Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
More evidence of inability to read documented Court Papers. This Company has documentation on its facts, you cannot try and do revisionist history without looking like a complete fool.
DBMM settled a toxic lending case on their terms for 50% of judgment and interest. They won the Asher litigation . All documentation summarized in DBMM Legal Proceedings 2018 10-K . See below
Take shots at a document prepared by a professional source whose business is securities research? From the cheap seats on the sofa you know better? Hahahaha
In your fever dreams .
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (2018 10-K)
1. The Company was involved in a litigation, Asher Enterprises, Inc. v: Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc., Index No.600717/2014, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau. The Plaintiff alleged $337,500 breach of contract principal and damages arising from an untimely periodic filing in 2013. On September 14, 2014 the Court declined to grant the plaintiff's application for default judgment and Linda Perry was removed as a defendant. The Court awarded judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on July 15, 2015 in the amount of $122,891.87, which did not include $25,000 paid in a subsequent settlement in February 2016.On June 18, 2018 the matter was settled between the parties with an Addendum to the Settlement Agreement, for a final payment of $65,000 which was paid in full on the same date. A Stipulation of Discontinuance was filed with the Court ending the litigation. A Satisfaction of Judgment through the Settlement Addendum was coincidently filed. The litigation is closed.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=13109460&guid=86N-kKOw442mB3h#DBMM20180831_10K_HTM_3
Real shareholders see examples over and over that bashers do not know how to read financial statements for public companies, omit information or extract out of context, but also you have no idea what you are talking about when others post public information.
Totally full of crap.
The Report was issued in August, 2023. It has never been published before and it is new. The Report is being shared by a shareholder, he didn’t write it.
The ignorance of bashers is stunning. Just bash, bash, bash to collect your paychecks. Pathetic way to make a buck.
Shareholders read PR and Update stating the Company will announce results as it did in 10 wins. The Final Order of Dismissal only occurred June 3,2023, and returning to normal business is not “pushing a button,” it is “turning yacht around.” All happening as public information has stated. Remember 10-K 2018 revenues $536K and growth underway from that base.
The Company’s competitive advantage is its “blueprint” and its plans. Very early days pre-OIP and Dismissal announced plans and bashers tried to derail many efforts, thus IMO they announced its intent early.
JM did usual NEVER whining as NoRadio posted earlier this week, and the Company just did it their way successfully. . Company 10 wins- NEVERS 0 .
Do not need you bashing an industry and a Company you neither understand nor support.
Shareholders know. They ignore your negative noise and bashers BS.
Bashers should be embarrassed to stick around a company they dislike so much. All I can surmise is they enjoy the grievance, the whining part.
It is truly crap as the first and only viable company acquired was Digital Clarity. DC as stand alone as was cash flow positive as a private company and growth financing was arranged a year following close of deal. More selective omissions on your part.
I have done extensive due diligence. Harken to response to your incorrect statement of reaudits as if the Company didn’t comply. See below
Reminder of facts:
1 . Acquisition completed 2012
2. Reaudit (3yrs) required through no fault of DBMM Nov 15,2013.
3. Asher litigation Feb 2014
4.Company completed Reaudit and filed all Amended K’s and Q’s (see EdGAR) seamlessly and chronologically in mid- Sept 2014.
5. Cost of Reaudit $157,300.
6.Mitigating circumstances caused delayed filings starting with 10-K 2015
7. Administrative Proceeding for delayed filings May 16,2017
8. New LTIs cashflow financing Oct 2017 starting with Cure
9. Delayed Filings cured May 31, 2018
10. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount.Their CDs canceled. June 18, 2018.
Perhaps you could borrow “How to read Public Company Financial Statements from TH?” Shareholders note pattern of behavior template which bashers follow. Bashers consistently omit key info or include out of context statement without clarification available.
Shareholders and new investors are not stupid. Going concern statement is formulaic and very common in OTC companies. Auditor includes on behalf of company after calculation. DBMM has clarification following with a $3M funding statement . Implicit after return to normal business, (future) which is in addition to the LTI cashflow financing which is additive. (Current since 10/17)
No bankruptcy — such a lightweight comment when digital industry model of cashflow financing which works for LTIs, let alone an earlier commitment which has been audited as stated.
