Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
what are you on peedee
What does your cyber babble have to do with Ingen paying NIR in shares or cash?
Did you somehow forget that every case with NIR has been--take a guess-- settled! This case will be settled imo. You say court orders to pay shares. We will see.
partly right partlywrong you are missing a step
The judgment in the Ingen case was for money. How they were to pay that money is in the settlement agreement. They dont pay as defined in the settlement agreement then they start taking steps to enforce the judgment by taking assets.
SMF you are confused. The ingen case they wilfully entered into a stipulated agreement and judgment. That is a settlement agreement. The terms of the settlement are what they chose. The courts will enfore the bargain you make. A court cant order you to pay in shares as a basis of paying someone back without it being agreed to. The judgment is in dollar terms then they marshall assets that were pledged etc. My response was to PeeDee was saying HLNT was going to get ordered to pay NIR in shares not money. Courts just will not do that
Not sure what you are reading. I read the commissions were ordered by the judge
What do you mean HAD technology? Did the peeps in ECMH take the so called assets out in some self dealing transactions?
Slow down must have sparked a nerve as You are the dude defendin ECMH for 7 or 8 years. Fact is ECMH was converting shares for Nir late 2010 and early 2011. Fact is NIR gave ECMH money during that time. Fact ECMH reversed the stock specifically to convert more stock for their buddies at NIR. those are facts dude. can't hide from the past with the tough guy persona
Why would NIR sue ECMH? They were complicit with each other. Convert reverse convert reverse and now no bid. ECMH never took a stand and said no. NIR gave ECMH about a year ago because they were buddy buddy and printing more shares to NIR. Although ITRO has idiots promoting the co at least ITRO and HLNT took a stand.
So you are saying that HLNT will follow the path of ECMH?
Thats dumb
No court is going to order you to do conversions. It will be settled like I said before. you can bank on that
jt they dont cancel the notes. I have never seen a case where nir canceled the notes. they may modify them or have a settlement agreement attached to them but the teeth are in the original contracts. also and this may be the most important feature WHY nir would never cancel a note and that is because nir would continue to get free trading shares upon conversions. New notes = new waiting period to start trading the stock
this is a nir board, including the companies nir funded (ITRO), including the lawsuits nir is involved in (ITRO), including the funded companies ceos and everyone who defends those actions
so ITRO is fair game. how much do the owe nir> $8 MILLION DOLLARS
Thats a topic for this board? Any investors disagree?
remember this classic twinkletoes?
you were saying that NIR expunged their notes with ITRO. What a hoot
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62865967
look at your posts on the itro board twinkletoes. they speak for themselves. i wouldnt call it a promotion because it doesnt look like you and your friends have done a good job. and for your beloved itro ceo he got lucky when he settled because nir couldnt sell the itro stock he was delivering. i remeber you were defending ceo
doubt there is a smoking gun to the hlnt lawsuit peedee. a lot of what you gripe about is overzealous in your own way.
i gottah believe that the feds have already combed through that one. just like the itro case it will come down to some settlement
jt those peeps that you mention are nothing more than pr guys running that board. get over it. they are real clueless when it comes to how nir operated and the settlement that itro and nir entered into. itro got real lucky as when they entered into the settlement. now nir cant sell stock because their accounts got shut down. so itro can convert nir all day and they cant sell a single share. pretty lucky if you ask me
Any filings coming soon FLMC?
pd How is ECMH going to handle PWC?
You are the expert on ECMH. Dont they owe NIR 4or 5 million? or is it more?
Have a different theory
people were selling!
sorry but the previous execs are no longer involved as of May 5, 2011
vp you are wrong the people from Latitude are NOT involved
the company now is Water Technologies
Will be updating the iBox
WTII is NOT Latitude Boats anymore
An ETF doesnt say alot about this company
Whats the history here?
What kind of company is this?
Anyone have info on James Painter?
Thats not good
Getsome you have to wait until April to use these jokes although you will not run out of ammo with scott webber and ecmh
What is the story with this company?
What a hoot! After a good laugh I was thinkin that you may actually be serious! If you are serious then you are just an idiot. Scott Webber "NOW holds the shareholders in his best interests" is just a dumb statement. Scott webber is a crook who KILLED his shareholders. Look at the stock. That is your best example of what everyone thinks of Scott Webber
Good luck to all of Scott Webbers bag holders
This crappy ceo really sold you down the river in 2011 with the increase in shares and reverse split. The bright side is that he probably will not get the chance to screw any more bag holders. I mean investors.
luck, you recommend buying this company?
invest a couple thousand dollars and get a penny back? is that your idea of a good buy?
where is the settlement agreement?
thats what is so funny about you dude
you claim you are posting facts but you leave out the ones that tie you to your nir funded company/ceo. everybody can see you have an axe to grind. if you are so cosy with ribotsky why dont you inform us about the selling of the notes. especially how your nir funded company/ceo helped sell nir notes to raise more money. Who did ribotsky sell the ECMH notes to? complicit ceos might get the wrong type of people looking into the ceos of nir funded companies. ask darly, ask corey
peedee you are factually misleading
You ARE affiliated with a NIR funded company. The ceo of that funded company is your friend. And that is how you are tied to this board.
peedee you give way too much credit to everything you hope for
The HLNT lawsuit is a dud. Its a typical suit with NIR that will end in a settlement. How much they settle for is the question. your hope that all these create a powder keg is far fetched. there is no way dworking gets 20. I bet he doesnt even do 6months.
I follow this sykes guy, I like what he writes about. Sykes is a notorious shorter but how does he short these penny stocks the way he claims? Are there any connections to Sykes, shorting and NIR funded companies?
Doubloon, looking at the press release Dan Jacobs says "With our 2010 sales exceeding $35 Million, we are a financially strong member of the OTC Market."
What he left out is that the 2011 sales are looking like $19,000,000. That is a 45% DECLINE IN REVENUES. That is a strong company?
Must admit, when I was first told about this company I was excited, now I am thinking what the heck!
They pay for a promotion and the stock is down 30%
He cant be that lucky if he is a friend of Scott Webber. Has anyone made money in this stock, other than pee dee?