. Hard ball can
be played by both sides. As they say down south screw and feed them
peanuts oh! to hell with the peanuts.
JMO
Mickey
JimLur
Just exactly what are you talking about? If LG didn't owe for 3G then why
would they want arbitration and why would there be terms for the back
litigation? Do you honestly think LG was paid up for 3G after 2010?
Hell I am surprised you didn't say IDCC owed them money for selling 3G.
JMO
Mickey
JimLur
I have read it and no way in hell did LG not pay for the use of 3G from
2010 till now. If that was the case why was they denied even arbitration?
Answer they had agreed to pay for 3G but they didn't and if IDCC couldn't
collect for that usage not any company would ever pay and that would
include LG.
Trying to use a FISH example you lease a condo in Mississippi and the
lease expires in 2010 and you in turn also lease a apartment in New York
city and you comute to and from the 2 locations and when the lease is
paid up on the Mississippi condo you have full use of it for life at no
more expense but your azz will pay to stay in that New York apartment
every year.
JMO
Mickey
dilt1
Just how much would you pay to save 5 trillion over 5 years. Does a
lousy 100 million a year for a total of 500 million make a lick of sense?
I would say you would be glad to pay 5 billion over the 5 years and be
jumping with joy for the huge savings. Even 5 billion would be dirt cheap
since it takes 1,000 billion to make a trillion I think.
I have said all along the Internet of Things will be a monster and should
make even small shareholders filthy rich over the next 10 years.
JMO
Mickey
FISH
IDCC may not get paid anymore for 2G on back money but you can bet your
sweet rear end they paid for use from December 31 2010 till the present
time and ongoing in the future and I hope they don't pay till January
and the tax rate is only 20%. If you think they forgave them for 7 years
of 3G and maybe 4G you are crazy.
JMO
Mickey
fish
Since you say there was definitely no back money can you say why
IDCC didn't say there was no back money but rather this is what they
said.
The parties have also agreed to terms for dismissal by InterDigital of the outstanding litigation among the parties and their affiliates.
Now tell us what kind of terms there is if there is no money or other
considerations. If you owed me nothing there would not be terms as far
as I know. Of course I don't know as much as you do so I am probably
wrong, and the terms was we got nothing.
JMO
Mickey
JimLur
Excuse me point out to me where in the prior license that LG was paid up
for 3G. To the best of my knowledge the agreement was for paid up on 2G
forever but they would in turn pay a royalty rate for 3G not a paid up
but ongoing and they stopped paying. Now if the terms of getting a 3G
ongoing was dependent on giving them a paid up 2G and they reneged on the
3G payment then they violated and breached the whole agreement or at least
that would be my opinion and if they went to court and I was on the jury
I would damn sure find them of violating their agreement and having to pay
for the 2G usage since it was a bargaining chip in the negotiating the
contract.
In fact why don't you ask Loophole and the other board attorney's what
there interpretation of the contract based on what we know or think we
know. If you use something to get something and after you get the
something and then don't pay on the other part you are in breach of
the whole contract.
JMO
Mickey
FISH
If you had read my previous post I said I would sue them for 2G sales
since they violated their agreement on 3G and that agreement to pay for
3G granted them paid up for 2G. IDCC either collected some or didn't but
the fact is they settled and going to pay. Do you get it?
Stock will soon blow by $100.00 like it was tied to a gate post.
JMO
Mickey
IDCC and its future in my opinion!!!!
First they have a court decision upheld as 2 patents are valid and
infringed, second I believe ZTE and LG owes back money, and Lenovo, Xaiomi to name
a few that owe back money. Then we still don't know the finality of the
Microsoft/Nokia settlement although some say its over that isn't quite
what IDCC said. Then we have a company that has been awarded top honors
for their technology in at least the moving of traffic and saving cities
money. Then we have the Hillcrest sensors which we have to believe will
be usefull in the future for automobile usage along with other technology
from IDCC. How many more things will IDCC be participating in on the
Internet of Things we are not sure but I don't think it is just for
automobiles and cities only and the overall indsutry is projected to
do 25 trillion by 2025 and I will beat the dead horse dead over the head
and say IDCC will get a nice chunk of change for their technology in
the Internet of Things if Microsoft don't take us out.
Let me add that the BMW Avanci license is just the tip of the iceberg
of events to be happening with the Internet of Things and these
automobiles don't sell cheap either, so even a relatively low rate on
the total sales price will be pretty good.
JMO
Mickey
jugygales
Eric in the future will resort to making cartoons as all of his movies
are a frigging joke. It is either that or how a movie called how to act
like you are a CEO starring Eric. Eric wouldn't know how to pick a good
movie to watch let alone produce one. How he ever got into the theaters
without any idea what a movie is supposed to be about is beyond amazing.
Total failure is the only way to critique this CEO.
JMO
Mickey
TAX BILL??????
Just how will the tax bill work at IDCC? Will they take expenses and
deduct them from earnings and then pay 20% on the earnings after deducts?
If that is right then they will have a decent deduction and then pay
taxes at just 20% of the profits.
The elected officials are stone cold idiots and don't realize when you
employ a million people who was on unemployment, food stamps, and
welfare and be come tax payers. The revenues increase and and expenses
decrease every month by 100's of millions, so you add a few million every
year you reduce the debt and have more spendable money that was going to
welfare. Old saying it isn;t how much you make but how much you save.
Hopefully we see at least a 10 point rally next week in the IDCC stock
from the oversold and tax benefit. Don't count on any thing from our
best in class license department. Count on many more deals from Avanci
and would be nice to get a idea what the rate IDCC gets out of the
BMW license.
JMO
Mickey
Let me say this and this is just a opinion!!!
If Irwin Jacobs had ran IDCC the rate we get and the unlicensed would
be totally different and there would be some very rich people here. I
was going to bump Warren Buffet out of his job, but unfortunately things
didn't work out as I thought so life goes on. IDCC has and has had the
technology for many years but terrible weak kneed management has held
the stock back. I thought when we busted through $100.00 we was headed
to $250.00 quickly but once again our best in class decided to take a few
years off again.
JMO
Mickey
FISH
I don't think even I have said IDCC would be getting 25 trillion. I think
the industry is predicted that the Internet of Things will generate 25
trillion by 2025 and I expect IDCC will get a share and the question is
what share will they get but a share of that 25 trillion and you don't have
to have something in all of the Internet of Things to still walk away
with a big pay check. I am sick and tired of IDCC selling itself short
and having 1 ball the size of a mustard seed and the other one a little
bitty thing. Get some balls and demand a fair and reasonable rate for
your efforts or sue the crap out of them and if possible get a cease
and desist order.
JMO
Mickey
mister
I don't often agree with you but IDCC should fire the whole license team
and let Avanci have a go at it. I would say we get better deals and save
money paying a useless bunch.
JMO
Mickey
JimLur
You don't have to get paid for everything in a 25 trillion industry to
make huge bucks. After all IDCC is in the Avanci cartel with other big
names and IDCC is recognized for their technology in the Internet of
Things. If you don't believe they have the goods to make big money then
sell is all I can say. Till I see they don't get paid a decent amount
I will continue to believe what Rob Wilshire said that in the future
IDCC would be the big dog. They have technology in almost all aspects
of the cell business and I believe with the court decision on valid
patents and infringed will put a strain on others to not pay. Worry more
about the pigs feeding at the bonus trough and then getting sold as they
will be filthy rich. If you think they care about us you better think
again the private piggy bank has always been open.
JMO
Mickey