Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanx man - just spent (wasted) 30 minutes
trying to figure out how to post a BMP on iHub. I'm over matched (LOL)
Couldn't find it or I'd cut-n-paste a snapshot of it for the board's perusal. IHDR's chart showing diffy, that is.
Right now I've got to get back to trading. I'm in ANDW (bought it due to it making the diffy list) and BKHM (ditto). Volume just came in on ANDW in the last two minutes. Gotta run....
Nice little turn on IHDR, too.
Imperial Whazoo
How so?
November 1 is my birthday. I could not think of a better birthday present to MOI!!
Imperial Whazoo
From a charting vantage point
the 200 day ema is the next level of support below the present price (Assuming that most MMs and players will use the 20 day, 50 day and 200 day, at a minimum). It is at .1567 (the 200 day EMA). The SMA is the usual case though, since most traders & MMs use the 20 day SMA (.1742), the 50 day SMA (.1254), and the 200 day SMA (.1828). Frankly, price is hovering just below the 20 day SMA and if you subscribe to the thinking that it needs to actually separate itself from a moving average, then it actually is at support on the 20 day at the present time. Thats what I think. I always throw up a 200 day EMA because, with the 200 day, I subscribe to the idea that the way the EMA is weighted vs the SMA is smoothed out in the 200 day range.
If you use a standard Bollinger (20 & 2), then it constricted on 10/4 and it fully expanded... now it is in the process of coming back to a more constricted pattern. Some people play the constriction points. I haven't studied it for this stock & I think that Ballinger is too loosy goosy to work one way all the time.... it seems to vary on a stock by stock basis in my observation. As for my Bollinger settings, I use David Elliott's thinking on this and use 11 & 1 (he actually uses 10 & .8, but AIQ, which I use for charting realtime, doesn't accomodate fractions). So, using Bollinger at 11 & 1, the lower line is either going to serve as a guide that funnels price further down or it is going to serve as a snapback, pulling the candle back to consolidation for the moment. I have no crystal ball but I expect the latter.
My own indicator is proprietary to me. I call it the diffy at the moment but if I publish it, I'll have to rename it probably. Diffy is kind of daffy, I'd say (LOL). Anyway, it is a momentum indicator that charts the difference between intraday momentum and interday momentum on the same stock. It is very strong on IHDR, showing that IHDR will probably turn and do another upleg soon. When (or even if) this will happen, it does not show. My diffy doesn't tell time... it only takes the temperature, as it were. I use my diffy only to create watch lists of candidate stocks that bear close scrutiny for the immediate future. IHDR made that list solidly today based on my proprietary diffy indicator, which I absolutely tell you is my own opinion... period. Do your own DD & decision making, man. I'm just telling you why I am strongly watching IHDR to make another charge to the upside sometime soon. It made my diffy list and it made it strongly.
So, my thinking is that there is no reason to worry at present. Watch like a hawk. Accumulate if it suits you. Not to worry, IMHO.
Thanx man
Imperial Whazoo
Thanx Pennimon
Thanx very very much much, redman,
GLTY
Imperial Whazoo
Thanx for the kind PM and for this post. Nice thinking, man. Well done. Right on top of it.
Imperial Whazoo
thanx aliengel
Imperial Whazoo
Thanx man -
I'll try to check it out. To be honest, I seldom watch TV, and never when trading. Do you think there will be a web link we can play to see the thing to which you refer?
You've been kind and helpful. GLTY & keep it between the white lines.
Imperial Whazoo
Excellent post again, 1stepahead1 -
You are one on target guy. Well done.
Imperial Whazoo
Thanx man - Finally, somebody discusses something associated with the issue.
Here's my question: since IHDR spent 500 thousand for exclusive rights to the EU, what in the heck are the non-exclusive worldwide rights about? Is that all worldwide rights except EU or is the idea that HYFS will have rights to commercialize in the EU? Like I said early on, I think this statement from the May 10 PR is loose: "The license grants to HYFS a world-wide non-exclusive right to commercialize the CAVD technology and to manage the previous agreement with Internal Hydro International." OK, what is the effect and what is the extent? Like I said earlier, I was not aware of the non-exclusive worldwide rights and the management of IHDR's existing agreement until 1stepahead1 posted post #2479. If I owned either of these companies, maybe I'd already know, but I don't follow them and I can't email them asking questions as though I'm a shareholder. I'm not and I don't intend to lie by pretending to be a shareholder just to obtain a better understanding. My thought was that, this being a discussion board, maybe it would be fruitful to ask it of others participating on the board.
