Breathin' clean fresh air and lovin' life.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
shotsky: Why try to prove a false narrative as true? BVTK can easily conduct an ASR Program if they are going to be as big as they are telegrahping. 100% can do and it's very legal and lucrative for all involved. The can hold certain info close to the chest to share w/ NDA signers...info the public at large is not privy too. NDA's are VERY LEGAL for publicly traded companies.
Based on the info shared w/ certain DEEP POCKETS, those DEEP POCKETS decide they want a 'special' piece of the future action. They work out a deal with these DEEP POCKETS who then line up the cash to conduct "THE BIG SHORT". Immediately, Bravatek and BVTK shareholders will see a MASSIVE REDUCTION in the O/S of whatever pre-arranged amount was decided..5.5-6BB?? And, the DEEP POCKETS benefit by having brand new preferred shares that will most likely have a 3-7yr holding period. The investment bank loves it too due to their forward-contract guarantee of a dandy pay day after they complete their cover and retirement of all those commons (typical contracted time period of 1-3 quarters).
It's a really neat, relatively new financial instrument called an "Accelerated Stock Re-Purchase Program", or simply ASR Program. Many PhD-level white papers have been written about them. They really are a 360deg win/win/win/win scenario. A really cool derivative.
You should read up on them. Here ya go... Let us know what you think.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133878452
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133987432
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134177186
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134213070
lns
flyers: Trips? Trippin'?? loL!!! The thing that really makes the six-month chart strong is the fact that it's at where it's at in spite of a 300+% increase in O/S!!!
She's got STRUNGTH!!!
Just imagine when THE B-TEAM unveils the ASR Program portion of its B-PLAN to help catapult BVTK to The NAZ!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133878452
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133987432
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134177186
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134213070
The merits of WHY an ASR Program is MUCH more beneficial for everybody involved in BVTK...shareholders AND stakeholders alike(!)...seriously needs to be discussed in depth on this board...now!
Ammo supplied above. There is much more to be found on the subject of BINDING, FORWARD-CONTACT ASR Programs precisely because they are so much more beneficial to a company in the long-run than an R/S or a voluntary, optional stock buyback plan for "O/S management".
It's gonna be awesome. And, BVTK WILL make OTC history "sooner than you think".
lns
TH11: And never forget...'Life is a gamble'. lns_eom
New MM VFIN bodes well...
ADR conversion trading
Block negotiations
Corporate buy-backs (10b-18)
http://vfinanceinvestments.com/index.php/equity-trading
lns
BC: BTW, not that you'd go to the notoriously incorrect Bloomberg site for TheCol's #, but Barry Baer can be reached via the # found in the factual source, OTCMarkets, NEOM Company Profile. Just to be 'clear', ya know. Wouldn't want anybody to be mislead now. Ha!
Nobody knows why Clearstream continues to report bad DTCC data, not even Clearstream themselves. I called them too. Clueless over there.
Funny that all this time NEOM has apparently been off the DTC CHILL list but it took a glitch in May for it to get investigated and found out. Not that it would've changed the outcome. But, I like this scenario better. Much more interesting.
And, the shares continue to sell...
Something's going on behind the scenes to warrant the buying. What's NEOM going to finally reemerge as? Time will tell...
Cheers!
lns
BC: Barry Baer. He wishes he remembered even the specific year but, doesn't. 2012? Yes, we weren't told. Doesn't matter now. Anybody can call him though to corroborate. Main thing is, it shows through a second avenue of information that in fact, the Clearstream list is INNACURATE and CANNOT be trusted.
Again, I will trust my broker, TDAmeritrade over a foreign outfit any day. Clearstream does not have the legal obligation TDAmeritrade has to insure they report the DTCC list accurately or timely. And, NEOM's CFO also has a legal obligation to report the facts in this case as he knows them. In this case, he also states NEOM HAS NO DTCC RESTRICTIONS on it. Shaken, yes, but not chilled.
lns
BC: According to TheCol. (anybody can call and verify) as late as two days ago, he remembers NEOM back a few years ago was in a group of stocks who all had their DTC CHILL status' removed due to some class ruling or rules determination. And, as far as he is aware, that last determination of the DTC CHILL being lifted from NEOM stock, has not changed. Again, anybody is free to check the source...TheCol. himself. Call the # listed on OTCMarkets.
