Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sept 30 2010 reuters:
The CareBot should be available by the second or third quarter next year said Spencer, who expects to sell 6,000 robots in the first 12 months. In-home trials have to date been successful. However, the firm still needs to raise $750,000 to build and market the first robots.
How close are we?
ChartPoppers.com, are you kidding me!
Thats the best we can do for a CEO interview?
Has anyone mentioned the other robot co's ie. "Irobot" using Kinect sensors on their machines as well?
Is that where Martin Spencer got the idea?
You consider going from "Current" to a YIELD SIGN to be a good thing?
"Delicate and Sensitive discussions with various Microsoft Representatives" are you kidding me!
Why does EVERY pr lack specifics?
Martin could have called the switchboard operator at Microsoft for all we know.
Robotgeek, can you explain (or link me to)what happened in Texas, I cant find it.
appreciate any help
thanks
That doesnt "AUGUR" well for the nearly 1400(1308) shareholders.
call them. If you dont believe.
What do you think, they gag the T/A to hide GOOD news?
Call the T/A and ask for the count, they will tell you to call the company, and they will refer you to the last report as opposed to TODAYS numbers.
For a CEO that claims "Respect for shareholders" we should be able to get those numbers any day.
There is no positive reason to gag the T/A. If Martin doesnt want us to know the sharecount on a daily basis that= BAD NEWS.
Why has Spencer been pounding the table about "1400" shareholders when the last couple annuals show the same number as 1308?(why lie when 92 more wouldnt make the stock perform any better?)
how do you go more than a year and not have any change in that shareholder number?
Isobar, as the Mod here do you think it is relevant if the CEO or other Execs of the company are posting here or on any message board? I'm asking your opinion.
Isobar said Martin returned late last week so I agree we are overdue for a PR about the "Japan Summit".
Isobar, and/or Chae do you have any updates for us from talking to Martin?
Maybe its informative if you are an engineer.
Why does Spencer feel such a need to use all the big "Tech" terms and have yet another PR with zero substance IMO.
I as a shareholder want to know when are these so called "ongoing in home trials" going to end (if they have'nt long ago)?
We get nothing regarding progress!
Why does it matter that we can improve and reduce the cost of something that nobody is buying?
Getting too complicated for me.
Sincerely, GLTA I hope this works out.
You honestly think that the 10 or so people on this stock board could have ANY effect on the stock price?
Highly doubtful.
10 out of 1399 or so says Martin.
"Blind negative attacks" is a bit strong dont you think?
I would ask questions of any CEO that acted in this manner. I dont invest in a company to make friends with the CEO I do it to make money. When I'm mislead I ask questions.
The SEC has nothing to do with the share structure. But the shareholders have a right to know the answers to these questions when they directly effect us through dilution of our shares.
why wont any of you Pro-Martins answer the question?
Is this some of the "Good Dilution" or "dilution done the right way so its not bad dilution" that Isobar referred to?
Do any of you still work for Gosy?
Dont forget Zdante sold so we are down to 1399 shareholders, all of whom should be concerned with Robotgeeks repeated request for an answer to what did Elaine do to deserve 90 mil shares?
Also it seems that unless a poster is tossing out puffball compliments about Martin's achievments that they are met with sharp criticism.
Why not just answer with the truth? Is it that painful?
And how did the meeting with the japanese (probably another visit to Jetro) become a SUMMIT?
I think you are exactly right about the majority meaning shares.
If they had even 100 people in a room we would see pictures and youtube video everywhere IMO.
For someone making reference to "Maturity levels" you seem to be a bit hypocritical. Why cant you and Isobar answer the concerns that some people have instead of being critical of their DD.
If you and your superior DD skills have uncovered info on this Flagman Grupp Ltd and Vladamir J then put it out instead of arguing about it.
I dont think anyone wants Martin to go anywhere, he is the heart of this company. That being said, he does need to give up trying to be a one man show.
Nobody would want someone that passionate to dissapear but he does need help.
It may just be difficult to find real talent that will take shares of .009 stock as payment for a career change.
Chae, yes retirement is nice, the 50 should have been a 40,start was age 20.
What does that have to do with anything?
post here if you want any responses please.
I cant think of any investment I've had in 50 years where the CEO has so many PR's and says absolutley Nothing.
What a surprise we cant find anything on this Flagman grupp ltd comapny and the quotes from Vladamir dont make any sense.
Cant find Vladamir either!
Dont forget the massive "RETENTION BONUSES" as if they have somewhere else to go.
Dont you think giving yourself and your spouse a RETENTION bonus is EGO in action?
How do you and Chae turn a "Bidding Process" into Orders coming in? Not quite the same are they?
How many other companies have they how many other companies have they asked to bid for this project?
How many times does Martin get to begin isobar?
It was considerate for them to look out for the taxes on shareholders from the divy.
Who would want 60-70 cents on the dollar when you can have Zero!
It also states that they "corrected their internal processes" so they would not repeat the mistake.
Does that mean they finally had a CPA look at the books?
IMO "VERY informative" is a bit strong. Why cant we (Shareholders) hear or see proof of orders (If they exist) before the BBc hears about it on the phone?
absolutely correct, limited progress if any without getting Martin's ego under control.
Cant wait to see 2010 shareholder letter or annual report.
Paying retention bonuses in 09? where are they going to go?
Why Isobar?
The next few months doesnt cut it Isobar, if there is even one order out there then Martin has to show it or quit misleading the public. No more witholding company names, responding to heightened interest, and my favorite Applauding what OTHER people say about robots.
Why no pictures of the new headquarters? Is Martin the only one there?
shipping next year 3rd qtr or later, says Martin. Same thing he said last year for 2010.
He said we have orders coming in, dont we as shareholders deserve to see such orders if they exist?
So what?
you guys are arguing about the stock price instead of addressing the obvious obstacle that robotgeek has repeatedly brought up which is Martin's EGO!
As long as he fails to be realistic about the CURRENT value of this company and believes that he belongs on the same page as an Irobot or similair, he will never get us the shareholder value we hope for.
If you have'nt been financed in 10 years, or you have arrogantly ruined financing opportunities the strategy must be changed.
Why not? Whats the SEC going to do investigate them???
Robotgeek you are spot on with this! Unfortunately, I don't think Martin Spencer agrees with us.
It seems as though he believes that he can do it all. Developing the product has very little to do with sales, marketing etc..
The ego needs to be checked at the door and get someone that can deal with people and create the needed relationships.
Posting videos on you tube and claiming that there is an ongoing in home trial going on is not going to do it.
Her you go again, Martin told YOU that there will not be a reverse split?
Why does the priveledged info just go to you? Waiting on that answer.
I just thought it a bit unusual that He "Martin" would tell you privately in July that there had been no dilution up to that point. You'd think that info should be public for all of us shareholders. No?