Do both of your monikers get paid or just one, and the other’s gain off depressing pps ?
SB 18,200+ negative posts over 10 years. A perfect example of Arrested Development.
Exit door will slam shut and lock. If I were you negative manipulation in headlights dangerous place to be. Especially with phony monikers. Getting away with it until ….
Shareholders know. Others too.
All of the PR accurate in Feb 2016 . All documented DD. Company Resource limited by delays in SEC filings beginning with 2015 10-K due Nov 30,2015.
Company acted in best interests of shareholders as acknowledged by ALJ Foelak in Dismissal.
Preceding Factual Events:
- Nov 2012 DC Acquisition completed
-Nov 2013 Reaudit mandate through no fault of DBMM. Immediately non-compliant
-Feb 2014 Asher litigation
-Sept 2014 Reaudit completed with amended 10-Ks and 10-Q’s . Filed in EdGAR.
-Cost of $157,300.
-Delayed filings began 2015 10-K . Would never have occurred without mitigating circumstances.
-Many things changed in 2016
2016. No more CDs vehicles for financing purposes via Corporate Resolution.
May, 2016- No more CDs executed since then.
-May, 2017 OIP late filings .
-Oct , 2017 LTI cashflow financing beginning cure through ultimate listing on NASDAQ.
-May 31, 2018 Delayed filings in EDGAR
-Nov 12,2019 Dismissal by Judge Foelak
-June 2,2023 Final Order of Dismissal
The overhang of the costs of Reaudit and subsequent litigation and SEC OIP precluded implementing business plan until return to normal business via a Final Order of Dismissal which did not occur until June 2,2023. Total DOE overreach, Standing Order of Judge Foelak should have been finalized back in 2019.
The bashers serve their masters, be that themselves to trade or the short sellers or as shills for bad actors, 24/7/365 from the cheap seats on the sofa.
No one buys your crap and call it beneficent. No gotcha moments—do not exist. Total BS.
Shareholders know.
More conflation , more of your false inference . Admission of your 10+ year bashing from the sofa is truly telling. Shareholders know who you are. Showing true colors once again.
Facts: David Marioni was the disclosed IR person for a year or so, then Company never replaced him.
There have been many shareholders who post information . None of them paid .
The Company discloses because it always disclosed. DM such an example
Stop the false equivalencies. Simply do not apply. Chicken Little, Chicken Little.
Shareholders know.
How many times do you have to be corrected? Am in Europe on holiday for almost a month and yet still have to counter false statements and name calling made to deflect false statements and NEVERS. Shareholders are united against misinformation via false inference.
The Company has not found IR to be useful for over 10 years. When they had it, it was disclosed. When terminated likewise. Supporters of the Company are far more effective as speaking of their own decisions after due diligence.
The Company’s Updates and other public information serve as purveyors of all results. Earlier PR stated no plans will be discussed. The damage done by bashers in advance of the 10 wins in place was atrocious Radio posted just some of them earlier this week.
Management would never post on a chatroom. False statements every time to infer and damage. Much too smart for that.
Shareholders know.
Recommend “Dummies Guide to Reading Public Company Financial Statements.”
Cashflow financing since 2017, no
Demand, in it to win it. NASDAQ ultimate goal.
Your comments are simply ignorance of data. Point in time like net loss, shareholder’s deficit , derivative liabilities, CDs, to name a few, are simply that, not debt . In a heartbeat, an event can again jumpstart the pps , market cap et al.
No wonder you can’t get out of your own way. You couldn’t say any of this crap on the proper exchanges.
Shareholders find bashers BS just that. No credentials but self congratulatory fictions about beneficent undertakings for years and years. Totally wrong about DBMM proven over and over, yet the gig continues.
Total nonsense. The pattern of negative bashers is not allowed on a proper exchange . The OTC is a platform and bashers have gotten away with making a career of years of 18,000+ negative paid posts. 20+ bashers have been identified
No credibility. Fraudulent and deceptive pattern of behavior.
