Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nice News**ASRE Issues Letter to Shareholders...
ASRE Issues Letter to Shareholders:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ASRE/news/story?e&id=2607505
Nice News**ASRE Issues Letter to Shareholders...
ASRE Issues Letter to Shareholders:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ASRE/news/story?e&id=2607505
Nice News**ASRE Issues Letter to Shareholders...
ASRE Issues Letter to Shareholders:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ASRE/news/story?e&id=2607505
Patents Owned by EGYF CEO Mohammed Zulfiquar...
Patents Owned by EGYF CEO Mohammed Zulfiquar:
https://patents.google.com/?assignee=Mohammed+Zulfiquar&oq=Mohammed+Zulfiquar
v/r
Sterling
exisnet, with all three measures getting approved...
With all three measures getting approved, I agree! This is the beginning of a new chapter for BLTH!
bordersconsulting, good call...
Good call with NVOS as they are one of your clients as is MONI. I think the investing community should really trust what you say when you say... it's coming!
v/r
Sterling
Zorax, let me clear the air on some things...
First, with my last post that I made to you below, I probably could have used a better example:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172603814
I do not believe that you are a crack head and do crack. That could have been seen as a low blow below the belt and I do not have to stoop to the likes of others to hit below the belt. I really don't know anything about you or someone dear to you that could of had some problems with crack to where my comments could have been hurtful. When I post, even when I'm fighting bashers, my intent is not to be hurtful. It is to make clear the point that I am referring to from a righteous standpoint. My apology for that. That was out of my character.
Look, I don't know if you are sincere in what you have been posting or if you are truly a basher. You know in your heart the truth just like I know in my heart the truth that I am not a scammer, I am not a paid promoter, heck I am not a promoter, I don't work for any of these companies, I am not a pumper, and I am not a few other things with such a negative connotation that some of you have been saying. Regardless to how some things might look on the outside, I'm just not.
I was in a zone with fighting some bashers so when I went to the "Question and Answer Board" to make some posts, I might have taken your initial response incorrectly as if you were bashing me.
v/r
Sterling
Zorax, here's why you are a basher...
Wow! So you you think you are not a basher? Just because you only responded to me less than 10 times in almost 20 years means absolutely nothing. Look at your posting history with all of your other posts. Look at the few posts you have made here within this forum even after you claimed to not be a basher. You claimed that I would be surprised of how many people would think that I'm a pumper, but I think that you will be surprised at how many people think that you are a basher. Where is the respect? You disrespect me and then you expect for me to just shut up and take it?
Like it or not, whether you think so or not, I defend myself because I do care.
You come here to personally attack and bash me... period. You just bashed me and all of the OTC Market in your posts. Look, if you have been doing crack everyday since you have been posting on IHub, then you are a crack head. You can try to defend it, but if every time you come to IHub you are doing crack, then you should see this for yourself. But wait! I'm against crack and I'm against doing crack, but you don't see me going to some crack forum trying to bash you for the crack that you are doing. So why would you come here to bash like you have very obviously done and then say that you are not a basher?
You are here only to bash me. Again, just read all of the posts that you made here:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172598389
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172598827
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172601808
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172601902
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172602066
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172602685
v/r
Sterling
Ferro546, with the Q getting done...
I think it's not so much of what was in the Q for PNNX, but I think it is the fact that it was done. I have a feeling that with the Q getting completed, it could be the prelude to something much bigger that's coming. Or that's what I hope! This is the most volume that we have seen in a while.
v/r
Sterling
trader59, by your standards...
By your standards, they would need to shut down the entire penny stock market because anyone that is believing and posting positive about a penny stock is a pumper and a scammer and are complicit to the frauds that you believe is applicable to anyone believing in a penny stock. Sorry, but I am not a pumper and I am not a scammer. Just because I like a stock and post why I like a stock does not make me a scammer or a pumper. Being right or wrong doesn’t make me a scammer or a pumper. I post how I feel and you post how you feel. I respect both stances as so should you.
I'm going to explain this to you one time and then I'm done with the back and forth. I will let you think as you may. You and your basher buddies have me all wrong.
I have a stock platform that allows me to see any news that hit the wires on any penny stock or major market stock that exists. I've had something like this for many years. Thousands of people within the market have this same kind of platform or something similar I'm sure. So, take for an example, if stock ABCD is sitting at .0001 per share and releases news through the wires that they have just signed a $50 Million deal with Microsoft (MSFT), then I am going to see that news. Also, there will probably be thousands of others that will see that news too.
Next, investors will start to do some quick due diligence (DD) to see if they should buy or not or to see how many shares should they buy. Investors are trying to see if they should load up, take a small amount, or even buy at all. I presume this is what we all are doing once we see the news of a stock.
Let's presume that I like the news enough to take a position to take the risk. Hmmm... at .0001 per share, maybe I'll throw $1,000 at it to buy 10,000,000 shares. Now let's presume I like it enough to go make a post about it on IHub about how I feel about the deal and the stock. Now keep in mind, regardless to what all of you might think, it is just me. I don't have a group, I don't hang out in any of those private stocks rooms. Now when I get to the board on IHub, I see that there are lots of posts and lots of new investors that are there. Some are there to pump the stock for a trade, but some are there as I am to hope that it transforms from a trade to an investment. That is what I am hoping for with any stock that I post on. If I am going to flip a stock or just do a quick trade with it, I never will ever post on that stock because that can be misleading in my opinion to have someone thinking that I’m planning on staying around for a while when I’m not. Nobody will ever know that I'm even in it. Some stocks for my own reasons I will have the patience of Job (from the Bible). Heck, look at here with EGYF. I've been here in EGYF for nearly 8 years:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=118532460
Now when I go to a forum to post, sometimes I see that after I post, because of how many years I've been around, there is somebody that usually knows me from that forum. Keep in mind, I used to have a couple different investing forums years ago to where I had over 7 to 8 thousand investors within my forums at one time. Some will welcome me, while some just remain quiet and only respond to me if I respond to them first. I also met a lot of people that were into investing throughout my military career all over the world. Many of them I have told to come to IHub to use as a tool to learn the pros and cons that could exist about a stock that they might be in.
There will also sometimes be some bashers there on forum for that stock. Normally once they see me post there for the first time, the first thing they usually do is start accusing me of leading the new pump as they will call it not knowing that I’m just as new to the stock as they are. Many of them I have been knowing and fighting against for years. A lot of times I don't even respond, but sometimes I do. Enough of the time I just don't pay them no mind because usually my responses would seem to get deleted. So I figured why bother. Things are a little different under the new rules though.
Even though you think that everybody that knows me do nothing but loses money, I'll just say, you'll be surprised if you knew that truth. I'll just say that I have help way more than you really care or want to believe. I really don't care what you think, but I do care about what many others might think that read this BS you post and don't see me respond back to it. That’s why sometimes I respond. Heck, they might start to wonder if you are right with seeing no response back. Sorry, you are wrong with this blame game that you are doing.
