Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So, if I read you right, you are saying that the company is CONning potential new investors? Given the magnitude of the Product, how could anybody be swindled into purchasing? You must have been thinking of another stock?
You are right, Gulfbreeze, the company has shown us nothing and will apparently continue to show us nothing. CONsultants was an apropos description.
My "conspiracy theory", as you put it, was based totally on a PM received by the Rev. back when Hasher had quit posting for a bit. In that message, he indicated to me that he had great distaste for Peter and wasn't it nice that he wasn't posting any more? By the by, it was I who asked Pete to tone it down for the benefit of those here with a lot to lose.
"Rants?" lol. Best take your sniping over to RB where you can hit "Kerby" and maybe do some damage.
Uh huh. "It depends on what the definition of 'is' is." In your case, it depends on what the definition of "us" is. I'm sure when you stated that maybe a lot of "us" have some growing up to do, that you had your colorful and fairly recent history at RB in mind -- NOT. You and the other one attempt to be so prim, proper and decent here then go on over to RB to "let your hair down". You see anything hypocritical there?
Good post, Preamp, and full of great logic. The problem, as I see it, is that the "cleaning up" of the board began with a vicious hatred directed at Hasher, who was perceived as a basher. Then, Wolf was next on the hit list as well as anyone else who backed Hasher. Now, in an effort to bring everyone into lockstep and perhaps cull the herd a bit, the NEW party line is the removal of "cussing". I say that there is not one iota more "cussing" now than when the Ihub board was first started. The only thing different is the moderator who is using the "vulgarity" club as a means of removing dissent. Well, just like beauty, "cussing" is in the eyes of the beholder and our moderator simply cannot or will not use common sense in his daily duties. Case in point was the post that eventually got me "offed". Did you happen to read that post, Preamp? Was it offensive to you? Was it offensive to anyone here other than Rooster and logman? Was it something that isn't heard or uttered by virtually EVERYONE here on a daily basis? I sincerely doubt it!
The rift is too deep, old buddy. Not even your $100 a share target could possibly return things to normal.
Offensive to whom? Majority or minority?
Growing up? You mean like your post on RB referring to e-Y as -- if I recall correctly -- doing "poopies in his pants"? If you like, I'll research that one and put the link here for everyone's eyes and sensibilities. From the pen of a "professional", no less.
"Growing up", as you put it, is a lifetime endeavour - not just a co-moderator's part-time gig. Oh, and please -- puleeeze, don't refer to me as "my friend". As long as things are being taken so literal around here, you may rest assured that is not the case.
Disdain for the stock/company (same thing) - no, not really. This thing should have shot out of sight several years ago. So, where does that leave us? Disdain for management? Yep, I've got to say that's accurate. Management has made some statements regarding self-imposed targets that haven't even come close to being realized. Disdain for management who won't even disclose information as to the contents of a supposedly "come-one, come-all" shareholders' meeting? Yep. Disdain for one who criticizes those who might trade this thing and then cry that maybe they should have done it themselves? Unquestionably.
I believe you're away.
Upon Rev. Loggie's coronation, it was requested of dfh to give me a call and ask me to remain on as co-moderator because I was a "straight shooter." I agreed and made it plain that my "straight shooting" ways were not going to be modified. As the days and weeks turned into months and years of waiting, I certainly didn't change the color of my stripes and, know what? -- my penchant for mild epithets is no stronger now than it was when I agreed to "serve".
But NOW -- the fact that I actually had the audacity to trade this stock in an effort to recoup some losses -- is one of the reasons cited for my being "let go". (Sometimes ya gotta laugh. This stuff can't be made up). So, if you don't agree and "cooperate" with the Rev., you're living on borrowed time AND if you want to sell on highs and buy on lows, you are considered maybe TOO MUCH of a straight shooter -- better to sit on your hands and watch opportunity after opportunity to get some money back than risk the ire of the self-perceived troika of holiness.
I don't agree with the holy ghost that attitudes will brighten when and if the company actually performs something noteworthy. I don't believe there are many here who view the "events" with anything less than pure disgust. Performance won't change that outlook.
