Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No one on this planet except you thinks Hi_Lo was quoting the FINRA website. He was not. As has been explained to you multiple times.
You are either extremely dishonest or extremely dumb. Or maybe both.
Are you going to try the lameass lie again? All I have to do is cut and paste these yet again and show just how pathetic your dumb ass is to keep trying it over and over.
August 23, 2023 12:14:56 PM
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172666406
August 23, 2023 11:31:25 AM
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172665824
August 21, 2023 3:05:19 PM
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172649409
August 21, 2023 11:39:00 AM
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172647090
August 21, 2023 11:03:41 AM
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172646677
Perhaps you should let Hokie know, seeing as how he specifically asked about them here and Hi_Lo was simply answering. "LMAOO"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172663105
I was going by all the people doing the split play that only bought like 1 share each beforehand. There was a whole bunch of them.
Both splits already happened, they were not separated events. That's why all the 200 share trades.
He's been playing some games in the filings. The one he filed March 1 removed all trucking references and it was CBD again. Then he switched back to trucking again in later filings.
Maybe that was to fool OTC Markets when they were doing the shell cleanup thing around then?
Blah blah blah it's hilarious that you're pretending to be on vacation in the Florida Keys yet keep posting on ihub all day.
Interesting how in February George used the phrase "can move forward with discussions" instead of "will move forward with discussions" and now in August we see why. According to the filing there is no merger on the horizon and he has not even started looking for one.
.I winder how many people got suckered in by that subtle little language thing he did back then and just assumed that meant a merger was imminent when it actually was not.
I liked the part where they even misspelled Kuora, LOL.
And I would like to have a pet dragon that fetches things.
Why is it so hard for you to understand that ICNM did not "buyout AAPT"?
All they did was purchase an asset from them. AAPT still exists. It still stands on its own. It just no longer owns Kuora. It sold Kuora to ICNM. ICNM bought Kuora from AAPT. That's all.
ICNM did not buy the entirety of AAPT. That's why you still have AAPT shares that you get to stare at in your account.
What "messenger"? That's your own lying, not someone else's.
And everything Hi-Lo was posting from law firm websites was in entire agreement with the FINRA website. They weren't even contradictory or anything. You were just trying to point to differences in wording as somehow evidence of his lying. Sooooooo dumb. Soooooooo pathetic.
As far as "he who holds no stocks of anything", well unless you happen to work at every single one of my brokerages then you have no idea what I hold.
Claiming that you do is just another lie from your dumbass, isn't it?
Buy all you want. Have at it. Go nuts.
That's 4 days you have been lying about it.
Are you seriously this effing dishonest or are you seriously this effing dumb?
You are looking at the FINRA rule website. Great, good for you.
Hi_Lo was quoting prestigious law firm websites discussing the rule which he quite clearly cited with the website URLs. He quoted them verbatim. No alterations, no photoshopping, no chicanery, nothing. He was not quoting the FINRA website and never said he was.
And this has already been explained to you. Yet you are still trying to pull this?
Hey dipshit, you specifically mention the "triggers" portion as being different in his quotes from the FINRA website quotes. Take a closer look at the FINRA website. There isn't even a mention of "triggers" at all. None. Zilch. Nada.
So how the hell is he misquoting the "triggers" section when there isn't even a FINRA "triggers" section to begin with?
It's because you're a lying sack of crap.
Pull the lie again and I'll start reminding people just how many times you are trying the same stupidass lie, with links and dates.. Holy cow you're going to look dumb as fugg. Do it. Do it again. You just look more and more pathetic every time. Do it. Do it again. Just get more and more dumb looking. Do it. Do it again. Just get more and more pathetic. Do it. Do it again.
They're not happy. And one dude posted a GoFundMe because he can't pay some legal bills.
The extension gave them until yesterday.
Then why have they held several calls and sometimes respond in the Discord?
Do you have a link to an actual rule that they cannot communicate? It sounds more like you are just trying to justify any silence.
If you know it's the same material then you obviously read it every time while yet complaining. That's quite odd behavior.
Unless you have been physically stalking him in real life you cannot possibly know whether he has a wife or what his lifestyle consists of.
Are you physically stalking him in real life?
Or are you just lying, as you pumpers are prone to do?
So now you're trying to throw shade on the websites of prestigious law firms with reputations to uphold?
Pathetic, dude.
Almost as pathetic as the "misquotes" you were trying to "gotcha" with. Fercryinoutloud the "misquotes" weren't even anything of significance. It was a different word or two here and there. Nothing of substance, nothing altering meanings or contexts. It was really stupid stuff.
And you were trying to blow it up into some big scandalous type of affair when it would have been a nothingburger even if it was true and yet it wasn't even true to begin with.
There needs to be a word for "pathetic to the fourth power" or something like that to describe what you attempted.
Your obsession with him even supersedes the activities one might undertake on an alleged Florida Keys vacation, wow.
That's fuggin bonkers.
And he was quoting law firm website discussions of the rule. He was not quoting the rule directly.
You are comparing two separate things and claiming he is misquoting when the fact is he clearly cited the website addresses he was quoting. Which he quoted verbatim.
You are either dishonest as hell or dumb as hell. Or maybe both.
So you're going to quit your pathetic lies trying to portray him as misquoting when you are intentionally comparing two separate things?