There are many public and private groups out there that will have investors that will bring the news into their rooms to be seen. All of a sudden, you might start seeing volume in that stock from investors that don't even post on IHub that start coming in the stock bringing massive volume. The stock could be running because of the news and the volume could be coming from a group of investors that don't know me and don't even know that I am posting about it on IHub. To sit around and think that I can control a stock or the market by me posting on a stock is giving me way too much credit. If that was true, EGYF would be at a dollar already! LOL!
You are really insulting your own intelligence and the intelligence of others. People are here within these forums looking for something that will be a good investment. If you think you can do better, put up or shut up. Then do better. Stop bashing and let people know what would be some solid stocks to look into to buy. People don't need you telling us what not to buy. People want to know what to buy. So unless you can do better, then your bashing will fall on deaf ears.
Ok, now you can have the last word.
v/r
Sterling
Zorax, about my reputation...
If I didn't care about my reputation, I wouldn't be responding to bashers like you.
v/r
Sterling
TenKay, but here's the difference...
Here's the difference though... I was holding all of my shares in TSNP/HMBL back then since 2015 before it had taken off to run. I wasn't just talking about it, I was being about it. And besides, I'm not a stock promoter so that was them.
Also, I'm not taking any credit for TSNP/HMBL and never have, but I'm not taking any blame either. I think this is what you seem to be getting twisted. How many times do I have to say that it didn't run because of little old me. Also though, it didn't tank because of little old me either. I think this is also what you seem to be getting twisted too.
v/r
Sterling
TenKay, let me go ahead and "Checkmate" this thing...
When I first started talking about TSNP/HMBL it was on Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:16:43 AM about the CEO being a Cancer Survivor:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=110315578
I posted and liked TSNP/HMBL basically because of talking to the CEO before he died with cancer about the tile deal with Wayfair that he had put out and confirmed as I had posted below:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=114798911
I thought they had nice flooring, but the market wasn't seeing it. Later, the CEO bought 100 Million shares at .0001 per share in which I thought was a huge show of confidence for where he believed TSNP/HMBL was going as I posted about that here years later on Tuesday, October 27, 2020 2:22:38 PM:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159146664
Still, it sat at .0001 per share for years as you can see. That's proof that what I was saying or posting regarding TSNP/HMBL didn't matter or it would have moved years ago before it had actually moved. This proof that TSNP/HMBL was going to run either with or without me. I was just lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time years later. Millions and millions and millions of dollars traded in TSNP/HMBL and it was not because of little old me. A lot of people made money and a lot of people lost money, but it was not because of me.
It sat there for years at .0001 per share after I first mentioned it before it moved years later. Everybody I know got in either in the .000s way back then or maybe later the .00s per share and .0s ranges after it started moving. Who knows, maybe there were some that bought higher. I don't go around asking people if they bought or not or where did they get in. That's never been my style. I share my thoughts for why I bought and later some of them ended up telling me that they had decided to buy. I'm sure there were some that didn't tell me. Either way, it's none of my business with what anyone does with their portfolio. If I post about a stock a stock at .0001 per share years before it runs and then later it runs to $1.93 per share and you had plenty of time to get all the shares you could want in the .000s or the .00s or anything under a penny for years, and you don't, then that's on you and not on me. But then if you did buy in the .000s or .00s or anything under a penny level, and you watched it go all the way to $1.93 per share some few years later without taking any kind of profit, then that is all on you, the individual. Thinking I'm responsible for those that bought shares over $1.00+ per share years later after I first posted about it and lost money is beyond ignorant. I don't care how you chose to twist the narrative. Thinking I'm responsible for anybody that bought shares at all is beyond ignorant.
People lose money in every single stock within the major markets and the penny stock market all the time. Who are you going to blame with those other stocks that have ran big and had huge drops? Is it my fault that people lost money in Enron when it dropped? Is it my fault that people lost millions and millions of dollars in AMC when it dropped? Is it my fault that people lost money in Bed, Bath, and Beyond when it dropped? Oh wait, if I would have made a post over there, in your eyes it would have been my fault. Like everyone is going to stop... and see what I post and then buy. Sorry, I'm not EF Hutton!
You read what I posted below about VKNG in response to some of your other thoughts:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172583007
VKNG is just another one of quite a few examples that I can post about regarding such. If I tell you about a stock at .002 per share and it goes to $1.10 per share with you having plenty of opportunity to sell for weeks and weeks afterwards, but you don't sell and keep holding until that transaction turns into a loss for you, then that is on you. That is your fault, not mines. If you bought at higher levels and the price came down, that is on you. That too is your fault, not mines.
Look, TSNP/HMBL came back down because of the reasons you stated regarding their Preferred B shares. The management was very stupid at best with how they handled things. Sorry, but that's not on me. yes, I did believe at one time and I was hoping that the management was going to do the right thing, but they didn't. That's on the company being greedy and not doing what they needed to do to stop the dilution. Again, that is not on me for taking the blame for everyone's else decisions they made. You are attacking and coming at the wrong person about TSNP/HMBL. I was nothing than a shareholder that at one time or another, believed.
v/r
Sterling
Zorax, you should know the doxing rule & definition...
I posted my name and my phone number before. I still post my name, but I stopped posting my phone number a while ago because it was in violation of the IHub TOS rules. I never posted my address. Me posting my own information I believe don't classify as doxing. However, someone else posting my personal information does from my understanding of the definition, especially when they have "malicious" intent as indicated within the definition. The bashers that were trying to be slick with the rules had "malicious" intent. Plus, none of what they are trying to post regarding my private information is "readily available" per IHub rules as they are trying to insinuate. See definition and then see the rules from IHub:
papaphilip, with these EGYF thoughts...
No worries at all. I believe that EGYF will be fine. The bashing really doesn't matter. I've been going through this on and off for some years now. That stock that I was using as a reference (TSNP) had more bashers than what we have over here. That stock failed in the end because of the management not doing the proper things that they were supposed to do. It did not fail because of the bashers.
EGYF will be fine. I always say that it doesn't matter what I think or what you think. It matters what the market thinks. If they execute on their business objectives, then what any of us post within this forum won't matter because the market will see it. The market will see it and take it to where it needs to be based on its own merit.
v/r
Sterling
ASRE - Regreen Research and Development - Hesperia
ASRE - Regreen Research and Development - Hesperia
ASRE - 350 MW Combined Cycle Power Plant
ASRE - 350 MW Combined Cycle Power Plant
ASRE - Zanzibar Clean and Renewable Energy Park
ASRE - Zanzibar Clean and Renewable Energy Park
uber darthium, here are the facts untwisted...
