Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I like BLSP. Very undervalued. Next big money maker right here.
I like BLSP. This could be huge!
Put your attention on VTXB!!!
VTXB is constantly on the rise!!!
VTXB has been taking off!!
VTXB seems to be on the rise!!
Interesting find! VTXB seems to be taking off!!
Good Morning Flex. What do you think of VTXB?
Asher has been gone but look through the filings and you will see Asher was not the only one. Asher is well known for selling at the bid so its a good thing that they are gone. But to say the Company has not issued shares to pay off the other debt is disingenuous. It is not necessarily a bad thing - the Company needs capital to expand its business plan. Everyone is just so used to most OTC companies not using that capital for business purposes and it appears after a few missteps and restarts GYST is looking like it has its feet under it now
That is not completely true. I disagree with what he says since it is almost always misleading but you can't deny the Company has had to issue shares to pay Asher and SC
You can't stand being proven wrong so yo have to resort to this type of BS
There you go again - you are right when you buy a house and finance it you never say you purchased a house - oh wait you do don't you. To finance something is to purchase it
It is poor when you have to misquote and mislead everything you cut and paste.
Now please write your three paragraphs to mislead from this fact
No Company ever has used cash from operations to pay for financing equipment. Its funny how every time you theory gets disproved you write these long posts about how everyone else is lying
Go ahead and keep misleading things with your posts. Its funny you ask how its possible and you simply can't even say - yes it is possible that the Company may have financed the purchase of the equipment.
You wanted proof how it was possible. Hre is just one possible answer: http://finance.cat.com/cda/layout?m=390227
How is it misleading when you ask for a theory and I provide one - oh because it does not fit your thinking. Seems you have a few posts like that though.
They have been a Pinksheet stock since March 22, 2012 but I guess it is too much to ask that you would know the difference between the OTCBB and OTCQB.
You love misleading posts that misquote things - the Company never said it was too expensive they simply mentioned the cost savings as one reason but the main was the OTC changing the tier system. This is from the 8-K filed:
The OTC Markets new bid requirement of $.01 for 30 days for OTCQB. The Company expects that it would have to do a reverse of the stock to obtain the $.01 prior to the May 1 deadline. The Company currently has no plans to reverse the stock and as such has determined that it will not be able to meet the requirement of maintaining a bid of at least $.01 for the 30 days prior to May 1.
There you go with your misleading posts again because you know that there is not a single company that finances the purchase of heavy equipment. Maybe Caterpillar should open a finance department - oh wait they already have: http://finance.cat.com/cda/layout?m=92721&x=7
Also, the Company referred to not diclosing the mines in Suriname they have had the location of the mines in Peru up for years
Maybe you should write an operational memo to the Company so that they can follow your suggestion with your vast knowledge on the Company's operation and mining overall.
Arara Mining is obviously a Suriname entity? What do you want they told you who it was - move on. Lets hear more about how you say the Company won't disclose where the copper mine is.
So what was the Company's actual cash loss?
Let me guess that is from the 12/31 filing?
Lets stick with you comment "It's up to those who are making the claim to prove what they say."
Prove they don't have the proper equiement
What happen to "It's up to those who are making the claim to prove what they say."
So prove to us your statement is correct
Most likely because the Record Date is essentially irrelevant. If you wanted the dividend you needed to buy the shares before the Ex-Dividend date which is usually 2 business days before the Record Date.
Ex-date or Ex-dividend date - On (or after) this date the security trades without its dividend. If you buy a dividend paying stock one day before the ex-dividend you will still get the dividend, but if you buy on the ex-dividend date, you won't get the dividend. Conversely, if you want to sell a stock and still receive a dividend that has been declared you need to sell on (or after) the ex-dividend day. The ex-date is the second business day before the date of record.
Date of record - This is the date on which the company looks at its records to see who the shareholders of the company are. An investor must be listed as a holder of record to ensure the right of a dividend payout.
Date of payment (payable date) - This is the date the company mails out the dividend to the holder of record. This date is generally a week or more after the date of record so that the company has sufficient time to ensure that it accurately pays all those who are entitled.
You mean just like how you claimed the stock would hit the trips?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=97268976
Thanks for posting what it says and not adding your commentary misstating it
No one would need to clarify your posts if you would stop misstating things.
Why don't you stop misstating what is clearly in the cut and paste you did?
You cut and past but then later in the post restate it and misstate it.
Also, that is the net loss for 2013 but if you know how to read a cash flow statement then you would see that the actual cash loss is a lot less because of Asher and the debt conversion the company has to book as a loss of over $1 million and that is just one line item from the cash flow.
Lets stay on topic - you keep misstating your own cut and paste. It clearly states profits but you keep saying revenues which are two totally different accounting terms.
BTW -I have read it and also read the cash flow statement.
Your cut and past says profits but you keep saying revenue so is that you being disingenuousness or not understanding the difference between revenue and profit?
Came across this company but cannot find any recent news on it - any idea what is going on here?
Actually 750 grams at $40 a gram is $30,000 which based on the filing you keep referring to covers the cost.
Also, buying new equipment from proceeds of operations in called covering the costs.
Can you show us where this alleged pump was at.
What happen to your comments about the trips were coming.
You keep forgetting to say that was as of December 31, 2013. Any you keep failing to state the increase in production since then.
Asher's debt has gone away.
The loss is not necessarily a cash loss but is also associated to non-cash transactions such as when Asher converted which generated losses on the balance sheet.
read the cash flow statement to see actual cash loss which show $1.4 million was associated to stock issuance. Thats what I noticed in the 30 seconds reviewing the cash flow statement.