For those who may have missed this:
Masta, you gave out contact info for the NVSOS that contradicts what you posted. Who did you talk to at NVSOS or did YOU TALK TO THEM AT ALL, because no one at the NVSOS says they put out or gave info to anyone stating that Thomas Megas or anyone on his behalf has paid fees or that Energy Source Inc. is updated.

mastaflash Share Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:30:53 PM
Re: op9171787 post# 135132 Post # of 135195

Why don't you just ask them:


Phone: 702-486-2440
Email: nvsec@sos.nv.gov

We hereby announce our intention of working with The National Government of Papua New Guinea.

Guess that's what's been said all along here..and considering that the PNG Head of Mining and Petroleum's contact info was given here for those that wanted to DD what TM was involved in kinda puts the kabosh on any TM venture.

Let's face it..even if TM had by some snowballs chance in Hades of getting some sort of project going here..all this, which has been going on for years would make it even MORE difficult for a pip squeek shell artist to get things going...but is fertile grounds for a stinky pink scam land unverifiable venture...too bad BCIT will never trade..and even if Sytner gets another shell going (and we all know which one)..it will mean absolutely nothing for BCIT/Energy Source.

Megas/Sytner venture confirmed:

Ok, I read all that malarky..and it confirmed nothing at all, in fact I don't see where it pertains to BCIT at all..and considering this will never trade again removes it light years even further.

BTW, I never claimed to have contacted NVSOS...I provided contact info is all....

umm...That's not quite correct now, is it..

mastaflash Share Friday, May 06, 2011 11:55:28 AM
Re: molson_ice1 post# 135150 Post # of 135254

I have it confirmed myself from multiple sources, it is no lie.

Really??..You called the # at the NVSOS provided by TM's own "spokesman"??..then you would have spoken to a gentleman named Ben who stated that NO FEES HAVE BEEN RECIEVED in regards Energy Source Inc., which they would know NOW especially if it had been paid by credit card as some here claim...and he DID CONFIRM that NOTHING had been filed...and that if ANYONE was claiming different it was FALSE!!
Considering the FACT that it was touted on this board that it was filed (someone posted an email supposedly from TM) 30 days ago..the 5-7 day excuse just don't wash. He mentioned NOTHING about any "upload" time, only stated that it WOULD SHOW HAD IT BEEN FILED.

How is it those FACTS were somehow elluded??

Masta, you gave out contact info for the NVSOS that contradicts what you posted. Who did you talk to at NVSOS or did YOU TALK TO THEM AT ALL, because no one at the NVSOS says they put out or gave info to anyone stating that Thomas Megas or anyone on his behalf has paid fees or that Energy Source Inc. is updated.
mastaflash Share Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:30:53 PM
Re: op9171787 post# 135132 Post # of 135195

Why don't you just ask them:


Phone: 702-486-2440
Email: nvsec@sos.nv.gov

THE NVSOS HAS CONFIRMED THAT NEITHER THOMAS MEGAS NOR ANYONE ON HIS BEHALF HAS PAID ANY FEES IN REGARDS ENERGY SOURCE AND IS IN DEFAULT STATUS AND HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED!

ANY POSTS TO THE CONTRARY IS A BLATANT FALSEHOOD!

Call the NVSOS..they have no record of any update or fees paid and stated if someone is putting out that info IT IS FALSE!
CONTACT INFO

702-486-2440
702-486-2880

THERE IS NO NVSOS UPDATE...IT IS FALSE!..I spoke with the people at NVSOS.

also, I have stated before that the update is meangingless..so it is a good question as to what the Megasites think will happen even if it were updated.

What is disturbing is the false info being posted publicly...and why?

Methinks in my opinion it has something to do with trying to avoid litigation towards the so called "legal fund"..

Masta..for public record..who did you say you spoke with at NVSOS that "confirmed" the update?
You did state on this message board that you had "verified" that info...so tell us your confirmation contact person...

I just got off the phone with NVSOS.

I talked with 3 different people thast could find no update info. The last one I spoke to was "Ben" and he stated per his own words:

"ENERGY SOURCE HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED NOR HAVE THEY PAID THEIR FEES."