You post BS and nonfactual info and then twist it to try to convince people that you are right. You are still very much so very wrong. I never got free shares as you keep incorrectly insinuating. Whatever document you are posting must be something you fabricated because I paid $50,000 for those 500,000 restricted shares that I have never got which was me paying .10 per share as it clearly indicates such. I did that as a shareholder. Not as an Insider. Now, the price of that stock is at .0001 per share and is on the Expert Market. So you think I'm trying to pump that stock on Expert Market at .0001 per share with restricted stock that I never have ever received? You really don't see how stupid that sounds and how stupid you look trying to twist the facts to be something that it's totally not? I realized it was a bad investment after I had already invested. It's a loss. A huge one. Posting all over the place that I got 500,000 free shares to pump the stock is 100% wrong and is very easy to prove. I can't believe how you are twisting this. Please show me. Where is the pump? Why would me or anyone even talk about a stock based on the true info that I stated about such above?
As for my address, I have never posted my address. I have posted my phone number before, but those posts were in violation of TOS rules and were deleted. Since then, I stopped posting my phone number. Posting personal information is in violation of the IHub rule of doxing.
v/r
Sterling
janice shell, within that particular post...
Janice, later within that post I did state that I did speak to you through some conversations:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172582915
I do remember calling you a few times, but I thought you had originally called me first. If I called you first, it's cool. It's neither here nor there as I was just glad to have the conversations that I did with you.
You didn't just hide behind some alias and talk smack. You were civil and you were sane and you were respectful with all of our conversations even though we didn't see eye to eye on everything. I have always respected you for that as you never made any of our disagreements personal.
v/r
Sterling
uber darthium , with you plea...
If you think that I am getting special treatment, I think you are sadly mistaken. Heck, I have had 5 posts deleted in response to you even under these new rules and you think I'm getting special treatment? I think they are being as fair as they can be given who you are. I think you have some things twisted so I will help to get them straight for you.
I have posted my phone number in the past, but I stop doing that because I was informed by IHub Admin and after reading through the rules that doing so is in violation of the rules.
As for my address, even though I'm sure it's out there, I have never posted my address anywhere before. So you tell me. What's the big deal? What are you trying to do?
v/r
Sterling
Citrati, with these thoughts...
Very interesting thoughts as I'm sure they are appreciated by those here reading this forum. As for me, major market stocks became too boring for me. First I started out doing only mutual funds. I was in Janus Global Technology and made 100% return on my money and I thought I was doing something. Then I researched why were they able to pay me 100% return on my money and stay in business. I researched their Top 10 Holdings for that mutual fund and saw that #1 was QCOM for where the greatest bulk of the money was being invested, #2 was CSCO with the second most of the money invested, #3 was MSFT with the third most of the money invested, and then the rest was distributed in smaller portions in sequential order to round of the Top 10 Holdings. That year, for those who can remember, QCOM had over 1,000% in gains for that particular year. CSCO and MSFT had good gains, but the rest of the Top 10 Holdings were not so good. I realized that if I trusted this mutual fund enough to invest in, then I should trust their decision for who they picked as their top stock within their Top 10 Holdings and just invested in that stock which was QCOM. I had seen that if I would have invested all of my money into QCOM that year, instead of a 100% gain for the year, I would of had a 1,000% gain for that year. That's when I realized that that something that I thought I was doing, was nothing! LOL!
So that got me out of mutual funds and got me into stocks. I had graduated to doing only major market stocks. I never even knew or heard of a penny stock until I had later researched QCOM further. I had done extensive research on QCOM. Some were claiming that QCOM started out as a penny stock and that's when I started learning more about penny stocks. I had seen where QCOM traded at a low I think of .30 per share once upon a time, but I think it was never officially deemed or classified as a penny stock by penny stock rules. I don't have my notes anymore about QCOM so I'm a little rusty on it to confirm all of those details.
Then eventually the major market stocks got boring to me because many of them are locked into the "Laws of Diminishing Returns" to where the growth was so slow, that it seems as if such growth was stagnant. The penny stock world is kind of like the Wild Wild West, but not as bad (although that might be debatable for another day). Penny stocks will give the investor a chance to make up for lost time for growing their portfolio if invested correctly. I would invest on and off into major market stocks, but by the year 2000, with the forward split crave, I was really done with major market stocks for the most part.
In the year 2000, it all started with VCSY and VNCAF for those who could remember. It was crazy! VCSY back in early 2000 announced that they were doing a 20-1 Forward Split on Jan 28, 2000. They announced that their Date of Record for their Forward Split was Feb 7, 2000:
http://www.vcsy.com/press%20releases/021400.html
I held past the close of business of the Date of Record of Feb 7, 2000. I still didn't really understand the magnitude of what was happening or about to happen to my portfolio until I kept holding and a little while later, on Feb 23, 2000, the stock (VCSY) had hit a high of $6.125 per share post-split for the day with plenty of volume. At that price, that’s equivalent to $122.50 per share pre-split price that’s derived by multiplying $6.125 per share x 20 Forward Split Ratio all while having 20 times more shares than what you had originally bought.
Then I had a similar experience with VNCAF and some others in the year 2000 from what I had mentioned in the link below:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172576733
After those experiences, I was done with major market stocks for the most part. I was very fortunate to have gone through such experiences. Our experiences are what helps mold us to be as we are and think how we do a lot of times.
v/r
Sterling
backtoreality, that's just it here with EGYF that should be understood...
That's just it. They have absolutely nothing to do with EGYF. It's not up to them for whether or not EGYF will succeed of fail so you should not be thinking that way. It will be up to EGYF and not up to anyone here posting and fighting against each other. I remember when I went to this one Microsoft (MSFT) forum years ago to research something and they had some bashers over there that were still bashing Microsoft since its early days. You think Microsoft paid any of those guys any attention?
It appears to really sadden some of the bashers to see that EGYF is at .16 per share when the meat of their story hasn't even been told yet and that I just so happen to like it. If I was not here, none of them would be here bashing. That is a fact! I'm sure they all felt that it was going to stay under a penny in the .00s forever. With this kind of share structure, I think some of them see how this can possibly hit dollars and it pisses them off knowing that I was here back when nobody was 8 years ago or so give or take.
The way they bash me and give me way too much credit for leading people to buy, it looks like they say to themselves... "Dam!!! Another victory for that dam stervc!" What they don't get is that is not how I see it. The market has humbled me over 20 years ago within my over 30 years of investing. Heck, you can have a streak of three or four good ones, then you can have a streak of 10 bad ones of which all of it will be out of your control as a shareholder to succeed or fail. That's why I say that the bashers really are taking things way too personal. Heck, if EGYF does what they are likely starting to look like they are going to do, it's not going to be because of me either. I'm not going to deserve any credit for such. It will simply be just my luck that EGYF turned out to be something huge. Sometimes it's better to be lucky than skillful within the market.
v/r
Sterling
TenKay, here's where being foolish kicks in...
If everyone thought like you, then nobody would ever post or talk about a stock in fear of it going up and people losing money when it goes back down. Trying to attach such blame on me is beyond ignorant. Technically speaking, the only place for a stock to go once it is up hitting new highs is down. Think about it for a minute. No stock ever just continues going up and up and up and up. At some point, the only place for it to come is down. This is with every single stock within all markets. So first understand that. As for why blaming such on me is beyond ignorant, let me explain why...
