Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Bit by bit different statements appear...In fact, they may never actually be returned to the company treasury but rather be placed in a LLC, wholly owned by the company.
One would think if the IR has his heart and soul in this he would be clearing up all this talk about the 'treasury stock' issue.
Funny the IR's talking through you!
Where did I say it was a Scam? You say...No dilution, ever, IMO!
EVER? Please that sounds foolish. Or is your EVER protected by your disclaimer...IMO
If you would like me to delete this post because of the "foolish" comment tell me I'll do it?
Iblong2 you are correct in no dilution at this point. Key word point!
It ALWAYS happens and when it does 1/2 the board will be saying, "see I told you so" and the other 1/2 will be saying, "but you have to sell shares so you can invest".
Dilution will happen.
Thanks I saw the same thing...Anywhere MD (PINKSHEETS: ANWM), announced today that it has entered into a Letter of Intent to acquire Premiere Investment Properties, Inc., a New Jersey based real estate and resource holding company.
Over a year and not one bit of info DD about Premiere Investments or the Pres/nephew.
WAIT A MINUTE! HOLD THE PRESSES! I'm sorry I think we all missed it. Here is why no further information/DD... The terms of the acquisition were not disclosed and are subject to further due diligence and a definitive agreement between the companies.
Now I get it, 'FURTHER DUE DILIGENCE' must be they're trying to find the same DD we have been looking and asking for. I wonder if the IR lost his/Pres. phone number?
So the big discussion yesterday was about the so-call treasury stock...
The company own millions of shares of treasury stock.
Now where and who was the first one to talk about this yesterday? Iblong2!
Not only bringing up info about said treasury stock but suggesting a possible direction as to their use in the future...
they could be used to provide equity
Why is it info is presented/leaked on this board by shareholders and not the company or a representative?
You would think after 150+ post mostly discussing this issue someone could've cleared things up! Hmmm. To simple of an issue to clear up and bring out into the open.
So some have asked who has said stock. IMHO anything could be possible. Could it be used for payment for services?
Again to simple to clear up to avoid so much chatter and mystery.
Well you did answer but...the amount of $ he has invested? IMHO you could say the same for the other stock. Yet where did that get him and his ability to understand that one for 10+ years?
You then say...No one has more to lose or gain then Ken. So you have been told. And you consider that to be something investors should sink their teeth into?
You then say...I know that others might say he only purchased those shares to later dump them on the market but that is not so. Well no one but the IR will know the factual truth to that statement. IMHO not so over the past 10+ years with many different stocks and many different posts.
You then say...Ken has also put many of friends and family into this stock. IMHO the same can be said for other stocks the IR was involved with/in. Let alone Geo. the Pres. which nobody knows anything about. Yet many have asked.
IMHO not Bernie only a player which he has mentioned many times over the years.
Fraud, jail time. Nah, nobody looks to go down that road. Hmmm, I bet Bernie never thought of that in the begining. Has the IR been in issues with rules, etc. etc.? From what others have posted I don't know what but something popped up. Was he found guilty? I don't know. Not an issue of mine. I'm here to play this stock.
You say...I believe that Ken's heart, body and soul are in the right place and he will do whatever he can, to make ANWM a success That's okay it very well be but do you have any idea how many post the IR has posted on this site and others? How many times he said this and said that. How many charts looks great. LOL And yet with every played stock nothing.
Yes he can say up 3100% and up 500% all well and good for played stocks. Investors are now to believe this is new, not played, going somewhere, for real, gonna happen?
Again dilution means nothing to me and has been run through the ringer to many times. IMHO dilution comes with time happens all the time. Fact!
Well Greedy as much as I dare do this I have to agree with you on one point. At this point in the game when it comes to someone it's nothing more then...Just a blind faith following of the IR in hopes .
We've asked politly the same general questions...Can you tell me exactly what you are supporting here? and What has made up your mind that ANWM will be different. Convince us? What will be different?
Now I'm not saying anyone has to answer anything or anyone but our questions are very simple ones.
I think I can put it better then "blind faith". It's more like "He has a dream".
Iblong2 again I ask...Okay fine first time I've seen someone come out and admit these things about the IR and his past.
So now lets take it a step further? What has made up your mind that ANWM will be different. Convince us? What will be different? Leave out the dilution BS that always come over time. What else?
When it was announced about the Pres. Geo., we were told shut up go away don't ask questions. When it was said Premiere, we were told the same. We here rumors about gold/mining we are told don't ask can't tell. You gotta admit this is the same as the other one all those years.
So what is so strong that you spend so much time of your life defending the IR and ANWM is going to be different?
I'm just curious which one is correct. The funny thing is you can see so many connections with people (Bond) on FACEBOOK. One of those name has a connection on FB!
Okay fine first time I've seen someone come out and admit these things about the IR and his past.