Shareholders know.
What a lightweight!
The world has changed. Tax write off? Silly, lazy thinking .
Shareholders are moving forward with LTIs to watch the Company grow with no hurdles. Pay attention to last Update. There is a blueprint which is sustainable.
https://www.dbmmgroup.com/an-open-letter-to-existing-and-potential-shareholders-of-dbmm/
What the company has accomplished all the NEVERS said we couldn’t against monoliths, and DBMM prevailed.
The Company will make it happen and leave the whiney bashers behind an exit door locked behind them!
Shareholders know.
Shareholders are savvy and smart and do their own due diligence. A flipping lightweight is white noise.
It is not only hypocritical it is ignorant to swan in touting big support for DBMM to then sell and bash as if people do not know who and what you are.
Anyone with a brain immediately spots your crap. Do what you want , but stop trying to influence anyone until you can put cogent sentences together.
The Company’s management has LTI’s who support growth both organically and by acquisition—after supporting 10 wins the NEVERS said could not happen. They made law. Shareholders know flipping is for lightweights—flippers never make as much holding for the full blueprint. The management will deliver as they have in their 10 wins.
Shareholders know.
The float is not a Company data point as transfer agent has the reporting responsibility through OTC Markets monthly.
Shareholders know that the bashers always omit key info or take data out of context to obfuscate . All DBMM SEC filings are reviewed by Auditors and audited in 10-K.
In Subsequent Events of 3Q23 10-Q it states:
“During June 2023 , the Company issued 30,000,00 restricted shares of its common stock to a lender in accordance with the terms of two aged loans payable.” OTC Markets for 6/30/23 shows shares restricted.
Post-settlement as described in several earlier posts, it is the Company’s role to issue the restricted shares for aged debt under settlement, and the lender’s role to meet Rule 144 criteria to issue free trading shares. All Settlements follow DBMM Counsel legal opinion and Auditor review.
It is either ignorance or hypocrisy that you are so ill informed about regulations in place.
Shareholders know.
Your “facts “ are always wrong and all of the real shareholders and real experts with standing are wrong according to you with no expertise in a new world of technology and digital businesses.
Yet NEVERS like you wrong 10 out of 10 times. Yesterday NoRadio called you out with your actual posts in 2019 which were just a few great examples. Shareholders are encouraged to check them out. Strident,adamant and wrong every time.
Being Generations behind the the digital industry with old manufacturing models do not cut it. The digital industry has remodeled with cashflow financing and is 2023.
Colors, fonts and name calling do not change your lack of facts in a business you do not understand .
Shareholders are long and strong.
Nonsense. You have no standing to make predictions which are nothing more than negative opinions to cause a certain depressed effect on pps. For years 24/6/365 for which you receive a form of compensation.
People who make “predictions” are con artists shilling for others or themselves. Proper standing as professionals , lawyers,accountants et al would never make “predictions.”
Bashers have no Safe Harbor Provision because they have no standing.
Supportive shareholders believe in the Company. Projection by you and recruits do not fly.
18,200+ negative posts!
Astonishing way to kill a day pretending 24/7/365
Called out many thousands of times dude.
Shareholders and new investors know how to read financial statements. You deliberately deceive even though clarified with regulatory facts. Conversely, you repeat out of context , point in time data which deliberately is trying to scare and mislead. LP is a respected shareholder, as I am. Shareholders know who I am and your continuous lies can do nothing to change that.
Repeat: Your pernicious lies and omissions when you have been corrected innumerable times The Company has so stated it’s intent to remove the basher’s manipulation in Updates.
Manipulation is false statements after being corrected to scare people to shake shares loose for your employers and your recruiter.
People are watching and evidence being aggregated . SB 18,200+ your 3,700+ negative posts 24/7/365– in living color. Being constantly corrected.
You pretend to reply to a shareholder who is steadfast in making his own decisions and being a “long.”
Your response is totally false as if he was complaining . He didn’t —-shareholders and new investors , read the thread.