This, also corroborates the latest, accurate DTCC restrictions list information TDAmeritrade receives at least 2x's week, every week. NEOM does not appear on said list TDAmeritrade relies on to protect their clients interests as they deem fit. Therefore, it is TDAmeritrade's determination that...
NEOM HAS NO DTCC RESTRICTIONS ON IT WHATSOEVER. PERIOD.
This is precisely why investors can purchase NEOM stock via TDAmeritrade. Otherwise, they could not.
lns
Porter: https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair
Application Number: 15/246500
Publication Number: 20170063869
Either of those should work.
Ian and esq. provided their argument/remark last Wed. Final word could be had this month.
lns
Chiron: Will you say he "can" when he does? What else then will you point to that he "can't" do, of whatever that is, which doesn't meet your timetable and/or criteria?
lns
kr800: TC's credentials ARE his "body of work". WTF? lns_eom
money: Laundering? BVTK? With ties to Trump? Guilliani? DHS? Pentagon? NATO? With TC's Official Fed Gov post to KZ? Really? You think that's what TC's early Sunday morning meeting w/ the mysterious KZ billionaire "equity investor" is all about? You think they are all involved or TC is pulling a fast-one on all of 'em?
Seriously, man? You think JB's wife is in on it too, hiding the loot in some abandoned CO mineshaft way up in the Rockies?
Wow! It's genius.
lns
Hilarious!
LONG & STRONG & LOVIN' THE RIDE! lns_eom
CONFIRMED...NEOM status w/ TDAmeritrade remains as TDAmeritrade themselves stated in May.
Playin, keepit, Popt...Won't call to confirm but instead accuse their letter is a forgery? A shame if not, yet continue to blindly claim that. I have done the HONEST DD.
I trust my broker, Ameritrade. Therefore, using Ameritrade's own business critical market data sources' reporting they rely on to properly fullfill their duties as an industry leading online, real-time broker, there's only one conclusion here which can be reached...
Clearstream's latest data, as presented, is incorrect and should not be trusted as current and/or factual market data.
lns
Porter: Apparently it's the 'ol, "Gaps gotta fill", crap, again. We'll see. If it doesn't and we go to a penny and beyond, that'll be chirped for months, ad nauseam.
Playin: Dude, it's not fake, doctored or an illegal forgery of any sort.
Did you call them?
No. I'm guessing not If you are suggesting such.
Call them and ask for yourself.
I will do the same again now and report back tomorrow.
lns
penny: YES! INDEEDY! lns_eom
Playin: I trust my broker. My broker and other folks brokers' corroborate my original evidence from my broker stating that NEOM does NOT have any DTC restrictions placed on it.
Dueling info.
Nobody here is making anything up. Nobody is lying. Nobody is fabricating info or data or proof.
But, based on the info and proof that I can but NEOM through that broker tells me, Clearstream's data is old and therefore, as currently reported on their website, INCORRECT.
Please, call your broker and ask them. ALWAYS verify others' DD to claim it as your own.
BC did. I know of others that did by contacting their respective brokers as well. Not all brokers have that info at their fingertips. One of mine does and other does not.
THIS is EXACTLY why you see and hear others often espouse to...
DO YOUR OWN DD.
lns
art: Just remember I said this multiple times before and now it's being VERY strongly hinted by TC himself...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/9/26/buzdcScreenshot_2017-09-25-21-58-28-720x1280.png
A reminder of my 1st mention of a probable ASR Program happenning here because it just makes a whole lot more sense than an R/S for stakeholders and shareholders alike...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133878452
And, remember this and tell your friends...
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-176
Retail Strategy Task Force
The Retail Strategy Task Force will develop proactive, targeted initiatives to identify misconduct impacting retail investors. The Enforcement Division has a long and successful history of bringing cases involving fraud targeting retail investors, from everything involving the sale of unsuitable structured products to microcap pump-and-dump schemes.