So now lets take it a step further? What has made up your mind that ANWM will be different. Convince us? What will be different? Leave out the dilution BS that always come over time. What else?
When it was announced about the Pres. Geo., we were told shut up go away don't ask questions. When it was said Premiere, we were told the same. We here rumors about gold/mining we are told don't ask can't tell. You gotta admit this is the same as the other one all those years.
So what is so strong that you spend so much time of your life defending the IR and ANWM is going to be different?
Wow that's saying alot...Ken believed his BS for over 10 years. With that comment it doesn't say much for the IR does it?
So now ANWM investors are to believe in the IR?
What are the comparisons...IR, mining, call me, wait and see, gold etc. etc. Hmmm. Your not helping the cause!
Am I missing something here? It says...Nurmukhamed (Mike) Khafizov director and president and Debra Bond, vice president.
Then it says...President & Director Nurmukhamed (Mike) Khafizov
Vice President Debra Jones
Can anybody tell me which one Bond or Jones?
It was a scam for 10+ years with promises of different mining ventures over those 10+ years with the same IR. So ANWM is going to be different?
Greedy are you telling me mining could be out for ANWM? What, mining stocks went out years ago? I know it's supposed to be gold but maybe it will be garnets or nickle or water or diamonds or oil. I forget the others but I know there are many they could try.
How about it they show pictures or give us assays or do a LOI or MOA? Will any of that work for ANWM? Wait how about a dividend?
I know a good friend who I can call he may be able to help his name is "Grizzly" I'll run this by him lets see what he has to say.
Gosh, I'm bummed mining is dead. I know where they can get their hands on some cream!
Without getting into a argument the last time it was $0.001 was around 5/2010. Are you telling me ken didn't average down all the while this thing dived?
Ok if that is what you say so be it.
I didn't say your loss was a "Fairy Tale".
I guess you don't feel like answering any other questions so be it!
Are you sure you don't want to remove the last part of your post?
IMHO, I wouldn't go as far as saying years ago! Again, I can't say one way or another if he is down big. If he or anybody is in one sense I feel for them and in another that's the life in pinks. Been there done that. I hope he makes it back! I feel for him and others.
You do love your...fat, lying, glutinous, POS, scumbag, cockroach saying don't you? LOL
Common sense only shows IDCN has been nothing but a "Fairy Tale". So to say the lying over the last 3 years is something new, is a "Fairy Tale" in itself.
Am I defending the CEO? No. But one can't sit here and say other people didn't know the past of IDCN i.e. dilution, BS and nothing coming true is something new. This is what is being presented on this board. Dilution and the BS just started a year ago. That is pure BS.
To bring his average down? The IR always knew to keep that down. His last buy in was at $0.0002 I'm quite sure he didn't have $0.0004,5,6's. That's not him. I could be wrong. Just hard to believe he was holding in the 4,5,6's.
So lets see if you'll answer some questions? Be honest?
Has there always been dilution? Whether it be 3 years or 10 years.
Could any newbie investor see this fact?
After 10 years of not one honest thing in IDCN would it be hard for some to believe the IR didn't realize this?
Knowing that and human nature couldn't you understand why some question his involvement and would attack him?
Like I asked pretend you didn't know him as Ken your friend but the IR person of IDCN and for years he has said buy, buy, buy wouldn't you be pissed at him?
Has anything ever come about with IDCN?
And last but no least what is your opinion of the CEO?
Lets try this...those who don't like this stock stay away.
Nothing new can be said or read over the past 3-4 years that any new investor can't read which will help them make up his or her own mind to invest.
So let old dogs lie.
And when it comes to the other stock respect the same. Will see how far this goes!
Not a conspiracy I was just kidding.
IMHO...The IR made $. Gee, how would I know that? It's simple...he has said so over the years. Please are you really going to have us believe he didn't make $? Please stop with the "whoa is me" bit for the IR.
One doesn't tout IDCN for over 10 years many of which he was the IR knowing of the massive dilution and not make $. Trust me I'm not knocking that he made $. But don't try to come across like he didn't make $.
Is he still a bagholder? Could very well be. I don't have his porfolio in front of me. I didn't say he wasn't a bagholder. In July he said he was buying. JB didn't tell him to buy.
Is the IR taking a lot of heat? For once will people admit the IR posted many things about IDCN over the last 10+ years? So when the shitz hits the fan why wouldn't other investors give him heat?
How can anybody sit here and say the IR was a victim of ALL the CEO'S lies? Victim? Did he get caught at the end. Yes/maybe! Victim for over 10+ years? NO!!!!
By you and others saying the IR was lied to by the CEO you are only belittling to the extreme the IR. Your making him sound dumb! The IR is no dummy. Bottom line, your trying to tell this board the IR was lied to for years and he didn't know it?
How dare I compare the two? I didn't call him any of those names that you called the CEO.