Or are you just that dumb that you don't even know you are comparing two separate things?
You're saying they lied in the filing?
Wow.
OTC Markets is not a regulatory authority.
I see that question often - Why would a custodian spend their own money on a shell if they didn't fully intend to wind up with the most amazingest merger ever, just bursting at the seams with unicorns and rainbows?
Quick and dirty answer: Because they know they will be repaid regardless.
They all issue themselves shares with the snap of a finger as compensation for whatever costs they incur.
From the filings:
"The Company issued 300,000 preferred shares to George Sharp in 2021 upon his being named
as custodian on May 4, 2021 for the $50,000 cash invested and $50,000 worth of consulting fees
incurred.
As of June 30, 2023, the Company owes George Sharp $33,180, which is the amount funded
over the $50,000 agreed to."
That seems to foreshadow him issuing even more shares to himself, doesn't it?
"The Series B preferred shares have a 10,000:1 conversion and voting rights. The Series A preferred shares are
voting only and have no conversion rights. The voting is equal to 50% of the issued and as converted preferred
shares plus 1 vote."
Heck, George's 20,000,000 commons are probably in the money on their own enough to cover his costs. Then those 300,000 B Preferred so far convert into 3 Billion shares. Even at a one cent share price those would be worth 30 million dollars. .001 would be 3 million bucks and the lowly .0001 would be 300,000 dollars - still over double what he has paid in. And that's worst case, like no name and ticker change, no merger etc. .0001 and he still more than doubles his money.
Blah blah "but he declared no converting for 20 years". Well guess what? He can reverse that just as easily as he declared it. It wasn't a court order or anything of the like.
Now do the math if he actually gets in a merger. Yup, astounding. But do keep in the back of your mind he makes money no matter how poorly it does.
As far as your statement "Without you providing a motive, commons sense says you're here for an agenda - not because you really believe what you post.", why wouldn't I believe what I post? I post true things. Of course I believe them. They are the truth. As far as an agenda, I very much loathe seeing people get lied to on these boards. If I can counter that crap, then great. If you truly believe that only money can be a motivation then you are a sad soul. But you can also consider that I trade these things too. If people can fall for less lies then perhaps their hard-earned cash can go into tickers with more legit happenings going on that I am also in and then we both make some money.
(But it's also real fun to fugg with d-bags that lie through their teeth to the naive, the uneducated and those that don't have the wherewithal to do their own DD. That must be so infuriating to them that I enjoy it for sport. And yes, I do in fact walk little old ladies across the street too.)
LMAO at the brokeass fool trying to paint the price up 10 shares at a time not realizing those buys aren't large enough to register a difference.
Where's your proof that the FINRA Notice of Deficiency has been dismissed? Oh, whoops you don't have any. Because none exists.
That bad boy is still in effect. George would have had to notify everyone if he was able to get rid of it.
Notice how we haven't seen a name and ticker change yet? It's been over 30 days now. How long should it take if it's a slam dunk?
Take note that one side has links to filings and screenshots on their side while the other only has insults and yelling fraud with no proof.
Bullshit. George wouldn't have had to withdraw the SEC appeal if none of that stuff applied anymore.
Yelling fraud over and over with nothing to back up the assertion whatsoever is the refuge of the beaten. The lamest of the lame.
Gee, I wonder why you never offer any proof. Oh that's right, because you don't have any.
Buy more, sell more, hodl more, knock yourself out, IDGAF. No skin off my back whatever you do.
If you truly intend to buy then obviously you know that the naked short claims are all bullshit just like I do.
You would have to be stupid as hell to buy thinking that it's just going to keep getting shorted lower and lower.
The smart play would be to wait until there is actual verifiable news and then buy in and enjoy the MOASS.
But since you're buying you obviously realize the naked short stuff is nonsense and is just an excuse by the lying pumpers to justify the chart's downhill ride to the naive that don't know any better.
Meanwhile, guess who is selling? Hint: "bashers" aren't the ones selling. Why do you think the pumpers are so vociferous? Why don't they just be quiet and let the price drop so they can "scoop up the cheapies"?
It's because they're selling. And have been. Do a search for the term "bank" on this board. You'll mostly see the usage referring to banking in the future, just like good old OTC echo chambers do. But occasionally someone slips and mentions that they have been banking and are banking. As everyone knows, just like you don't lose money until you sell you also don't bank money until you sell.
Someone has already been admitting to banking. That is selling. While blaming shorts, LOL.
They have not arrived at Fidelity yet.
Was there any verifiable merger DD in those posts?
Just because something is posted many times doesn't make it true.
Lying pumpers will happily repeat something over and over to make something more believable than it should be.
You are both correct, he did not even bother with a Late Notification, sheesh.
How is it a clean shell when it's Caveat Emptor?
And anyone thinking AAPT shareholders are getting free ICNM shares is truly delusional.
"Nice"? It's now No Bid.
If there was actual naked shorting going on as some claim then how dumb would you have to be to get pumped into buying this?
A little food for thought for you.
How am I lying when it wasn't my claim?
The dude claimed he had numerous examples examples exactly like GVSI that got name and ticker changes.
Yet can't name a single one. Obviously he is lying.
Maybe you should try reading sometime.
Got it. Thanks for confirming you're full of shit with the old "look it up yourself" evasion.