BC: And THAT is the smoking gun. lns_eom
I hope everybody realizes that "Community Sentiment" meter is total BS and a tool to manipulate and distort the truth. What a load of malarkey.
A $100MM "finder's fee" PR to be out, possibly Monday, pre-market.
Let it sink in...a $100MM "finder's fee".
This is only the beginning.
So much more to come.
We are golden.
Blessed.
BVTK
WOW
lns
p.s.- Doc Holliday in da houuuuuse! Love it. Welcome and Please stick around.
BC: Yes, LLC's CAN go public but it is VERY PROHIBITIVE...a LEGAL MESS and NIGHTMARE due to 50 different states' rules to adhere to since LLC's are 'creatures' of state locales whereas C corps are goverened by Federal rules and regulations.
If I recall correctly, last I checked a few years ago, there were literally only a handful of publicly traded LLC's I was able to dig up.
Our thoughts are aligned on this one! Riding that same wavelength!!
It was always VERY interesting (and telling to me, I might add) that investor info for NeoMedia, owned by NM,LLC, NEVER CEASED to linked DIRECTLY to NEOM's ticker.
I mentioned that early on way back a year(?) ago when trading activity started back up here in earnest but, of course, was poo-pooed on by the usual suspects. Just like my letter shared from Ameritrade regarding NEOM and their info regarding its non-DTC CHILL status and their own rules regarding client purchase restrictions for DTC CHILLed stocks was poo-pooed on and it was even suggested I fabricated it to advance a lie. Too funny.
It's happenning folks, IMVSHHO!!!...NEOM is in the midst of being the public vehicle for an upcoming REVERSE MERGER. MARK IT! Looks like it could most definitely be as it's 'former self', currently disguised as NM,LLC. But, again, it doesn't really matter. And don't forget, NEOM's stock PAR VALUE is .01/share. Yes...a penny...not a fraction of but a while penny. Many, of not most even big board stocks don't have par values that high. That WILL come in play, IMVSHHO.
Also VERY telling at this time is the VERY LIGHT amount of shares now present on the ask in totality. VERY VERY VERY INTERESTING, to say the least.
lns
p.s. - looks like the cat(lady) and friend came back. Imagine that. Remember that song from my folk's era? WHOOOHOOO!!!
penny: BOOOOM!!! And, to add, dovetailing wg...my get is Bravatek is DEFINITELY going to be one of the PREMIER cybersecurity "marketplaces" in the MAUF bill.
This is gonna be HUGE!
Great, compilation post!
lns
Cosa: LOGICALLY explain to us, in detail, WHY a merger (and/or) aquisition between BVTK and Dark Pulse would be "ridiculous"? They are a MAP already so why NOT go one step further?
Can you do that? Will you do this?
Enquiring MINDS want to know.
TIA,
lns
NEOM solid did the FLIP!_WHOOHOOO!!! lns_eom
FEAR W/ THE POST_OF_THE_DAY!!! BOOOOM!!!! lns_eom
Popt: Last year, 2016, NEOM had an average volume of...nil. In 2017, as you pointed out, the average volume is now up to 19MM.
What changed to warrant that kind of EVER INCREASING average volume per month?
There are plenty of other 'worthless' shell stocks to gamble on that are trading like NEOM did last year...nil.
Why aren't they seeing the EVER INCREASING VOLUME NEOM is experiencing this year? Why not them? Why NEOM?
WHAT CHANGED to bring in this much more interest in this particular stock this year? It's certainly NOT "bagholders of years past" suddenly all thinking that this year is finally the year to rid themselves of a "worthless" stock. That's ludicrous. Those folk s had plenty of time and opportunity to do that when the writing was clearly on the wall 2-3yrs that NeoMedia was in serious trouble and most likely would not make it and would go bankrupt.
So, what changed?
