Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If so, then Mark Schmidt should simply SAY THAT periodically if only to allay shareholder fears and encourage investors to purchase more stock...
C
The CE and the CEO as far as I'm concerned if MS doesn't get this straightened out by June...
A good, honest, competent CEO shouldn't have to be told that (and told and told and told...) That's what I find most alarming. From the very start following the CE snafu his vow to have weekly updates felt like a thinly veiled attempt to pacify shareholders in place of providing useful, actionable information. Updates about updates that really say nothing substantive won't accomplish that...
Disgusted,
C
If you manage to coax an answer out of him about the logic of the cryptic posts he sends in view of the gap between the current DPLS share price and the target price in those posts of his I'll be agreeably surprised...
That's what my gut tells me as well...I've shed most of my shares because even if you'd held one million shares previously, following the (minimum) 1:1000 share exchange with the reformed company you'd only be left with one thousand shares and no real guarantee that the stock price won't drop in the months after that... And if the ratio ends up being 1:10,000, forget it...
Disgusted,
C
?DPLS?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
If I'm not mistaken Dennis will be just one of six members in the revised board of directors which means that he'll no longer have sole discretionary decision making power with the reformed company.
With that in mind, why would he still need to be replaced? (Not that I'd care..)
I think Al Davinchi's post sums it up pretty well...If true, it would explain the heavy selling of DPLS shares despite the superficially rosy news issued by D.O. about investors getting full value for their holdings
Sorry Doog & Trader...At this point I'm not the least bit optimistic
C
I'd far prefer that he had enough pull with the OTC hierarchy to remove our Caveat Emptor status in a timely manner....like NOW...
C
It's both suspicious and mildly alarming to me that Mark Schmidt--in view of his acknowledged careless, slipshod screw up(s) with the OTC--actually has to be implored to provide the basic information that you correctly proposed. If he did so it would allay investor fears and buy him more credibility not only with us but with potential contract targets in various commercial and military sectors as well...
C
So??
I need a clear answer to the following question:
If I have 100,000 shares of DPLS prior to the official establishment of the re-formed company, will I have 100,000 shares of the new company after the dust settles?
(I suspect not...)
And what was the 52 week high??
Thanks for fleshing the explanation out further for me Peach!
C
I hadn't thought of possible long term growth for IFUS from the angle of industry whales losing market share to smaller competitors who saw value in using bagasse before the Cargills and the Monsantos did...
Thanks!!
C
When I opened the link you referenced I expected to see article(s) much more recent than reports from the Spring of 2013...IFUS' hierarchy has probably changed several times since then, so the variables in the equation--and derivatively the results and conclusions gleaned from them--are likely to be different as well; or so I reason...
C
Thanks for that!
The article you provided sounds great in many respects vis a vis contrasting the benefits of IFUS' product with the detriments which accrue to the ongoing use of conventional cattle feed. My concern is that the global and domestic influence of the largest feed providers and agribusiness titans like Monsanto, Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland, Purina, et al, may actively work against disruptive concepts like bagasse for cattle unless they can be persuaded to sign contracts with IFUS, no?
C
Due to their many alleged connections to the Pentagon and to the military industrial complex more generally I assume that the company will do well if Mark Schmidt's attorneys ever straighten things out with the OTC's hierarchy. Until they do that though, conjectures about possible Cyberlux stock prices in the dim future don't interest me... It's too much of a tease, and we've already had enough of that.
First things first,
C
Sage advice...Thx!
My gut wants to remain optimistic but my head tells me that something we can't quite put our finger on may keep this stock from escaping Caveat Emptor status anytime soon...
Since I'm heavily invested here I hope I'm dead wrong...
C
Should we revive that saying about leading a horse to water here?
All of which begs the question: Are you still invested in IFUS--even residually?
If so, why?
C
Right Said, Fred!
C
All things considered, a Baby Berk would work just fine for me
C
Do you realize what you're inferring with that remark?
But how tall is he? (Body builders are often short...)
Please elaborate...
Than why are you here?
And I assume that there's no prototype on the horizon yet for this brilliant intermodal transport concept?
C
I fear we'll see a run on Monday all right...but not in the direction we hope...
C
After it drops to three cents a share next week I might too...
I don't give a tinker's damn about either of them...All I care about is profit...
GLTUA,
C
Valid points and beautiful seascape!
Thanks!
C
I can't figure out why in the weeks leading up to the event JPB referred to this meeting as a celebration when there really wasn't anything significant to celebrate based on his revelations...
What the f*ck is a mouk???
I heard originally that the venue for the meeting was supposed to be one of Trump's hotels...From that I inferred that there would probably be many more conferees in attendance than the fifty or sixty people who ultimately showed up...Anyway, given the underwhelming nature of the news that was shared at the meeting it would surprise me if the stock manages to hold even five cents after Monday's widely anticipated mass selloff...
C
Only fifty or sixty attendees held at a venue of that size???
I guess they didn't need to hold the event at the Trump Hotel after all...
Unfortunate,
C
Why would they? Never gonna happen Bunda Buddy...NEVER going to happen...
C
Based on what???? I've said all along that this shareholder meeting wasn't going to budge the share price one inch...The ONLY thing that will cause ILUS to take off meaningfully are significant contracts with industry whales--along with massive buy-in from large institutional investors...Nothing else and nothing less...
Good Luck To us All
End,
C