Apparently... NOT!! (LOL!!)
Thanks for this help your reply gave. I hope somebody who follows these companies can offer something helpful in way of explaining the limitations of the May 10 PR... what is commercialization? Who is responsible for commrcialization in the EU? What exactly is covered by the management of the existing IHDR agreement.... that kind of thing. As I do not follow these companies, I am not informed regarding them specifically. I was not even aware, until post 2479, that IHDRs arrangement was subject to the May 10 agreement. That was news to me and I thought it worth discussing.
Best wishes etcetera...
Imperial Whazoo
I have wondedred the same thing myself.... any Russian Engineer sightings in Tyler or Oklahoma recently?
Imperial Whazoo
Hey penni - What are million plus members?
Imperial Whazoo
Right on futrcash.
Imperial Whazoo
tchauncy -
Even despite the paucity of info and even if it is impossible to obtain, I'd still like to know about the rig for Romania. Just an update would be helpful. Is it still in the US? Is it on the high seas? Is it in Europe? Just knowing is worth something, even if its just to tell us that, like the Army, its hurry up and wait.
Anyway, thats my humble opinion.
Imperial Whazoo
Bingo Residuum1 -
Right on topic. It is simply a fact that I am tired of IHDR insulting people. Your link lays out the raodmap. I'm trying to tear it up and toss it in the trash.
I trade for a living. Thats all I do. I am a professional daytrader and I think that those of us like myself deserve better discussions than we all were subjected to today. I believe that Teddy Roosevelt had it right. Walk softly and carry a big stick. I will never initiate insulting attacks on anyone, but I will fight back if attacked because I am an honest man and I have investments to protect. I want to discuss things in an adult fashion with other knowledgable adults. And thats what I pay for.
I pay for iHub. I own IHDR. I believe it is a genius idea. I thought the matter of exclusive rights vs. non-exclusive rights that was the subject matter of the discussion IHDR broached in his post #2477 deserved to be further discussed. I still do. If I thought the place for discussions was Raging Bull, I'd be over there. I'm not. My goal (in part) is to keep this place from becoming another Raging Bull. One of the first things we need to do to keep this from descending into the slime is to make a conscious effort to stop the insults. Thats why I made that the subject matter of my posts here today: Stop attacking.
I think we will all have a better board if we treat each other with more respect. I know that sounds trite, but its true. If people feel free to comment without fear of being attacked, you'd be surprised how valuable a board can become. Thats why I kept asking IHDR to please quit attacking me. And quit attacking everyone else. Quit attacking. We'll have a better board and everybody will benefit.
Imperial Whazoo
And by the way, the only child involved in this debate is you.
Grow up, John. This isn't your board. All of us who own stock have the right to post here and those of us who pay to do so have the right to expect more than your petty insults.
Imperial Whazoo
We do have a great product.
OK John - This is on topic:
1.) you state in your post #2477 that IHDR paid WESCO a one-time license fee of $500,000 for exclusive rights to deploy WESCO's Catalytic Activated Vacuum Distillation (CAVD) technology in the European Union.
2.) 1stepahead1 posts #2479 which is a link to a PR on the following site ( http://www.usenergyic.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=archivecategory&year=2006&mo.... )
that contains this exact wording: "May 10, 2006: US Energy Initiatives Corporation (OTCBB: HYFS) ("US Energy" or the "Company"), manufacturer of a patent dual fuel diesel to natural gas conversion technology, today announced the Company has acquired a world wide non-exclusive license agreement for the Catalytic Activated Vacuum Distillation (CAVD) technology"
Now, post #2477 by you and post #2479 by 1stepahead1 were part of a discussion, one post being a reply to the other. So, here I am, trying to join in the discussion on a discussion board. I ask a decent, reasonable, uncombative question ... and then I spent the rest of my posts today defending myself against your meanness. Exclusive rights to the EU and non-exclusive world rights... hmmmm, sounds to me like an interesting subject for discussion. Here I am, just a dumb investor, and I am so dumb that I think that two posts on a subject on a discussion board might mean it is a subject wirth discussing. How stupid of me.