It's something, and "going out of business" (as it already did) is not it. That drives volume out of a stock, ESPECIALLY two (2) years hence. Going back into business as 'who knows what' would be a much more logical answer. But, heck, that may just be me and my crazy way of thinking.
So, instead of dodging the questions w/ derogatory responses, give us a truthful, logical guess.
lns
shotsky/all: Please get the discussion going, PLEASE, since I am restricted to 1/ppd on this board...
WHY or WHY NOT Bravatek/EcryptOne to be selected as the NEW EMAIL GATEWAY INFRASTRUCTURE to replace MS Exchange for DISA'S MAIL.MIL system?
The BILLYDollarDISAdeal...
It is VITAL, IMO, that this seriously be vetted out on this board because this one, single contract would be the catalyst to get BVTK to $1.00/share and beyond.
Please continue this discussion, all. To kick start it, here's a look at the competition....
http://www.theperformancecenter.com/BRAVATEKSALES/images/ECRYPT_ONE_COMPARISON.docx
If not Bravatek and their Ecrypt One then who and what?
Re-read the replied to post for further detail.
lns
shotsky: Who do you think will be the company to provide DISA's NEW EMAIL GATEWAY INFRASTRUCTURE for their GLOBAL 4.5MM users (current, scale to 10MM) on its MAIL.MIL email system (currently MS Exchange)?
And, WHAT do you think will be that NEW EMAIL GATEWAY INFRASTRUCTURE they will have in place in less than one year (7/18)?
Any thoughts on this subject you care to share w/ the board?
They are doing it. They've committed to it, no matter how difficult and "impossible" you think it is.
So, given that...
Any thoughts on it?
If not Bravatek and Ecrypt One, then who/what?
Info on it to refresh memories...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134352200
TIA,
lns
p.s. - Anybody is welcome to guess, not limited to shotsky. Please. All input is welcomed and wanted. This is a seriously big deal DISA promises so let's all discuss it. They've been asking for this since 2011 and now it's finally committed to be done, and we all know it needs to be done, it's a matter of NATIONAL SECURITY.
keepit: My mistake...3yrs too far. 1-2yrs ago. Times flying but not that fast. Ha.
What changed? Ameritrade's rules on DTC CHILL stocks is what it is...can't buy them, period. We can now though.
Why?
What changed?
Why no volume last year but ever increasing volume this year?
2004. In/out along the way, mostly in until just before the RM. Overall, did not lose money on NEOM, just time and a few hairs.
I've bought shares this year at .0001/share. Haven't lost a fraction of a penny on them and don't expect to. Signs point to continued, increasing trading in NEOM (trend), not the opposite and certainly not a shutdown as long as there is MM interest and sponsorship. That is fact.
No reason for the SEC to suspend trading since no need and non-reporting.
As long as one MM wants it to trade, they sponsor it to do so and it does. Period.
That is the state of NEOM now. That fact can not be changed not logically disputed.
It is what it is...increased volume and orderly MM activity.
"Volume precedes price"...one of the oldest and truest phrases regarding all markets throughout history.
You don't accept this simple fact?
Nobody knows why, really, it just is what it is.
Time will tell us why.
"Patience, grasshopper."
lns
keepit: If that's all it is, then why didn't they do this 2-3 yrs ago, and just now over the past 8-10 months? Why all the volume and MM's that wasn't and weren't here 2-3yrs ago???
WHAT CHANGED?
Why can traders/investors now purchase NEOM through Ameritrade when since 2011 that was impossible and they're informing their clients that there are no longer any trading restrictions for this security?
WHAT CHANGED over the last three years w/ NEOM to warrant and answer for all this new activity and restriction change we've seen here since late last fall?
WHAT HAS CHANGED???
lns
BC: Makes sense. YA are patient scum. lns_eom
shotsky: I am not surprised you think that. But, it doesn't matter what you think. They are going to do it an DISA will lead the charge. They say so, right here...