I told him someone has been posting on a public message board that the fees were paid weeks ago and he again stated:

"THAT WOULD BE INCORRECT AND IS FALSE INFORMATION".

The numbers I contacted:
702-486-2440
702-486-2880 (Ben)
toll free 1-800-450-8594

BTW..why don't you tell us what you expect to happen that would differ from the last time the NVSOS was updated a few years ago that would get BCIT to trade..and place a bet on that.

I'm willing to bet you would not even make such a bet.

yet you still won't take my bet

That's because nobody cares..try betting something that means something. The NVSOS update (or not) is meaningless..other than in my opinion temporarily warding off the possibility of legal action towards and in regards the "solicitations" that have so far..how shall we say..not lived up to it's stated intent.

And let's hope for the sake of TM and some of his "followers" that the NVSOS update does come thru. I have a "hunch" and it is my opinion that this will delay at best any investigation and possible charges steming from the fact that TM endorsed solicitations sent via U.S.POSTAL SERVICE and INTERNET for the so called "legal fund"..which laid out specific uses for these solicited funds including the updating of filings (for one) after which TM promptly allowed this to be revoked without further action on his part to update filings that was mandated by the SEC. To this date funds are still being solicited without further action by TM to update as required, among other things specified in the solicitations.

IMO this can and will be viewed as fraud, and since the U.S.MAIL as well as internet was used and endorsed for such purposes..we are talking about a serious matter.

I'm guessing that updating the NVSOS is the most innocuous action that can be taken in view of the 2 year limits coming up, and IMO will be done to keep charges and investigations at bay..for the time being anyway.

What I would still like to know and think all shareholders should question is exactly who paid the fees to update the NVSOS if in fact it is updated. If TM's credid card was used as stated, was he reimbursed by anyone..and if so...who.

Point is, regardless of TM's status or umm, "non-status", some will always be around to try and perpetuate what was started..why, one would ask?..because the SEC/DTCC shut down this scam before it could run it's course, and in the stinky pinky world, an unrun course is money left on the table..and true scam artists will ALWAYS try to find a way to try and "resurect" an unrun course, futile or not.

..and futile it is, as the fact is this will never trade..all that we shareholders can do is pursue and wait for justice against those who perpetrated this scam..and not be distracted by bogus ploys to the contrary.

I wouldn't be here if I didn't think so.

mastaflash Share Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:55:26 PM
Re: mretgnol post# 134566 Post # of 135081

Megas has been dead for 6 years, and you didn't know it?

I am very confident you will be hearing from TM again someday.

mastaflash Share Friday, December 10, 2010 1:00:07 PM
Re: op9171787 post# 133466 Post # of 135057

I'm confident we will hear...but when?...no clue.

mastaflash Share Wednesday, February 02, 2011 12:28:53 PM
Re: molson_ice1 post# 134011 Post # of 135056

Do you have any info that the rest of us are not privy to or simply leaning on good faith? - [i]Mostly faith at this point.

when we`ll be current with NVOS , this won`t be a typo, but a fact.Enjoy with it and upcoming events :)

?? Not sure what that's supposed to mean..but anyway, please tell us in detail what you expect to happen that will differ from last time.

That is correct..the NVSOS status, updated or not, makes no difference as far as trading status..it simply means somebody paid the fees just like they did a few years ago when nothing happened(except that it coincided with the solicitations for donations to the so called "legal fund") and was allowed to lapse..again.

Other than that..this remains revoked, shares are not registered, and filings are out of compliance,..,which appears entirely deliberate.

Those posters want us to believe that Megas is responsible for the failure of the SFC to address shareholder issues.

Umm..wrong again..the SFC DID NOT FAIL to address shareholder issues..they investigated the facts and relegated this to where is belongs..TM's response..or should we say lack of professionalism in the "wanker" letter simply cemented his status to where is belonged..the bottom of the "whackjob" barrel..along with a few others.

Never has the SFC inferred that the "wanker" letter single handedly put the "kobosh" on the investigation...the investigation itself did that, as the facts did not support what the Megasites were trying to pull off. The wanker letter simply cemented this to where it already had been relegated, not to mention the true character of the author.

