Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL, best-kept secret. Bears lead you to honey.
I'm not sure why he hasn't moved on from $GTEH yet. Time will tell.
Chart shows nice cresting, but the PPS has to break through $0.05 (at the very least) before getting anywhere noteworthy.
Most would take even less than that. Like willpellel indicated, these dormant stocks can pop when you least expect them to. No guarantees though, obviously.
Not necessarily. Never know, though.
The bid/ask are finally dropping a bit.
Still pink current, although no news lately.
Old resistance became new support (@$5). What's next?
"Dilution" how? When was the last offering?
hawkshaw812: "Lol had me going there for a minute this turd is done . Move on"
Also hawkshaw812: "She’s on a roll let’s keep it going get above that dollar"
Also hawkshaw812: "Watch out we might clear a buck"
Also hawkshaw812: "Right on looks like we may see a buck"
Apologies in advance for the length of this post, presented as two solid blocks of text. Sorry, not sorry. Feel free to fact-check, critique, whatevs. I would be disappointed otherwise.
"Deliberate misinformation" is actually called disinformation. The poster you linked to seems uneducated and embittered at best. That being said, Cal experienced what everyone else experienced during the meeting, which was the audio cutting out at a key moment when the voting results for the reverse/split (R/S) were being announced. Was that deliberate? Well, it seems pretty sus to say the least. Regardless, in response to comments made during Cal's live stream, Cal reached out to DM and received confirmation that the R/S was in fact approved (which is still assumed to be true in lieu of a PR). In spite of that timely clarification, vile extremists from both ends of the sentiment spectrum, here and elsewhere, peddled lies and generally responded with pump-and-dump bulls saying "no R/S" while short-and-distort bears said "1:100 R/S imminent." Both sides were full of fecal matter and lied for financial gain while playing the game of deception for the sake of their respective agenda. What a circus. Evidence that bulls and bears, extremists anyhow, are equally wicked, greedy, and ultimately resemble each other. Neither cares about the truth and will lie for ill-gotten gain. Anyhow, since receiving that confirmation from DM, Cal has shifted sentiment toward being less bullish in favor of the truth. Cal has started calling attention to inconsistencies coming from DM, such as whether or not he voted and what degree of voting power he actually has. As of now, no one knows the potential R/S ratio although it's speculated that if it's 1:9 or less, the company will avoid breaking the Excessive Reverse Stock Split rule (not exceeding a cumulative total of 1:250 over a two-year period) and retain the right to R/S in the future if needed for NASDAQ compliance. The con to a 1:9 or less R/S ratio obviously is that shorts will do they thang and bang that MFer right back down to pennies. However, the net result could be the same (albeit after a longer period of time) if a more aggressive R/S ratio is chosen such as the maximum of 1:100 in this case. Either way, and I hope that even the most extreme bulls and bears can at least agree on this one thing, DM needs to stop talking and start delivering. The seemingly staged stock photos of finished vehicles and production sites are not cutting it, and shareholders (longs and shorts) are not even slightly convinced that fat, greasy bastard is honest or out for the best interests of retail investors.
TL;DR: Cal was confused alongside everyone else because extreme bulls and bears wanted to capitalize on the disarray they helped cause for ill-gotten gain. Cal steadfastly confirmed from DM that the R/S was in fact approved. As of this post, the ratio is unknown (no official PR, although one may surface around market close today). A 1:9 or less ratio could be good, could be bad, but is necessary to stay above $1 (perhaps briefly) and will allow a future R/S if necessary for NASDAQ compliance. A ratio >= 1:10 will not allow a future R/S if needed for NASDAQ compliance, and a more aggressive ratio (such as 1:100) will only scaffold the PPS temporarily if DM doesn't start convincing shareholders that $MULN is a legitimate business. In other words, DM needs to STFU and start generating profits (not just revenue and/or lip service). Finally, DM is a fat, greasy bastard, but hey... we all have our struggles.
Oh, the reverse/split you claimed wouldn't happen? Just to recapitulate... you lied before the meeting about a reverse/split not happening, you lied after the meeting that a reverse/split won't happen, and then you finally dumped your shares for a profit. Pump-and-dumps are illegal, you know? Have fun sleeping at night with those ill-gotten gains.
Doubling down, are you? Know when to quit. YOU LIED in stating BEFORE the meeting that there would be no reverse/split. No matter how you dice it, that's what you did. Own it.
Retail is always the last to find out. Strange activity though, on the "Expert (money laundering) Market." I would've averaged down by now regardless of all the uncertainty, but couldn't because again... it's on the "Expert (money laundering) Market."
Simply called you out for deceiving. STOP LYING!
Also, you have a nice day as well... but get a grip on the truth and stop lying first.