Deceitful and misleading makes for a real deplorable. Continuing basher handbook behavior. Everyone ignore.
Shareholders long and strong.
Bashers are actually deliberately misleading in their refusal to understand how to read public company financial statements, particularly when the audited/reviewed data is documented and clarified.
Be clear: cashflow financing is modeled in digital and technology sectors as an evolved form of growth and acquisition. They are supportive of taking a company through various stages of growth and development through seamless cashflow, repaid at a TBD point out of increased revenues or some mutually agreed point.
The Company knows exactly what it is doing with optimal support . The BS from bashers shows itself over and over. Frankly, as a real shareholder don’t know how these people look in the mirror. Wake up and go to sleep thinking about what bullying tactic or fraud they can perpetrate next.
Shameful!
The law of logical thinking is you can’t prove a negative.
NSS are illegal and their elimination stated by every regulator’s CEO or principal as an objective in 2033-2023.
You do not know— it is your opinion truthful or deliberately misleading through usual semantic deflection, e.g. “verifiable sources.”
Neither the TA nor the Company has any way of knowing and has so stated.
Bashers are frauds. Pretend they are experts while spewing pejorative opinions they try and name call and bully shareholders or new investors into accepting. False before, false now.
Shareholders know.
From the cheap seats on the sofa again?
Company made law , cleared every hurdle and brought in LTIs who are in it to ultimate NASDAQ goal.
Watch and weep . You couldn’t meet your bosses expectations in 18,200+ pernicious posts, you won’t now. DBMM was vulnerable before it had 10 wins prevailing over a list of mitigating circumstances, it is not vulnerable now.
As a shareholder, have watched the paid bashers fail for years and still hang on to their gig. Who is pulling strings?
DBMM always prevails.
Facts matter. Long and strong.
Reminder of your 11/6/19 posts —“DBMM not long for this world?” Wrong every time
Nov 6, 2019 “DBMM isn’t long for this world?”
WHY POTENTIAL SHAREHOLDERS NEED TO AVOID DBMM
THE REAL FACTS:
- DBMM was suspended for failure to file for 2 years and is trading on the grey "Expert" (non-public) market with a skull and crossbones!
- It is facing a hearing for complete REVOCATION shortly!
- No stock has ever avoided revocation after being suspended for failing to file... even if they catch up on filings!
- Read the below passage from the SEC on 10/23/19, DBMM is not long for this world:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152141115https://
The US operations have been minimal because the acquisition was 2012 and the Reaudit was 2013 which made DBMM immediately non-compliant . It took almost a year and $157,300 and amended to complete the reaudit and become compliant.Tremendous drain on resources and growth funding was not forthcoming because of reaudit.
Why is it so difficult to speak facts and truth? Omissions are lies . DBMM’s mitigating circumstances were acknowledged by an ALJ and all regulators separately.
Those are facts and it is ignorant to pretend they don’t exist. That is misleading and deceitful.
Shareholders long and strong.
Shareholders are encouraged to do their own due diligence and know that your 10+ years of negative , pernicious remarks always omit facts and are so out of context.
Quite rightly, the acquisition was finalized in 2012. Then you omit everything that occurred between the and the OIP in 2017!! That is truly dishonest and deliberately intended to deceive.
Calling you out on your revisionist history by omission or by stringently announcing lawyers, judges and credentialed experts are wrong and you are always right.
Here are the documented facts:
1 . Acquisition completed 2012
2. Reaudit (3yrs) required through no fault of DBMM Nov 15,2013.
3. Asher litigation Feb 2014
4.Company completed Reaudit and filed all Amended K’s and Q’s (see EdGAR) seamlessly and chronologically in mid- Sept 2014.
5. Cost of Reaudit $157,300.
6.Mitigating circumstances caused delayed filings starting with 10-K 2015
7. Administrative Proceeding for delayed filings May 16,2017
8. New LTIs cashflow financing Oct 2017 starting with Cure
9. Delayed Filings cured May 31, 2018
10. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount.Their CDs canceled. June 18, 2018.