Funny how everybody and anybody that looks into this can figure out what's what in regards BCIT, which always directly contradicts the Megasites assertions...huh...odd indeed.

The bottom line. It all comes down to the FACT that the DTCC's stock borrow program allowed Brokers,Hedge funds , and Market Makers and anyone else who sells shares of BCIT stock without owning it or borrowing it, to happen

NO it's not the "bottom line" or any line for that matter in regards BCIT, and as long as you keep asserting that falsehood I will rebuff it..all those shares you refer to as NSS in regards BCIT were per TM's own admission "issued" shares and therefore by very nature cannot possibly be NSS...the real bottom line is we got pump n dumped, not NSS'd. If there is a problem with NSS in the U.S. markets, it is NOT related to BCIT.

The DTCC is ultimately responsible and will be held responsible.

No. TM already took responsiblity for the shares you call NSS and deemed them "issued" shares and made them part of the o/s, but did not nor does not appear to want to register them and would rather have this revoked.

Anybody who naked shorted BCIT needs to be worried because Justice is coming and they will be held accountible. The long arm of the law will be grabing the bad guys very soon.

You may die of old age before you understand this, but "issued" shares cannot be NSS, and those that ISSUED certs are the ones that have to worry. But as long as TM does not register those shares he covered and stays revoked, it won't be dealt with either..nor can the DTCC allow unregistered shares to trade...and it's pretty clear TM allowed this to be revoked and would rather have this revoked than deal with this.
Somewhere somehow a flicker in the ole lightbuld should be happening by now..it's been 6 years.

Have a great holiday weekend.

Again, you are making stuff up. The reality is the SFC investigated the FACTS instead of following the Megasites effort to blind them with BS assertions that didn't match the facts...and the people looking into this were professionals and experts with astute abilities way beyond what this stinky pink scam deserved...at TAXPAYER EXPENSE!

I'm guessing whoever the constituent(s) were that pulled the "favor" card to get the SFC's ear on this pretty much relegated themselves to the bottom of the "whackjob" barrel for good...and I'm guessing TM's "wanker" letter affirmed and cemented that status...just say'in is all.

Have a fantastic holiday!

That's about as factual as your posts concerning TM in PNG which you have yet to follow up on with the contact information provided you.

In reality, there was more than one on the SFC committee investigating this and they were fully versed and informed with facts, and acted accordingly..hence the unprofessional wanker letter from TM which showed the true character of the author.

This mass conspiracy and "everybodies an idiot" that does not agree with the Megasites is getting old..especially regarding the fact that virtually everybody and every entity looking into this disagrees with the Megasites and sees this for what it is.

Have a great holiday weekend.

We were passed for trading by everyone except the DTC and they made a series of demands ,

In case you have not noticed, this was revoked, not passed for trading by any entity...and those "demands" you claim the DTC made has never been corroborated by anyone except..geee..Megas!..who's credibility is less than zero based on past "performance".

Let's face it.. considering this is a stinky pink the DTCC and SEC acted quicker than normal to shut this down..and what they shut down according to TM's own filings was not NSS, but the dumping of "issued" shares/certs that were not registered..that TM covered and took responsibility for.

Any way one tries to twist this, and we've seen it all in the last 6 years..it all comes back to "what were BCIT insiders up to during the dump and what association did TM have in regards...and TM would rather have this revoked than deal with this.

Have a good nite.

Ummm..what did you say or imply "Pammy" was charged with? Funny how time can distort facts..and TM did try to make a backroom deal with Pino...his associate at the time..that's a fact.

Here's a good summation of the FACTS.

clarity789 Share Tuesday, March 31, 2009 5:47:05 PM
Re: mastaflash post# 117635 Post # of 134994

Both Pino and Thompson were charged by the SEC for failing to register the BCIT securities they created.

Megas created nearly 800 million BCIT securities - and failed to register them.

Very simple logic here...

the DTC has a lot of 'splanin' to do...