If you told me about TSNPHMBL at .0001 per share and it goes all the way up to $1.93 per share and traded millions and millions of dollars above a dollar and traded millions and millions of dollars from above .50+ per share, I could not be mad at you if I lost or didn't make any money. The market is too big for little old me to be worried about managing everyone's portfolio for when they should buy or sell. All I can do is present it when I think it is a good time to consider it. From there, the decision resides with each taking their own responsibility for doing such. Sometimes I'm right... sometimes I'm wrong. I'm sure there were some of us that took some profits on the way up, but I am sure that there were some of us that held way to long. Depending on where you bought, you either maximized your gains or minimized your gains or had a lost. Regardless, the credit or blame resides with each individual and not with me.
Within the penny stock world, I would venture to say that probably 90% to 98% of penny stocks fail for a variety of reasons. Some fail for reasons of dilution, lack of funding, lack of marketing, bad management, being a scam, etc. I could probably come up with a few more reasons, but I think you get my point. I say this because with me knowing this, I would have to say that the odds are generally not in anyone's favor for taking the risk for gains within the penny stock world. But there is something that should be given to everyone that makes the decision to buy a penny stock... RESPECT!
Bottom line, if I can RESPECT that you don't like a certain stock. You should be able to RESPECT that I do like a certain stock and simply leave me alone about it. If you have something negative to say, then it's fair to say it and then move on out of RESPECT. One should see no need to sit around day in and day out to belabor their negative sentiments and negative points on a daily basis for months and/or years potentially stressing out the good IHubbers that are here making IHub what it is... a stock investing forum. Then on top of that, there is no need to twist the subject from attacking the stock to attacking the character of a person because they simply don't think and feel like you do about how the world turns. You think you are keeping people from failing, but failure is in the eye of the beholder. Here's an example to help you to better understand.
Take VKNG for an example. When I first posted or told people about it, it was at .002 per share. Heck, I didn't even get any at .002 because I posted about it before buying it. I was fine with where I got in at though in case you were wondering. VKNG ran to $1.10 per share. Why? Not because of little old me and my posts. Research their medical technology within the link below. If you bought somewhere under a penny or two or three or four or so, you had the chance to do very well. However, if you bought over a dollar, then you didn't do well because VKNG was later bought out for .27 per share by CONMED Corporation (NASDAQ: CNMD) which now trades at over $112.00+ per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=43041543
https://conmed.gcs-web.com/news-releases/news-release-details/conmed-corporation-acquire-viking-systems-inc
Is it my fault that investors that bought VKNG above .27 per share lost money because the buyout came in lower than what was expected? Just like with the situation with how TSNP/HMBL turned out, neither there nor here was my fault for those investors that lost money. Again, trying to attach such blame on me is beyond ignorant.
Most people know enough about either what they are buying or the risks that are associated with that stock. All people want to do is be left alone about a stock that might not be doing well at such time. There will always be plenty of moments like that with most of the stocks within the penny stock world, even if they do eventually turn around. People don't wake up in the morning trying to see where they could go to be stressed out about their investment that they decided to instill hope into. In case you didn't know it, stress kills! Bashing and being hateful is simply not cool, especially when it is delivered in a way to mock a person that might already be down about a stock they bought.
With my valuation posts, I always make it known that they are not the gospel and should not be considered something that's finite. It's something to use if the company does what they are claiming they will do to generate revenues and profits. It's to help investors to be able to gage where a stock could be fundamentally worth if they do what they say they are going to do. If the company doesn't do what they were claiming, that doesn't mean that it was my fault. Then of course that would mean that the valuation I posted would not manifest into a reality and would be considered incorrect. Like I said before, my intent is to always help people and to never trick, deceive, manipulate, etc. anyone. If things don't work out with a stock, I simply just move on looking for the next one in hopes of a better outcome. I don't just give up to throw in the towel.
v/r
Sterling
Microlytics, one for all to read...
You know the old saying... If I don't send for you... then don't come for me!
If you notice here and if you go through all of my battles with the bashers over the years, they always come for me. I never go after them because I really want peace with them. I even posted my personal phone number over the years and not one of them has called me to speak directly with me. But if peace is not the answer, then I'm fine with war to maybe one day bring peace. They respond to me to knock me, blame me, and challenge my character publicly. It really doesn't bother me because I know who I am and the things I have achieved and failed at. They come at me as if they are perfect and as if they are doing anything better with "trying" to help anyone. Telling people "what "not" to research to potentially "not" buy as an investment or trade" is really not helping anyone. Think about it??? The market wouldn't exist if that's what people were looking to do! Wouldn't anybody buy anything if they are looking for what "not to" buy! People are looking for what "to" buy. People want to know what's out there that presents an opportunity to be a good investment or even a good trade for those who do more trading than investing. My thing is to put up or shut up! Tell me something that is a good buy or shut up with the bashing telling me how stupid I am for buying whatever stock that is! And don't tell me Microsoft or Apple or something of such. They are oversaturated and locked into the Laws of Diminishing returns... for the most part.
They bash me as if I were to go away, the market would all of a sudden become a perfect market. LOL! Heck, I'm not even really around that much on any stock for such a thought to have that kind of a meaning. Look at the dollar volume of the stocks that I'm posting on. And they are worried about little old me being wrong when I'm in a stock and it goes sour? But wait, if any of those stocks do well, they go into hiding without saying a word to keep from looking stupid. They wait for it to start going down again to come out of hiding to bash. Ok, over the years I have been in some stocks that have had some crazy dollar volume, but it was not because of little old me and liking them or picking them.
Right off the top of my head, take PTSC for an example. Yes, I was posting on it and telling people about its potential when it was at .02 per share because of the patent infringement piece against Intel that was existing. Once the verdict came out, it ran to $2.25 per share. Just because I posted why I believed, it did not move because of me. Just like when it came down months later, it did not come down because of me. If you bought at .02 per share you had a chance to make a lot of money. If you bought at $1.00 per share or higher and you kept holding, then you lost a lot of money. Regardless, whatever decisions that were made by people were not my fault for the final outcome of the company. In one of my posts, I gave it a minimum valuation of $2.52 per share and it hit $2.25 per share. It didn't tank because of my valuation post and me posting on it. The company simply didn't follow through on some things to maintain such sustained growth at such time. Heck, I wasn't in any of those meetings to know why they didn't follow through. Yet bashers would choose to blame me or my posts as if I was the reason for why people lost money as if I caused it to go down. To me those thoughts are beyond ignorance which is why I have no problem defending myself about such sometimes. Sometimes I just let a lot go to let people think as they may. My intent is to always help people and to never trick, deceive, manipulate, etc. anyone. Of course I am always sorry if things don't work out for the better for us all, but it comes with the territory if you are going to be doing this thing called the market. Sometime things just don't work out, especially within the penny stock world for a variety of different reasons.
