Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Maybeeeee.... "D. B. Cooper Shells" ?? ... its kind of catchy...right?
This is hard to hear.... It reminds me of when I turned 4...
...My parents told me that i had accomplished nothing of value.. It really screwed me up.
Well, I guess not everyone can be as successful as a guy that's confounded 2 public companies...
Seriously the best gut laugh Ive had all week.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171659682
Like a divine epiphany.... It is suddenly obvious to me my friend.
You - I - the Mohave desert ...and peyote.
The entire world is counting on us for the answers.
Getting Deep in here...
The "Big Dump at this mornings bell was planned the day before.... There were many small buys running it up to .036 (the previous day) all done so the seller would have eager bids to "sell in to" at the opening bell this AM...(who ever couldn't see that one coming should not be trading)
Today's average PPS was .0278... So, the comment about (this mornings seller) missing out on a "Whole Penny Higher" is absurd.
Today's close @ .035 was literally a 40 dollar paint.
In short:
I am long .. AND....Via the practicing legal council (that I am married to, and friends with) I believe that Calasse will get sent packing ... BUT, being the consummate hustler that I am, I cant stand listening to crappy cons (thus my statements above).
...Perhaps all too easy for me to say as Ive been here coming up on two years and Ive tied my knot real nice on this one.
Just my 2 cents
$WNFT
Come on Sammy, yer a smarter than that... (OK, as 2+2 as I can be) Folks selling/taking profits that were bought/held in the "pre-announcement PPS range.
FORW could cure cancer and there would still be folks (plenty) skimming/shaving/profit taking. ....Simple math
Todays action has nothing to do with material events good or bad.
("yer a smarter than that" was not meant as a slur by the way)
Profit takers selling, plain and simple.
Agreed. +++
Reminds me of the time I got arrested at the public pool....
... Underwater... chasing...holding.
What a day.
Uhhhm, yeah you did...
Sure looks like you were quoting him to me. I don't see how any reasonable person could think otherwise.
Your Post:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171537669
...Looks like a "Semi Quote - ("It takes as long as I takes") with a little added content to me...
No, your statement was not spoken by George Sharp in English or any other language....
Understand-. This was spoken in English.....
."" have a Great LONG Spring-it will take as long as it takes "
Ok got it....
pump so many times insider.
Solid advice.
So here we are... Thanks to Mr. Sharp for the opportunities afforded here. The money, time and hard work that he has put into this venture is much appreciated.
...Looking forward to a "Team Sharp" victory in the Nevada Supreme Court.
$WNFT
The very article that this post refers to (here:https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171442029) is a great example of why and what George Sharp is accomplishing here with WNFT.
Sharp points out all of the dangers and shortcomings that are associated with these types of tickers. Tickers that have been commandeered by guys like Adam Tracy just looking to make a fast sloppy buck with absolutely NO interest in cleaning up the ticker properly
Some of what what Mr Sharp says in the article below: http://www.clippercorporatepartners.com/2017/09/the-walls-are-closing-in-on-attorney.html?m=1
For potential investors, there is none of the regulatory oversight, even if it is minimal at times, that comes with a filing for a new public issuer. In other words, any two-bit, assetless, do nothing company (the common characteristics of companies who choose to go public in this way) can instantly become publicly traded through a reverse takeover transaction.
I have long been an advocate for ending reverse takeovers and requiring companies to go public through the regulatory approval process with a qualifying and provable asset.
Typically, the newly minted custodian will then make himself (or his nominee) the lone officer/director, reverse split out the established shareholders and then award himself enough shares to give him defacto control, usually through a series of concocted debt that suddenly appears on the books.
The very article that this post refers to (here: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171434836) is a great example of why and what George Sharp is accomplishing here with WNFT.
What Mr Sharp says in the article: http://www.clippercorporatepartners.com/2017/09/the-walls-are-closing-in-on-attorney.html?m=1
" I have always maintained that this is a lousy way to go public, both for a (legitimate) company and especially for prospective investors. The company can face a myriad of unknowns which can affect the well being of the company and/or the trading of their stock; for example, undisclosed debt holders and nefariously intended established shareholders. This was indeed the case with GOFF, as I will discuss later".