Since the coronation, the transformation of some has been like watching a child on a bike with training wheels. Eventually they shed the wheels and go on to be proficient in riding their bike. Some, however, are left behind, still using the training wheels but thinking they're gone.
If nominated, I will run. If elected, I will serve. If told by the majority to take a powder, I will do so.
Well, there you have it, folks, the Rev. Loggie has had me removed as co-moderator. lol. That's what happens then the man-child's delicate sensibilities are ruffled. He's been looking for this opportunity for some time now as I've always strived to be one of the voices of reason. However, there is apparently no reasoning with some people. I'm thoroughly amazed that Matt has agreed with him that I should be removed (I assume Matt had to sanction the "hit"). I've seen much more "descriptive" language on boards that he moderates, but he does seem to give absolute power to moderators.
Unfortunately, I am the assistant on the LOGMAN board, it is no longer the PWTC board. You have injected what you feel to be proper morals for everyone to follow and any variance results in the Rev. Loggie's immediate ire. Have you considered leaving your position as it is clearly taking a toll on your mental health?
Go right ahead. Never told you that I bought a donkey while in Alaska, did I?
You buy your underwear at K-Mart?
Primo volume today, fantastic product, stellar leadership, magnificent communications -- so why does my gut hurt whenever I even THINK about PT? When I get completely out from under this piece of feces, I won't even want to HEAR the word "battery" again.
Thanks, Beejay, Elbee
(How about just BeeBee)
Unity must begin from the head and work its way down. When you can't squeeze even a syllable out of the "head" as to the outcome of the now-infamous ASM, where's the unity?
As was the largest decline. As were the most lies. As were the best partnerships and possibilities lost. etc., etc., etc. He did, however, orchestrate the very first Bagholders Meeting after which there was no mystery as to what took place. Maybe BeeJay should call ol' Reverend Bluejeans for pointers on successful meetings?
Am going on an Alaskan cruise next week. Won't be here for the next PR and will, therefore, miss the opportunity to kiss BeeJay's ring. See youse guys in a week.
LOL -- A well-placed Hot Dog stand at Fenway Park will do that in a month!
The realities are;
1. Patents or no patents, the "best" lead-acid battery there is -- isn't -- as of 7/27/06, at any rate.
2. How do we know that they're working on the pilot plant? Has there been any information from the "horse's mouth" to that affect?
3. Everyone here would be tickled whizzie-eyed should they come out with news of some magnitude which, incidentally, would be a first.
4. No news is not necessarily good news, now is it?
5. There isn't enough interest by management to "share" with the shareholders that which was discussed at the shareholders meeting. Even highlights of the event could have been posted on the website.
6. As they say these days -- "reality bites".
One would wonder just how many "friends" are left.
Perhaps a $20.00 tape recorder? No need for a stenographer, just some sort of trail as to what took place.
It's been roughly a week since I emailed the company inquiring into the availability of a copy of the minutes taken during the shareholders meeting. I also asked about Kung Long, the pilot plant, pipelink and a couple of other items. This should come as a surprise to nobody, but there has been no response as of yet.
They sure are, but their stock is over 2 bucks and climbs as high as $3.50 at times PLUS they have government sponsoring in the form of grants.
Electro Energy Gives Senator Lieberman Close-Up Look at Battery Development for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Electro Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: EEEI), a developer and manufacturer of advanced rechargeable batteries, gave Senator Joseph Lieberman a close-up look at the development activities for the Company's advanced rechargeable bi-polar nickel metal hydride batteries which are being applied to plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs).
Senator Lieberman visited the Electro Energy headquarters in Danbury on Monday, July 17, 2006. Martin G. Klein, Chairman and Chief Technologist, introduced him to the proprietary bi-polar battery design that Electro Energy has been developing since 1992. Michael E. Reed, CEO, discussed the large commercial markets -- military, utilities, transportation, hybrid vehicles, plug-in hybrid vehicles and power tools -- that the Company is targeting.