Important to understand, with every single stock in the market, once it hits a new high, the only place for it to go is down. It could eventually hit a new high, but guess what? It's going down from there. That's the nature of the market. Nothing ever keeps going up forever.
Actually, on a side note with what I stated earlier, one basher did call me. Janice Shell called me one day years ago. We actually had some good conversations and I think we better understood each other after we spoke. I realized that I'm not changing her and I'm sure she realized that she is not changing me and my thoughts, but I think a certain level of respect was gained from each other. Sometimes it's ok to simply agree to disagree. I think she is not as bad of a person as many believe, but because she has bashed the hell out of some stocks, some people got her labeled. She would clown me to tell me to say... come on over on the "Dark Side" because it's more fun over here! It made me think of Star Wars (LOL)!
Microlytics, forgive me for digressing although I think it's needed at times. EGYF has always been a good investment in my opinion, but as you can see, the bashers started with their "Gang Stalking" again to come at me over here with their senseless bashing. It's actually a chance for me to express myself a little to where I would not have been able to do so otherwise when they come at me like they do. It's really ridiculous though and I don't mind defending my character when necessary. Please forgive me with such, but I have been defending myself for years against them. It helps to keep me on my toes!
This is a post that all EGYF shareholders should make sure to read and understand.
uber darthium, with PMPG...
First and foremost, I'm expecting PMPG to be one of those stocks in the Expert Market to rise from the ashes and become in good standing again.
Next, who are you? Why would people be enticed to listen to you when if they were to go search your posting history, all they would see is that every single post is about you bashing and attacking a stock and its shareholders. Looks very hateful and basher like in my opinion.
PMPG was a story that was created by the management of the company with what they were bringing into the company. I didn't buy PMPG for the reasons you posted. I bought because of these reasons below:
Yes or No?
Homebrew, question...???
Do you think EGYF is a scam? Yes or No
v/r
Sterling
TenKay, with these new rules...
I like the new rules too because they give me a chance to rightfully defend myself too from such foolish thoughts that you have posted. You and your basher buddies really give me way too much credit, but thanks. The only thing I can think of for why all of the bashing is because I must have really made for some difficult times for some covering of some shorts or something. There must be a huge short that exists over here on EGYF. Why else would you, Homebrew, and crew come over to join forces with your basher buddies?
You guys, and gals, act as if I'm some "Stock Scientist" or "Stock God" or something the way you bashers follow me around as if I pose such a huge threat for the movement of a stock. You guys act as if I control the entire market and that if anyone loses any money, it's because of little old me, especially if I was ever posting on it to show any kind of belief in the stock at one time.
I'm truly sorry to disappoint you guys. It's just little old me. I have no network, I have no crew, or anything of the sorts. You guys act like I sit around in a room and have conjured up thousands of stocks with all of this buying power over the years that have caused so many stocks to run. Take TSNP for an example. I was in it at .0001 per share. It ran to $1.93 per share. You and your crew were over there bashing me on every post that I made all the way up and all the way down. Why? LOL! Again, I had nothing to do with its moves up or down. So making it personal with me... why? Was it again because there were some shorts in need of being covered and you guys were pissed that it got pushed from .0001 to $1.93 per share? It was not my fault for those that lost money in TSNP just like it was not my fault for those that made money on TSNP. Sorry, I am not the market.
I guess since TSNP went to $1.93 per share with a nearly 4 billion OS at such time, I'm guessing maybe you guys are worried about where EGYF will go after learning that they have an OS of 121,986,365 shares and that they have something truly real that just might revolutionize the way we all use energy in our homes and businesses and everywhere. Is that why you showed up over here to bash little old me believing in EGYF? Is there a huge short position that we all need to be aware of?
Hmmm... So, not that I care, but now I'm just curious... tell us... Why are you here? Look at the dollar volume. Clearly you are not saving anyone from losing substantial amounts of money. If that's the crusade you are on, then there are far more major market stocks that investors are losing millions and millions of dollars each day that needs to be saved far more than us investors here in little old EGYF.
v/r
Sterling
trader59, here's the problem with that thought...
I don't know if a certain stock is a pump and dump originally. You post as if I create the news and the stories with all of those stocks that I post on. Take me away from the market. Act like I never existed. Do you think that those stories would not had ever been released and news to tell their stories? I'll answer that for you. Yes, they would tell their stories with or without little old me talking or posting about them. Whether I am around or not, stocks are going to tell their story and people are going to buy, sell, trade, etc. based on making their own decision to do so.
If I see a stock that seems to present a good opportunity for making gains based on the risk that exists, I share my thoughts just like thousands of other people do. If the company fails, then so be it. You can't blame that on me, but go ahead if that makes you feel better. I'm not accepting it though.
v/r
Sterling
trader59, question for you... ???
LOL! Are you crazy? I'll let you go do that research since you like doing research so much.
Heck, actually, ask them (your basher buddies) yourself!
Heck, just look at the EGYF board for today. I make one post today and look at how many bashers showed up bashing me? And when I say "bashers" I'm meaning that you can look at their posting history to 100% see why they and you are referred to as bashers.
Just from today, after I posted here on the EGYF board, these are the bashers that have shown up with something to say that's all really off topic in my opinion...
1. trader59 (you)
2. Homebrew
3. TenKay
4. uber darthium
I'll let you and others decide if there is a 5th one.
v/r
Sterling
Homebrew, question for you and your basher buddies...
How many boards are you and your basher buddies going to follow me around on? Just so you know, it really doesn't bother me, but IHub should not allow "Gang Stalking" with the bashing. It just really looks very obvious and really stupid. Heck, I must really be somebody! I'm not sure if you guys are trying to chase me off because I caused some problems with some of you guys covering for the shorts or what.
For years, y'all bashers have been trying to harass me out of IHub through this silly "Gang Stalking" with your bashing. It's never just one of you. It's always a group of you guys. It's like you all are in the same room or live in the same house or are all related or something. I've been fighting you bashers for over 30 years. I have no problem continuing to do so!
v/r
Sterling
StocksGoneWild, he followed me over from here...
He had no idea that EGYF existed. He followed me over from the BRTXQ board and I also forgot to mention, I started talking about that stock at the .0004 to .0005 per share share levels and it went to over .04 or .05 per share. Somehow, he leaves that part out:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=157464026
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=157476039
If you were not bashing me at .0004 per share, then don't bash me after it runs to .04 or .05 per share and later comes back down because of the lack of certain execution that was unexpected. Again somehow that was my fault.
v/r
Sterling
trader59 , here are some facts about my history...