Let me see if I can put this into persective for you. Lets take an investor who knows nothing about a stock but what he reads on a stock chat board. And everything he reads is by an IR. And everything he reads says buy buy buy and here is why. Now time goes by and this person buys, buys and buys believing the IR. And after 10+ years nothing comes true and he realizes everything has been BS. What would you think this person would call the IR? How would you feel? Be honest now.
Does that help you understand how someone, human nature would lead this person to form an opinion of another as feeling they are a lier?
Am I calling the IR a lier? Nope.
Again with this CEO selling all those billions of shares trash talk. For once will somebody admit IDCN has been nothing but a dilution machine for over 10+ years? Will you please admit it? You know the IR knows dilution has been going on for so long it's not even an issue to be discussed anymore.
You ask where did all that $ go? Don't ask me, ask the CEO. Ask the IR! Why didn't he ask that question over the last 10+ years? Now all of a sudden it's a concern?
Did it go into the CEO's pocket? I don't know? Ask him! If that is an issue why didn't the IR ask the CEO the same thing over the years. Didn't look like it was an issue to the IR. Ask the IR that one.
The IR didn't make a dime or any other compensation? I don't know it's none of my business. Has he made $ being an IR person over the years with stocks. That's easy to find out just look on the internet and you'll find the truth to that question.
The IR's vindication will come with the other stock where the company is not being run by some scam artist. There you go with that scam BS again. You can't call something a scam if you've been closely involved for over 10+ years.
With the other stock there is much to say but it always seems to be deleted. Which is really a shame. Unless your attacking someone lets let post stay. You have a pro and a con side let them talk it out.
Do I hope the other one moves again? Damn right I do. But posters should not be deleted because they have different opinions.
But lets not forget IDCN at one time had as little OS. How true, massive dilution in IDCN! All the while the IRO made $ during said massive dillition.
IDCN a scam? What? You mean nothing the CEO or the IRO said all those years was true? Well that wasn't right of them to mislead investors all those years, mind you during the massive dilution.
It's been said on this board...
from the fat, lying, glutinous POS, scumbag, cockroach, CEO, JRB, IMO!
With that said should we be calling the IRO the same thing?
IMO
I truely beleive Ken the IR of ANWM has his own IR. So much is being said about Ken yet it's not Ken saying it? Hmmm.
How true in what you say "peanut butter & jelly". One thing I must correct you on though...Ken was involved with IDCN much longer then 6 years.
Gotta love how someone who was invested in IDCN for years making $ while watching the whole time EVERY venture being presented by Ken the IR & JB being nothing but BS.
Now trying to state Ken the IR had nothing to do with anything he was just the poor ole IR who was lied too!
You know what else is funny you don't see Ken here day in and day out making those claims. I guess he is Kens IR person.
Frankie, I say it's time to release the hounds!
How true in what you say!
Funny thing is the one who is bad mouthing IDCN doesn't realize by doing so he is hurting the other one at the same time.
He just doesn't get it.
And another company and another and another and another. Wait a minute and another and another.
I remember the same conversations over the years with the other company. Hmmm!
News the week of the 7th.
Ken besides all the hub bub going on what you stated in a post to me was nice to see backed up by the Pr. from Georgos.
3. A lawyer has been retained for corporate matters.
So let me ask you to elaborate some...
When was he retained? Just now? A month ago? 2 Months ago? How did Mr. Rett come about, the Florida connection (Georgos is from NJ your from NC JB from Fla.).
It says he advises, consults and serves as an expert witness. If we as you said previously have...
1. ANWM has all important info from mlkna.
2. ANWM paperwork is in order.
Has he already reviewed said documentation? Or is he reviewing it as we speak? If he has reviewed the documentation is everything in order like you stated?
4. There is a MM lined up and awaiting docs from just hired lawyer
Or by your reply to #4 should we assume Mr. Rett is still looking over said documentation? About how long should it take if so? Has he advised anything i.e. get this get that, everything is good, better do this need that?
5. When MM receives docs from lawyer 15C211 will be filed.
ANWM's paperwork will be filed in conjunction with our market maker and submitted to FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) for perusal
I guess this could go with all the above questions, key word WHEN.
#6 went with a R/M you said yes.
Does this info have to be submitted with documentation? Is all that documentation in order?
Next...
7. It is a resource property with excellent assays.
Is this also info that needs to be included with submitted documentation?
Next, this one is a little confussing...
8. Financials are with lawyer along with MM.
So if I'm to understand Mr. Rett has already reviewed said documentation and has submitted it to the MM already? Then how does #4 add up? Are you saying financial documentation are different then other documentation? If we are to understand "are with the lawyer and the MM". Has everything been reviewed by Mr. Rett and was submitted? Could you clear up the difference with what you said between #4 & #8?