Senator Lieberman was one of several Senators and Representatives who test-drove Electro Energy's Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle (a modified Toyota Prius) at an event in Washington, D.C. on May 16-17, 2006, sponsored by the Plug-In Hybrid Consortium. The vehicle is powered by Electro Energy's bi-polar NiMH battery and is capable of driving 20 to 25 miles on a single battery charge without using any gasoline, the equivalent of over 100 miles per gallon of fuel economy. Further driving range is possible in the normal hybrid operating mode.
The visit to EEEI headquarters showed Senator Lieberman the broad range of potential the Electro Energy technology presents for greater fuel economy and batteries with more power, less weight, and less cost, as well as greater environmental safety. The Senator serves on several committees related to Electro Energy's technology, including the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Armed Services, Environment/Public Works, and Small Business Committees. He is actively involved in issues such as environment, energy and transportation.
About Electro Energy Inc.
Electro Energy Inc., headquartered in Danbury, Connecticut, was founded in 1992 to develop, manufacture and commercialize high-powered, rechargeable bi-polar nickel-metal hydride batteries for use in a wide range of applications. Its Colorado Springs operation supplies aerospace-grade high quality nickel cadmium batteries and components for satellites, aircraft and other specialty applications. EEEI is also developing high power lithium rechargeable batteries utilizing the Company's proprietary bi-polar design. EEEI has recently acquired significant manufacturing assets near Gainesville, Fla., to accelerate commercialization of its battery technology. For further information, please visit www.electroenergyinc.com.
LOL - "Choo choo boy?" -- Guess it fits. Whatever makes your putter flutter
lol -- that would be the latter.
Toyota's aiming at plug-in hybrids would sure be great for a company and the company's shareholders who happens to be in the battery business. Anybody know where we can find one?
Yeah, but that word used in any other context is considered "macho" by some.
Speaking of "macho" -- I wonder what ol' Beej is up to these days. No news good news? Yeah, that must be it.
Can you imagine this? The President of the US would be deleted for using such egregious language on this stalwart forum.
http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/bush-curses-hezbollahs-actions-at-g-8/20060717081909990004
"Then maybe you should be buying more." Really spiffy response. To the point, pithy. I give it a 9.5
LOL -- Given the facts (?) that we have such dynamic products as to save the world from ruin AND our newest addition to the payroll, I would think we should trade nicely in any market.
I see you drew immediate flak from your favorite admirer. So what else is new? lol
I'm not putting my Lewinsky's on just yet. -- lol
There's that word again -- "delighted". I wonder if anyone ever actually used that word except in "News" releases. I'm "delighted" to see that we have another expense added to the debit sheet.
Next spring, there'll be another reason for a run-up. That would be the hysteria and anticipation of the upcoming Annual Bagholders' Meeting. I'll be buying fresh seatbelts for THAT ride. L-O-L
....no end to it, huh?
Why call for an AGM if ya got nuthin' to say?
Musta had some legal reason for doing it. Maybe we'd lose our status as "most likely to succeed" if there wasn't an official meeting. To put it in Bill's words -- "Ha!"
Oh, I'm sure someone profited as a result of the meeting -- just none of us.
No feedback that I'm aware of, Hash. There has been, however, quite a bit of acid reflux as a result of the apparent lackluster efforts on behalf of our fearless leader.
WHY WOULD THEY CALL AN AGM IF THERE WAS TO BE BAD NEWS?
Better question: If there was no news, (which apparently there wasn't) why have a "Meeting" at all?
That snail trail is getting slimier and smellier.
I believe there's an odor associated with that trail as well.
I had a piece of cheese on my tongue and was waiting with "baited" breath for those results. Carnac couldn't have done any better -- even WITH the mayonnaise jar! lol
One would think that management would be "pleased" and "excited" enough about the meeting that they would be rushing to inform the unwashed masses of the results of said meeting. I guess ya gotta stick around for another 7 or 8 years for that to happen. The ongoing situations with Kunk Long and the pilot plant must have been discussed as well as Sentry and maybe even Pipelink. Anyone else feel like a mushroom?