Why don’t you fill in rest of the timeline and put a pin in it?
Management saved the day and made law. Try and get the story straight in chronological order
$DBMM
Shareholders do their own due diligence and are very familiar with the 10-Ks and 10Qs which have improved quarter to quarter. Will return to revenues of $536K as in 2018 10-K.
This is the 15th time you have posted the 3Q 2023 as if a gotcha moment. Shareholders yawn—real shareholders hold the line . They know non-shareholders want your shares and to depress pps. They are totally self-serving.
You and SB over 20,000 negative posts to fill your piggy banks.
Bad data: Paper numbers like Net loss is not a debt and not a liability. Simply a point in time.
All metrics can improve (often exponentially ) as growth and positive events in the pipeline take place . Loans are cashflow financing with investors in it to win it. Going nowhere but supporting ultimate goal of NASDAQ
Why do these guys want your shares?? Don’t be fooled by nonsensical inferences by bashers who are fronting for bad actors, short sellers or themselves to depress pps.
Strong and long .
Shareholders know BS when it is imbued with words like “educate” as if? Incredible hubris to weave some tale and expect we shareholders to believe you bash all day every day 24/7/365, for free? However you couch it you make and have made plenty of revenue for yourself . You also recruit others who have a template and know nothing about DBMM and its supporters to do as much damage as they can and then move on. That is manipulation.
The shareholders like myself are savvy and many extremely well educated , both academically and on the street, so certainly do not need a self-proclaimed pretend adjudicator as to what is a proper public company. We do our own due diligence and make our own decisions
It is fraudulent to infer that your almost 20,000 negative posts were beneficent to protect shareholders . Especially with the bullying, the name calling, the memes and childish cartoons and screeds.
An acquisition , making law with an ALJ , clearance by all regulators and extensive external due diligence, always turn around to negative because that is what you are paid for , isn’t it? For years.
Shareholders know who you are and why you are here. It also knows you are not even cognizant of how regulations are implemented and applied. You know why not.
DBMM has earned the respect of the regulators and has had dialog and documented every step.
Scare tactics are considered manipulation. Particularly when you stated by blustering how much you have made on DBMM and bullied upward, and the bullied and depressed to encourage selling. Very adolescent ploys.
DBMM knows exactly what it is doing and dismissing bashers has been included in its Updates. Aggregating post after post , moniker by moniker. To put forth as and when. Tens and tens and tens of thousands to choose from.
Shareholders know and is public information as discussed since delayed filings cured, the blueprint is step by step implementation. It is DBMM’s competitive advantage.
Posting the same thing over and over is tedious. The Company has clarified and directed to MD&A which is Management perspective and positioning in real time.
Reread the update
https://www.dbmmgroup.com/an-open-letter-to-existing-and-potential-shareholders-of-dbmm/
Corrections:
-10-K due Nov 30, 2023.
-Loans are LTIs and Company supporters. They are not called —Loans are cashflow financing. LTIs want NASDAQ as ultimate objective. Paid for out of increased revenues or other creative financing as digital industry models.
-Paper losses irrelevant, point in time only.
-no CDS executed since 2016, nor issued since 2015. Corporate Resolution so stated. Settlements remove aged debt by mutual agreement to the benefit of DBMM.
-Both Net Loss and Shareholder’s Deficit are paper losses, not debt nor liability. Point in time governed by pps volatility and derivative liabilities
-Derivative Liabilities are canceled as every CD canceled.
Try and keep up as you sound ridiculous! Shareholders know.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172554248
Both shareholders and new investors are encouraged to do their own due diligence , and certainly doesn’t need paid bashers to direct or insult them.
Another recruited non-shareholder basher, are you?
SB have you no life in the summertime? Doesn’t the basher in Chief take a holiday? I’m in Europe but still have to call you out on the BS and lies!
Shareholders know that DBMM has had a bit over a 1% increase in OS per year since 2016. Dilution which removes aged debt from balance sheet with all ancillary charges is a good thing.
Basher go home, your template doesn’t work here.