Since I'm going to be judged by my history, let's get the facts out there then. I have been doing this investing thing for over 30 years. I have had my share of winners, but I have also had my share of losers. If you are going to bash me to acknowledge those stocks that I was in that were losers, then you should also praise me to acknowledge those stocks that I was in that turned out to be winners for shareholders. Apparently, you didn't do your research back far enough so I will help you out. Go research my posting history over the past 30 years from IHub and the RagingBull days... here is just a small piece of what you will learn about some stocks that I mentioned to be in that had huge moves from some old notes that I had that I had shown to another basher that was trying to tarnish my character about the stocks I liked and were in...
** WNSH mentioned at .0001 to hit 800% (as high as .0009 7/23/2007)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=19364402
** CBAY mentioned at .0001 to hit 600% (as high as .0006 on 9/24/2007)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=22945746
** CNOA mentioned at $1.26 to hit over 240% (as high as $4.37 on 12/11/2007)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21029095
** DMGS mentioned at .055 to hit over 500% (as high as .35 on 11/08/2007)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23633713
** SRSR mentioned at .0003 to hit over 29,733% (as high as .0895 on 4/30/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=24218049
** SSWC mentioned at .0004 to hit over 200% (as high as .0013 on 12/5/2007)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=25041663
** HCPC mentioned at .0001 to 600% (as high .0007 on 12/17/2007)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=25170148
** SGCP mentioned at .016 to over 150% (as high as .0395 on 2/13/20808)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26665918
** WSTN mentioned at .022 to over 200% (as high as .07 on 2/25/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26952932
** GRMU mentioned at .0019 to over 300% (.006 on 3/3/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=27321454&txt2find=grmu
** BIDU mentioned at $261.83 to hit over 46% (as high as $382.90 on 5/07/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=27560102
** ADCS mentioned at .0012 to hit 400% (as high as .005 on 4/9/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=27483601
** ECCI mentioned at .0011 to over 400% at (.005 on 4/9/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=28066187&txt2find=ecci
** IGPG mentioned at .007 to over 200% (as high as .023 on 4/14/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=28343157
** ASFX mentioned at .01 to hit 200% (as high as .03 on 4/21/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=28160255
** BLDV mentioned at .0008 to hit over 3,000% (as high as .025 on 6/17/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=28563104
** GCOG mentioned at .0005 to hit over 3,800% (as high as .02 on 5/14/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26860291
** MMGP mentioned at .0012 to hit over 100% (as high as .0025 on 5/19/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=28751446
** MMTE mentioned at .0012 to hit 275% (as high as .0045 on 05/27/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=29502848
** IMMD mentioned at .08 to hit 200% (as high as .24 on 05/30/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=27948583
** CVCP mentioned at .01 to hit 150% (as high as .025 on 06/06/2008)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=29746571
**PNHL mentioned at .0005 to hit 180% (as high as .0014 on 07/22/08)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=29833548
Those above were stocks after I had returned from Iraq in 2007. Before going to Iraq, here is a list of some stocks that I mentioned before they ran, but again, you would need to find the links to verify such over on the RagingBull Boards as some might remember me speaking about these stocks in Paltalk too:
** PBLS mentioned from .0035 to .007 ranges before going to .128 per share
** RAPT/SNPD mentioned from the sub-pennies before it ran to .135 per share
** SWKJ mentioned at .025 per share before it ran to .145 per share
** UPDA mentioned .22 per share before it ran to $1.01 per share
** USXP mentioned at .0005 per share before it ran to .045 per share
** DGKO mentioned from .01 to .07 per share ranges before it ran to .21 per share
** DMGS mentioned at .09 per share before it ran to .50 per share
** ADZR (the first time) mentioned at .02 per share before it ran to $1.30+ per share
** ADZR (the second time) mentioned at .05 per share before it ran to .268 per share
** SRGX mentioned at .05 per share before it ran to .25 per share
** OXFV mentioned at .0009 per share before it ran to over .01+ per share
** RNVO mentioned at .0011 per share before it ran to .0086 per share
** CNES mentioned at .0003 per share before it ran to .0028 per share
** EPYH mentioned at .005 per share before it ran to .0424 per share
** JKRI mentioned at .0038 per share before it ran to .029 per share
** MSEV mentioned at .04 or lower per share before it ran to .245 per share
** ATISQ mentioned at .03 to .04 per share before it ran to .20+ per share
** HVYW mentioned at .14 per share before it ran to .99 per share
Heck, even VYST, before it got to where it's at now, had ran from .000s to over .10 per share... twice!
Does all of that above mean that I am some stock GURU? Heck NO! I’m far from it as I’ve been wrong a number of times too. It actually means that I’m about like everyone else where… you win some… you lose some. I do all of this because it’s fun to me and because I think I am helping more than hurting. The list above does not include many stocks for many years after that last stock mentioned that I was mentioning to investors before having tremendous moves. Right off the top of my head...
Think about VKNG at .002 per share that I mentioned that ran to $1.10 per share that was later bought out by CONMED Corporation (NASDAQ: CNMD) which now trades at over $114.00+ per share (make sure to check out their video inside the link to really understand why it had such a run):
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=43041543
Think about EGYF that I mentioned that I was talking about at .000s and low .00s per share range that ran to .20+ per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=118532460
Think about PMPG that I mentioned that I was talking about at the low .00s per share range that ran to .20+ per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=127274481
Think about NSAV that I mentioned that I was talking about at .0001 per share that ran to .14+ per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129839423
Think about TSNP (now HMBL) that I mentioned that I was talking about at .0001 per share that ran to $1.93 per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159146664
Think about WSRC that I mentioned that I was talking about at .00s per share range that ran to .49+ per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133220976
Think about PNNX that I mentioned that I was talking about at .003s per share that ran to .88 per share (twice):
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=91457791
Think about RVBR that I mentioned that I was talking about at .00s per share that ran to .20 per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151176636
Think about AABB that I mentioned that I was talking about at low .00s per share that ran to .50+ per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=155349523
Think about ENZC that I mentioned that I was talking about at .0003 per share that ran to .90+ per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=158335361
I'm sure you remember TTDZ (now GRCU) and EVRM. I'm just thinking of them right off the top of my head right now where I was fighting some of the same type of bashing at .0001 per share with those stocks and both of them ran to over 04+ per share.
Heck, I even left off some of my forward split stocks that had major runs from back in the day. I was in VCSY back in early 2000 when they announced doing a 20-1 Forward Split on Jan 28, 2000. They announced that their Date of Record for their Forward Split was Feb 7, 2000:
http://www.vcsy.com/press%20releases/021400.html
I held past the close of business of the Date of Record of Feb 7, 2000. I kept holding and a little while later, on Feb 23, 2000, the stock (VCSY) had hit a high of $6.125 per share post-split for the day with plenty of volume. At that price, that’s equivalent to $122.50 per share pre-split price that’s derived by multiplying $6.125 per share x 20 Forward Split Ratio.
Here are some more Forward Split stocks that I was in back in the year 2000 that I will allow you to go back and research for yourself...
COOX announced a 100-1 Forward Split on Oct 4, 2000. On Oct 3, 2000 it closed at $1.50 per share. On Oct 6, 2000 it traded between $12.50 - $19.00 per share. On Jan 09, 2001, it hit $1.87 per share post split. That $187.00 Pre-split Price Equivalent.
