InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 1510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2007

Re: None

Friday, 10/21/2011 6:56:28 AM

Friday, October 21, 2011 6:56:28 AM

Post# of 22918
Ken besides all the hub bub going on what you stated in a post to me was nice to see backed up by the Pr. from Georgos.

3. A lawyer has been retained for corporate matters.

So let me ask you to elaborate some...

When was he retained? Just now? A month ago? 2 Months ago? How did Mr. Rett come about, the Florida connection (Georgos is from NJ your from NC JB from Fla.).

It says he advises, consults and serves as an expert witness. If we as you said previously have...

1. ANWM has all important info from mlkna.
2. ANWM paperwork is in order.


Has he already reviewed said documentation? Or is he reviewing it as we speak? If he has reviewed the documentation is everything in order like you stated?

4. There is a MM lined up and awaiting docs from just hired lawyer

Or by your reply to #4 should we assume Mr. Rett is still looking over said documentation? About how long should it take if so? Has he advised anything i.e. get this get that, everything is good, better do this need that?

5. When MM receives docs from lawyer 15C211 will be filed.

ANWM's paperwork will be filed in conjunction with our market maker and submitted to FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) for perusal

I guess this could go with all the above questions, key word WHEN.

#6 went with a R/M you said yes.

Does this info have to be submitted with documentation? Is all that documentation in order?

Next...

7. It is a resource property with excellent assays.

Is this also info that needs to be included with submitted documentation?

Next, this one is a little confussing...

8. Financials are with lawyer along with MM.

So if I'm to understand Mr. Rett has already reviewed said documentation and has submitted it to the MM already? Then how does #4 add up? Are you saying financial documentation are different then other documentation? If we are to understand "are with the lawyer and the MM". Has everything been reviewed by Mr. Rett and was submitted? Could you clear up the difference with what you said between #4 & #8?