The fact that Mr Sharp sued for custodianship of GOFF after pointing out the risks involved and bagging on Tracy's handling of it LOUDLY states one thing:
"OK folks, now let me show you how its done"...
And that he has... SEC reporting - Fully audited by one of the best firms in the country - Name change - forward split - And Six figures out of of his own pocket to do so.
Calasse is the final blemish... Once Calasse is gone, this ticker will be the polar opposite of what Sharp is referring to in the above article
.... A clean SAFE vehicle for a legitimate company looking to go public
Got your PM.. I have a free account so I could not reply... But yes... The ones you asked about are quite confident.
There seems to be "no reasonable way" as you put it.
Judges are human too and can make bad decisions.... that being said, my camp says Calasse's battle is a steep uphill climb.
His "Oh I meant to do it right the first time around" did not fare well in his reconsideration attempt with the the lower court.... In other words, he was denied there twice.
The fact that the Superior court filed an "Order to Show Cause as to why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction" adds insult to injury in an appeal where Calasse was already unlikely to win. In essence, they are asking Calasse to explain why their findings are wrong.
As I have said many times, the legal professionals that I rely upon for advice are people that I have long standing personal relationships with (I'm happily married to one of them) ...AND, they truly - sincerely care about my well being.
They could be wrong.. But I doubt it greatly.
The opening of certain mouths facilitates the removal of all doubt.
Abe Lincoln would be proud.
$WNFT
Well for one, SRNW is not completed yet (and it certainly wasn't last July). If I'm not mistaken, It still has one more forward split coming up due to its very small O.S. of 84 mil.
Although I don't know what George is thinking, I'm pretty certain of one thing. He did not lay out six figures (a few times over) to wind up with a boat anchor that he cant do anything with.
He is in business to make money... and again, with Calasse gone I believe the scenario below is very feasible.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171408276
I really don't know why Mr Sharp does what he does ..(or, why he does what he does in the order that he does it).... I'm just not a mind reader.
That said... I do believe that this whole scenario will have closure soon enough.
...and when it does - I believe that there is a good chance of this happening:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171408276
No offense but I truly (really) don't understand the meaning or relevance of your question...
In short, it seems silly to me.
But you still managed to sidestep the question by saying that you don't think the decision will be a lengthy document.
That wasn't what I was asking. I was asking if the decision is 6+ pages, do you agree that that favors Calasse? I would be surprised if it took them 6+ pages to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
And when I say "Calasse conundrum"
By the way, my position on the Calasse conundrum (above) was derived from information provided to me by the same group of legal professionals that I am relying on today.
Im having trouble understanding much of your post as I just cant seem to comprehend your writing style (No offense for the sake of offending)
But I can assure you one thing....Tyrus is NOT my boy...
ACORDING TO YOUR BOY TYWRUS
FEARANDGREED
Re: Tyrus603 post# 49926
Wednesday, July 06, 2022 2:50:45 PM
Post# of 62809
As long as Calasse is exercising his grievances through the court system legally (erroneous as they may be), tortious interference does not apply .... period.
In other words, just as you or I, Calasse has a right to exhaust all of the legal channels available to him.... Im not saying i like it any more than you do.
That being said, AFTER he exhausts the court system (which is his right), if he then goes out of his way to cause harm to Sharp's dealings/process (which could involve a million different methodologies) THEN tortuous interference applies.
....Going through the court system does not qualify as he has the legal right to do so (like it or not).
Nothing to do with WNFT now
.... Yes, actually it does have something to do with WNFT, why do you thing Mr sharp keeps bringing up "tortuous interference" on his twitter feed if Calasse's actions weren't having a negative impact here. I would say it is out of frustration. Unfortunately (at least in this case), you cant sue someone for engaging the due process legally afforded them.