The general idea of a discussion board is for people to feel free to openly discuss things amongst themselves. All of us could act in isolation sending independent emails (like sagan and other suggested I do) to the company and shepherding the answers like they were precious jewels, but thats not the idea of a discussion board. The idea is for people to raise a subject and then for other people to join in in an adult discussion. If people are going to get insulted by you when they actually try to do this very thing, you are destroying the value of this board, and since I pay iHub to keep up with stocks I own, you are stealing from me the value of what I pay for. I spend my good money to be able to talk about the stocks I own and I deserve to have the right to do so without being insulted for trying to do so. When you insult people, you frighten people off from sharing their thoughts because most people aren't willing to stand up for themselves when bullies (who think the board is their private domain) attack them for doing the very thing a discussion board is designed to do. You are undermining the intrinsic value I deserve to derive from this board because people are unwilling to endure your insults just to try to have an adult discussion with others who don't insult them.
Now, to return to the two posts in question: I was only joining into a discussion on a discussion board on a subject you had personally raised. If you don't want it discussed on a discussion board, what the ever loving blue eyed heck are you doing raising the subject in the first place? And once you have raised it, what right on God's green earth do you have attacking people who think the subject is worth inquiring about?
The Energy Commander is a revolutionary product. I think it is genius. When you treat your fellow posters like you treated me today, you are creating discord on this board, the net effect of which is to damage an otherwise superb company. I don't want the value of my investment to go down. Given the considerable size of the positions of the participants of this board, it is fair to say that you could foolishly undermine the value of IHDR's shares by fomenting discord and its accompanying doubts. If it is your plan to do this very thing, and to swoop in and buy the shares from weaker hands, then you have, by your insults to me today, created an committed opponet on this and every other board I encounter you on. You have no right to screw with my investment simply to feed your petty vanity. You are acting like you have rights that are superior to the other posters on this baord. At the very least, you have no right to post your post (#2477), only to attack people who take you up on trying to discuss it.
If you don't want something talked about, don't post on the subject. Like they say in these parts, "Sit down bus driver. Sit down, shut up, and drive the bus." You are the moderator, not the mind police, John. Try acting like a decent human being. Respect your fellow posters. They deserve it. And so does IHDR. Its a good company with a genius idea that looks like it could change a lot of things we have all come to take for granted. Quit damaging the board. Its not yours. You've done a huge amount, but that does not give you special rights.
Peace is best created when respect reign in men's hearts.
Imperial Whazoo
Where is this investors paradise?
Imperial Whazoo
Thats better. At least you didn't insult me this time. Well done. There may be hope for you yet.
And, also, perhaps an answer and/or explanation to the puzzle presented by the two quotes.
Hey, I've got an idea... why not just apologize, admitting that my being offended by being accused of needing medication might just be a little bit justified? Interesting idea, don't you think CHICKEN MAN?
Cockadoodledo! I really am a hilarious guy aren't I, CHICKEN MAN?
Imperial Whazoo
This question then is not a waste of this board's time
So let me state my question once more.
Lets review, shall we:
In post #2477 you posted the following:
"Pursuant to the Letter of Intent (LOI), Internal Hydro has agreed to enter into a definitive agreement, pursuant to which it shall pay WESCO a one-time license fee of $500,000 for exclusive rights to deploy WESCO's Catalytic Activated Vacuum Distillation (CAVD) technology in the European Union. A $100,000 down payment on the initial licensing fee has been paid to WESCO by Internal Hydro. The agreement will also provide for WESCO to be paid a continuing royalty of $100,000 for each European country in which Internal Hydro intends to establish an operational CAVD plant. In addition, Internal Hydro will pay WESCO a one-time license fee of $250,000 per state for rights to deploy the technology in Alabama and West Virginia, as well as a royalty stream equal to 5% of gross revenue per plant (projected at $5.2 million per year in gross revenue), excluding carbon credits and tire tipping fees."
Then, in reply, 1stepahead1 posted #2479 drawing my attention to the following link:
http://www.usenergyic.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=archivecategory&year=2006&mo...
which contains the following:
"Tampa, FL - May 10, 2006: US Energy Initiatives Corporation (OTCBB: HYFS) ("US Energy" or the "Company"), manufacturer of a patent dual fuel diesel to natural gas conversion technology, today announced the Company has acquired a world wide non-exclusive license agreement for the Catalytic Activated Vacuum Distillation (CAVD) technology from EarthFirst Technologies, Inc., (OTCBB: EFTI).