Shareholders know the bashers always use other companies issues to infer chicken little falling and scare shareholders. Shareholders have been encouraged to ignore but read details as has no relevance to DBMM. It is desperation on your part right out of Hansel & Gretel.
Idiot, you are a fraud and insult shareholder’s intelligence. We are a savvy bunch and happy to hold for the future Dude, not hypothetical.
Only actual financial execution matters, when bought, when sold. That is what “follow the money,” means . Are your breadcrumbs written about your trades accurate? Perfect follow the money and manipulation, if accurate that is?
IMO you should read the documentation available as the Company met every hurdle directly with the regulators . Starting with SEC Release 5543 which was Company’s request to Judge of Confidentiality which was granted in Jan 2018, when new evidence allowed and all previous orders vacated/remanded. The plans for future growth in company management consulting has been addressed. All has been documented as cited . That is competitive advantage.
Do not threaten individuals or the Company after the stunts you bashers pull. You have been warned and your fiction doesn’t fly. The Company has gone on record in Updates as manipulation by bashers being aggregated . Paid negative manipulation or take profit and bash is same as being paid. Financial gain, then depress pps to buy in again is manipulation.
Very dangerous inference here. Two people always brought in by bashers are Renee and Janice to reinforce their false statements
Shareholders know the famous intervention in Nov 2022 in which Renee “as DBMM advocate” laid out an (absurd) recommendation for shareholders to contact DBMM management and their Counsel and recommendation “revocation.” What kind of a shill was she?
Then Janice who never even understood the DBMM mitigating circumstances made some very suspect posts all in Archives containing Renee-like outlook. Brought in by SB to support bashers and compliment SB on his “leadership.”??? Hahahaha
Now your manipulating support for your hypocritical threats over a typo? Inviting in the agent for whom, one asks? Stage right, enter Janice, you say? Very thin ice Idiot.
Based on previous interventions both blatantly Wrong in assessment , some dangerous conspiracies here. All to shake shares loose? Scare shareholders and new investors?
Who are you to direct more chaos knowing how the last two worked out? Not anything to cite or be anything but embarrassed about.
Remember you will be outed surrounded by a sea of hypocrisy with your posts
The posts are all archived and they are intended to be self-serving with ignorant statements with chronology that is never even accurate. Total lack of due diligence.
I have reposted both as your attempt to defame the Company with false statements and then never acknowledge your error.
Perfect example: Your post # 318070
…everything management’s fault…”All the SEC wanted was to have financials reaudited”
Thats Linda's fault. There was a better way to go through this but that would have meant Linda admitting she made a mistake. So THE COMPANY CHOSE to dig the big hole and climb out of it, wasting 7 years and millions of $$s.
All the SEC wanted was to have the fins reaudited, which had to be done anyways.
You 'Jonny come latelys' have no clue but what the pumpers feed you, and much of it is BS.
Nss/Bashers dont kill good companies,
Good companies kill NSS/Bashers.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172519584
And my response post # 318144 which provided the accurate chronology which confirmed that the Company reaudited as required all filed amended in EdGAR.. you had everything upside down, omitted and out of sequence.
Shareholders know the crap that is spewed by bashers who never have their facts straight and whose chronology is wrong. All in Court Papers.
Actual Facts:
1 . Acquisition completed 2012
2. Reaudit (3yrs) required through no fault of DBMM Nov 15,2013.
3. Asher litigation Feb 2014
4.Company completed Reaudit and filed all Amended K’s and Q’s (see EdGAR) seamlessly and chronologically in mid- Sept 2014.
5. Cost of Reaudit $157,300.
6.Mitigating circumstances caused delayed filings starting with 10-K 2015.
7. Administrative Proceeding for delayed filings May 16,2017
8. New LTIs cashflow financing Oct 2017 starting with Cure
9, Delayed Filings cured May 31, 2018
9. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount.Their CDs canceled. June 18,2018.
Why don’t you fill in rest of the timeline and put a pin in it?
Management saved the day and made law. Try and get the story straight in chronological order . The dearth of facts is stunning!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172522738
I have reposted both as your attempt to defame the Company with false statements and then never acknowledge your error.
