Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
snowcrow, the statement released by OMDA stating that the stock issued to Lanza was invalid, if accurately worded makes me wonder. If OMDA's stock issued for payment of debt is ruled invalid, isn't that a problem for OMDA?
badrguy, I think you are on to something here with the alias. On your post about Barry's info, Quincy was listed. This is very close to Southie and "Whitey's Gang". Maybe Barry has done some financial work for them. Keep up your searching, maybe you'll find Whitey. All others, just refer to my previous post to badrguy.
badrguy, every time you make a post you strengthen my position on BDGR. Thank you.
That must be a reluctant yes. That's good to know.
I just hope you continue to post after the audit.
badrguy, I know more about Barry but unless he were to give permission, I will not pass it on. That it why I suggested you call him at BDGR and ask him.
I am glad to see some calm has come back to the board. I would prefer to see all participate. For me, the opposing viewpoint gets me to prove my points, so I find it beneficial, and if I can keep it amusing, I will. Life is too serious to take seriuosly. Some history from me on my involvement with the Dragon. I was told about the stock from a former business associate who lives in Vegas(fits right in to BDGR) who discovered it on a recommendation by Henry Weingarten( newsletter). I bought in from .3-.4 over a year ago. The stock went over $2 in the spring on many of those RM fairy tales, along with RedChips' paid promoting. I sold more than half at $2. The only problem being, I did not sell all of it and bought back in much too soon. From the start, I believed the environment for these kind of companies was right, as someone else has stated " with the proper management". If Barry had not been brought on, I would have exited with my losses late last year. I am "betting" on his ability to pull this off and I know there is a lot on the plate to pull off( or try to remove). In court, anything is possible, but I believe the "professional plaintiff" Barnett at OMDA is not going to get anywhere. From a paradoxical standpoint, I think Barnett got involved with a person(Lanza) who knew the game better than he did, but we will see. badrguy, if you want to know Barry's background, get a hold of him and ask, he will probably tell you. By the way, OMDA has issued about 300,000,000 more shares recently, probably to pay for the lawyers, certainly not to increase production. To all, a good weekend and patience with BDGR, my intent is to have a happy ending with BDGR when I go to Vegas in April.
Local, Thanks, in trader lingo, light sweet vs. sour heavy. Which one separates from the water faster? I would guess the one with the lower sp.gr.
Local, thanks, the "crude" way to separate the water and oil is obviously done because there is very little cost, just time involved. Just curious, what is the sp.gr. of the crude in that area? I would imagine it varies based on the type of crude.
Now back to reality, can someone explain to me the process for separation when a mixture of water and oil is pumpedou of a well? How and where is it done? Also, it has been stated that after an initial flow the content of water in a well increases, what is the reason for this? Is it agitation in the ground or other factors? Thanks.
badrguy, do not comment on what you do not know, barry m. is far from a low-life and frankly some of your assumptions are just self serving. Try to produce facts to discuss.
Badrguy, bingo you answered your own "weak" connection. If Lanza sold the properties to BDGR that disavows BDGR. If BDGR acquired property that Lanza did not own then BDGR has a problem with Lanza, likewise the supposed issue for OMDA. The connection is Lanza not BDGR, the liability rests with Lanza. Also, stating information from a press release from omda does not carry a lot of weight. I would like to access court documents. Everyone seems to be avoiding the issue of OMDA's viability. Let's have some discussion on that, it does have some bearing on the validity of the lawsuit.
The "connection" with BDGR seems weak at best. It appears that the "professional plaintiff"(the nicest name I can give) Mr. Barnett added BDGR at a later date for an unknown reason(no speculation please). The post stating the termination of SHWJ as an operator of properties begs the question, what properties, who is the operator then and now, where are the financial reports stating this, and does Barnett make good french fries? The lawsuit is against Lanza and possibly SHJW. Throwing BDGR in could be the result of OMDA assuming that Lanza then sold the same supposed properties to BDGR. I can see no stock connection with all these "notes & conv." Lanza was given Pref.Stock by BDGR which was announced recently that it was extinquished. That means eliminated. OMDA issued pref.stock to certain individuals for payment of assets. The judge called this invalid. If this is a accurate word from the court, this is significant. What I think you have here is two related but different events. Please apply the same due diligence here that many of you have done with Black Dragon and not OMDA
Is there a way to get the court ruling of this online? I do not trust press releases.
Dragon, adam makes joe look like an angel, maybe a fallen angel, but still an angel. If you look at the lack of info of omda and what is known, the dragon looks like an angel also. Anyone want 2.5 billion shares of stock.