Under the terms of the license, US Energy shall issue 1,000,000 restricted common shares to be held by EFTI or distributed amongst the EFTI shareholders of record. In addition, US Energy shall pay a fee of 5% of revenues of all sales related to the licensed technology. The license grants to HYFS a world-wide non-exclusive right to commercialize the CAVD technology and to manage the previous agreement with Internal Hydro International. "
I applauded 1sepahead1 for a nice piece of DD, for making me aware of something I was unaware of in my post #2480. At this point, you attacked me. I objected and resisted your ugliness and your reply was to attack and attack and attack. You see, this is a discussion board and 1stepahead1 made me aware, by that post, of something that might be important and that was entirely consistent with the spirit of a well run board. For having had the audacity to observe that the quoted material raises a question or two, you ultimately assert I need both medication and anger management. These are personal insults and personal attacks.
In the mean time, you have deflected attention from explanations that investors deserve. I refuse to shut up in the face of your insults. If you want to continue to insult me, go ahead. If you are determined to undermine your credibility, who am I to stand in your way? Go ahead and attack me one more time. I pay for my right to post and I have even asked you to please stop. You are out of control.
Quit attacking me for asking a question on a discussion board. The only basher on this board is you... you are bashing me personally in unwarranted personal attacks. I do not need anger management. I do not need medication. I need you to quit acting like a bully, so I'll ask you once again: please stop attacking me for daring to ask a reasonable question.
You are acting badly and you should stop. Like I said before: now would be a good time.
Now, as regards your most recent insipid comment, I trust that this post is not being read by only me.
Imperial Whazoo
Oh well, I'm wasting my time reasoning with you... pearls before swine.
Imperial Whazoo
Couldn't resist another attack, eh?
Now I'm in need of my medication? Lets see... a bulletin board bully fails in an attempt to bully someone else... so he next decides to attack that guy for the guy's manner of speaking.... attacking his choice of words... repeatedly. Then, if that idiot has the stupidity to actually stand up for himself, attack him again and again. Then, if the guy sticks to his guns and actually has the audacity to enunciate an intelligent opinion, such as my idea that this is supposed to be a friendly discussion board... and here's the clincher... if the idiot is so stupid that he actually says "Please stop attacking".... you see, to use the word "Please" is a sign of weakness... an indication of the need to be medicated.... Attack CHICKEN MAN... Attack!!!
That’s a crime, you know.... defending yourself and arguing for a friendly board. Yeah... anyone defending themselves against unjustified meanness by the bully of a board needs to be medicated. I stand back in awe, CHICKEN MAN. Nice piece of mean spirited ugliness. Nice technique...Very well done, man. Bravo! "Attack man... attack!! That Imperial Whazoo... he's stepped out of line... he needs to be medicated because he objects to being attacked." Very impressive, CHICKEN MAN... When I get grown, I want to be just like you.
I'm being schooled by a master, so let me see if I've got the routine down: If some guy is a decent fellow, complying in this case with the spirit of a discussion board... I'll attack him. Yeah, that’s the game plan.... can't have anybody with an independent mind on this board. If he objects to being stabbed in the back for the horrible crime of actually trying to think independently, I'll attack him again, and again and again. What I'll do is insult his choice of words, lampoon him for saying something in a way I think wrong.... that usually works. Then (and this is the really sicko part) I'll accuse him of needing medication... you know, a mental problem of some kind. You see, anyone who has an independent mind or demonstrates a propensity to think for himself... such a person obviously needs medication.
Yessirrebob... when I get grown, I want to be just like you CHICKEN MAN. The jack booted thuggery of the mind police.
Peace man...
Cockadoodledo!! (LOL)
Imperial Whazoo
Yes. Running interference. Finding things out. Digging out truth. Choose any wording you like that conveys the basic idea that you have done an excellent job of being a go between with the company. Having gone to such lengths to have established your credentials in this regards, you can't very well object if you are viewed in that way by folks on this board.
So, attack me because I say "loosy-goosy". Then attack me because I say "running interference". Attack attack attack, IHDR. Cut it out. Are you just intent on challenging me time and time again for daring to say "Stop attacking me? Stop being unfriendly, please?" Which phrase are you going to choose to attack me on now?