No they don't...TM has the ONUS of some 'splanin to do, but guess what..he'd rather have this stock revoked and reside outside jurisdiction... so who's "bull'in" who??..it's pretty obvious.

People wanted to buy this shell in 2005. Why?

Are you talking about the backroom deals TM was trying to make with his assiociates such as Pino?

and fear Mr. Megas. Maybe they should not have passed bad certs, shorted this stock, or aided people in those two actions.

You seem a little confused here...even TM never refers to any "shorting"..but rather "issued" shares, which means they cannot possibly be NSS...not to mention, do you know what insiders were up to regarding so called "certs" in '05 and what association TM in regardes?..and I highly doubt anyone fears TM..but methinks someone hiding in PNG is in fear.

Oh, and I can assure you the DTCC had absolutely nothing to do with the aforementioned..they and the SEC simply halted it, as they should.

Six years and still looking under the wrong rock, huh.

Have a great day.

Pump..as in it will be used to solicit funds just like last time it happened couple years ago..only this time it appears to serve the duel purpose of fending off legal action in regards those same solicitations via U.S.MAIL..for the moment anyway...

..and we all knew this obvious ploy was coming.

If I were someone that had shorted this or passed a bad cert and they are obvious fakes, then I would be on the hook for that and terribly afraid if this ever traded again

Hmmm, TM covered those shares and then allowed this to be revoked...kinda fits huh?

later,

BCIT is not a scam....

Umm..I hate to break this to you but it is...a proven one..and maybe that's where your confusion begins.

..so allow me to give you your own advise..BCIT is revoked and will never trade again..and that is out of your control.

As for me, I'm simply here as a shareholder to expose the truth in regards BCIT, which is what we shareholders are entitled to..and those that have a problem with that..well, speaks for itself.

gotta go,
have a great day.

Considering BCIT is among the "99%" of those scams...it IS a problem.

Then allow me to enlighten...BCIT is a scam, that's a negative.

Reporting and exposing facts on a negative is a positive.

Wanting to continue or supporting an existing negative, is a negative.

I'll use a different perspective or analogy inre BCIT..if your kids were having trouble in a particular environment (i.e. school etc) with drug users that were ruining the entire environment, should they take the drug users advice to "chill, relax, don't be so negative..go with the flow etc"...or do something POSITIVE to mitigate the environment? You tell me.

We as shareholders need to demand accountability from the CEO and full exposure of the truth as to what went on, especially in regards insider activity in '05, NOT more of the same, as some would like you to believe.

Any questions?

Have a great day

Yeah, that's why he allowed this to be revoked and ran..

We were even informed to seek our shares when Megas announced in filings that INVALID shares existed. That obviously ment NSS postions were sold since all fraudulent shares created were settled in Oklahoma.

Better read those filings again...he covered ALL the supposed NSS shares and called them "issued"..which means they can't possibly be NSS..and means every arguement and idea you have been putting forth is invalid..legally and otherwise. One can argue around that for another 6 years with the same exact result we have now.
In other words our shares weren't stolen..we were dumped on..the filings prove that.

..oh and BTW...why don't you ask TM why he didn't register those shares he covered and made part of the O/S...think about that.

So what. Ignoring and dodging the real issues and truth has been going on for almost 6 years by a few shareholders in TM's "camp"...and those issues won't be ignored..even though some will have the American right to remain silent...

Odd..I did not see one word of factual truth in regards BCIT..maybe you could provide that for us line by line.


I'll check back later
have a great day.

He could make all this go away over night...just dissolve the company. So I put it too you...why has he not done that?


Been discussed before...it would open a can of worms for TM/INSIDERS..here's a hint for just one tiny example...think of the last PR and what was solicited via U.S.MAIL and what the repercusions would be if this would have been "dissolved" after that..think of that for starters and then think back even farther....in fact I'd say the latest move involving the NVSOS was in part to deter any legal action in regard..just say'in is all.

i am saying his coporate MO does not seem to be one of just randomly getting things done unconnected to a larger agenda.

From a factual historical perspective, that statement appears to be totally inaccurate, on more levels than one.

Have a great weekend.