Ken besides all the hub bub going on what you stated in a post to me was nice to see backed up by the Pr. from Georgos.
3. A lawyer has been retained for corporate matters.
So let me ask you to elaborate some...
When was he retained? Just now? A month ago? 2 Months ago? How did Mr. Rett come about, the Florida connection (Georgos is from NJ your from NC JB from Fla.).
It says he advises, consults and serves as an expert witness. If we as you said previously have...
1. ANWM has all important info from mlkna.
2. ANWM paperwork is in order.
Has he already reviewed said documentation? Or is he reviewing it as we speak? If he has reviewed the documentation is everything in order like you stated?
4. There is a MM lined up and awaiting docs from just hired lawyer
Or by your reply to #4 should we assume Mr. Rett is still looking over said documentation? About how long should it take if so? Has he advised anything i.e. get this get that, everything is good, better do this need that?
It is said there is an MM lined up. That clears up a false post by another person there were two.
5. When MM receives docs from lawyer 15C211 will be filed.
ANWM's paperwork will be filed in conjunction with our market maker and submitted to FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) for perusal
I guess this could go with all the above questions, key word WHEN.
#6 went with a R/M you said yes.
Does this info have to be submitted with documentation? Is all that documentation in order?
Next...
7. It is a resource property with excellent assays.
Is this also info that needs to be included with submitted documentation?
Next, this one is a little confussing...
8. Financials are with lawyer along with MM.
So if I'm to understand Mr. Rett has already reviewed said documentation and has submitted it to the MM already? Then how does #4 add up? Are you saying financial documentation are different then other documentation? If we are to understand "are with the lawyer and the MM". Has everything been reviewed by Mr. Rett and was submitted? Could you clear up the difference with what you said between #4 & #8?
Ken from what I can see posted Ibelong2 is closely involved and one could assume has a relationship with you when it comes to information about the goings on.
No I'm not pointing to any insider BS or anything like that.
So could we assume my assumption to be correct?
Kinda makes one wonder if what we are being told is true after seeing what you just posted!
1. ANWM has all important info from mlkna.
2. ANWM paperwork is in order.
3. A lawyer has been retained for corporate matters.
4. There is a MM lined up and awaiting docs from just hired lawyer
5. When MM receives docs from lawyer 15C211 will be filed.
6. Yes
7. It is a resource property with excellent assays.
8. Financials are with lawyer along with MM.
9. Large investors through proxy voted Jameson Rose out and
George Androusopolous in as new president. OTC markets and
transfer agent was notified and have reflected this important
change several months ago.
10.SCG owns a large amount of stock. No need to report because
unaffiliated unrelated just like minded long term investors.
There are no restrictions from someone buying or selling.
Have a good weekend!
Blah, blah, blah the SAME thing every day from the same person. Over 1,000 post first 500 how great the stock is buy, buy, buy. The second 500 how the stock sucks.
For someone to spend all day saying the same thing is sad! My God we get it on this current 500+ go round, you don't like Jeff. Get a life will you.
Did you like Charles youtube video? What a web I follow. Brother in-law? Send it PM
It's from Charles. LMAO
Baaahh nice try Greedy. If I only knew how to do something like that.
Who is the poster who always finds all those different pictures and post them all the time. I'm not sure if it is on this board or the other one. The person who put up the guy looking at his computer and a hand comes out and slaps him then it's a different guy and a hand comes out and slaps him.
Am I saying it's him no, but he does put up nice stuff.
And by the way Greedy how do you come up with it was me check out post from a few days ago? You must be bored tonight!
I had to agree with Space on the video I laughed my azz off.
As I said before...Can one prove he is not? Has Ken stepped forward at any time and said he wasn't?
So your logic of the issue being "non-sense" or being "gospel" can be cleared up easily. Well Ken/IRO here is another question for you to clean up.
Why don't you ask Teffy/Tefman/Ross where he got the story?
Well Ken/IRO lets not waste your 2 post I'd like to ask a few questions. I'm quite sure every investor would like to know the answers to the following. It WILL put to rest all this back and forth and 99% of any negativity on the board. It WILL only help all investors!
Is Medlink cooperating?
Have they filed their back paperwork?
Several times we've heard things are in our lawyers hands, is this true?
Is it true there are MM's lined up?
Are we close to the 15(c)211 being filed?
Is there still going to be a R/M?
Is there still a profitable business in line to put into the shell?
Is it true there will be financials?
Was there a takeover by the SCG?
Is it true the group owns more then 50%?
Important day 10/10.
Why is what I've been posting any different then what has been posted since the begining?
Why is it any different then this posted on 9/21?...
I believe we will have the 15(c)211 filed within three weeks at which time you and everyone else will be informed via a PR.
Or this 7/19...
Medlink completed 3 years back financials & paid their own accountant to review.
Or this 7/19...
anwm obtained an mm