BIFS announced a 100-1 Forward Split on Feb. 28, 2000. On Mar 1, 2000 it traded between .75 - $2.00 per share. On Aug 16, 2000, it hit $2.26 per share post split. That $$226.00 Pre-split Price Equivalent.
I'm getting lazy with finding and typing this proof. I'll just say to go research to see similar huge moves with the 50-1 WTPE/SKGV announced on Nov 27, 2000, the 30-1 DMPT/COBB announced on Nov 14,2000, the 15-1 - VNCAF announced on 18 Feb 2000, the 15-1 SSCP announced on Aug 25, 2000, the 10-1 SWTI/SYWI announced on Sep 19, 2000, and the 10-1 RCVR/ESYG announced on Nov 22, 2000.
CVRG is another stock I was in at .0003 per share that I posted about here that later ran to .20+ per share after it changed its ticker to MCOA:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=117057179
ADZR is another stock that ran big for me that I was posting on originally at .02 per share that ran to $1.30 per share. That was back during the RagingBull days. Any links would be inactive for now. I might have some posts that I saved somewhere, but I'm sure there might be some investors that surely remember from back then.
ICNB is another stock that I was in that ran from .0001 per share to over .03+ per share. Add up those percentage gains! ICNB sat at .0001 when they finally got their deal with Christie Brinkley and her Bellissima Prosecco champagne:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126983085
PTSC was another one that had a huge run where lots of people made lots of money. It's one where I was posting on it while it was at .02 per share and it ran to $2.25 per share. The valuation post I made below from the link I saved shows where I had a valuation for it to hit $2.52 per share if they won their patent infringement case against Intel and didn't get all that was expected. Well, they won and it went to $2.25 per share. I don’t quite remember. I was able to find the link and some of it that I had saved that was from the actual post that I made back in 2004 from my DD page for that stock:
exisnet, hmmm...
Hmmm... I'll take a 1.427 Ratio if that's what it will end up being for us BLTH shareholders. That would still be awesome!
v/r
Sterling
stealofadeal...
I think so too! I think BLTH is going to be a billion dollar lithium company after it merges into SGII:NASDAQ. The info is right there in their Technical Reports.
v/r
Sterling
Citrati, here with those bashing EGYF...
I think so too! I think those bashing are going to continue to look stupid. Sometimes it's not even worth responding to them bashers when they are eating crow and can't even taste it.
EGYF will prove to hold merit with what they are bringing to the table and they will continue to feed those bashers crow. They are trying to make this about little old me and they still don't get it after all of these years. Just because you hate me or don't like me, it has absolutely nothing to do with the company that I might be liking at such time. Each company and its growth trajectory has no direct correlation with me directly or indirectly... AT ALL! Each company will either earn or not earn their place in the market based on their own merits and not because I like them or not. Stupid is as stupid does.
v/r
Sterling
Key Variables for BLTH and SGII:NASDAQ Calculations
I will explain the key variables associated with BLTH and SGII:NASDAQ for showing how the 1-300 reverse split is a very good thing for shareholders to position and facilitate BLTH getting to the NASDAQ much quicker than originally planned.
Key Variables for BLTH and SGII:NASDAQ Calculations
SGII OS (Outstanding Shares) per last filing = 7,843,498 shares
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SGII/disclosure
BLTH OS (Outstanding Shares) per last filing = 3,301,910,170 shares
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLTH/disclosure
The PR released by SGII:NASDAQ below indicated that 100% of the BLTH (ABM shareholders) will represent 70% of the new SGII:NASDAQ after BLTH merges or roll over their equity into SGII:NASDAQ:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SGII/news/story?e&id=2545695
30% of Post Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ = 7,843,498 shares
70% of Post Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ = What I will solve for.
So...
I will solve for... X ... with X representing the 70% of the Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ after BLTH has rolled 100% of its Pre BLTH equity up into SGII:NASDAQ.
To do this, we must pose this in a question as indicated below…
7,843,498 is 30% of what?
Now let’s set the problem up to solve for X…
7,843,498/X = 30/100
Now you must cross multiply to get this below...
30X = 784,349,800
Now you must divided both sides of the equation by 30 to get this below...
30X/30 = 784,349,800/30
X = 26,144,993
This means that the Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ is 26,144,993 shares.
Now you must subtract the Post Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ of 7,843,498 shares from the combined number for the total OS after the merger has been consummated to get this below...
26,144,993 - 7,843,498 = 18,301,495 shares
The 18,301,495 shares represents the 70% of the Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ.
So...
70% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ = 100% Pre BLTH Merger OS
So…
26,144,993 = 100% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ
7,843,498 = 30% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ
18,301,495 = 70% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ
So if 18,301,495 shares equals 70% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ, and if that also equals 100% of the Pre BLTH Merger OS of 3,301,910,170 shares, how do we equate to 100% of the now 3,301,910,170 shares for the Pre BLTH Merger OS equating to the ratio of BLTH shares to be converted into SGII shares?
So...
70% of BLTH OS Post Merger of SGII:NASDAQ = 100% of BLTH OS Pre Merger
Basically...
18,301,495 BLTH OS Post Merger = 3,301,910,170 BLTH OS Pre Merger
To get the ratio of SGII:NASDAQ shares to be distributed to BLTH shareholders after the roll up, you must first divide to current BLTH OS by 300 to take into consideration the 1-300 reverse split. Then you must take the BLTH OS Post Merger shares of 18,301,495 shares and divide by that total to get as indicated below:
BLTH OS Post Merge for SGII:NASDAQ ÷ BLTH OS Pre Merger = Distribution Ratio
18,301,495 shares ÷ 3,301,910,170 = Distribution Ratio
18,301,495 shares ÷ (3,301,910,170 ÷ 300) = Distribution Ratio
18,301,495 shares ÷ 11,006,367 shares = Distribution Ratio
1.66 = Distribution Ratio
Here's what this means...
This means that if you buy 1,000,000 shares of BLTH as of today, you will pay roughly $12,000 because of the current price of BLTH being .012 per share. You will now have to consider the 1-300 reverse split. This will convert your 1,000,000 shares of BLTH down to 3,333 shares rounded, With the roll up of BLTH into the SGII:NASDAQ entity, your 3,333 shares would need to be multiplied by the conversion ratio of 1.66 to equate to...
3,333 BLTH Shares x 1.66 Conversion Ratio = 5,532.78
This means that you will have 5,533 shares of SGII:NASDAQ trading at over $10.00+ per share. Your previous $12,000 investment will immediately be worth...
5,533 Newly Converted Shares x $10.00 Price of SGII:NASDAQ = Newly Converted Investment Value
$55,333 = Newly Converted Investment Value
The beauty about the "Newly Converted Investment Value" is that it is considered a bottom value. Insiders own billions of shares. No way they approve this 1-300 reverse split to happen because they believe they are going to lose money. They are allowing their shares to be affected by the reverse split because they know that they are very likely going to make a lot of money behind how this is structured.