Get a grip, man.... all I did was point out that the management agreement appears to be in need of explanation. This isn't Raging Bull. This is a discussion board. Stop attacking me for trying to generate a discussion about what I consider a legitimate issue. If people don't want to discuss it, thats fine with me, but you have absolutely no right to attack time time and time again simply because you don't like the question.
Further, since you bask in the glory of your relationship with the company, it seems entirely legitimate to funnel the question thru you. In fact, it even seems respectful of me to treat you as though the work you have done finding things out makes you deserving of deference. What offends me to the very marrow of my bones is that you attack me time and time again for the huge crime of asking a legitimate question on a discussion board and having done so deferentially and thoughtfully.
So, go thru this and my previous posts. Choose any phrase or phrases you wish and attack me time and time again. You are not the mind police, IHDR, and you have no right to attack people because they think differently than you. That, in fact, is the very intention of a discussion board.
Like I make clear herein: if people don't want to pursue the matter of finding out what the phrase means, that is their business, but you have no business attacking me or anyone else simply because you don't approve of the way another man thinks or of the words he chooses. Stop it. Stop attacking. Now would be a good time.
Imperial Whazoo
Running interference on obtaining explanations to unclear matters such as this comes with the territory, IMHO, of being the conduit for info between the company & the board.
To each his own, though. GLTY.
ImperialWhazoo
On the other hand, maybe it is a relatively accurate reflection of my opinion of the following phrase, which deserves explanation:
"and to manage the previous agreement with Internal Hydro International".
It is not even difficult to make the point that this is loosly worded. It is 100% unclear. Furthermore, I spent nearly 35 years as a professional consultant. If I had ever been able obtain a wide open management agreement with absolutely no apparent limitations, I would have thought I had died and gone to heaven. What exactly is being managed here? What limitations? What framework? Reference this matter using any phrasing the warms the cockles of your heart, but as for me, I think each and every shareholder deserves to know more than just that there is an undefined expense related to "management" of IHDR's existing agreement. For heaven sakes, man, what exactly does this mean? Who pays? When? How much? How long? Come on, man, you could drive a fleet of trucks through this thing.
As the conduit of info... and let me at this point complement you.... you have done a fine job in this regard and you deserve abundant recognition.... so, as the EXCELLENT CONDUIT, rather than slapping me for having the wherewithall to spot this "loosy-goosy" phrasing, you need to get on your horse and ride. Find out the answer and get back to us. Waste no time slapping the astute observers on this board, who, like me, are well behaved contributors on this and other boards. If you want to wear the mantle... the chicken hat, as it were... of this board's leader, find stuff like this out and voluntarily refrain from shooting the messenger.
Imperial Whazoo
You need to be less offensive in your replies.
My question was, and is, both well founded and well intended. Further, it was not offensive, did not illustrate my being uninformed, is not bashing, was polite, and was well phrased.
And, I might add, your answer was unnecessarily mean. This is a friendly board. It would behoove you to treat those of us, well adept at posting on this and other boards, with the simple and genuine friendliness that we deserve and that was absent from your reply. And, I might add, that was preesent in my question.
I don't ever slap others for asking such questions and you, in your zeal to promote this company, should refrain from such offensive replies as this one.
I am insulted by your reply and frankly, embarrased to have to point it out.
I am long long long on this stock and regardless of whether you like it, such a question as I asked deserves a better and more friendly answer than you gave. I have a right to be on this and every other board I participate in and you have no built in right to slap me upside the head as though I am stupid just because it is easier for you to do so than for you to treat a question such as this with the diligence it deserves.
Imperial Whazoo
1stepahead1 -
Nice dig man... nice DD. It is in need of a thorough explanation to explain exactly where & how it fits into IHDR agreement. What it looks like is there is an additional 5% fee that covers sales (thus not directly effecting IHDR) but the 5% also covers unspeciafied management services.
To quote: "...US Energy shall pay a fee of 5% of revenues of all sales related to the licensed technology. The license grants to HYFS a world-wide non-exclusive right to commercialize the CAVD technology and to manage the previous agreement with Internal Hydro International."
The totally unclear part is the phrase "and to manage the previous agreement with Internal Hydro International". I am not the sharpest pencil in the pack but that sure sounds loosy-goosy to me!!. IMHO, a full explanation would be reasonable from IHDR the company.