STOP LYING! Meeting starts at 9:30 a.m. (PST). Hence, no one knows the outcome yet. Also, the result of the reverse/split proposal is irrelevant if proposal 4 is passed. Proposal 4: "To approve the conversion of Mullen Automotive Inc. from a Delaware Corporation to a Maryland Corporation" is what matters most. If passed, the company assumes full control over all other proposals. Pay attention, bulls and bears... and stop lying (both of you). Smell that StinkFinger of truth, and as always... caveat emptor!
It's polarized like a cult here. Only room for two extremes and nothing in between, yet BOTH sides lie profusely. Neither can handle the StinkFinger. Too hopeful for bears and too skeptical for bulls. $MULN R/S is right around the corner, bears and bulls. GLTA!
LOL, I'll grant that; the cars look photoshopped. Kinda sketch, to be honest... and I'm a bullish long. Scam or not, they could've tried a liiittle bit harder than using GIMP to splice cars onto stock images.
Historically, he plays both sides of the fence. This illegal pump-and-dump attempt didn't quite work out like the last one (back in Feb 2021), LOL. I think his strategy is to go long at the bottom, pump the stock, dump/sell at the top, go short, distort/bash the PPS back down into the trips, and then finally cover. Rinse and repeat.
Well, Lakota-45... address JuicePigs' FACTS and Sampleandhold's statements. We will wait... tic, toc, tic, toc. Whenever legitimate concerns are presented by longs, you suddenly become silent or retort with subtle insults. Kind of reminds me of how the mismanagement team addresses legitimate concerns. Hmmm... perhaps you are the mismanagement team.
I prefer a disciplined life full of challenges. Keep your mixed drinks; I'll take water instead.
Market is bearish AF due to fed hikes. It's just a phase of the typical cycle. Not sure what you are even talking about.
Probably the most honest and accurate post here. You described what is so painfully obvious about the cynical regulars that frequent here. They live miserable lives full of discontentment. Like an angry, possessed mob, they fiercely attack anyone that disagrees with their deceptive narrative about the company.
I don't promote/pump. Conversely, you ILLEGALLY short-and-distort. Linky to a description of Dragon Lady's illegal activity.
I don't promote/pump. Conversely, you ILLEGALLY short-and-distort. Linky to a description of Dragon Lady's illegal activity.
Chill, benhor/Dragon Lady. Let "Dragon Lady" respond first. Of course, it's obvious that benhor and Dragon Lady are the same person. Grammar matters greatly, benhor, and for the love of everything good, Dragon Lady, stop abusing uppercase letters.
Have you covered yet, as you illegally short-and-distort? Still waiting for that "30 DAYS TO NASDAQ DELIST" you lied about over two months ago.
Have you covered yet, as you illegally short-and-distort?
Yep, as I said, "the dust will settle."
Weightloss > cosmetic surgery, IMO. And cheaper, too!
Not likely without a substantial catalyst. Just saying. The potential for a reverse/split will continue to promote uncertainty and caution for buyers.
Hopefully you're right about all of that. I won't complain if that's the case. Been long for quite a while now.
Surely the usual brood of vipers will slither out of their dark lairs tomorrow to resume their illegal short-and-distort campaign. They won't admit to something as trivial as being wrong about the Shoshoni/Shoshone, though. Utterly ridiculous to die on such a meaningless hill. If they can't even be honest about that one simple thing, then they're likely being deceptive about everything.
I'm not a pumper; I'm neutral. I've expressed skepticism in past posts. Just now, I simply clarified that most search results indicate that Shoshoni is an alternative spelling of Shoshone. Same tribe, different spellings. Is what it is.
Um, Sherlock... that tribe goes by both names. Shoshoni is just an alternative spelling of Shoshone.
True. R/S still possible but not guaranteed. No need to pump-and-dump OR short-and-distort; both are illegal practices, people. A lot can happen in the next month or two, depending on what this company decides to do. Could be good, could be bad. We'll see.
Wow. I REALLY like the Full View option! Inevitably, there will be kinks to work out, but I hope this option remains. It's more streamlined and easier to grasp the on-going context of a discussion rather than classically having to read fragments after clicking links. Great job!
Take that as a resounding no then, bears? Perhaps open discourse with CEOs on an even playing field doesn't afford the same hierarchical advantages in controlling the narrative. However, losing the tactical edge shouldn't be enough to dissuade accusers from proving that $RSHN is a scam. The burden of proof remains on you, bears. Must've had paper-thin arguments all along, LOL.
Same. I'll never block or ignore anyone. Won't trap myself in an echo chamber of my own making. Some users are simply testing limits and looking for boundaries as they tantrum in response to the rule changes, but that will inevitably fade. Might have a few bad characters test the upper limits at some point, but the vast majority will comply and adjust to the new standards. The dust will settle.
Any bears want to invite Ashley back here since he can now defend the integrity of the company on a level playing field?