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bjxjxv/the-pentagon-says-it-will-start-encrypting-soldiers-emails-next-year
A letter from vice director of DISA Sarah Zabel to Wyden, which Wyden's office shared with Motherboard, said that "the use of STARTTLS will be implemented as part of the migration to the new email gateway infrastructure." The migration will be done "in July 2018," the letter reads.
whiz: L2 flip almost here. Boom Boom lns_eom
shotsky: Yes, really. IF you had read the PhD's research you would see that in the case of an ASR, a firm most often DOES use equity financers money to buy back shares. AND, when it's done, all make money in the transaction AND all shares bought back are reduced IMMEDIATELY from the O/S.
C'Mon, man...do some DD. There is PLENTY out on the web detailing exactly HOW and WHY an ASR program is a PERFECT FIT for BVTK'a UNDERVALUED situation. Oh, and, the safe harbor rules are 'built-in' to the forward-contract.
"ABSOLUTELY"says BVTK's CEO about getting current with its FINS and "NO" to BVTK management's desire for RS!!! "YES" to equity commitments.
— Bravatek Solutions (@bravatek) August 28, 2017
Bashers will be bashers--we don't waste our time with nay-sayers at BVTK. More 8-Ks and PR this week...
— Bravatek Solutions (@bravatek) August 28, 2017
FEAR: TC talking w/ many equity investors points to an ASR Program...
FACTS OF AN ASR Program...
Why Do Firms Undertake Accelerated Share Repurchase Programs?
If one truly believed an R/S is necessary for BVTK to undertake one would sincerely have to believe nothing BVTK tweets, PR's or otherwise communicates w/ shareholders about the numerous inquiries and meetings w/ large equity financiers wanting a piece of Bravatek, is even remotely true. You must believe they are all lies.
That said, did the crowd chanting "R/S" forget about Bravatek's "B-Plan", or, again, they just think it's all lies?
Bravatek's "B-Plan" in summary again for folks to think about...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132945365
Reading that over again, it makes one think about current vs. FUTURE VALUATION figures and again...Realizing that Bravatek's new CPA's specialize in VALUATION SERVICES, one MUST ask themselves why that particular expertise might be sought after in THIS CASE.
http://www.dbrookscpa.com/palm-beach-valuation-services1.html
An RS would benefit nobody IN THIS CASE. NOBODY. One MUST take these situations on a CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.
Believing what the company communicated, one obviously sees the IMMENSELY PROFITABLE business PLAN that Bravatek has in front of them.
Just read the quotes from the last PR about the CrucialTrak MAP aggreement.
Being able to understand and grasp the MAGNITUDE of what is really taking shape here, one can surmise that what TC is sharing w/ the multitude of equity investors he's been meeting PRIVATELY with is on such a game-changing level that to NOT structure a share reduction in a way that benefits THE MOST players would be a HUGE disservice to those financing institutions who have kept the operations going for so many years.
If anybody thinks the future could be VERY BRIGHT for BVTK and that given the NEAR TERM FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE WORKS an R/S would be remotely necessary, or even beneficial for any and ALL of BVTK's investors, shareholders, stakeholders and financiers, one just needs to take a deep paruse of this white-paper on exactly WHY an ASR program is MOST BENEFICIAL for EVERY party involved and has BVTK written all over it.
Why Do Firms Undertake Accelerated Share Repurchase Programs?
R/S vs. ASR for BVTK? It's a big read but after mustering through it...
Naysayers...Can you give a convincing argument as to why NOT an ASR for BVTK, and "sooner than you think"?
lns
Mjo: Yeah, that one left a bad taste. lns_eom
mrcarnita: And that is EXACTLY why this chart came to be. You explained in detail what was shown in pictures. I'd day pretty damn good unintended teamwork delivering a powerful "1-2 punch" to naysayers who claim these type of valuations don't make sense.
Of course they do. And, now you everybody should be able to see that yes, indeed, THE BillyDollarDISAdeal WILL bring $BVTK ABOVE THE CLOUD to see nothin' but BLUE SKIES after that. From a few weeks ago... WOW...
I more realistically, as shown, had revised my outlook to ~.13-.14/share by Labor Day. Could be a big next two weeks.
lns