The Company successfully has made its case to those who matter with its 10 wins and it is all documented and reviewed. Revisionist history impossible with facts.
Do not threaten or bully from the sofa , as it is childish . From the private cheap seats from yet another person who has never , ever had a role in a public company. And your pals with name calling with cartoons and one lie after another? Most of the bashers are not even shareholders and are paid for years as shills for others?
FYI slander is verbal not written.
But Defamation is what you guys do. Intent and continuation after being corrected is key component. DBMM bashers fit the defamation criteria. Quit self congratulating yourselves while you bully , whine and threaten while trying to scare new shareholders with total BS.
Shareholders know that the basher brigade responsible for over 45,000 manipulative posts with false statements and one ignorant opinion after another. Defamation with an exponent. The most virulent are non-shareholders or those stridently manipulating the pps.
Projection thy name is basher! False statements and lies all in archives. Year after year, wrong every times, deflecting with childish cartoons, memes and name calling. Bully in the schoolyard.
Real Shareholders (not one share) do our own do diligence and believe in DBMM. We have real lives and real careers, who make our own decisions.
Not nickel ‘n dime shysters being paid to negatively post like your 18,200 + posts for years.
Long and strong —DBMM and its shareholders.
What a fraud you are to think you could affect new shareholders! The ignorance on the OTC is rampant and stunts would not be allowed on a proper exchange. Remember, you may be able to get away with this crap, until you are not.
Shareholders do their own due diligence . Moreover, Shareholders do not need your supportive comments until you sell, then basher comments to depress the price so you can buy in again? Deliberate manipulation, just like a couple other self-serving bashers .
These kind of antics are not allowed on a proper exchange. They are also why the regulators are all over the manipulative OTC platform.
Bad list to get on. Such an obvious attempt to manipulate.
DBMM long and strong
Same basher template which is irrelevant as point in time and new shareholders encouraged to read filing, specifically MD&A for 3Q23 and Update same day. Trying to scare new investors with out of context nonsense.
Bashers ignore the industry because they do not understand it nor care. Their paid template is depress pps and shake loose shares. Short term false information over and over. They represent bad actors and they are bad agents to short outcomes. They are manipulators and liars as have been corrected many many times.
Read update
https://www.dbmmgroup.com/an-open-letter-to-existing-and-potential-shareholders-of-dbmm/
Corrections:
-10-K due Nov 30, 2023.
-Loans are LTIs and Company supporters. They are not called —Loans are cashflow financing. LTIs want NASDAQ as ultimate objective. Paid for out of increased revenues or other creative financing as digital industry models.
-Paper losses irrelevant, point in time only.
-no CDS executed since 2016, nor issued since 2015. Corporate Resolution so stated. Settlements remove aged debt by mutual agreement to the benefit of DBMM.
-Both Net Loss and Shareholder’s Deficit are paper losses, not debt nor liability. Point in time governed by pps volatility and derivative liabilities
-Derivative Liabilities are canceled as every CD canceled.
Try and keep up as you sound ridiculous! Shareholders know.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172554248
Real Shareholders agree with Gusher.
Conversely you are Wrong again , just like the other 10 times when you knew better than attorney, judge and credentialed advisors . Your opinion is simply a consistent naysayer of 7,800 negative posts name calling and using pejorative language to damage DBMM. Tone down your ranting absolutes , opinions with no facts are weak.
The decision maker is OTCM, not your reading of googled info. Just like your castigation of Judge Foelak’s judicial discretion, DBMM has been taking instruction directly from principals of OTCM since it was acknowledged Pink Current by them when 15c2-11 amendments were executed on Sept 28, 2021. 2300+ other companies were thrown off platform and not allowed to trade. Then came broker sponsored Form 211 resulting in FINRA appointed market maker and clearance followed by CE removal. Then Final Order of Dismissal by SEC on June 2, 2023.