...And yes, Ive swung this six ways from Sunday-$$$ but Im still holding a "core stack" (just in case you want to accuse me of exercising the "FEAR" part of my handle as you have done before). I'm just not into B.S. these days... as in
WNFT is not a shell. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169321074
...Yeah it is in fact still a shell - until it is not. When the deal/RM is signed/done/ink dry, then it wont be.
...This will be happening shortly in my opinion... as soon as the "Calasse issue" is resolved which Im hoping is any day now.
As Ive stated before, with Calasse in the mix, George can/could/did proceed with FINRA/split/name change no problem.... But getting the actual RM done, (transfer of power etc...etc...) that is going to be tricky while this is going through the court system in my opinion.
I hope I am wrong, as would toughly enjoy making more money here.
In closing, I would say its a safe bet that Nevada SC shoots this down (sooner than later...much sooner Im hoping)
...This will be happening shortly in my opinion... as soon as the "Calasse issue" is resolved which Im hoping is any day now.
I misunderstood your previous question a bit...
I though you were focused on the length of time the decision is taking to be rendered... As in, does that spell bad news for Sharp... Again, to that my answer is no.
As far as: "Would you agree that a lengthy decision is bad news for Sharp?" (if the decision itself is lengthy once rendered)
I don't think it will be a lengthy decision at all.
I think it is disingenuous to claim you don't think a lengthy decision bodes poorly for the appeal being dismissed
I'm using the ongoing delay as a proxy for length and assuming that it will be a long decision
So that being said...Perhaps tomorrow... perhaps in a month... (But seemingly out of nowhere) the decision will be rendered.
That will be a good day in my opinion.
There is also a chance that I talk straight out of my ass and every professional I have spoken with is wrong... (But I strongly doubt both of those possibilities).
No.
Would you agree that a lengthy decision is bad news for Sharp?
If Sharp wins (which is a lock in my opinion) a 150 million dollar market cap (for starters) would be a very modest valuation for a squeaky clean fully audited SEC reporting shell.
Given the current share structure, a 150 milly cap puts this ticker at roughly 30 cents per share. From my experience, that is a very modest figure.
I dont know exactly who or what what Mr Sharp will bring here once Calasse is gone....
...But I do know this, a "squeaky clean fully audited SEC reporting shell" is worth a LOT of money for a company looking to go public.
I have said this before... (and spoken kindly)
The courts move on THEIR time.... AND, just because its taking more time than expected, that does NOT mean that the "strong likelihood of a Sharp victory" has been diminished in any way.
Here are some reference links as to why I am very confident here.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171283758
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171371159
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171370504
gave me a laugh...
diamond hard tent
Well...On that glorious note. I wish you the best of "Luck".
lol... "just got my tax refund in"....You keep telling yourself that.
Oh it is tax time alright... but Im pretty sure I paid out more taxes from 22 than you make in a year.
But the way.. The day you are referring to, I bought much more than that. Do you remember the price point over two days following...Hmmm?...
I would suggest that you learn how to trade. instead running your negative mouth so much.
I stick with a positive narrative here (because its what i truly believe) weather I'm long OR looking to buy.
...consistency, you should try it.
Your Statement:
Math don't lie
Indeed.. Also, regarding one of the ridiculous comments made below about the Kentucky Derby... I'm pretty sure that the supreme court doesn't break for the Triple Crown outings.
..Their decision is coming.... Sharp for the win.
The replies you are addressing border on...
(could be either character...)
Taking care of me and my needs is one thing... But you want me to ask 300-600 dollar an hour professionals to take the time to write a legal opinion?... so I can post it on a chat board??
Come on my friend.... really????
I tell you what...If you agree to start paying all my bills, take me out to dinner once in a while, and give each and every one of the above mentioned professionals a weekly foot massage (including my wife and I)... THEN, Im pretty sure I can navigate the fulfillment of your request.
This:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171371159
And this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171370504
I'll add this... The experts that I know have considered the Pro-Calsse arguments put forth here in detail.
The difference between them and "Google U degree" folks (as you put it) is this:
My "camp" understands the proper context of the "arguments"
...AND.. they understand when said "arguments" are being erroneously assigned and valued.