Imperial Whazoo
crossbow - When did he tell you this and
was he referring to anything specific or was he generally saying thet nothing was going on at present at all? there must be something going on. Heck, even I have something going on (LOL)!
For example, I'd like them to tell us about the drilling rig they were transporting to Europe. Has it left? Has it arrived? Has it cleared customs? Where exactly is it? When will it be set up on location to begin being used?
So, does anybody know anything about this? There are plenty of things that would merit a PR that would surely be seen & heard as good news.
So, maybe you guys who have KINGs ear could nudge a status report on the rig out of them. Just a thought...
Thanx
Imperial Whazoo
tchauncy - Its 3 days. I was right in my
understanding but your post on this defense day (yesterday apparently). Does KING hire a firm to perform this service or is it simply interested parties such as the players you refer to in your group who conduct what amounts to a defense? And, if hired by KING, is it standard operating proceedure for pinkies to retain the services of some firm to do this and other similar things throughout the month... on retainer, as it wer like an accounting firm or a law firm?
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
Thanx - Do they use 3 , 5, or 7 days to settle? I assume 3.
Imperial Whazoo
Hey trademe -
forgive my ignorance but what is a CC?
Imperial Whazoo
Tchauncy -
As ever, you are the best educator on any board I've seen. So, would you elaborate on a comment you made regarding monthly bonuses and defending the price on a certain day to maintain those bonuses? I'm in the dark as to the motivations you obviously assume we all understand. I'm afraid I need a picture of what is happening so I can understand your comments and put them into a meaningful context.
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
OK... and what does that mean to the less experienced of us?
Imperial Whazoo
Hey wave,
Wasn't there some some comment yesterday on one of the boardz you frequent as to you being of a particular religious persuasion? Well, judging by your new logo, aren't you a Shaker? (Bad joke, I know, but I couldn't resist)
Anyway, as regards Royal combining with BIGN, I think it is more likely that Hydroslotter and BIGN get together. I'm not putting any money on it, but I'm leaning towards that being one of the surprises to soon show up... ie: the name change to something like Hydroslotter Energy Corp. I do think we'll see Skips little company get combined into Hydroslotter. My guess is that Hydroslotter is tired of working thru others and wants an accelerated path for their technology and they logically see that as one wherein they are in the drivers seat. And, frankly, such an announcement (BIGN /Hydroslotter combo) would really goose the stock price up bigtime! I'd definately favor it. As to its likelihood, thats a crapshoot, but thats my thought on name changes/combos. Anyway, I've been meditating on it for a while, and since you offered up the combining of Royal & BIGN, I thought I'd offer my equally untested idea on the upcoming name change/corporate change. FWIW.
Imperial Whazoo
thanx, man
Its nice that somebody besides me saw the visual here as a positive. 25 cents would be fine with me!!
Imperial Whazoo
I was too tired. all i saw was the chart and thought somebody might be encouraged by the visual. Obviously, I misread you. Some folks always see the glass half empty and seem to delight in being accusatory. Whatever. Sorry I made the horrible mistake of not being 100% impregnable for you. Glad to have offered you my neck. Enjoy, pal, enjoy.
imperial Whazoo
OT: Check out this company with 5 wells
in total: SERG. If these guys can be at 2.50/share with 5 wells, where does that place us in January or February with 5 wells?
Just thought it might help to see a real chart that is another small company that had nothing doing in August only to be over 6X since then.
Imperial Whazoo
As regards what exactly land banks
are, I think (but do not know) that it is more than a new name for an oil company that is building a portfolio of properties. My guess, which I'll have to pursue later, is that some management types in some high brow MBA type setting (professor types or folks who make a living publishing articles and the like) have coined the phrase and it is something "trendy" that is more than just an accumulation of properties. I'm certain there is more to it, but I have not had the time to dig it out. A land bank is something specific and kind of clever or something of the sort. IMHO of course.
Imperial Whazoo
Man wave - you hit one out of the park!
Now, every time I look at your posts I smile. Listen man, post a lot, will ya?. Thats all I've got to say.
You definately buried that insipid Dallas theme... no offense to anybody on that tune... it had its time... but you have, IMHO, put a personality to this board that it hasn't had... and needed!
Tell futrcash to put your little gal on the main BIGN screen. It belongs there, IMHO!! LOLLOLLOL!!
Imperial Whazoo