You are not anything more than an uncredentialed opinion. As stated in Updates, DBMM is working with OTCM directly to Uplist to OTCQB and has 10 wins and counting. Each of the 10 you had long diatribe about Never, citing opinion that nothing could happen before OIP concluded. Wrong on every count.
OTCM have the authority and certainly do not give private info to anyone but the company officers. They also have discretion based on the proven relationship established.
DBMM and real shareholders-long and strong.
The lawsuit that could kill Wall Street’s industry regulator
By SAM SUTTON 08/17/2023 08:00 AM EDT
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority tried to expel Alpine Securities from the securities market over allegations that it misused customer funds and violated basic compliance rules.
Now, the Utah-based broker has unleashed a legal battle against FINRA that could dismantle the authority of powerful self-regulatory industry groups that back up Washington regulators.
“It’s not just about FINRA, it’s about the entire self-regulatory organization regime. It’s illegal — period,” American Securities Association President and CEO Chris Iacovella, who represents regional wealth advisers and financial services firms, told your host.
FINRA acts as Wall Street’s industry-governed gatekeeper; licensing brokers, conducting market surveillance and levying penalties when institutions or investment professionals break the rules. Those activities have long been blessed by federal securities law and are conducted under SEC oversight.
Alpine denied Finra’s allegations and, earlier this summer, the firm was granted an injunction by a federal court that blocked its expedited “death sentence” pending appeal. In an accompanying opinion, D.C. Circuit Judge Justin Walker questioned whether FINRA actually has the authority to determine Alpine’s fate, contending that the organization’s hearing officers — who aren’t government employees — could present a “constitutional problem” because they aren’t members of the executive branch.
“From start to finish, FINRA hearing officers execute government laws subject to a government plan, with little to no room for private control,” wrote Walker, a Trump appointee and Brett Kavanaugh protégé who has been a leading proponent of paring back powers afforded to federal regulators.
Similar arguments have already been used to chip away at enforcement mechanisms at the SEC and FTC. If the court eventually follows Walker’s opinion and rules in favor of Alpine, it would jeopardize FINRA’s ability to carry out its responsibilities.
It would also upend similar powers held by self-regulatory organizations across the securities, transportation, energy and health care industries, FINRA’s Gibson Dunn attorneys wrote in a filing. On Wall Street, that could include national securities exchanges like Nasdaq and NYSE.
It would amount to a “seismic shift in state action jurisprudence,” wrote Gibson Dunn’s Amir Tayrani, Alex Gesch and Max Schulman. Other law firms have also issued memos noting the potential implications for other industry groups.
Still, Alpine’s legal team says that their real target is FINRA’s authority, and that the impact on other self-regulatory organizations might be overstated.
“FINRA’s enforcement power is really unique. The lines that have to be drawn here aren’t always easy to draw,” said Brian Barnes of the law firm Cooper & Kirk, which is one of the firms representing Alpine. “There’s a tendency on the other side to engage in a sort of hyperbolic, sky-is-falling rhetoric.”
A ruling isn’t expected until next year. In the meantime, “FINRA looks forward to the hearing before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in this matter,” the organization said in a statement sent by spokesperson Rita De Ramos. “FINRA believes it has strong defenses to the claims being made.”
Walker did not respond to a request for comment.
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-money/2023/08/17/the-lawsuit-that-could-kill-wall-streets-industry-regulator-00111572
Shareholders do their own due diligence .Moreover, Shareholders do not need your supportive comments until you sell, then basher comments to depress the price so you can buy in again? Deliberate manipulation, just like a couple other self-serving bashers .
These kind of antics are not allowed on a proper exchange. They are also why the regulators are all over the manipulative OTC platform.
Bad list to get on. Such an obvious attempt to manipulate.
DBMM long and strong
$DBMM
Shareholders do their own due diligence .Moreover, Shareholders do not need your supportive comments until you sell, then basher comments to depress the price so you can buy in again? Deliberate manipulation, just like a couple other self-serving bashers .
These kind of antics are not allowed on a proper exchange. They are also why the regulators are all over the manipulative OTC platform.
Bad list to get on. Such an obvious attempt to manipulate.
DBMM long and strong.