This appears to remind me of INTV back when I was in it at .002 per share. They announced that they were going to do a 1-50 reverse split and the stock dropped to .001 per share. Everyone had all the opportunity to average down and get all of the .001s before the reverse split. After the reverse split, the stock opened at .05 per share, but it traded so thin that you couldn't get any shares at .05 per share. Then later, INTV ran from .05 per share to $6.74 per share. That's an over 13,000% gain. Believe it or not, I am expecting some very serious gains for us BLTH shareholders post split. I'm not sure if we will see over 13,000% gains, but I think we will see some very large gains somewhere north of 1,000% gains in my opinion. I think BLTH is going to the NASDAQ because they are going to become a billion dollar company and those behind the scenes putting this SPAC together is fully aware of this. I suggest all to read and understand this post below, especially if you are new to BLTH, to learn about the SPAC and more:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172485145
The above thoughts are my opinions on how things might be calculated. What the company articulates at some point will be the gospel for determination of the distribution of SGII:NASDAQ shares to us BLTH shareholders. If any of the variables above should change for any reason, use the "Substitution Property" accordingly. This post should be taken only as “food for thought” or “speculation” until we get such finite information from the company.
v/r
Sterling
Key Variables for BLTH and SGII:NASDAQ Calculations
I will explain the key variables associated with BLTH and SGII:NASDAQ for showing how the 1-300 reverse split is a very good thing for shareholders to position and facilitate BLTH getting to the NASDAQ much quicker than originally planned.
Key Variables for BLTH and SGII:NASDAQ Calculations
SGII OS (Outstanding Shares) per last filing = 7,843,498 shares
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SGII/disclosure
BLTH OS (Outstanding Shares) per last filing = 3,301,910,170 shares
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLTH/disclosure
The PR released by SGII:NASDAQ below indicated that 100% of the BLTH (ABM shareholders) will represent 70% of the new SGII:NASDAQ after BLTH merges or roll over their equity into SGII:NASDAQ:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SGII/news/story?e&id=2545695
30% of Post Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ = 7,843,498 shares
70% of Post Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ = What I will solve for.
So...
I will solve for... X ... with X representing the 70% of the Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ after BLTH has rolled 100% of its Pre BLTH equity up into SGII:NASDAQ.
To do this, we must pose this in a question as indicated below…
7,843,498 is 30% of what?
Now let’s set the problem up to solve for X…
7,843,498/X = 30/100
Now you must cross multiply to get this below...
30X = 784,349,800
Now you must divided both sides of the equation by 30 to get this below...
30X/30 = 784,349,800/30
X = 26,144,993
This means that the Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ is 26,144,993 shares.
Now you must subtract the Post Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ of 7,843,498 shares from the combined number for the total OS after the merger has been consummated to get this below...
26,144,993 - 7,843,498 = 18,301,495 shares
The 18,301,495 shares represents the 70% of the Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ.
So...
70% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ = 100% Pre BLTH Merger OS
So…
26,144,993 = 100% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ
7,843,498 = 30% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ
18,301,495 = 70% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ
So if 18,301,495 shares equals 70% Post BLTH Merger OS for SGII:NASDAQ, and if that also equals 100% of the Pre BLTH Merger OS of 3,301,910,170 shares, how do we equate to 100% of the now 3,301,910,170 shares for the Pre BLTH Merger OS equating to the ratio of BLTH shares to be converted into SGII shares?
So...
70% of BLTH OS Post Merger of SGII:NASDAQ = 100% of BLTH OS Pre Merger
Basically...
18,301,495 BLTH OS Post Merger = 3,301,910,170 BLTH OS Pre Merger
To get the ratio of SGII:NASDAQ shares to be distributed to BLTH shareholders after the roll up, you must first divide to current BLTH OS by 300 to take into consideration the 1-300 reverse split. Then you must take the BLTH OS Post Merger shares of 18,301,495 shares and divide by that total to get as indicated below:
BLTH OS Post Merge for SGII:NASDAQ ÷ BLTH OS Pre Merger = Distribution Ratio
18,301,495 shares ÷ 3,301,910,170 = Distribution Ratio
18,301,495 shares ÷ (3,301,910,170 ÷ 300) = Distribution Ratio
18,301,495 shares ÷ 11,006,367 shares = Distribution Ratio
1.66 = Distribution Ratio
Here's what this means...
This means that if you buy 1,000,000 shares of BLTH as of today, you will pay roughly $12,000 because of the current price of BLTH being .012 per share. You will now have to consider the 1-300 reverse split. This will convert your 1,000,000 shares of BLTH down to 3,333 shares rounded, With the roll up of BLTH into the SGII:NASDAQ entity, your 3,333 shares would need to be multiplied by the conversion ratio of 1.66 to equate to...
3,333 BLTH Shares x 1.66 Conversion Ratio = 5,532.78
This means that you will have 5,533 shares of SGII:NASDAQ trading at over $10.00+ per share. Your previous $12,000 investment will immediately be worth...
5,533 Newly Converted Shares x $10.00 Price of SGII:NASDAQ = Newly Converted Investment Value
$55,333 = Newly Converted Investment Value
The beauty about the "Newly Converted Investment Value" is that it is considered a bottom value. Insiders own billions of shares. No way they approve this 1-300 reverse split to happen because they believe they are going to lose money. They are allowing their shares to be affected by the reverse split because they know that they are very likely going to make a lot of money behind how this is structured.
This appears to remind me of INTV back when I was in it at .002 per share. They announced that they were going to do a 1-50 reverse split and the stock dropped to .001 per share. Everyone had all the opportunity to average down and get all of the .001s before the reverse split. After the reverse split, the stock opened at .05 per share, but it traded so thin that you couldn't get any shares at .05 per share. Then later, INTV ran from .05 per share to $6.74 per share. That's an over 13,000% gain. Believe it or not, I am expecting some very serious gains for us BLTH shareholders post split. I'm not sure if we will see over 13,000% gains, but I think we will see some very large gains somewhere north of 1,000% gains in my opinion. I think BLTH is going to the NASDAQ because they are going to become a billion dollar company and those behind the scenes putting this SPAC together is fully aware of this. I suggest all to read and understand this post below, especially if you are new to BLTH, to learn about the SPAC and more:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172485145
The above thoughts are my opinions on how things might be calculated. What the company articulates at some point will be the gospel for determination of the distribution of SGII:NASDAQ shares to us BLTH shareholders. If any of the variables above should change for any reason, use the "Substitution Property" accordingly. This post should be taken only as “food for thought” or “speculation” until we get such finite information from the company.
v/r
Sterling
jdes...
No problem, YW. I'm not aware of any exact timelines, but it looks like they are accelerating along the process here with BLTH to hurry up and get them to the NASDAQ through the SPAC deal with SGII:NASDAQ.
v/r
Sterling