For those of you worrying about OMDA(omog) and adam barnett, here is something to whet your appetite on the rock he crawled out from under. http://www.biotechmedics.com/page13.html
Camera Turret, has any of your detractors contacted you to debate your points?
The numbers are at the auditor's and will be finished in approximately three weeks depending upon the schedule of the auditor. I do agree with part of your statement - This company "was" a scam.
Offaly Oil, I had the pleasure of having lunch with Barry, Tbird, and CT yesterday. I knew going in that I would not learn any great revelations on the company except in one area and that was the opportunity to meet the person that possibly had the opportunity of making BDGR a legitimate company. Few of us ever have the ability to meet with any of the people of the companies that we might invest in and all the more important here was the fact that the person here at this company has much more potential influence than Immelt at GE. So, I was looking more at personality than content. Barry is a very sharp, connected guy that knew going in there were issues. It was part of the reason he was brought in. I also get the feeling that once he got there, he discovered that more effort would be needed than believed, but this is not unexpected in this type of business situation. Putting the pieces back together, in the proper way, has taken more time than the timelines put out over the last few months. This has caused much understandable frustration on the message board, but this is business. I get the impression that Barry's intention is not a quick fix, but a basis for improvement that can be carried forward by the company. I've worked in manufacturing (chemical business) for years and I would have put Barry above 90% of the people that were in charge of those companies. He is aware of the people issues and aware of the company issues. You can not fix a company without dealing with all the issues and I believe he is trying to do that. My wife accuses me of making decisions based on my first impressions of people but she will also agree that I am very rarely deceived. Barry is straightforward, honest, and what I believe is needed for this company. BDGR and its shareholders are very fortunate to have him there. Just my thoughts.
Badrguy, thanks for your homage, you're really coming around.
Seriously, I am surprised that Red Chip would announce any target based on their prior conclusions ($4-$7). Maybe you can add the two together and divide by two. I would guess that any number they put out would be conservative based on their past riveting analysis on BDGR. They did less homework than I did and they were getting paid to do it. Maybe that's the problem. I based my guess on comparable numbers with other legitimate companies listed on the exchanges. Now I agree that the word legitimate has a big influence on that price. Hope that explains it.
Speaking of relevent issues. Nigeria is beginning to squeeze the oil markets, declaring that shipments may not be met. Joe must be stealing Nigeria's oil too.
Actually I am being factual. Also to badrguy, I do believe the SEC does not have restrictions on him, but that was told to me by another person who contacted them. Although, I do think he is reliable. But many of you are not paying attention to what is relevent and beneficial for BDGR. That is, unless you do not want that to be.
I believe my point here is that he was not convicted of Securities violations.
I am short term bullish on oil prices, world demand and geopolitical factors bode well for oil. Longer term the threats to higher oil prices are world recession and price. Oil prices that rise too quickly will generate alternatives that will correct the price of oil. But we do have politicians that are bullish for oil due to their inherent ability to do the wrong things. Good article and at these prices for oil, oil properties and rights are an interesting investment when managed the right way.
And who is going to believe Red Chip at this point. It does not seem that they ever did their homework.
I hope it is times 5.
CT , I'm worried, you are beginning to spell like Dragon
Hey Dragon, the first time I can understand or agree with you. Any company with that many shares has a problem. Keep up the good work.
If they are investors in the company, they are not looking out for their own interests.
You're missing the point of the news release and its meaning in relation to Wooldridge and extinquish.
ENY has denied that they are in negotiations with BDGR.
By the way Trooper, no one was ever convicted of being a stock promoter associated with this company.
I know who Wooldridge is and I know what "extinquished" means. I was asking if all of you know. Obviously, most of you do not. Keep on trying though.
There are some interesting aspects of the latest two reports if you look into the wording and details, especially last evenings. Wooldridge(who is Wooldridge), Convertible notes fully "extinquished". What is the meaning of extinquished and is this a prelude of what is to come? Doing homework here helps.
Let's here some more old stories from the doomsdayers. It is the new stories that you should worry about.
badrguy, if Barry was hired by Lanza, doesn't that give the indication that he was trying to rectify the situation at the company? If you are running a pump and dump or a scam, you do not want outsiders involved.
Offaly oil, if you believe BDGR is not a scam, but a real company with assets and potential, you cannot buy enough at this price level. At present, the company is priced for failure. Many posts that have been made here have been made by individuals without real facts, just their own desires to meet their endpoint. If you have done your homework, you will make the right decision. Good luck on your choice.
EnerNorth Industries.
Camera, are you buying more? I would like to be on the board.
Camera, Carl, in Vegas, definitely needs some good news with Black Dragon's Little Darlings.