InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 3578
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/14/2020

Re: Jetmek_03052 post# 321923

Sunday, 08/27/2023 1:40:10 PM

Sunday, August 27, 2023 1:40:10 PM

Post# of 348165
Back to the past again— all over and done—

You have always been the apologist for the DOE position since the beginning. The extract was from DOE overreach motion. The FULL transcript is NOT available to the public . By regulation, only available to DOE and DBMM . A basher should not be misleading trying to use transcript only available to parties.

Nevertheless, you want to , once again try on revisionist history of superseded extracts from the Company’s August 2017 testimony with deletions and omissions?

There was no evidence of CD notes submitted at the time. The actual notes were from 2012 as Counsel clarified later by Company. Asher opportunistically sued because it couldn’t convert in 2013 because of reaudit mandate by SEC.

Another error you included, Civil Court Judge threw out default claim, ( see 10-K 2018 Legal Proceedings) because Asher knew of SEC Mandate. (Transcript wrong on that point as well, later clarified)

All this is yesterday’s news . Company won, NEVERS wrong every time. No real shareholders care as the Company won a Dismissal from ALJ Forlak after all new evidence provided under Confidential Cover to Judge Patil in Feb 2018/Release 5543 following the remand and order to vacate served by SCOTUS in Dec 2017.

Cherry-picking superseded info is dishonest and an ongoing ploy of bashers. All deflection, all intending to mislead.

DBMM on its way to exciting times , finally with no hurdles. IMO No one can stop the Company now.